Caenorhabditis elegans: a model to monitor bacterial air quality
© Groboillot et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 26 July 2011
Accepted: 18 November 2011
Published: 18 November 2011
Low environmental air quality is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity and this question is now emerging as a main concern of governmental authorities. Airborne pollution results from the combination of chemicals, fine particles, and micro-organisms quantitatively or qualitatively dangerous for health or for the environment. Increasing regulations and limitations for outdoor air quality have been decreed in regards to chemicals and particles contrary to micro-organisms. Indeed, pertinent and reliable tests to evaluate this biohazard are scarce. In this work, our purpose was to evaluate the Caenorhaditis elegans killing test, a model considered as an equivalent to the mouse acute toxicity test in pharmaceutical industry, in order to monitor air bacterial quality.
The present study investigates the bacterial population in dust clouds generated during crop ship loading in harbor installations (Rouen harbor, Normandy, France). With a biocollector, airborne bacteria were impacted onto the surface of agar medium. After incubation, a replicate of the colonies on a fresh agar medium was done using a velvet. All the replicated colonies were pooled creating the "Total Air Sample". Meanwhile, all the colonies on the original plate were isolated. Among which, five representative bacterial strains were chosen. The virulence of these representatives was compared to that of the "Total Air Sample" using the Caenorhaditis elegans killing test. The survival kinetic of nematodes fed with the "Total Air Sample" is consistent with the kinetics obtained using the five different representatives strains.
Bacterial air quality can now be monitored in a one shot test using the Caenorhaditis elegans killing test.
The deep impact on health from chemical pollutants  is now a main concern of governmental policies in most countries. As well as airborne nanoparticles and chemicals , airborne bacterial and fungal contaminants are also of major importance in human health [3, 4]. These micro-organisms may lead to typical respiratory tract infections but also to delayed sensitization (allergic) reactions somehow considered as the "epidemy of the 21st century" . Some of these micro-organisms simply originate from the environment but human activities are also important sources of aerial biological contaminants . It would be particularly interesting to develop a microbial air quality alert system equivalent to that for chemical pollutants. Microbial air quality is commonly evaluated by measuring the global concentration in the air of bacteria and fungi by culture-dependant or bio-molecular methods . High microbial concentrations in the air are generally associated to potential danger. The search for endotoxins has been developed . The composition of microbial communities is often assessed by molecular methods [8, 9] and pathogen species have been also detected by PCR with specific probes . Studying airborne bacterial and fungal communities in land [4, 9], urban [11–13], and occupational  environments now allows an almost complete description of environmental air micro-organisms biodiversity. However, the identification of microbial species and strain is not sufficient to extrapolate at the sanitary risk level, as many different parameters may affect virulence. Indeed, both contact mediated and toxin dependent virulence are regulated by environmental conditions including temperature , bacteriophages  and of course microbial communication factors . Sometimes bacterial strains are generally considered safe and devoid of pathogenic potential and, however, induce clinical infections [18, 19]. Determining the real risk associated to airborne micro-organisms first requires collecting a maximum amount of micro-organisms in conditions which avoid the stress or even the destruction of the most sensitive micro-organisms which are usually the most metabolically active . The identification of the composition of this population should be realized in a second step but the essential point is to evaluate the virulence of the complex community. This requires a cheaper and more rapid test than classical animal assays but also less sensitive than in vitro cytotoxicity tests. In the present study, the chosen model was the Caenorhabditis elegans worm. It is a versatile metazoan model previously used to assess of the virulence of many human pathogens [21, 22], and especially to study primary respiratory chain dysfunction in humans . Spontaneous predation and ingestion of bacteria provoke nematode death by contact dependent bacterial virulence and by the bacterial secretion of toxins [21, 22]. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the risk linked to airborne bacteria in the dust cloud generated during crop ship loading in harbor installations located in close proximity of residential areas. After collection of the total microbial population, bacteria were identified by traditional phenotypic and molecular techniques. The virulence of some individual representatives chosen among the collected bacteria was compared using the nematode C. elegans. to that of the pooled replicated bacterial population defined as "Total Air Sample".
