Skip to main content

Table 2 Balance performance with free compared to restricted arm movement by sex

From: Effect of arm movement and task difficulty level on balance performance in healthy children: are there sex differences?

Test/Outcome

Boys (n = 18)

Girls (n = 22)

Free

Restricted

Free

Restricted

OLS test

 OLS time; EO, FI (s)

52.9 ± 14.0

54.8 ± 13.2

57.1 ± 15.7

51.4 ± 13.2

 OLS time; EC, FI (s)

40.5 ± 26.2

37.6 ± 25.8

31.5 ± 22.1

31.7 ± 23.6

 OLS time; EO, FO (s)

36.3 ± 23.6

34.3 ± 23.0

37.9 ± 22.6

32.0 ± 21.4

 OLS time; EC, FO (s)

9.9 ± 7.8

6.9 ± 4.8

8.0 ± 5.2

5.0 ± 4.7

3-m beam walking backward test

 6-cm beam walk (steps)

13.3 ± 4.2

12.9 ± 4.2

14.0 ± 3.7

12.2 ± 4.1

 4.5-cm beam walk (steps)

11.5 ± 5.2

10.4 ± 5.1

12.8 ± 3.7

10.2 ± 3.9

 3-cm beam walk (steps)

10.2 ± 5.2

5.9 ± 3.3

8.2 ± 3.5

5.4 ± 3.2

YBT-LQ test

 YBT-LQ: AT reach (% LL)

79.3 ± 7.6

77.3 ± 7.8

77.1 ± 9.1

73.0 ± 9.7

 YBT-LQ: PM reach (% LL)

113.1 ± 11.9

108.1 ± 12.1

109.0 ± 16.6

102.9 ± 13.6

 YBT-LQ: PL reach (% LL)

108.3 ± 13.5

103.7 ± 13.6

105.8 ± 15.4

101.0 ± 13.1

 YBT-LQ: CS (% LL)

100.2 ± 9.9

96.4 ± 10.3

97.3 ± 12.6

92.3 ± 11.1

  1. Data are presented as mean value ± standard deviation
  2. AT , anterior; CS , composite score; EC, eyes closed; EO, eyes opened; FI , firm ground; FO, foam ground; LL , leg length; OLS, One-Legged-Stance test; PL, posterolateral; PM, posteromedial; YBT-LQ , Lower Quarter Y Balance test