- Research Note
- Open access
- Published:
Genomic structure and marker-trait association for plant and fruit traits in Capsicum chinense and Capsicum baccatum germplasm
BMC Research Notes volume 17, Article number: 231 (2024)
Abstract
Objectives
Capsicum baccatum and C. chinense are domesticated pepper species originating from Latin America recognized for their unique flavor and taste and widely diffused as spicy food for fresh uses or for processing. Owing to their capacity for adaptation to diverse habitats in tropical regions, these species serve as a valuable resource for agronomic traits and tolerance to both biotic and abiotic challenges in breeding projects. This study aims to dissect the genetic diversity of C. baccatum and C. chinense germplasm and to detect candidate genes underlying the variation of plant morphological and fruit size and shape traits. To that goal, SNP data from genotyping by sequencing have been used to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of 103 accessions belonging to the two species. Further, plants have been assessed with main plant descriptors and fruit imaging analysis and association between markers and traits has been performed.
Results
The population structure based on 29,820 SNPs revealed 4 subclusters separating C. chinense and C. baccatum individuals. A deeper analysis within each species highlighted three subpopulations in C. chinense and two in C. baccatum. Phenotypic characterization of 54 traits provided approximately 125 thousand datapoints highlighting main differences between species for flower and fruit traits rather than plant architecture. Marker-traits association, performed with the CMLM model, revealed a total of 6 robust SNPs responsible for change in flower traits and fruit shape. This is the first attempt for mapping morphological traits and fruit features in the two domesticated species, paving the way for further genomic assisted breeding.
Introduction
Pepper (Capsicum spp.) is one of the most important vegetable crops which has been originated in the American tropics and after European conquests has been spread throughout the world. Pepper fruits are a finest source of health-related compounds such as Vitamin C (ascorbic acid), Vitamin E (tocopherols), provitamin A (b-carotene), flavonoids [1]. Peppers are also unique among vegetables for the presence of capsaicinoids conferring the characteristic pungent aroma [2]. The genus consists of approximately forty species, out of which five, namely C. annuum L., C. baccatum L., C. chinense Jacq., C. frutescens L., and C. pubescens, are domesticated and extensively used for consumption. Among these, C. baccatum is highly consumed in the Andean regions as fresh of processed spice whereas, C. chinense, is largely grown in the Caribbean area, Africa and Northeast India, and its popularity is given by the presence of highly pungent varieties, that reached the Guinness World Record [3, 4]. Both species include a wide range of variation related to plant and fruit traits [5, 6]. Furthermore, them are recognized for their distinctive flavor and for uses in traditional cuisines [3], as well as a source of resistances to main pathogens, pests and abiotic stresses [7]. The growing demand of peppers with desirable quality and disease resistance traits has raised the interest of both C. baccatum and C. chinense in breeding programs [8]. Therefore, it becomes essential to integrate phenotypic evaluation with genetic diversity analysis with the goal of exploiting germplasm resources and improve the allele mining that plant breeders can use to create novel varieties. Dissecting plant architecture and morphological fruit traits is fundamental prior the establishment of any breeding strategy. In pepper, precise phenotyping can be achieved by plant descriptors and automated imaging tools [9]. Progress in plant genotyping have been facilitated by development of leading-edge technologies that sped up the detection and analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genotyping-by-sequencing was the most successful one providing a cost-effective approach for exploring the diversity of crops genome-wide scale [10].
The genetic diversity and association mapping studies in Capsicum have primarily focused on C. annuum [11,12,13,14], with limited research on other domesticated species, mainly focusing on specific traits [15, 16] The objective of this work was to explore the genomic diversity and population structure of 103 accessions of C. chinense and C. baccatum and perform candidate genes scan for 54 plant and fruit traits via association mapping. Findings help to cover the gap of knowledge among domesticated peppers toward their better use for genetic improvement.