Aerial bacteria collection
Bacteria were collected in January 2009 at the dockside of Rouen harbour (Normandy, France) during loading from crop silo onto ship from stocking silo. All operations were done in the morning. Samples were obtained by aspiration of 30, 60, 90, or 190 L (under a flow rate 100 L.min-1) in the dust cloud of particles generated by crop transfer using an AirTest Omega Biocollector (LCB, France). In this device, air is drawn in through a 0.5 mm grid to remove macroscopic particles and the air flow is directed towards the impact medium where micro-organisms are trapped. In order to limit the stress on bacteria, a semi-solid impact medium, Tryptipcase Soy Agar (TSA), was made with Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) diluted 1:5 containing agar (10 g.L-1 ) and amphotericin B (25 mg.L-1) as a fungicide.
Bacterial characterization and identification
Each isolated bacterial strain was initially characterized by morphological observation (colony aspect, cell shape, motility, endospore), Gram staining and biochemical tests (oxidase, catalase and oxidative metabolism). These observations allowed different bacterial groups to be defined. In each group including potential pathogens, one representative strain was chosen and submitted to further characterization on API tests galleries. API kits were operated according to the manufacturer's instructions (BioMérieux, France). For Gram-positive bacteria, API 50CH was used for the identification of Bacillus, API ID STAPH 32 for identification of germs of the genus Staphylococcus or Microccocus and API Coryne for Gram-positive catalase-positive non-sporing rods. For Gram-negative bacteria, API 20E was used for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and API 20NE for non fermenting rods. Species identification of representative strains was confirmed by 16S RNA sequencing. For amplification of the complete 16S RNA gene, universal primers UNI_OL (5¢-AGAGTGTA GCGGTGAAATGCG-3¢,) and UNI_OR (5¢-ACGGGCGGTGTGTACAA-3¢,) were used as suggested by Sauer et al. . Amplicons were then purified through migration on agarose gel and sequenced directly by using the amplification primers UNI_OL and UNI_OR (Qiagen, Germany). Afterwards 16S RNA fragments (+/- 750 pb) were analyzed (Qiagen, Germany) and homologies with sequences of other eubacteria were determined by searching the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sutils/genom_table.cgi) and RDP (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/seqmatch/seqmatch_intro.jsp) data banks using BLAST software. An isolate was positively identified when the full-length 16S RNA gene yielded a >98.3% sequence similarity with the closest bacterial species registered in the data banks.
Evaluation of bacterial virulence using the Caenorhabditis elegans killing tests
The virulence of the airborne bacterial population, i.e. the "Total Air Samples", was compared to that of individual representatives of bacterial strains collected in the air using the slow killing tests on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, accordingly Figure 1.
Experiments were conducted using the wild-type Bristol strain N2 of C. elegans provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Worms were maintained under standard culturing conditions at 22°C on nematode growth medium (NGM) containing 3 g NaCl, 2.5 g peptone, 17 g agar, 5 mg cholesterol, 1 mL 1 M CaCl2, 1 mL 1 M MgSO4, 25 mL 1 M KH2PO4, H2O for 1 L of medium. This medium was plated on Petri dishes and Escherichia coli OP50 as added as a normal food source . For virulence tests, synchronized worms of the same development level were obtained by bleaching an adult population using sodium hypochlorite/sodium hydroxide solution . The resulting eggs were incubated at 22°C on E. coli OP50 lawns until the worms reached the L4 life stage (48 h). The stage of development was confirmed by microscopic observation.
For bacterial virulence assays, "Total Air Samples" or individual air strain aliquots standardized by dilution (at OD580 = 1) were prepared by spreading 100 μL on 35 mm Petri dishes containing NGM supplemented with 0.05 mg.mL-1 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUDR), a eukaryote DNA synthesis inhibitor preventing C. elegans egg offspring during the experiments. Plates were incubated overnight at 29°C and then transferred at room temperature for 4 h. In each Petri dish a mean of 20 L4 synchronized worms, harvested in M9 solution (3 g KH2PO4, 6 g NaHPO4, 5 g NaCl, 1 mL 1 M MgSO4, H2O in 1 L) were layered. Plates were incubated at 22°C and worm survival was scored every 24 h throughout a 22 days period using an Axiovert S100 optical microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a Nikon digital Camera DXM 1200F (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY, USA). A worm was considered dead when it remained static without grinder movements for 20 s. Results are expressed as percentage of worms surviving every day and were calculated as the mean of 3 independent assays in which each point was the average of 3 replicates. Nematode survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences were tested for significance using the log-rank test (GraphPad Prism version 4.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA).
