Perinatal folate levels do not influence tumor latency or multiplicity in a model of NF1 associated plexiform-like neurofibromas

Objective In epidemiological and experimental research, high folic acid intake has been demonstrated to accelerate tumor development among populations with genetic and/or molecular susceptibility to cancer. Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common autosomal dominant disorder predisposing affected individuals to tumorigenesis, including benign plexiform neurofibromas; however, understanding of factors associated with tumor risk in NF1 patients is limited. Therefore, we investigated whether pregestational folic acid intake modified plexiform-like peripheral nerve sheath tumor risk in a transgenic NF1 murine model. Results We observed no significant differences in overall survival according to folate group. Relative to controls (180 days), median survival did not statistically differ in deficient (174 days, P = 0.56) or supplemented (177 days, P = 0.13) folate groups. Dietary folate intake was positively associated with RBC folate levels at weaning, (P = 0.023, 0.0096, and 0.0006 for deficient vs. control, control vs. supplemented, and deficient vs. supplemented groups, respectively). Dorsal root ganglia (DRG), brachial plexi, and sciatic nerves were assessed according to folate group. Mice in the folate deficient group had significantly more enlarged DRG relative to controls (P = 0.044), but no other groups statistically differed. No significant differences for brachial plexi or sciatic nerve enlargement were observed according to folate status. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06515-8.


Introduction
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), a disorder caused by inherited or de novo NF1 gene mutations, is characterized by the development of benign neurofibromas, occurring in 25-30% of all NF1 patients [1][2][3][4].As these neurofibromas can be congenital [2], perigestational exposures may influence their development.Among increased risk for several other malignancies [5][6][7][8], malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are the most common malignant NF1-associated tumors (10-13% lifetime risk of occurrence) [9,10].As malignant transformation from benign plexiform neurofibromas to MPNST has been proposed [11], those with benign plexiform neurofibromas have an increased risk of developing MPNSTs relative to NF1 patients without such benign tumors [12,13].Transformation to MPNST is of particular concern, as these have no targeted therapies available for treatment and patients have poor 5-year survival [14].Clinical manifestations of NF1 vary [15], and little is known regarding factors that influence tumor risk among NF1affected individuals.Interestingly, there are no observed sex differences for the prevalence of plexiform neurofibromas from an examination of a large pediatric cohort [16].While the incidence of NF1 is equal between males and females, there is evidence of an age delay in diagnosis between the sexes [17].In our mouse model of peripheral nerve sheath tumors, there also has been no sex difference observed in tumor penetrance or development timing [18].There is an vital clinical need to identify factors that influence tumor risk among individuals with NF1 to enable risk prediction and, ultimately, prevention.
We hypothesized that maternal folic acid intake during pregnancy may influence offspring tumor risk.In the general population, increased adult folate intake has been found to decrease risk of several malignancies [19][20][21][22][23], and epidemiological evidence has suggested an inverse association between peri-gestational maternal folic acid intake and risk for disease outcomes in offspring [24][25][26][27][28].In contrast, adults with 'genetic susceptibility' , pre-neoplastic lesions, or who are at risk of cancer recurrence may have an increased risk for tumorigenesis when combined with high folate intake [29][30][31][32].Experimental studies in rodents [33][34][35][36] have largely corroborated these findings.Collectively, these studies suggest that, in the presence of genetic and/or molecular susceptibility, folate supplementation may promote tumor growth.However, these mechanisms have yet to be experimentally explored in the context of MPNST risk among NF1 patients.
We sought to address this literature gap by determining whether perigestational folic acid exposure modifies risk of plexiform-like peripheral nerve sheath tumors in transgenic NF1 mouse models [18].Our objective was to understand whether varying folate intake in a mouse model of NF1 associated plexiform-like neurofibromas during the perigestational period modulates the incidence and severity of tumor formation in the offspring, hypothesizing that reduced maternal folic acid intake during pregnancy decreases rate and severity of tumor formation in offspring.Our results may inform future human clinical trials regarding optimal maternal dietary folate intake in populations genetically susceptible to cancer syndromes.

