Multiplex PCR for the simultaneous detection of the Enterobacterial gene wecA, the Shiga Toxin genes (stx1 and stx2) and the Intimin gene (eae)

Objectives The aetiology of several human diarrhoeas has been increasingly associated with the presence of virulence factors rather than with the bacterial species hosting the virulence genes, exemplified by the sporadic emergence of new bacterial hosts. Two important virulence factors are the Shiga toxin (Stx) and the E. coli outer membrane protein (Eae) or intimin, encoded by the stx and eae genes, respectively. Although several polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols target these virulence genes, few aim at detecting all variants or have an internal amplification control (IAC) included in a multiplex assay. The objective of this work was to develop a simple multiplex PCR assay in order to detect all stx and eae variants, as well as to detect bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae, also used as an IAC. Results The wecA gene coding for the production of the Enterobacterial Common Antigen was used to develop an Enterobacteriaceae specific qPCR. Universal primers for the detection of stx and eae were developed and linked to a wecA primer pair in a robust triplex PCR. In addition, subtyping of the stx genes was achieved by subjecting the PCR products to restriction digestion and semi-nested duplex PCR, providing a simple screening assay for human diarrhoea diagnostic. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3457-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.


Introduction
According to WHO diarrhoeal disease is the second cause of death of children less than 5 years old, killing around half a million every year [1]. Hence, easy to implement diagnostic tests are highly relevant for patient care as well as for food and water monitoring. Once associated only with specific bacterial strains or serotypes, some diseases have been caused by new strains that were not previously identified as food/ water-borne pathogens. A major mechanism associated with the emergence of pathogens is horizontal gene transfer enabling the sudden acquisition of virulence factors [2,3] also between phylogenetically distant bacterial genera [4]. Among the numerous known virulence genes, stx and eae play a major role in the virulence of various enteric pathogens members of the Enterobacteriaceae [5][6][7]. Detecting the presence of these virulence genes is now a common procedure for tracking the associated aetiologic agents although other markers have also recently been used to monitor diarrhoeic E. coli [8]. The Shiga toxin producing E. coli (STEC) comprises the enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) pathotype and is defined by the presence of the stx gene. Two main types of this virulence factor have been defined, stx 1 (quasi identical to Stx produced by Shigella dysenteriae) and stx 2 , both of which are further divided in several subtypes [9]. Most STEC detection methods rely on the identification of serotype O157H7.
As more than 50% of STEC infections may be caused by non-O157H7 strains, the need for diagnostic methods detecting all types of STEC has been emphasized [10,11]. The gene eae coding for intimin has been found in enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), EHEC, E. albertii and Citrobacter rodentium [12].
Several multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for the detection of virulence factors and serogroup markers associated with human gastrointestinal diseases have been previously developed which include the presence of an internal amplification control (IAC) [13][14][15][16], or of an indicator organism such as E. coli to provide a positive control [17][18][19][20][21] (see Additional file 1). E. coli belongs to the Enterobacteriaceae, a group which includes the total coliforms (TC) and most enteric pathogens and is described as a "general (process) microbial indicator" [22] used for assessing the efficiency of food and water treatment. Therefore, in the present method, the Enterobacteriaceae was chosen to serve both as a general microbial indicator of sample contamination, and as a positive control for the multiplex PCR when tracking the presence of stx and eae genes. The "universal" primer design for the detection of stx and eae virulence genetic elements aims at detecting all variants of the gene regardless of the bacterial host species whereas other "universal" stx and eae primers, aim at E. coli (Additional file 1). In addition, sequence variability within the stx PCR product was exploited in order to develop a nested PCR and a restriction digestion protocol for typing of the genes. To our knowledge it is the first time such screening "universal" stx and eae primers are used in a multiplex PCR with an Enterobacteriaceae IAC.

Bacterial strains and culture media
For testing the multiplex protocol, the 23 bacterial isolates used are listed in Additional file 2. The bacterial strains were provided by The Norwegian National Institute for Health (Folkehelsa) and the Rikshospitalet University Hospital. Pure cultures were grown in 10 ml Luria Broth over night at 37 °C with shaking. Grown cultures were boiled for 10 min, and serially diluted in water before being used for PCR analysis. Alternatively, single colonies were picked from agar plates, suspended in water and used directly for the PCR.

Software and primers
Sequence alignments were performed using the Multalin web site http://multa lin.toulo use.inra.fr/multa lin/ accessed 1 February 2018 [23]. Primer design as well as restriction enzyme analyses were performed with Oligo 6.0 (Molecular Biology Insights, Inc., USA) software or performed manually using the alignments results and guidelines [24][25][26][27]. Amplicon product sizes and primer sequence are shown in Table 1.

PCR amplification
Samples (10 μl) were amplified in 50 μl final reaction mixtures using a BioTest Biometra or a TGRADIENT

Table 1 Primer sequences, product sizes and conditions used in the triplex and simplex PCRs
Triplex PCR (A) semi-nested duplex PCR for stx 1 and stx 2 typing (B) and simplex PCR for Enterobacteriaceae (C) a R = A or G, M = A or C, K = G or T

Restriction endonuclease
The reaction mixture contained 16 μl PCR products, 10 U BsrI restriction endonuclease (New England Biolab) with the provided NEB3 buffer in a total volume of 20 μl. Digestion was performed in PCR tubes at 65 °C for 2 h 30 min in the thermocycler after which 10 μl of the sample was analysed by electrophoresis as described for PCR amplification.