Results and Discussion
Identification of airborne bacteria in the dust cloud generated by crop transfer
Plates obtained with 30 L air presented a sufficient number of colonies which remained well separated. In cultures obtained with higher air volumes, bacterial colonies were too numerous for correct isolation.
Airborne bacterial composition in the dust cloud resulting from crop transfer
Next to crops ship loading winter 2009
30°C on 1:5 diluted TSA plate
Morphological characters, Gram staining and biochemical tests were carried out for the 323 bacterial strains. These orientation tests allowed to distribute the bacterial population in 8 groups, i.e. Gram-negative oxidase-negative strictly aerobic rods such as Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas... (Group 1), Gram-negative oxidase-positive facultatively anaerobic rods such as Aeromonas... (Group 2), Gram-negative oxydase-negative facultatively anaerobic rods mainly Enterobacteriaceae (Group 3), Gram-negative oxidase-positive strictly aerobic rods like Pseudomonas...(Group 4), Gram-positive sporing rods such as Bacillus...(Group 5), Gram-positive catalase-positive nonsporing rods such as Arthrobacter... (Group 6), Gram-positive catalase-positive strictly aerobic cocci such as Micrococcus... (Group 7), Gram-positive catalase-positive facultatively anaerobic cocci such as Staphylococcus... (Group 8). No Gram-positive catalase-negative were found. Gram-negative rods accounted for the greatest part of the bacterial population (72.4%) with the following distribution: 39.9% for Group 3, 17.6% for Group 1, 10.8% for Group 4 and 4.0% for Group 2. Concerning Gram-positive bacteria, the predominant group corresponded to Group 6 (11.1%) followed by Group 5 (5.3%), Group 7 (3.7%), and Group 8 (2.8%). The bacterial composition, characterized by a predominance of Gram-negative bacilli, appeared unchanged compared to a similar study . This observation is logical with regards to the nature of the material at the origin of the particles (crops). The main bacterial group, i.e. Enterobacteriaceae, Group 3, (39.9%), corresponds to bacterial species frequently associated with plants, and behave as epiphyte, endophyte or even pathogens . These bacteria colonize crops during field growth, survive and even proliferate during storage and then are present in the dust cloud . The second group of bacteria in quantity is Group 1, represented by P. syringae, a germ present in the phyllosphere and generally adapted to growth at low temperature . Catalase-positive non sporulated Gram-positive rods, Group 6, representing 11.1% of bacteria in the dust cloud, should correspond to bacteria of the genus Corynebacteria, Rhodococcus or Arthrobacter also usually present in the ground and already detected in urban air  and during crop manipulations .
Identification by API galleries and 16S RNA sequencing of the five representatives: P. syringae, S. marcescens, Brevundimonas, B. cereus, and S. aureus
16S RNA identification
Pseudomonas luteola (G)
Serratia liquefaciens (VG)
Bacillus cereus (Exc)
Bacillus thuringiensis, B. cereus, or B. anthracis
Staphylococcus sciuru (Exc)
The discrepancies between identification results, especially at the species level, could be explained by the incomplete covering of clinical API galleries for the identification of environmental bacteria. This imprecision could also result from the 16S RNA strategy of identification, especially when it is applied over a large diversity of environmental bacteria whose compilation is not complete in data bases such as NCBI/PUBMED.
Comparison of population and bacterial virulence using the Caenorhabditis elegans killing test
This study deals with the impact of bacteria present in outdoor air on human health. A robust and practical experimental model was therefore needed in relation to respiratory diseases resulting from bacterial infection. The nematode C elegans model is known to model mammalian bacterial pathogenesis  and especially in human respiratory dysfunction .
