Eating lizards: a millenary habit evidenced by Paleoparasitology
© Sianto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 March 2012
Accepted: 1 October 2012
Published: 25 October 2012
Analyses of coprolites have contributed to the knowledge of diet as well as infectious diseases in ancient populations. Results of paleoparasitological studies showed that prehistoric groups were exposed to spurious and zoonotic parasites, especially food-related. Here we report the findings of a paleoparasitological study carried out in remote regions of Brazil’s Northeast.
Eggs of Pharyngodonidae (Nematoda, Oxyuroidea), a family of parasites of lizards and amphibians, were found in four human coprolites collected from three archaeological sites. In one of these, lizard scales were also found.
Through the finding of eggs of Pharyngodonidae in human coprolites and reptile
scales in one of these, we have provided evidence that humans have consumed reptiles at least 10,000 years ago. This food habit persists to modern times in remote regions of Brazil’s Northeast. Although Pharyngodonidae species are not known to infect humans, the consumption of raw or undercooked meat from lizards and other reptiles may have led to transmission of a wide range of zoonotic agents to humans in the past.
KeywordsPaleoparasitology Coprolite Helminths Lizard Zoonosis
As in modern times, diet varied among prehistoric human groups and small animals, including lizards and other reptiles, were important food sources for prehistoric people[1, 2]. Analyses of human coprolites demonstrate this dietary diversity. Coprolites also contain intestinal parasites transmitted by contaminated food or water, including zoonotic helminths. Moreover, spurious parasites can also be found in human coprolites and continue to occur, especially in current groups with traditional food habits. By spurious, we mean parasite eggs that are not infective to humans and pass harmlessly through the human intestinal tract. Parapharyngodon sceleratus Chatterji, 1933 (Oxyuroidea: Pharyngodonidae) eggs were recorded in lizard coprolites (Tropidurus torquatus, Squamata, Tropiduridae) dating from 9,000 to 11,000 years. The diagnosis was based on egg morphology and metric parameters in comparison with published checklists. The parasite is known to commonly occur in several lizard and amphibian species of the American continent[6–10].
The first coprolite was collected in the archaeological layer dated to 10,640 ± 80 years before present (BP) and located in the site known as Toca dos Coqueiros (Archaeological Area of São Raimundo Nonato). Two other samples were collected in the site of Toca da Baixa dos Caboclos (Archaeological Area of São Raimundo Nonato) from two human burials dated respectively 525 to 315 (Beta 136209) and 530 to 440 (Beta 136208) cal years BP.
A fourth coprolite was collected in the archaeological site of Furna do Estrago (Pernambuco state), which is located in an area of upland forests, a mesic enclave, representing a true "oasis" in a semiarid region. The coprolite was found in a human burial dated between 1860 ± 50 (Beta 145954) and 1610 ± 70 (Beta 145955) years BP.
A careful analysis of food remains was carried out. All coprolites showed macroscopic and microscopic remains consistent with those expected for a typical human diet, such as seeds, plant fibers, cooked starch grains, phytoliths, charcoal remains, and pollen grains. These latter were identified as belonging to the families Chenopodiaceae, Malvaceae and Convolvulaceae. Some species in these families are known for their medicinal properties and have traditionally been used, even up to the present day, to treat inflammation, abscesses, intestinal disorders, and parasites[24, 25].
Hunter-gatherers groups in different parts of the world consume freshly killed animals or living animals for their subsistence, including reptiles. The biological risks associated with consumption of reptile meat has been reviewed by Magnino et al. and includes diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, intestinal helminths and other parasites. Forty-six species of lizards are reported in the Brazilian Caatinga, including large species such as Iguana iguana and Tupinambis merianae and many others of medium and small size[27, 28]. They represent an important biomass and a food source available for human groups. The consumption of lizards is a relatively common practice in parts of Brazilian northeast semi-arid region, especially during periods of prolonged drought, when the population is forced to search alternative food resources. Today, in this study area, children and young people capture small lizards for complementary feeding of families. Anthropologically, this suggests that prehistoric people in the semiarid region of Brazil used small animals as food source similarly to hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists in North America, as discussed by Reinhard et al. and Sutton and Reinhard. It is noteworthy that in some areas of Brazil, this strategy is still used currently.
Results of the present analysis of human coprolites bring further data about spurious parasitism and food habits in prehistoric populations. We found eggs of reptilian parasites and lizard remains in human coprolites dating from 10,000 years ago to colonial times. This shows that the habit of eating lizards, still persistent in the current local population, had ancient origins in the Brazilian semiarid region. Moreover, although species of parasites belonging to the Pharyngodonidae family are not known to infect humans, it is possible that the consumption of lizard meat led to the risk of human infection by a wide variety of zoonotic agents in the past.
Coprolites were sent to our laboratory by the team of archaeologists from Fundação Museu do Homem Americano (which also provided estimated dates) and from Universidade Católica de Pernambuco- UNICAP; we received financial support from the Brazilian agencies CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) and FAPERJ (Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro).
