Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratio and 95% CI for general obesity across quartiles of total and subtypes of meat intake

From: Meat consumption and the risk of general and central obesity: the Shahedieh study

  

Quartiles of meat intake

  

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

P-trend*

Total meat

Reference

OR

95%CI

OR

95%CI

OR

95%CI

 
 

Crude

1.00

0.93

(0.81–1.07)

0.89

(0.77–1.02)

0.85

(0.74–0.97)

0.01

 

Model 1

1.00

1.07

(0.93–1.23)

1.12

(0.97–1.29)

1.26

(1.08–1.47)

0.002

 

Model 2

1.00

1.08

(0.93–1.24)

1.11

(0.96–1.29)

1.30

(1.11–1.52)

0.001

 

Model 3

1.00

0.99

(0.86–1.15)

0.97

(0.83–1.20)

1.00

(0.83–1.20)

0.95

Red meat

        
 

Crude

1.00

0.99

(0.87–1.13)

0.86

(0.75–0.99)

0.80

(0.69–0.92)

< 0.001

 

Model 1

1.00

1.05

(0.92–1.20)

0.98

(0.84–1.13)

1.01

(0.87–1.17)

0.87

 

Model 2

1.00

1.03

(0.90–1.19)

0.97

(0.84–1.13)

1.02

(0.87–1.19)

0.98

 

Model 3

1.00

1.03

(0.89–1.18)

0.95

(0.82–1.11)

0.98

(0.84–1.15)

0.60

White meat

        
 

Crude

1.00

1.00

(0.87–1.15)

1.05

(0.91–1.20)

1.10

(0.95–1.26)

0.13

 

Model 1

1.00

1.11

(0.96–1.28)

1.33

(1.15–1.53)

1.59

(1.37–1.84)

< 0.001

 

Model 2

1.00

1.10

(0.95–1.27)

1.29

(1.11–1.50)

1.59

(1.37–1.85)

< 0.001

 

Model 3

1.00

1.06

(0.91–1.23)

1.18

(1.00-1.38)

1.31

(1.06–1.61)

0.007

Processed meat

        
 

Crude

1.00

0.96

(0.75–1.22)

0.92

(0.82–1.04)

0.95

(0.84–1.07)

0.62

 

Model 1

1.00

1.03

(0.80–1.32)

1.05

(0.92–1.20

1.25

(1.09–1.43)

0.01

 

Model 2

1.00

1.03

(0.80–1.33)

1.03

(0.90–1.18)

1.21

(1.05–1.38)

0.04

 

Model 3

1.00

1.04

(0.8–1.34)

1.01

(0.8–1.16)

1.11

(0.96–1.28)

0.49

Organ meat

        
 

Crude

1.00

1.00

(0.87–1.15)

1.02

(0.89–1.17)

1.02

(0.89–1.17)

0.94

 

Model 1

1.00

1.04

(0.90–1.20)

1.12

(0.97–1.29)

1.14

(0.98–1.32)

0.23

 

Model 2

1.00

1.03

(0.89–1.19)

1.10

(0.95–1.28)

1.16

(1.00-1.35)

0.16

 

Model 3

1.00

1.02

(0.88–1.18)

1.06

(0.92–1.23)

1.03

(0.88–1.21)

0.85

Poultry

        
 

Crude

1.00

0.99

(0.87–1.13)

1.04

(0.85–1.26)

1.08

(0.95–1.23)

0.46

 

Model 1

1.00

1.16

(1.02–1.33)

1.09

(0.89–1.34)

1.50

(1.31–1.72

< 0.001

 

Model 2

1.00

1.14

(0.99–1.30)

1.09

(0.89–1.33)

1.49

(1.30–1.71)

< 0.001

 

Model 3

1.00

1.08

(0.94–1.24)

0.99

(0.80–1.22)

1.23

(1.04–1.45)

0.02

Fish

        
 

Crude

1.00

0.88

(0.77–1.01)

0.93

(0.81–1.06)

0.97

(0.84–1.11)

0.34

 

Model 1

1.00

0.97

(0.84–1.12)

1.13

(0.98–1.31)

1.34

(1.16–1.55)

< 0.001

 

Model 2

1.00

0.95

(0.82–1.10)

1.11

(0.96–1.29)

1.30

(1.12–1.51)

< 0.001

 

Model 3

1.00

0.92

(0.80–1.07)

1.04

(0.89–1.20)

1.09

(0.93–1.29)

0.21

  1. Data are presented as OR (95% CI)
  2. Model 1: adjusted for age, gender and energy intake
  3. Model 2: adjusted for variables included in model 2 plus physical activity (continuous), marital status (married vs. single vs. divorced), supplement use (yes vs. no), house possession (owner vs. non-owner), education (university graduate vs. non-university education), family size (≥ 4 vs. ˂4 people), current smoking, night shift working, and history of thyroid problems (yes vs. no) and depression (yes vs. no)
  4. Model 3: adjusted for variables included in model 3 plus the intake of vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and dairies
  5. *Obtained from the binary logistic regression
Back to article page

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us