Surprisingly, two strains: Brevundimonas sp., and S. aureus appeared less virulent than E. Coli OP50 (P < 0.0001 log-rank test). Even if S. aureus is accepted as usually pathogen and Brevundimonas considered as an opportunistic pathogen, we have to keep in mind that the bacterial virulence depends on the strains and is closely related to the bacterial adaptation to its microenvironment. But from the random selection of the representatives, no strain is known as strictly human pathogen. Also, according C. elegans test, no sanitary threat appeared because all representative strains were less virulent than the standard opportunistic pathogen P. aeruginosa PAO1. As isolation of all the bacterial spots on the impacted plate is rather fastidious work and complex populations should have virulence which differs from individual strains. Another approach is to test the virulence of the "global" impacted bacterial population against C. elegans, as shown in Figure 1. This was done with the bacterial mix, defined as "Total Air Sample". As with the representatives, virulence against nematodes was studied for the "Total Air Sample", corresponding to the bacterial population collected during crop loading on ships (plotted in Figure 2). The kinetics of the survival of worms with "Total Air Samples" was surrounded by most of the representative plots and was significantly different from that of P. aeruginosa PAO1 (P < 0.0001 log-rank test). Moreover, within the first 11 days of the study, the percentage of death of the worm population was greater using "Total Air Samples" than the avirulent standard E. coli OP50. This difference vanished afterwards and in both cases all worms were dead between 17 and 19 days.
Thence, any environmental sample with the help of a biocollector makes the assessment of the bacterial sanitary risk possible. After incubation of the softed impacted TSA plates, the total and cultivable bacterial population collected can directly feed the C. elegans nematode model, whose latest death shows the good quality and bacterial safety of the sample environment.
This study establishes that the outdoor air quality can be evaluated with the help of C. elegans nematodes alternative model for bacterial virulence aspects, even with high concentrations of airborne bacteria. Without the fastidious microbiological labor (isolation and bacterial identification), air quality can be monitored easily with a one-shot virulence test of the collected bacterial population obtained from a TSA plate impacted by outdoor air.
This study was supported by grants from Grand Evreux Agglomération, AFSSET, and FEDER "Pseudomonas Virulence".
We wish to thank Olivier Maillot and Magalie Barreau for technical assistance. We thank Dr Vlad S. Barbu (LMRS, 6085 CNRS, University of Rouen) for help with the nematode statistics and data analysis. We wish to thank Christine Farmer for linguistic insight for this manuscript.
- Laumbach RJ: Outdoor air pollutants and patient health. Am Fam Physician. 2010, 81: 175-180.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Morawska L, Wang H, Ristovski Z, Jayaratne ER, Johnson G, Cheung HC, Ling X, He C: JEM spotlight: Environmental monitoring of airborne nanoparticles. Environ Monit. 2009, 11: 1758-1773. 10.1039/b912589m.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Douwes J, Thorne P, Pearce N, Heederik D: Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003, 47: 187-200. 10.1093/annhyg/meg032.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bugajny A, Knopkiewicz M, Piotraszewska-Pająk A, Sekulska-Stryjakowska M, Stach A, Filipiak M: On the Microbiological Quality of the Outdoor Air in Poznań, Poland. Polish J Environ Studies. 2005, 14: 287-293.Google Scholar
- D'Amato G, Liccardi G, Russo M, D'Amato M: On the interrelationship between outdoor air pollution and respiratory allergy. Aerobiologia. 2000, 16: 1-6. 10.1023/A:1007608510653.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lai K, Emberlin J, Colbeck I: Outdoor environments and human pathogens in air. Environ Health. 2009, 8: s15-10.1186/1476-069X-8-S1-S15.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fang Z, Ouyang ZY, Zheng H, Wang X, Hu L: Culturable airborne bacteria in outdoor environments in Beijing, China. Microb Ecol. 2007, 54: 487-496. 10.1007/s00248-007-9216-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fierer N, Liu Z, Rodríguez-Hernández M, Knight R, Henn M, Hernandez MT: Short-term temporal variability in airborne bacterial and fungal populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 200-207. 10.1128/AEM.01467-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maron PA, Lejon DPH, Carvahlo H, Bizet K, Ranjard L, Mougel C: Assessing genetic structure and diversity of airborne bacterial communities by DNA fingerprinting and 16S rDNA clone library. Atmosph Environ. 2005, 39: 3687-3695. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.03.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Létourneau V, Nehmé B, Mériaux A, Massé D, Cormier Y, Duchaine C: Human pathogens and tetracycline-resistant bacteria in bioaerosols of swine confinement buildings and in nasal flora of hog producers. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2010, 213: 444-449. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.09.008.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhu H, Phelan PE, Duan T, Raupp GB, Fernando HJS, Che F: Characterizations and relationships between outdoor and indoor bioaerosols in an office building. Aerobiologia. 