Virulence factors
A total of 45 different stxA gene sequences and 21 different eaeA gene sequences were aligned (see A1 and A2, respectively in [28]). The primers were aimed at detecting all variants of stx and eae, and thus were designed on the basis of the most conserved area of the DNA sequence alignment. An alignment of the universal degenerate Ustx primers with the most relevant primer pairs used in other PCR protocols is shown in Additional file 3.

Triplex PCR
The triplex PCR was developed to simultaneously detect Enterobacteriaceae, used as an IAC, and the presence or absence of any variants of stx and eae genes. The triplex PCR was optimized varying annealing temperature, primer concentration and by testing additives or facilitators such as DMSO, glycerol, bovine serum albumin, formamide and MgCl 2 which are reported to improve multiplex PCR [24,29,30].
Only increasing the concentration of MgCl 2 from 2 to 3 mM improved results as shown in Fig. 1. The results from testing 19 pathogenic E. coli, 3 S. dysenteriae and 1 non-pathogenic E. coli, for specificity of the assay are shown in Fig. 2a and Additional file 2.

Semi-nested duplex PCR for differentiating stx 1 and stx 2
The semi-nested duplex PCR consisted of UstxL1, used as the reverse primer in the triplex PCR, and two new forward primers, Nestx1 and Nestx2. These two forward primers are complementary to stx 1 and stx 2 respectively and are located within the amplicon produced in the triplex. The products of the amplification consist of 200 bp and 410 bp for stx 1 and stx 2 , respectively. The assay was tested on 14 strains containing stx 1 or stx 2 , or both, and the results are shown in Fig. 2b. These results were corroborated by those produced by the restriction enzymatic digestion assay shown in Additional files 4 and 5.

Enzymatic restriction digestion for typing
The result obtained after digestion with BsrI of the stx simplex PCR product is shown in Additional file 4. The fragment pattern enables the distinction of four different groups of stx variants, stx 1c , stx 1 , stx 2 + stx 2c + stx 2d , and stx 2e + stx 2f as shown in Additional file 5. The smallest fragment, of 39 bp, could not be visualised on the agarose gel, but this does not affect the interpretation of the results. Similarly, the 62 bp fragment produced from stx 1 was not always visible. However, this fragment was not required for positive identification of stx 1 , which was specifically identified by the presence of the 334 bp fragment.

Enterobacterial Common Antigen
The Enterobacterial Common Antigen (ECA) was first described in 1963 by Kunin [31] and is defined as a crossreactive antigen that is detectable in all genera of Enterobacteriaceae by several methods including using antisera to E. coli [32]. ECA was later found to be strictly family specific with diagnostic potential because of its universal presence in the family (see reviews [32]). Two of the genes implicated in the ECA synthesis are the rfe and rff genes [33,34] later renamed wec [35]. Immunologybased diagnostic tests have been developed to detect the presence of ECA for clinical applications [36] and later to monitor the quality of drinking water by probing for bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family [37]. In the PCR based protocols used here, the wecA primers detected all tested 23 strains of E. coli and S. dysenteriae.
Among the two stx groups, the second, stx 2 and its five variants, is the most diverse and includes the most potent Shiga toxins for humans. Both stx 2 and stx 2c are mainly hosted by STEC associated with the aetiology of severe human diarrhoea whereas stx 2d has been isolated in STEC from human as well as cattle origin [44]. Finally, stx 2e is found in porcine STEC [45] while stx 2f is found in STEC hosted by birds [46,47]. Although the toxins Stx 2e and Stx 2f seem to be adapted to their respective hosts, both have been associated with human disease [45,48]. Swine was also shown to harbour STEC carrying stx 1 and stx 2d associated with human infections [49], a finding which further underlines the importance of establishing screening methods designed for detecting all variants. The results obtained for stx in the present study were in agreement with expectations. All three S. dysenteriae were positive for stx by triplex PCR and further confirmed to harbour stx 1 by both semi-nested duplex PCR and enzymatic restriction. Among the 13 EHEC strains, 11 were found stx positive by triplex PCR. Strain ATCC 43888 was stx-negative as expected whereas strain 3005/00 was unexpectedly stx-negative although eaepositive. This could be the result of loss of the virulence factor as it has been previously demonstrated for stx both in vivo [50] and in vitro [51]. Three EHEC strains were shown to have both stx 1 and stx 2 , confirmed by both the semi-nested duplex PCR and the enzymatic restriction typing method. In particular, strain BE97-2317 was shown by enzymatic restriction to harbour stx 1c , a gene coding for a toxin type also previously found associated with EHEC O128:H2 and negative for eae [43].
Various universal primer pairs for the detection of stx have been described in [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] some which overlap with the Ustx primers employed in this study (Additional file 3). However, few primers are able to detect all variants and are used in a multiplex assay [60][61][62] or also have integrated an IAC such as E. coli detection [19]. Integrating the detection of an indicator group, expected to be co-detected along with the targeted virulence markers, has the advantages over using a traditional IAC that it will also be able to detect, not only PCR inhibition or failure, but also absence of DNA. Finally, the Enterobacteriaceae family has been described as a possible alternative to faecal indicator bacteria, as it can better reflect the hygienic status of food products [63], hence Enterobacteriaceae PCR assays should find several areas of applications. Overall, this simple molecular screening assay including its further typing possibility for stx, should help food and health authorities to increase their monitoring efforts to improve water and food microbiological quality as well as patient diagnostic capabilities.

Limitations
A limited number of strains were used for detection capability of the assay, and specificity testing for Enterobacteriaceae was not performed. Limit of detection has not been evaluated.

Authors' contributions
MA and RS conceived and designed the study, MA performed laboratory work, analysed the data and drafted the manuscript, RS supervised the study and revised the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.