Main text
Materials and methods
Plant material
Plant material consisted of 41 C. baccatum and 62 C. chinense accessions retrieved from main international genebanks (Centre for Genetic Resources, CGN, Wageningen, The Netherlands, and the Leibniz-Institut for Plant Research, IPK, Gatersleben, Germany) and seed companies (Esasem) and highly representative of the variability existing in the origin centres and other World regions. Details are in Additional File 1: Table S1. Prior to experiments, accessions were subjected to cycles of controlled self-fertilization to increase homozygosity and remove any off types. For minimizing the environmental effect, all genotypes were grown in controlled conditions under glasshouse at the Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops (Pontecagnano, Salerno, Italy; Latitude: 40°39′N, Longitude 14°53′E). The cultivation cycle was carried out during spring-summer season with a climate control consisting of an evaporative fan cooling system and a shading screen able to ensure an internal temperature range was from 14 °C (night) to 28 °C (day). Plants were grown in pots filled with peat and pumice (3:1 v/v) with water and nutrients administered via fertigation through a drip system. A complete randomized design with three replicates was adopted.
Phenotypic characterization and data analysis
Fifty-four traits were considered including qualitative and pseudo-qualitative descriptors conform to the guidelines of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute [17], colour CIELAB (L*a*b*) coordinates, fruit size and shape parameters from imaging analysis. Details of traits scored are in Additional File 1: Table S2. All traits were subjected to subjected to ANOVA (analysis of variance) to detect significant differences among the two pepper species. Analyses were performed in R version 4.3.3. [18].
Genomic diversity and association analysis
Genotyping data were retrieved from the dataset described in Taranto et al. [11]. The ApeKI restriction enzyme was used for library preparation. The resultant fragments from all samples were directly ligated to a pair of enzyme-specific adapters and then combined into pools. PCR amplification was carried out to generate the GBS library, which was submitted to a single Illumina HiSeq 2500 run (Illumina Inc., USA). Illumina reads were trimmed with cutadapt [19] then aligned to the C. annuum CM334 reference genome v1.6 [20] with the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner BWA-MEM v0.7.17 [21] with default parameters. The GBS analysis pipeline implemented in TASSEL (version 3.0.166) was used to call SNPs [22]. SNP calling implemented within the TASSEL-GBS pipeline produced a raw HapMap genotypic data file. A two-step filtering procedure was used to filter high quality SNPs. SNPs were filtered out with VCFtools version 0.1.17 [23] considering a call rate of 95% able to retain SNPs with less than 5% missing data and minor allele frequency of 5%. Three datasets were obtained: (i) a matrix of 29,820 SNPs for the entire collection including 103 individuals of both species, (ii) a matrix of 22,739 SNPs for C. chinense, (iii) a matrix of 24,290 SNPs for C. baccatum. Homozygosity and heterozygosity of individuals of the two collections was inferred by Tassel v5.2.15 [24]. Genetic differentiation parameters including F statistic and private and shared alleles were computed in VCFtools version 0.1.17.
Population structure and ancestry were investigated in the whole collection and keeping separated the two species using ADMIXTURE version 1.3.0 [25] with K ranging from 1 to 10, 1,000 bootstrap replicates to estimate parameter standard errors, 10-fold cross-validation (CV) with five iterations. The optimal number of ancestral populations was detected with the lowest value of the cross-validation error. Individuals were considered to belong to a specific K population if its membership coefficient (qi) was ≥ 0.5, whereas the genotypes with qi lower than 0.5 at each assigned K were considered as admixed. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in Tassel v5.2.15 [19] and the biplot was drawn using the ggplot2 R package [26]. The Neighbor-Joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was drawn using the Maximum Composite Likelihood methodnmethod with 1000 bootstraps. Analyses were conducted with the MEGA 11 software [27]. Association between traits scored and markers was performed using Tassel v5.2.15 software. Phenotypic data from three replications were used. The compressed mixed linear model (CMLM) considering principal components covariates and the familial relatedness based on the SNP data model was used. The significance of association between traits and markers was estimated by using an adjusted P value (Bonferroni correction) according to the formula B = 0,05/n° of SNP. Manhattan and quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plots for association mapping results were produced using the R package CMplot. Functional annotation of significant association signals was performed on C. annum CM334 genome http://peppergenome.snu.ac.kr/ [20] For associated SNPs mapping within intron regions, the nearest genes located upstream or downstream of the significant marker.
