Open Access

Ablation of prion protein immunoreactivity by heating in saturated calcium hydroxide

BMC Research Notes20081:99

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-1-99

Received: 23 April 2008

Accepted: 28 October 2008

Published: 28 October 2008

Abstract

Background

Prions, the infectious agents that cause transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), are relatively resistant to destruction by physical, enzymatic, and chemical treatments. Hydrolysis in boiling saturated calcium hydroxide (limewater) utilizes inexpensive chemicals to digest protein components of offal. The purpose of this work was to determine if incubating brain material from scrapie-infected sheep in near-boiling saturated calcium hydroxide solution (Ca(OH)2) would abolish immunoreactivity of the infectious prion (PrPSc) as determined by western blot.

Findings

After incubating for as few as 10 minutes in saturated calcium hydroxide at 99°C, immunoreactivity of protease resistant bands by western blot analysis is completely lost.

Conclusion

Boiling in limewater may offer an alternative for disposal of carcasses and enable alternative uses for rendered products from potentially infected carcasses.

Background

Scrapie in sheep, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), chronic wasting disease (CWD) of deer and elk, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans are chronic neurodegenerative diseases associated with the accumulation of the protease-resistant, disease-associated isoform of the prion protein (PrPSc) in selected regions of the central nervous system. PrPSc is relatively resistant to inactivation by standard decontamination procedures [1] and can remain infectious after undergoing sterilization procedures under high pressure, treatment with disinfectants, or exposure to dry heat.[2]

The host of any particular prion disease determines the potential distribution of PrPSc in the tissues. Brain, spinal cord, and distal ileum and in some species, peripheral lymphoid tissues contain infectious material (PrPSc). Removal, handling, and disposal of tissue with the potential to harbor infectious PrPSc represent a challenge to the meatpacking and by-product industries. Efficient methods of inactivating potentially infectious material are needed.

A number of procedures have been described to decontaminate surfaces or reusable medical devices, [37] but few of these methods are appropriate for decontamination of large volumes of animal tissue from TSE-infected animals. Chemical means of inactivation such as concentrated hypochlorite (bleach) solutions or sodium hydroxide solution can damage equipment, cause respiratory irritation in workers exposed to fumes, pose problems with disposal, or may not be appropriate for processing large amounts of material. Disposal of large volumes of chemically treated material may present problems for some municipal sewage systems. High-pressure and temperature methods of inactivation [3] or reducing infectivity[8] of tissues and proteolytic digestion by enzymes secreted by thermophylic bacteria[9] have not been demonstrated to be effective on a large scale.

Methods for detecting abnormal prion in meat and bone meal (MBM) are under development,[10] but methods that inactivate abnormal prions and leave material with by-product value (concentrated amino acids, feed additive, fertilizer, etc.) may be more desirable. Incineration can inactivate the agent,[2] but precludes any recovery or reuse of raw material.

Inexpensive, effective means of inactivating prions in offal are needed for safe disposal of carcasses and to ensure the safety of animal by-products if used as a feed source. Ultimately, the success of any potential method of inactivation must be measured by comparing infectivity in cell cultures[11] or animal models of prion disease, but western blot can be used to screen for unfolding or denaturation of PrPSc, which would result in a loss of reactivity with prion-specific antibodies. The purpose of this study was to determine if incubating brain material from scrapie-infected sheep in near-boiling saturated calcium hydroxide solution would abolish immunoreactivity of the infectious prion (PrPSc) as determined by western blot.

Methods

Preparation of brain material

Brain immunoreactive for PrPSc by immunohistochemistry and western blot from intracerebrally inoculated sheep or brain from scrapie-free control animals[12] was homogenized at a final concentration of 40% (w/v) in 10 mM Tris 5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.5 using a tissue homogenizer (Powergen 125 homogenizer, Fisher Scientific) with disposable probe. Secondly, ultrasonic dismembranation (Fisher Scientific Model 500 Ultrasonic Dismembrator, Fisher Scientific) was performed for four 30-second intervals in an ice bath with brief vortex mixing between sonication. The samples were then centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 2 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant was then treated with 100 U/mL benzonase (Novagen) at 37°C for 1 hour. The material was used immediately for the inactivation experiments or frozen at -80°C for later use.