Animals and diets
The University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and the US Army Medical Research and Material Command (USAMRMC) Animal Care and Use Review Office (ACURO) approved all protocols for this study.Mice were housed in plastic cages layered with shavings in a temperature and humiditycontrolled room at the University of Minnesota.Mice had 12-hour day/night cycles with access to food and water ad libitum.Mice used for breeding included Dhh-Cre; Nf1 flox/flox males and Nf1 flox/flox ; Pten flox/flox females.One month prior to mating, 6-10-week-old female mice were assigned to one of three amino-acid defined diets, containing 0.3 mg/kg (deficient), 2.0 mg/kg (control), or 8.0 mg/kg (supplemented) folic acid and 1% succinyl sulfathiazole (SST) (Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI: catalogue numbers TD.07056, TD.07057, and TD.07058) to prevent folic acid synthesis by intestinal microflora [37].Our primary hypothesis based on prior literature was that the folate deficient group would have increased survival compared to controls.Therefore, we chose an unbalanced study design to allocate more experimental animals to the deficient group, maximizing the statistical power to detect an increase in survival time.The primary endpoint on which we calculated power was a log rank test of survival in days.There were 25, 15, and 5 dams assigned to the deficient, control, and supplemented folic acid groups, respectively.Animals were randomized into groups via random number generation, and no exclusions were made.To minimize possible supplementation/feed mixing, cages of dams assigned to the same supplementation group were housed next to each other with gaps separating them from cages of dams assigned to different folate groups.Due to fecundity concerns in folatedeficient mice, all dams were switched to standard diet for a month after weaning their first litter then returned to experimental diet before producing a second litter.Female mice were harem-mated at two-to-three per cage with one Dhh-Cre; Nf1 flox/flox male mouse.Female mice were maintained on their respective diets until three weeks post-delivery, at which time pups were weaned and switched to standard chow for the remainder of the experiment.In conjunction with the University of Minnesota Research Animals Resources staff and veterinary technicians, mice were monitored for neurological indications of tumor development, such as ataxia and limb paralysis.Animals were euthanized by CO 2 inhalation and cervical dislocation in accordance with institutional guidelines at 12 months (specified endpoint), tumor formation, or when moribund for any reason, whichever came first.Necropsies were conducted to assess the presence of enlarged per-herbal nerves and potential tumor burden.Abnormal sciatic nerves and brachial or sacral plexi were also removed.In mice dorsal root ganglia (DRG) display distribution of sizes considered to be "normal", typically between 300 and 600 mm and anything over 700 mm classified as large [38,39].For our work, we consider enlarged DRG to be visibly larger than the normal size distribution observed in the mouse and generally greater than 1.5 mm in diameter [18].Figure 1 schematically summarizes our experimental design and procedures.Figure 1 schematically summarizes our experimental design and procedures.

Genotyping and red blood cell (RBC) Folate Measurement
Full genotyping and RBC folate measurement methods can be found in the supplement.