Results and discussion
Admixture analysis of the entire collection based on 29,820 SNPs, revealed the presence of 4 subclusters mostly separating C. chinense and C. baccatum individuals, as from the CV error results (Additional File 1: Table S3). The first cluster (K1) included 39 C. chinense genotypes highly diversified in terms of geographical origin (Fig. 1a, Additional File 1: Table S4). The second one, included 11 C. chinense and 1 C. baccatum accessions highlighting specific group of individuals from Perú. The third subcluster (K3) revealed admixtures between the two species, including 6 accessions of C. baccatum and 10 of C. chinense, while the fourth one (K = 4) exclusively consisted of 33 individuals of C. baccatum. The principal component analysis (PCA) projections revealed clear differentiation of most of the individuals of the two species, showing furthermore a greater diversity within the group individuals belonging to K = 3. This observation agrees with previous studies showing defined genetic differentiation between the two species [28]. The first two principal components explained a combined 76.31% of the genetic variance (PC1, 58.63% and PC2, 17.68%) with the first component separating the two species, while the second highlighting substructures within each species. Given the results on the whole collection, population structure has been thoroughly investigated within each species. Based on 24,290 SNPs, two subpopulations were detected in C. baccatum (Additional File 1: Table S3, Fig. 1b). The first subpopulation (K = 1) included 8 genotypes, while the remaining 33 were clustered in the second one (K = 2). The PCA revealed a clear separation of the two subclusters on the first axis (PC1, 66.09%); the second component exhibiting 5.37% of the variation showed a further subdivision of K1 in two subgroups mostly distinguishing accessions from the internal region of Perù. For C. chinense, a filtered dataset of 22,739 SNPs allowed to distinguish three subpopulations including 39, 9 and 13 accessions, respectively with one accession classified as admixed (Additional File 1: Table S3, Fig. 1b). The PCA revealed on the first axis (PC1, 45.70%) a high differentiation of accessions belonging to cluster 2 from those of clusters 1 and 3, while the second component (PC2, 7.21%) better separated the latter two subpopulations. The fixation index (Fst) considering the entire collection and individual species, revealed a relatively lower genetic differentiation between C. chinense clusters compared to C. baccatum ones (Additional File 1: Table S5). Indeed, at entire population level, K1 and K2 mostly including C. chinense genotypes exhibited a moderate Fst = 0.349 whereas the remaining clusters showed high Fst values above 0.7 with peaks between K4 (C. baccatum) and the rest of the clusters. The trend was confirmed when ADMIXTURE analysis was performed at single-species level with the two clusters of C. baccatum showing Fst = 0.770 while for C. chinense, the greatest differentiation was observed only between the largest cluster (K1) and the other two (0.732 < Fst < 0.762) whereas between K2 and K3 an Fst = 0.326 was detected.
The observed (Ohom) and expected (Ehom) homozygosity in C. baccatum were 88.713% and 69.951%, respectively. In C. chinense Ohom was 90.099%, whereas Ehom was 68.979%.
On average the level of heterozygosity of the two species was similar with slightly higher values observed for C. baccatum (He = 11.286%) compared to C. chinense (He = 9.900%) (Additional File 2; Figure S1). Only few accessions showed heterozygosity higher than 20% with the maximum values observed in two C. baccatum genotypes. High inbreeding coefficients (Fisand Fit) were observed for the two species with values in C. baccatum and C. chinense of Fis = 0.710, Fit = 0.837 and Fis = 0.698, Fit = 0.831 respectively.
To better understand the genetic diversity of the collection, a Neighbor-Joining tree was constructed (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic diversity analysis was generally in agreement with the population structure one. Two main subpopulations which separated the two species were detected, with a third group that included a both C. chinense and C. baccatum accessions (Fig. 2a) and few C. baccatum accessions grouping with the main C. chinense cluster. The separation of the subpopulations obtained with the structure analysis was equally evident by redrawing the tree in accordance with the ADMIXTURE clusters (Fig. 2b).
These results can be explained by the role of C. chinense as a bridge species in interspecific crosses between cultivated pepper (C. annuum) and C. baccatum, thus making possible a gene-flow between these two species [29] as highlighted by the number of shared alleles between the two species with a percentage of 39.357% in C. baccatum and 43.201% in C. chinense.