2003, 19: 201-211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gonçalves FL, Bauer H, Cardoso MR, Pukinskas S, Matos D, Melhem M, Puxbaum H: Indoor and outdoor atmospheric fungal spores in the São Paulo metropolitan area (Brazil): species and numeric concentrations. Int J Biometeorol. 2010, 54: 347-355. 10.1007/s00484-009-0284-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee SH, Lee HJ, Kim SJ, Lee HM, Kang H, Kim YP: Identification of airborne bacterial and fungal community structures in an urban area by T-RFLP analysis and quantitative real-time PCR. Sci Total Environ. 2010, 408: 1349-1357. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.061.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grisoli P, Rodolfi M, Villani S, Grignani E, Cottica D, Berri A, Picco AM, Dacarro C: Assessment of airborne microorganism contamination in an industrial area characterized by an open composting facility and a wastewater treatment plant. Environ Res. 2009, 109: 135-142. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.11.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Picot L, Chevalier S, Abdelmoula S, Merieau A, Guerillon J, Leroux P, Cazin L, Orange N, Feuilloley MGJ: Regulation of the cytotoxic effects of Pseudomonas fluorescens by growth temperature. Res Microbiol. 2004, 155: 39-46. 10.1016/j.resmic.2003.09.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Casas V, Magbanua J, Sobrepeña G, Kelley ST, Maloy SR: Reservoir of bacterial exotoxin genes in the environment. Int J Microbiol. 2010, 754368:Google Scholar
- Antunes LC, Ferreira RB, Buckner MM, Finlay BB: Quorum sensing in bacterial virulence. Microbiology. 2010, 156: 2271-2282. 10.1099/mic.0.038794-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chapalain A, Rossignol G, Lesouhaitier O, Merieau A, Gruffaz C, Guerillon J, Meyer JM, Orange N, Feuilloley MG: Comparative study of 7 fluorescent pseudomonad clinical isolates. Can J Microbiol. 2008, 54 (1): 19-27. 10.1139/W07-110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mondello P, Ferrari L, Carnevale G: Nosocomial Brevundimonas vesicularis meningitis. Infez Med. 2006, 14: 235-237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barer MR, Harwood CR: Bacterial viability and culturability. Adv Microb Physiol. 1999, 41: 93-137.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darby C: Interactions with microbial pathogens. WormBook. Edited by: The C. elegans Research Community, WormBook. 2005, [http://www.wormbook.org]Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Díez B, Sánchez P, Baquero F, Martínez JL, Navas A: Differential interactions within the Caenorhabditis elegans-Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis model. J Theor Biol. 2003, 225 (4): 469-476. 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00288-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rea SL, Graham BH, Nakamaru-Ogiso E, Kar A, Falk MJ: Bacteria, yeast, worms, and flies: exploiting simple model organisms to investigate human mitochondrial diseases. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2010, 16: 200-218. 10.1002/ddrr.114.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sauer P, Gallo J, Kesselova M, Kolař M, Koukalova D: Universal primers for detection of common bacterial pathogens causing prothetic joint infection. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005, 149: 285-288.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stiernagle T: Maintenance of C. elegans. In C elegans. A practical approach. Edited by: Hope IA. 1999, Oxford. Oxford University Press, 51-67.Google Scholar
- Clark RP, de Calcina-Goff ML: Some aspects of the airborne transmission of infection. J R Soc Interface. 2009, 6: 767-782. 10.1098/rsif.2009.0236.focus.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Swan JR, Crook B: Airborne microorganisms associated with grain handling. Ann Agric Environ Med. 1998, 5: 7-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holden N, Pritchard L, Toth I: Colonization outwith the colon: plants as an alternative environmental reservoir for human pathogenic enterobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009, 33: 689-703. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00153.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gora A, Skorska C, Sitkowska J, Prazmo Z, Krysinska-Traczyk E, Urbanowicz B, Dutkiewicz J: Exposure of hop growers to bioaerosols. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004, 11: 129-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirano SS, Upper CD: Bacteria in the leaf ecosystem with emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae-a pathogen, ice nucleus, and epiphyte. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000, 64: 624-53. 10.1128/MMBR.64.3.624-653.2000.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ballestriero F, Thomas T, Burke C, Egan S, Kjelleberg S: Identification of compounds with bioactivity against the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans by a screen based on the functional genomics of the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata D2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76: 5710-5717. 10.1128/AEM.00695-10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clifton IJ, Peckham DG: Defining routes of airborne transmission of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2010, 4: 519-529. 10.1586/ers.10.42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.