Statistical analysis
Based on our hypothesis that offspring of folate deficient mice will experience increased survival and offspring of supplemented mice will experience decreased survival relative to controls, we chose an unbalanced design (allocating more mice to folate deficient diets and fewer mice to supplemented diets) to maximize statistical efficiency.To examine the effect of folic acid on rate of tumor development, we utilized Kaplan-Meier survival tests to assess whether time to tumor development varied according to dietary group.Survival time was calculated as number of days from birth to tumor development or one year of age, whichever came first.Differences in RBC folate and DRG were assessed using Brown-Forsythe and Welch's analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett's T3 test for multiple Fig. 1 Experimental design for study of triple transgenic Nf1 mice assigned to folic acid supplementation groups to observe tumor growth and survival in offspring comparison due to standard deviation (SD) differences between groups.Differences in sciatic nerve enlargement were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Dunn's test for multiple comparisons due to abnormally distributed data.Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 9.4.1)(GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).Tests were two-sided and p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results
A total of 45 female mice were assigned to deficient (n = 25), control (n = 15), and supplemented (n = 5) folate diets.Dams assigned to a deficient diet produced 88 (48.4%) of the 182 total experimental offspring.Corresponding numbers for control and supplemented folate dams were 81 out of 159 (50.9%), and 21 out of 47 (44.7%), respectively.All experimental animals were included in the study, and all non-experimental offspring (determined via genotyping) were excluded.There was no statistically significant difference in percent experimental offspring according to folate group (P = 0.73).Kaplan-Meier survival analyses indicated no significant differences in overall survival according to folate group.Relative to controls (180 days), median survival did not statistically differ in deficient (174 days, P = 0.56) or supplemented (177 days, P = 0.13) folate groups (Fig. 2).Maternal dietary folate intake was significantly, positively associated with RBC folate levels at weaning, as significant differences were observed among all group comparisons (P = 0.023, 0.0096, and 0.0006 for deficient vs. control, control vs. supplemented, and deficient vs. supplemented groups, respectively) (Fig. 3).DRG, brachial plexi, and sciatic nerves of 62 mice from the deficient group, 68 mice from the control group, and 20 mice from the supplemented group were examined via necropsy to assess tumor burden (Supplemental Fig. 1).Mice from dams with a deficient, control, and supplemented folate diet had averages (SDs) of 4.02 (2.10), 3.16 (1.83), and 3.60 (1.64) enlarged DRG, respectively, with mice in the deficient group having significantly more enlarged DRG relative to controls (P = 0.044).Comparisons among other groups did not statistically differ.Brachial plexus enlargement did not differ according to folate status.Among folate deficient, control, and supplemented dams, 87.3%, 85.5%, and 78.6%, respectively, had enlarged brachial plexi (P = > 0.99, > 0.99, and 0.83 for deficient vs. control, control vs. supplemented, and deficient vs. supplemented groups, respectively.We also observed no significant difference in sciatic nerve enlargement among supplemented (20.0%), control (14.7%), or deficient (17.7%) groups (P = > 0.99 for all comparisons).