Phenotypic characterization has involved the analysis of 18 morphological and colour traits as well as 38 fruit size and shape descriptors from the scan of over 3000 fruit sections. Overall, over 125.000 data points were obtained. The distribution of phenotypic data between the two species are shown in Fig. 3, while detailed results of ANOVA, average, maximum and minimum values for each trait, are reported in the Additional File 1: Table S6. Six out of twelve morphological traits showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between species, with colours traits turned out to be the most discriminating ones. Among these, the greenish/yellowish spots are distinctive characters of C. baccatum from other domesticated species [30]. Contrariwise, C. chinense does not present flowers with either spot or purple coloured corolla flowers [30]. Most significant differences were found for fruit size and shape traits. C. baccatum accessions showed in average a higher size (perimeter and area) and height of the fruits. The width was instead more similar between the two species. As a result, C. baccatum displayed a more elongated fruit shape, resulting in greater dimensions compared to C. chinense, whose fruits had square dimensions. This was also confirmed by ellipsoid (E) and circular (C) higher in C. baccatum and rectangular (R) higher in C. chinense. The parameters defining the internal shape of the fruit (e.g. PMA, PIA, DMA) were higher in C. chinense, thus evidencing the higher irregularity of berries.
The Spearman rank correlation coefficients after Bonferroni correction calculated for qualitative and quantitative traits revealed how some traits were rather independent, whereas a group of traits clustered together because of a reciprocal tight correlation for the same category of measures (e.g., fruit size and shape traits, colour traits) (Fig. 4). The strongest positive correlations in both species were found between fruit shape indexes and height/width related traits as well as between these traits and eccentricity area index and lobedness degree. Negative correlations were found between height, width, fruit shape index traits and proximal and distal angles of fruits. As for morphological traits, in C. chinense moderate correlations were found between stem pubescence, leaf shape, leaf pubescence and corolla shape with fruit shape and size traits, while the same trend was not observed in C. baccatum.
Considering the outcomes obtained with population structure and genetic diversity analysis and the observed variability at phenotypic level, the collection can be considered suitable for association analysis. Marker trait association was performed in individual species as well as in the entire collection. This strategy allows to detect those robust SNPs across species considering the high level of heritability of the traits studied. In terms of computational and statistical capabilities, the compressed mixed linear model utilized has been demonstrate effective in reducing false positives caused by population structure [31]. The Bonferroni correction for multiple testing have been also used in order to manage the family-wise error [32]. In total, 6 robust associations on 5 chromosomes, were consistently identified in both species (Fig. 5). Four peaks fell within intergenic regions at a distance of 0.13 to 42.41 kb from known genes (Table 1).
In pepper, the accumulation of pigments in the vegetative parts of plants (e.g., anthocyanins) exert important biological functions by aiding in the resistance to diseases and pest attack [33]. Both C. baccatum and C. chinense are reported a valuable source of resistances to many pathogens and insect vectors of viruses [34]. Corolla shape may play role in the selection of pollinators [35], although no evidence has been reported in pepper. Among intergenic associations, the monothiol glutaredoxin-S14, chloroplastic-like GRXS14 play important roles in the control of vegetative growth and possessing specific functions in the maintenance of chlorophyll content upon depending on environmental and light conditions [36], although this does not appear to affect flower morphology. The metal transporter CNNM4 associated to corolla spot colour has been found to mineral homeostasis in barley seeds [37], while the H0515C11.6 protein have been found in Oryza sativa play a role in ion transport photosynthesis metabolism [38]. However, these two genes do not seem to have any function on the presence of corolla spots.
Only for flower anther colour and obovoid associations within unknown proteins were found. In both instances, the minor allele determined an increase of the trait. While these associations were not previously reported, the significant association detected for obovoid (trait related to fruit shape determined by the ratio of the area of the fruit above and below middle height) confirm chromosome 10 as a main one holding candidate genes responsible for fruit size and shape in pepper [13, 39, 40]. This outcome demonstrates the reliability of associations found and of the pursued methodological approach.
Limitations
-
Passport data not available in all accessions.
-
A higher number of accessions could provide better understanding on the geographical stratification of the two species under study, increasing furthermore, the power of detecting novel associations.
-
The two species represent valuable source of quality traits and resistances/tolerance to pathogens and environmental stress: phenotyping additional traits would provide better insight of the value of the collection for breeding purposes.