Calcium Hydroxide (Ca(OH)2 treatment

The 40% brain homogenates were diluted to a final concentration of 10% (w/v) brain in saturated Ca(OH)2 containing excess insoluble Ca(OH)2. Samples of 10% (w/v) brain homogenate in 10 mM Tris 5 mM MgCl2, pH 7.5 were processed in parallel to those homogenized in saturated Ca(OH)2 to serve as a heat-only control. All samples except from the zero timepoint were placed at 99°C for incubation. The zero timepoint sample and samples measured at subsequent timepoints were neutralized by a 1:6.9 dilution into 1 M Tris-HCl to stop the reaction. Ice-cold acetone (4 volumes) was added to each sample, and samples were then placed at -20°C for at least 1 hour.

Preparation of samples and analysis by western blot

Following incubation at -20°C for 1 hour, the calcium hydroxide treated samples were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 10 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant was discarded and the protein pellet was allowed to air dry. Once dry, the pellet was dissolved in SDS-PAGE sample buffer such that 1.2 mg tissue equivalent (assuming 100% yield) was loaded on the gel. Positive and negative scrapie control samples were homogenized in 10 mM Tris-HCl 5 mM MgCl2 pH 7.5 and loaded on a gel at ~1 mg tissues equivalent in SDS-PAGE sample buffer without treatment or after 240 minutes at 99°C. For the control samples, proteinase K (USB) was added to a final concentration of 80 μg/ml; digestion was conducted at 37°C for 1 hour and stopped by the addition of Pefabloc (Roche Diagnostics) to a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL.

For SDS-PAGE and western blot, a 4–20% commercially prepared SDS-PAGE gel was loaded and run according to the manufacturer's instructions, blotted to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (GE Healthcare) and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin. Western blot detection was conducted using mouse anti-PrP monoclonal antibody P4 (R-Biopharm AG), which targets to amino acids 89–104 of the ovine prion protein sequence,[13] at a 1:10,000 dilution (0.1 μg/mL) as the primary antibody. Western blots were repeated using monoclonal antibody F99/97.6.1, which targets residues 220–225 of ovine prion protein sequence.[14] A biotinylated sheep anti-mouse secondary antibody at 0.05 μg/ml and a streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (GE Healthcare) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions in conjunction with the ECL Plus detection system (GE Healthcare) and imaged using a Kodak Image Station In-Vivo F. Primary antibody incubations were conducted with the membrane at either room temperature for 1 hour or 4°C overnight (≥ 12 hours). Secondary antibody and streptavidin-HRP conjugate incubations were conducted at room temperature for 1 hour. Band intensity was determined using Kodak Molecular Imaging software.

Results and discussion

Scrapie-positive and scrapie-negative samples were confirmed based upon the presence or absence, respectively, of proteinase K-resistant PrP (Figure 1). For both scrapie-positive and scrapie-negative samples, PrP is clearly visible in the first sample taken after dilution into saturated Ca(OH)2, however, after only 10 minutes there is virtually no detectable PrP in either the scrapie-positive or scrapie-negative samples (Figure 2) on a western blot. Analysis of the western blot indicates that greater than 95% of all detectable PrP is hydrolyzed in the first 10 minutes. Samples homogenized in 10 mM Tris-HCl 5 mM MgCl2 pH 7.5 remained immunoreactive after 240 minutes at 99°C (results not shown).
Figure 1

Western blot of non-treated brain homogenates. Representative western blots of scrapie-positive and scrapie-negative sheep brain homogenates. Lane 1-Molecular weight marker; lane 2-Scrapie-positive brain without proteinase K digestion; lane 3-Scrapie-positive brain treated with proteinase K; lane 4-Blank; lane 5-Scrapie-negative brain without proteinase K digestion; lane 6-scrapie-negative brain with proteinase K digestion. Only the scrapie-positive brain homogenate exhibits proteinase K resistance.