- Reinhard K, Ambler JR, Szuter CR: Hunter-gatherer use of small animal food resources as evidenced in coprolite analysis. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2007, 17: 416-428. 10.1002/oa.883.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sobolik K: Paleonutrition: the diet and health of prehistoric Americans. 1994, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional PaperGoogle Scholar
- Sianto L, Chame M, Silva CSP, Gonçalves MLC, Reinhard K, Fugassa M, Araújo A: Animal helminths in human archaeological remains: a review of zoonoses in the past. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2009, 51: 119-130. 10.1590/S0036-46652009000300001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho-Costa FA, Silva AG, de Souza AH, Moreira CJ, de Souza DL, Valverde JG, Jaeger LH, Martins PP, de Meneses VF, Araujo A, Boia MN: Pseudoparasitism by Calodium hepaticum (syn. Capillaria hepatica; Hepaticola hepatica) in the Negro River, Brazilian Amazon. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009, 103: 1071-1073. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.04.015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Araújo A, Ferreira LF, Confalonieri U: A contribution to the study of helminth findings in archaeological material in Brazil. Rev Bras Biol. 1981, 41: 873-881.Google Scholar
- Barus V: Some remarks on the neotropical species of the genera Parapharyngodon and Batracholandros (Oxyuridae). Folia Parasitol. 1973, 20: 131-139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vicente JJ, Rodrigues HO, Gomes DC, Pinto RM: Nematóides do Brasil. Parte III. Nematóides de répteis. Rev Bras Biol. 1993, 10: 19-168.Google Scholar
- Ávila R, Silva R: Checklist of helminths from lizards and amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2010, 16: 543-572. 10.1590/S1678-91992010000400005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luque L, Martins A, Tavares L: Community structure of metazoan parasites of the yellow Cururu toad, Bufo ictericus (Anura, Bufonidae) from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Acta Parasitol. 2005, 50: 215-220.Google Scholar
- Walton A: Notes on amphibians parasites. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash. 1940, 7: 87-91.Google Scholar
- Chame M: Terrestrial mammal feces: A morphometric summary and description. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003, 98: 71-98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Martin G: Pré-história do Nordeste do Brasil. 2008, Recife: Editora Universitária UFPE, 4Google Scholar
- Callen E, Cameron TWM: A prehistoric diet revealed in coprolites. New Sci. 1960, 8: 35-40.Google Scholar
- Araújo A, Reinhard K, Bastos OM, Costa LC, Pirmez C, Iñiguez A, Vicente AC, Morel CM, Ferreira LF: Paleoparasitology: perspectives with new techniques. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1998, 40: 371-376.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carvalho OA, Queiroz AN, Moraes FAA: Diagnóstico diferencial entre fatores tafonômicos, anomalias de desenvolvimento e casos patológicos nos crânios exumados do Sítio Furna do Estrago, Brejo da Madre de Deus, Pernambuco, Brasil. Canindé. 2007, 10: 27-49.Google Scholar
- Yamaguti S: Systema helminthum. 1963, New York: Interscience PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Sloss MW, Kemp RL: Veterinary clinial parasitology. 1978, Iowa: Iowa State University PressGoogle Scholar
- Garcia LS: Practical guide to Diagnostic Parasitology. 2009, Washington, D.C.: ASM PressGoogle Scholar
- Saehoog P, Wongsawad C: Helminths in house lizards (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1997, 28: 184-189.Google Scholar
- Araújo A, Confalonieri U, Ferreira LF: Oxyurid infestations in small animals from 9.000 BP in Brazil. Paleopathology Newsletter. 1980, 31: 13-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Araújo A, Ferreira LF, Confalonieri U: Oxyurid (Nematoda) egg from coprolites from Brazil. J Parasitol. 1982, 68: 511-512. 10.2307/3280974.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rataj AV, Lindtner-Knific R, Vlahović K, Mavri U, Dovč A: Parasites in pet reptiles. Acta Vet Scand. 2011, 53: 33-10.1186/1751-0147-53-33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ávila RW, Silva RJ: Checklist of helminths from lizards and amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 2010, 16: 543-572. 10.1590/S1678-91992010000400005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costa M, Tavares E: Anatomia foliar de Chenopodium ambrosioides L. (Chenopodiaceae) –erva-de-Santa Maria. Rev Bras Pl Med. 2006, 8: 63-71.Google Scholar
- Mauseth J: Plant Anatomy. 1988, Menlo Park: Benjamin/CummingsGoogle Scholar
- Magnino S, Colin P, Dei-Cas E, Madsen M, McLauchlin J, Nockler K, Maradona MP, Tsigarida E, Vanopdenbosch E, Van Peteghem C: Biological risks associated with consumption of reptile products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009, 134: 163-175. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.07.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigues M: Fauna de anfíbios e répteis da caatinga. Biodiversidade da Caatinga: áreas e ações prioritárias para conservação. Edited by: Silva J, Tabrelli M, Fonseca M, Lins L, Brasília DF. 2004, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco: Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 175-179.Google Scholar
- Rodrigues M: The conservation of brazilian reptiles: challenges for a megadiversity country. Conserv Biol. 2005, 19: 659-664. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00690.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maciel M: Cultura e alimentação ou o que têm a ver os macaquinhos de Koshima com brillat-savarin?. Horiz Antropol. 2001, 16: 145-156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sutton M, Reinhard K: Cluster analysis of the coprolites from Antelope House: implications for Anasazi diet and cousine. J Archaeol Sci. 1995, 22: 741-750. 10.1016/0305-4403(95)90004-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Johnson KL, Reinhard KJ, Sianto L, Araújo A, Gardner SL, Janovy J: A tick from a prehistoric Arizona coprolite. J Parasitol. 2008, 94: 296-298. 10.1645/GE-1059.1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fry GF: Analysis of prehistoric coprolites from Utah. 1977, Salt Lake City: University of Utah PressGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.