Data availability
Raw data analysed during the current study are available in the Short Read Archive repository (SRA), https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP070992. Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/10611831.
Abbreviations
- GBS:
-
Genotyping by sequencing
- SNP:
-
Single nucleotide polymorphisms
- CMLM:
-
Compressed mixed linear model
- PCA:
-
Principal component analysis
References
Tripodi P, Lo Scalzo R, Ficcadenti N. Dissection of heterotic, genotypic and environmental factors influencing the variation of yield components and health-related compounds in Chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum). Euphytica. 2020;216:7: 112.
Naves ER, de Ávila Silva L, Sulpice R, Araújo WL, Nunes-Nesi A, Peres LE, Zsögön A. (2019). Capsaicinoids: pungency beyond Capsicum. Trends Plant Sci. 2019. 24(2), 109–120.
Tripodi P, Kumar S. The Capsicum crop: an introduction. In: Ramchiary N, Kole C, editors. The capsicum genome. Cham: Springer; 2019.
BBC Guinness World Records crowns. new hottest pepper https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67136085 {last access 28/01/2024].
Baba VY, Rocha KR, Gomes GP, et al. Genetic diversity of Capsicum chinense accessions based on fruit morphological characterization and AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2016;63:1371–81.
Albrecht E, Zhang D, Mays AD, et al. Genetic diversity in Capsicum baccatum is significantly influenced by its ecogeographical distribution. BMC Genet. 2012;13:68.
Parisi M, Alioto D, Tripodi P. Overview of biotic stresses in pepper (Capsicum spp.): sources of genetic resistance, molecular breeding and genomics. Int Jour Mol Sci. 2020;21(7):2587.
Kamvorn W, Techawongstien S, Techawongstien S, Theerakulpisut P. Compatibility of inter-specific crosses between Capsicum chinense Jacq. And Capsicum baccatum L. at different fertilization stages. Sci Hortic. 2014;179:9–15.
Tripodi P, Greco B. Large scale phenotyping provides insight into the diversity of vegetative and reproductive organs in a wide collection of wild and domesticated peppers (Capsicum spp). Plants. 2018;7(4):103.
Chung YS, Choi SC, Jun T-H, Kim C. Genotyping-by-sequencing: a promising tool for plant genetics research and breeding. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2017;58:425–31.
Taranto F, D’Agostino N, Greco B, Cardi T, Tripodi P. Genome-wide SNP discovery and population structure analysis in pepper (Capsicum annuum) using genotyping by sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:943.
Wu L, Wang P, Wang YH, Cheng Q, Lu QH, Liu JQ, Li T, Ai YX, Yang WC, Sun L, Shen HL. Genome-wide correlation of 36 agronomic traits in the 287 pepper (Capsicum) accessions obtained from the slaf-seq-based GWAS. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5627.
McLeod L, Barchi L, Tumino G, Tripodi P, Salinier J, et al. Multi-environment association study highlights candidate genes for robust agronomic quantitative trait loci in a novel worldwide Capsicum core collection. Plant J. 2023;116:1508–28.
Han K, Lee H-Y, Ro N-Y, Hur O-S, Lee J-H, Kwon J-K, et al. QTL mapping and GWAS reveal candidate genes controlling capsaicinoid content in Capsicum. Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:1546–58.
HAILE, Mesfin, et al. A Comprehensive Genome-Wide Association Study of Carotenoid and Capsaicinoid contents in Capsicum chinense Germplasm. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):13885.
Nimmakayala P, Abburi VL, Saminathan T, Almeida A, Davenport B, Davidson J, Reddy CVCM, Hankins G, Ebert A, Choi D, Stommel J, Reddy UK. Genome-wide divergence and linkage disequilibrium analyses for Capsicum baccatum revealed by genome-anchored single nucleotide polymorphisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:1646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01646.
Bioversity International. Available online: https://www.bioversityinternational.org/e-library/publications/descriptors/ [accessed on 18 October 2018].
Team R. Core. RA language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical. Computing; 2021.
Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–2.