Figure 2

Western blot after calcium hydroxide treatment. Western blot analysis of calcium hydroxide treatment of scrapie-negative (A) and scrapie-positive (B) sheep brain homogenate. For both, Lane 1-molecular weight marker; lane 2–0 minutes; lane 3–10 minutes; lane 4–20 minutes; lane 5–30 minutes; lane 6–60 minutes; lane 7–120 minutes; lane 8–240 minutes. PrP immunoreactivity is abolished in scrapie-positive samples after 10 minutes treatment with calcium hydroxide.

As the infectious agent, reduction in PrPSc levels is strongly suggestive of reduced infectivity. However, PrPSc is detected indirectly via western blot and disruption of antibody-PrPScinteractions for which there would be no corresponding reduction in infectivity could be one potential explanation for lack of immunoreactivity. Western blots were performed with multiple antibodies with different binding epitopes to assure that lack of immunoreactivity was not due to loss of an epitope at a single site. Failure to reduce PrPSc levels while reducing infectivity is much less likely.[15]

Base-catalyzed hydrolysis using sodium hydroxide at concentrations ≥ 1 N is an accepted means of decontamination of PrPSc-contaminated material.[16] Reports indicate that even this fails to completely inactivate some PrPSc isolates.[17] Failures may be more a result of the consumption of hydroxide ion in the hydrolysis than an inability of 2N NaOH to hydrolyze PrPSc. The pH of 2 N NaOH is greater than 14. In contrast, saturated Ca(OH)2 is nearer pH 12.5, which is still sufficient to rapidly hydrolyze peptide bonds. As the hydroxide ions are consumed in the case of NaOH, the pH of the solution would drop; however, using a slurry of saturated Ca(OH)2 solution and insoluble Ca(OH)2 the hydroxide ion concentration and thus the pH is readily maintained. Additionally, Na+ ions are poorly tolerated in feed, whereas Ca2+ ions are much more readily tolerated. Thus, although Ca(OH)2, is a weaker base than the often-used NaOH it offers some practical advantages to prion inactivation on an industrial scale for the purposes of producing a safe, alternative by-product.

New methods of prion inactivation for application to offal would reduce complications with carcass disposal and assure safety of rendered materials used as an animal feed source. Immunoassay alone is not sufficient to evaluate the efficacy of a particular method of inactivation [11] as removal of all immunoreactive PrPSc correlates poorly with levels of infectivity measured by bioassay. Animal inoculations appear to be a standardizable method for the evaluation of prion inactivation, but a 15-month incubation period is required to guarantee total absence of infectivity.[3] Results of this study demonstrate the potential for heating in near-boiling saturated Ca(OH)2 as a method of PrPSc inactivation with practical and safety advantages to the handling of the hydrolysate. However, confirmation of loss of infectivity requires bioassay or cell culture infectivity studies as loss of immunoreactivity in WB is not equivalent to loss of infectivity. Bioassay using inoculum treated with heating in saturated calcium hydroxide is currently underway. Because strain differences to some methods of inactivation have been demonstrated,[6] it may be necessary to pursue inactivation studies using material derived from cattle with BSE and cervids with CWD.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Leisa Mandell and Semakaleng Lebepe-Mazur for providing technical support to this project. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Virus and Prion Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service
(2)
Oceaneering Space Systems
(3)
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station