Discussion
Although maternal folate intake is critical to healthy fetal growth and development [40,41], folate may also fuel growth and proliferation of neoplastic cells [42][43][44], increasing risk of tumorigenesis in susceptible populations.Current results, however, do not corroborate this line of evidence, as folate supplementation did not affect overall survival in our susceptible population of NF1-affected mice.
In our previous analysis of a mouse model with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, offspring of dams assigned a low folate diet had reduced risk of medulloblastoma relative to control and a statistically significant increase in medulloblastoma survival [34].Similarly, in a study of adenomasusceptible mice, Lawrance et al. found folate deficiency prior to conception was associated with decreased adenomas, while high folate introduced after weaning was associated with increased adenomas [33].Deghan Manshadi et al., in a study of mammary tumors initiated in female rats at puberty, demonstrated accelerated tumor progression and greater tumor weight/volume associated with folic acid supplementation 2.5x the control concentration [36].Sharma et al. discovered that high folate progressed the development of hepatocellular carcinoma among rats given diethylnitrosamine carcinogen [45].In a previous study also investigating nerve sheath tumors, mice carrying the human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 transactivator gene and provided high folate developed tumors significantly sooner than carrier mice assigned to low folate [35].Among humans, a large randomized trial of folic acid supplementation among participants with a history of colorectal adenomas found supplementation was associated with increased risk of ≥ 3 adenomas [29], and a prospective analysis of women with BRCA1/2 mutation found a positive association between plasma folate and breast cancer risk [46].Additional experimental and human studies also demonstrated risk associated with high folate both with and without known genetic or medical susceptibility [30][31][32]47].
While we do observe a statistically significant change in the number or enlarged DRG when comparing the control (2.0 mg/kg) folate group to the low (0.3 mg/kg) group, we do not believe this is a biologically meaningful change.We only observe an average increase of ~ 1 extra enlarged nerve root.For example, a strong promotor of tumorigenesis in this mouse model, such as loss of the second allele of Pten, increases the number of enlarged DRG by nearly 20 [18].
It is possible that our smaller sample may have contributed to the inconsistency with previous findings, as our current study assigned 25, 15, and 5 dams to deficient, control, and supplemented folate categories, respectively, versus the 42 dams assigned to respective categories in our previous study [34].However, given our results, it is unlikely that a larger sample size would have made a meaningful impact, particularly considering the significant results observed in other studies with small samples [33,35].The inconsistency could also be due to differences in administered folate concentrations.In the current study, deficient, control, and supplemented diets contained 0.3, 2.0, and 8.0 mg/kg folic acid whereas the high folate group in Lawrance et al. received 20 mg/kg folic acid [33], and Sharma et al. provided low and high folate groups with 0 mg/kg folate and 20 mg/kg folate, respectively [45].The higher concentration of administered folate in supplemented groups and/or wider range of dietary consumption in other studies could help explain the inconsistency of our results.However, folate concentrations administered in the current study are identical to concentrations administered in our previous study [34], similar to concentrations administered by Deghan Manshadi et al. (2,5,8, and 10 mg/kg folic acid) [36], and greater than concentrations assigned by Bills et al. (0.11 micromoles/kg folic acid [~ 0.05 mg/kg] and 11.34 micromoles/kg folic acid [~ 5 mg/ kg]) [35].As all three of these studies demonstrated statistically significant findings, the inconsistency with our results Fig. 3 RBC folate level at weaning according to maternal dietary folate intake is unlikely due to folate dosage.Also, because of the findings of Bills et al. [35] and the demonstration of folate-associated effects in similar tissues [48][49][50], the inconsistency of our results cannot likely be attributed to etiologic and/or biological differences between soft tissue sarcomas and other various tumor types.Therefore, current results may differ from previous analyses due to folate being administered perigestationally versus directly to offspring.Although previous findings [33,34] demonstrated associations between maternal folate and adverse events in offspring [34], and it is established that the maternal intrauterine environment can impact offspring cancer risk [51][52][53], it is possible that maternal conditions are not as critical to plexiform-like neurofibroma formation relative to other tumors.Future studies on the effects dietary folate levels throughout life may reveal a role in peripheral nerve sheath tumor development.

Conclusions
Our results failed to support the hypothesis that high perigestational folic acid intake in a model of NF1-affected mice increases the rate or severity plexiform-like tumor formation in offspring.Further study is needed to confirm these findings and assess the safety of high perigestational folic acid intake in the presence of cancer-susceptibility syndromes, particularly NF1.

Limitations
Our study was limited by only being able to detect tumor initiation and progression through monitoring onset of neurological symptoms, motor function impairment, and paralysis in the mice.It is possible that imaging modalities, such as a longitudinal MRI study, could have shown differences in tumor initiation and/or growth rates that our study was unable to discern.Additionally, physiological and pathological differences in folate metabolism [54] and neurofibroma progression between mice and humans limit our ability to extrapolate findings to human populations.Regarding folate metabolism, both species share a common set of enzymes and transporters involved in folate processing, the key distinction lies in the utilization of certain folate derivatives.In humans, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) predominates as the primary circulating form, which facilitates the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine.In contrast, mice predominantly utilize 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (5-FTHF) for this remethylation reaction.Moreover, the distribution and expression of folate transporter proteins, especially the reduced folate carrier (RFC), vary between mice and humans, leading to differences in folate absorption and tissue distribution [55].

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Overall survival in transgenic NF1 mouse model according to dietary folate consumption