Kim S, Park M, Yeom SI, Kim YM, Lee JM, Lee HA, Seo E, Choi J, Cheong K, Kim KT, Jung K, Lee GW, Oh SK, Bae C, Kim SB, Lee HY, Kim SY, Kim MS, Kang BC, Jo YD, Yang HB, Jeong HJ, Kang WH, Kwon JK, Shin C, Lim JY, Park JH, Huh JH, Kim JS, Kim BD, Cohen O, Paran I, Suh MC, Lee SB, Kim YK, Shin Y, Noh SJ, Park J, Seo YS, Kwon SY, Kim HA, Park JM, Kim HJ, Choi SB, Bosland PW, Reeves G, Jo SH, Lee BW, Cho HT, Choi HS, Lee MS, Yu Y, Do Choi Y, Park BS, van Deynze A, Ashrafi H, Hill T, Kim WT, Pai HS, Ahn HK, Yeam I, Giovannoni JJ, Rose JK, Sørensen I, Lee SJ, Kim RW, Choi IY, Choi BS, Lim JS, Lee YH, Choi D. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat Genet. 2014;46(3):270–8.
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009a;25(14):1754–60.
Glaubitz JC, Casstevens TM, Lu F, Harriman J, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, Buckler ES. TASSEL-GBS: a high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e90346.
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8.
Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2633–5.
Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1655–64.
Wickham H. ggplot2. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Comput Stat. 2011;3:180–5.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar. MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120.
Tripodi P, Rabanus-Wallace MT, Barchi L, Kale S, Esposito S, Acquadro A, et al. Global range expansion history of pepper (Capsicum spp.) revealed by over 10,000 genebank accessions. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(34):e2104315118.
Manzur JP, Fita A, Prohens J, Rodríguez-Burruezo A. (2015). Successful wide hybridization and introgression breeding in a diverse set of common peppers (Capsicum annuum) using different cultivated Ají (C. Baccatum) accessions as donor parents. PLoS ONE, 10(12), e0144142.
Csilléry G. Pepper taxonomy and the botanical description of the species. Acta Agron Hung. 2006;54(2):151–66.
Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai CQ, Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42:355–60.
Nyholt DR. A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:765–9.
Cheng GX, Li RJ, Wang M, Huang LJ, Khan A, Ali M, Gong ZH. Variation in leaf color and combine effect of pigments on physiology and resistance to whitefly of pepper (Capsicum annuum L). Sci Hort. 2018;229:215–25.
Parisi M, Alioto D, Tripodi P. Overview of biotic stresses in pepper (Capsicum spp.): sources of genetic resistance, molecular breeding and genomics. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(7):2587.
Gomez JM, Bosch J, Perfectti F, Fernández JD, Abdelaziz M, Camacho JPM. Spatial variation in selection on corolla shape in a generalist plant is promoted by the preference patterns of its local pollinators. Proc Royal Soc B: Biol Sci. 2008;275(1648):2241–9.
Rey P, Becuwe N, Tourrette S, Rouhier N. Involvement of Arabidopsis glutaredoxin S14 in the maintenance of chlorophyll content. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40(10):2319–32.
Darbani B, Noeparvar S, Borg S. (2015). Deciphering mineral homeostasis in barley seed transfer cells at transcriptional level. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0141398.
Rodríguez AA, Vilas JM, Sartore GD, Bezus R, Colazo J, Maiale SJ. (2023) Field and genetic evidence support the photosynthetic performance index (PIABS) as an indicator of rice grain yield. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 201, p.107897.
Borovsky Y, Paran I. Characterization of fs10. 1, a major QTL controlling fruit elongation in Capsicum. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;123:657–65.
Colonna V, D’Agostino N, Garrison E, Albrechtsen A, Meisner J, Facchiano A, Tripodi P. Genomic diversity and novel genome-wide association with fruit morphology in Capsicum, from 746k polymorphic sites. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–14.
Funding
This research was funded by funded by the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forests, grant name ‘RGV-ORFLORA’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.T conceived the work, collected and analyzed the data, drafted the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
I declare than no licence or permissions were necessary to collect the accessions used in this study.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication is not applicable for this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tripodi, P. Genomic structure and marker-trait association for plant and fruit traits in Capsicum chinense and Capsicum baccatum germplasm. BMC Res Notes 17, 231 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06889-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06889-3