References

  1. Taylor DR, Hooper NM: The prion protein and lipid rafts (Review). Mol Membr Biol. 2006, 23 (1): 89-99. 10.1080/09687860500449994.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown P, Rau EH, Johnson BK, Bacote AE, Gibbs CJ, Gajdusek DC: New studies on the heat resistance of hamster-adapted scrapie agent: threshold survival after ashing at 600 degrees C suggests an inorganic template of replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (7): 3418-3421. 10.1073/pnas.050566797.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vadrot C, Darbord JC: Quantitative evaluation of prion inactivation comparing steam sterilization and chemical sterilants: proposed method for test standardization. J Hosp Infect. 2006, 64 (2): 143-148. 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fichet G, Comoy E, Duval C, Antloga K, Dehen C, Charbonnier A, McDonnell G, Brown P, Lasmezas CI, Deslys JP: Novel methods for disinfection of prion-contaminated medical devices. Lancet. 2004, 364 (9433): 521-526. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16810-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jackson GS, McKintosh E, Flechsig E, Prodromidou K, Hirsch P, Linehan J, Brandner S, Clarke AR, Weissmann C, Collinge J: An enzyme-detergent method for effective prion decontamination of surgical steel. J Gen Virol. 2005, 86 (Pt 3): 869-878. 10.1099/vir.0.80484-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Peretz D, Supattapone S, Giles K, Vergara J, Freyman Y, Lessard P, Safar JG, Glidden DV, McCulloch C, Nguyen HO, et al: Inactivation of prions by acidic sodium dodecyl sulfate. J Virol. 2006, 80 (1): 322-331. 10.1128/JVI.80.1.322-331.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kasermann F, Kempf C: Sodium hydroxide renders the prion protein PrPSc sensitive to proteinase K. J Gen Virol. 2003, 84 (Pt 11): 3173-3176. 10.1099/vir.0.19355-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown P, Meyer R, Cardone F, Pocchiari M: Ultra-high-pressure inactivation of prion infectivity in processed meat: a practical method to prevent human infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (10): 6093-6097. 10.1073/pnas.1031826100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tsiroulnikov K, Rezai H, Bonch-Osmolovskaya E, Nedkov P, Gousterova A, Cueff V, Godfroy A, Barbier G, Metro F, Chobert JM, et al: Hydrolysis of the amyloid prion protein and nonpathogenic meat and bone meal by anaerobic thermophilic prokaryotes and streptomyces subspecies. J Agric Food Chem. 2004, 52 (20): 6353-6360. 10.1021/jf0493324.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Murayama Y, Yoshioka M, Horii H, Takata M, Miura K, Shinagawa M: Specific detection of prion antigenic determinants retained in bovine meat and bone meal by flow microbead immunoassay. J Appl Microbiol. 2006, 101 (2): 369-376. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02944.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Solassol J, Arlotto M, Lehmann S: Detection of prion after decontamination procedures: comparative study of standard Western blot, filter retention and scrapie-cell assay. J Hosp Infect. 2004, 57 (2): 156-161. 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.03.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamir AN, Kunkle RA, Richt JA, Miller JM, Cutlip RC, Jenny AL: Experimental transmission of sheep scrapie by intracerebral and oral routes to genetically susceptible Suffolk sheep in the United States. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2005, 17 (1): 3-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardt M, Baron T, Groschup MH: A comparative study of immunohistochemical methods for detecting abnormal prion protein with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. J Comp Pathol. 2000, 122 (1): 43-53. 10.1053/jcpa.1999.0343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. O'Rourke KI, Baszler TV, Besser TE, Miller JM, Cutlip RC, Wells GA, Ryder SJ, Parish SM, Hamir AN, Cockett NE, et al: Preclinical diagnosis of scrapie by immunohistochemistry of third eyelid lymphoid tissue. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38 (9): 3254-3259.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Triantis J, Dennis MM, Salman MD, Gould DH: Effect of time and temperature on PrPCWD immunoreactivity as evidenced by Western blot. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007, 19 (4): 389-391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Richmond JY, McKinney RW, Centers for Disease Control (U.S.), National Institutes of Health (U.S.): Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories. 1999, Washington: U.S. G.P.O.: For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 4Google Scholar
  17. Taylor DM: Inactivation of transmissible degenerative encephalopathy agents: A review. Vet J. 2000, 159 (1): 10-17. 10.1053/tvjl.1999.0406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Greenlee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement