Skip to main content

Table 2 Scale measurement results of the participants (n = 794)

From: Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey)

Variables

 

n

%

mean

SD

IQR

Not

a barrier

%

Somewhat of

a barrier

%

Significant

barrier

%

TIC provider survey

            

Knowledge

   

28.6

2.9

29 (27–30)

      

Opinions

   

16.4

2.4

17 (15–18)

      

Self-rated competence

   

9.3

4.3

10 (7–10)

      

Practices

   

3.2

2.9

3 (0–7)

      

Barriers

1. Time constraints

     

129

16.2

454

57.2

211

26.6

 

2. Scope of practice constraints

     

153

19.3

462

58.2

179

22.5

 

3. Lack of training

     

182

23.0

464

58.4

148

18.6

 

4. Confusing or unclear information on trauma informed care

     

131

16.5

489

61.6

174

21.9

 

5. Worry about further upsetting or traumatizing patients

     

155

19.5

498

62.7

141

17.8

ARTIC-10

   

4.3

0.6

4.2 (4-4.7)

      

J-MSQ2018

   

37.5

10.5

39 (32–44)

      

PHQ-9

   

4.1

5.4

2 (0–6)

      

GAD-7

   

3.0

4.5

1 (0–4)

      

SUB

   

27.6

7.7

27 (22–32)

      

NAQ-R

   

27.9

13.1

22 (21–27)

      
  1. Note: TIC provider survey: Japanese version of the Trauma-Informed Care Provider Survey; ARTIC-10: The short version of Attitude-related Trauma-Informed Care Scale; J-MSQ_2018: The Japanese version of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire 2018; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9; GAD-7: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; SUB: Stress Underestimation Beliefs; NAQ-R: Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised
  2. ARTIC-10 consists of 10 items with a 7-point bipolar Likert scale, asking about attitudes towards TIC on their job, during the previous two months. The mean scores ranged from 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate a more favorable attitude towards TIC
  3. The J-MSQ_2018 consists of 10 items with a 6-point scale, ranging from 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement). The total scores ranged from 10 to 60. Higher scores indicate higher moral sensitivity
  4. The PHQ-9 consists of 9 items, rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total scores ranged from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms
  5. The GAD-7 consists of 7 items, rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The total scores ranged from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of anxiety
  6. The SUB consists of 12 items, with a 4-point scale, ranging from 1 (not applicable) to 4 (applicable). The total scores ranged from 12 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater stress underestimation beliefs
  7. The NAQ-R consists of 23 items, with a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (daily). The total scores ranged from 23 to 115. Higher scores indicate more workplace bullying. In this study, we could not use two items that asked about violence or abuse in the workplace and perception of workplace bullying because these questions were assumed to be too sensitive for participants and the research company refused to include them. Therefore, we used 21 items of the NAQ-R and summed the total score, which could have ranged from 21 to 105 in this study