Leaks can dramatically decrease FiO2 on home ventilators: a bench study
© Goutorbe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 May 2013
Accepted: 18 July 2013
Published: 21 July 2013
Long term oxygen therapy improves survival in hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Because pressure support ventilation with a home care ventilator is largely unsupervised, there is considerable risk of leakage occurring, which could affect delivered FiO2. We have therefore conducted a bench study in order to measure the effect of different levels of O2 supply and degrees of leakage on delivered FiO2. Ventilator tested: Legendair® (Airox™, Pau, France). Thirty-six measures were performed in each four ventilators with zero, 5 and 10 l.min-1 leakage and 1,2,4 and 8 l O2 flow.
FiO2 decreased significantly with 5 l.min-1 leakage for all O2 flow rates, and with 10 l.min-1 at 4 and 8 l.min-1 O2.
During application of NIV on home ventilators, leakage can dramatically decrease inspired FiO2 making it less effective. It is important to know the FiO2 dispensed when NIV is used for COPD at home. We would encourage industry to develop methods for FiO2 regulation Chronic use of NIV for COPD with controlled FiO2 or SpO2 requires further studys.
KeywordsNIV Leaks Home ventilation COPD FiO2
Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) improves survival in hypoxemic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [1, 2]. The minimum recommended duration of O2 therapy is 15 hours per day. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is now recommended for acute on chronic COPD respiratory distress, whereas its chronic use is more controversial [3, 4]. Nocturnal non-invasive ventilation (NIV) improves quality of life and blood gas status, with fewer intensive care admissions, although survival is not affected [5, 6]. Most home care ventilators deliver pressure support via a turbine and a constant normobaric O2 supply [7, 8]. The O2 source is liquid O2 or from extractors. We hypothesized that, whereas ICU ventilators deliver the set Fi02 (hyperbaric 02 witch permits variable O2 supply), with pressure support NIV, leakage around the mask could influence the received FiO2. Indeed leaks are well compensated by modern’s home ventilators by delivering higher flows, using an additional volume taken from the room air. Under constant O2 supply FiO2 should decrease. We therefore analysed the variation of delivered FiO2 in pressure support ventilation with a home care ventilator under different levels of O2 supply and leakage in a bench study.
Material and method
Experimental bench study
A Legendair® (Airox™, Pau, France) ventilator was set to give pressure support ventilation (PSV) with an expiratory pressure (PE) of 5 cmH2O and inspiratoty pressure (PI) of 15 cmH2O. A standard single circuit with valve was used to connect the ventilator with the test chamber. In place of the mask we used a ‘leaks valve’, which could allow 0, 5 or 10 l.min-1 leakage. The level of leakage was calibrated during a continuous airway pressure 10 cmH2O, with two pneumotachographs one before and one after the valve (Fleisch 6V, Lausanne, Switzerland). Signals were digitized by an analogic/digital system (MP150, Biopac Systems, Goleta, CA) with modules (DA 100V 1000z, Biopac System). The O2 supply was set on the ventilator and flow was measured by a FlowAnalyser PF-300 (Imtmedical, Switzerland).
The Kruskal-Walis test was used to compare all variables and the post hoc Steel test if significance was found. All data are presented as group median [25–75]. Statistical analysis was performed with JMP 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Comparison of FiO2 according leakages and oxygen supply
Leakage (liters per minute)
n = 12
n = 12
n = 12
24.2 [23.7 - 24.4]
23.6 [23.2 - 23.9]*
25.1 [23.8 - 25.1]
28.6 [28.5 - 28.8]
27.0 [26.1 - 27.6]*
29.3 [27.4 - 29.6]
39.0 [38.0 - 40.0]
34.0 [33.0 - 34.6]†
36.6 [34.5 - 38.0]*
70.4 [67.5 - 71.9]
53.1 [51.2 - 54.0]†
49.5 [47.1 - 51.6]†
The bench study confirms our hypothesis in six cases of eight; FiO2 decreases with all O2 flows with 5 liters per minute leaks and with 4 and 8 liters O2 supply with 10 liters per minute of leaks. We are not able to explain why in several conditions FiO2 increased with 10 liters per minute of leaks. We assume that it would be possible venturi effect with increased O2 flow but this one was continuously measured by a FlowAnalyser PF-300 (Imtmedical, Switzerland) and it was constant.
The Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial (NOTT) and the Medical Research Council study, using similar inclusion criteria, demonstrated the beneficial effects of LTOT on survival in subjects with COPD and severe resting hypoxemia. The median survival in those using O2 for 15 hours/day was approximately twice that of those receiving no O2 [1, 2]. The use NIV in acute exacerbation of COPD is now recommended. Two RCTs of long term NIV for respiratory failure failed to demonstrate any effect on mortality, although quality of life was improved and there were fewer hospital admissions. SPO2 at home was not reported [5, 6].
Although some studies show no improvement in mortality [5, 6, 11], the physiological basis for NIV is clear; it relaxes the inspiratory muscles. External PEEP should counteract intrinsic PEEP , and VA/Q ratios may be improved . However, leakage caused by movement of the mask is common. Opening the mouth, and poor fit to the face associated with weight loss, leads to leakage, especially at night . Fortunately, many home ventilators now have well-developed software to detect and compensate for leaks from room air, and can compensate for leakage of about 30 l.min-1. Nevertheless, leaks can decrease the delivered FiO2 because the O2 supply is constant, as demonstrated here. NIV failure to improve surviving in chronic COPD may be due to this.
There are no studies of the delivered FiO2 in NIV, the value of which is increased by oxygen supplementation with home ventilators. Thys and Schwartz showed the influence of site oxygen delivery on FiO2 [16, 17]. Although in several home ventilators using a liquid O2 source or an O2 extractor, FiO2 can be monitored but it is not possible to set. Unfortunately regulation of FiO2 with home ventilators is not yet available. Our study is the first to focus on the affect of leakage on FiO2 during NIV with home ventilators, although such effects have been previously shown with ICU ventilators . In several conditions FiO2 can vary by up to 30%. With the O2 supply of 8 l.min-1 we found a decrease in FiO2 from 70 to 50% with a leakage of 10 l.min-1.
NIV offers an excellent treatment for chronic respiratory insufficiency, but in the home there is no control of leaks or measurement of SPO2. In a recent meta-analyse Chen et al. point out that with an inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) greater or equal than 14 cmH2O the PaO2 decreased ; increasing of leaks with high airway pressure should explain that. With increasing leakage, FiO2 decreases, and hypoxemia ensues leading to an increase of minute respiratory intake which in turn results in aspirating room air; if the O2 supply is constant then FiO2 decreases again leading a vicious circle of hypoxemia. This may explain the poor results of treating respiratory failure with NIV in the home.
The O2 supply can be triggered by the patient’s SpO2 or the ventilator FiO2. The former is more relevant clinically; the latter is more easily measured. The cost of measuring FiO2 is about 1000 Euros; SpO2 is less expensive but the measurement is subject to artefacts.
The design (bench test) limits the impact of the findings. On the over hand we underestimated the leaks, which could reach 30 liters per minute; the FiO2 decrease may be greater in clinical conditions.
We purpose to adjunct and O2 turbine witch should adjust O2 flow supply to a SpO2 objective.
New home NIV chronic use in COPD study’s should be conducted with this O2 flow control.
We propose to add a dedicated O2 turbine allowing automated O2 flow adjustment in order to achieve a predefined SpO2.
Thereafter, studies will be mandatory to evaluate effects of this automated O2 flow supply on COPD prognosis.
This lung model study demonstrates that during application of NIV on home ventilators, leakage can dramatically decrease FiO2 making it less effective. As consequence, it is essential to know the FiO2 dispensed during NIV at home. Further research should explore the role of the O2 flow control during application of NIV in chronic hypercapnic COPD patients.
We hope that industry can address the problems we have highlighted in this study.
Chronicle obstructive pulmonary disease
Inspired fraction of oxygen
Inspiratory positive airway pressure
Long term oxygen therapy
Non invasive ventilation
Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial
Positive end expiratory pressure
Ratio: ventilation perfusion ratio.
- Continuous or Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy in Hypoxemic Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [Internet] annals.org. 2012, 2012 [cited 2012 Feb 8]. Available from: http://www.annals.org/content/93/3/391.abstract?sid=79927bd3-e7f2-4273-baab-19b98e3d4991
- Council M: Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema: Report of the Medical Research Council Working Party. Lancet. 1981, 1 (8222): 681-686.Google Scholar
- Rossi A: Noninvasive ventilation has not been shown to be ineffective in stable COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000, 161 (3 Pt 1): 688-689.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hill NS: Noninvasive ventilation has been shown to be ineffective in stable COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000, 161 (3): 689-691. 10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.16135b.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Casanova C, Celli BR, Tost L, Soriano E, Abreu J, Velasco V, et al: Long-term controlled trial of nocturnal nasal positive pressure ventilation in patients with severe COPD. Chest. 2000, 118 (6): 1582-1590. 10.1378/chest.118.6.1582.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clini E, Sturani C, Rossi A, Viaggi S, Corrado A, Donner CF, Ambrosino N, Rehabilitation and Chronic Care Study Group: The italian multicentre study on noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases patients. Eur Respir J. 2002, 20 (3): 529-38. 10.1183/09031936.02.02162001. Erratum in: Eur Respir J. 2002 Dec;20(6):1617PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cuvelier A, Molano LC, Muir JF: Domiciliary ventilation in patients with COPD. Rev Mal Respir. 2005, 22 (4): 615-33. 10.1016/S0761-8425(05)85614-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lloyd-Owen SJ, Donaldson GC, Ambrosino N, Escarabill J, Farre R, Fauroux B, et al: Patterns of home mechanical ventilation use in Europe: results from the Eurovent survey. Eur Respir J. 2005, 25 (6): 1025-1031. 10.1183/09031936.05.00066704.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tassaux D, Strasser S, Fonseca S, Dalmas E, Jolliet P: Comparative bench study of triggering, pressurization, and cycling between the home ventilator VPAP II and three ICU ventilators. Intensive Care Med. 2002, 28 (9): 1254-1261. 10.1007/s00134-002-1421-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Richard J-C, Carlucci A, Breton L, Langlais N, Jaber S, Maggiore S, et al: Bench testing of pressure support ventilation with three different generations of ventilators. Intensive Care Med. 2002, 28 (8): 1049-1057. 10.1007/s00134-002-1311-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kolodziej MA, Jensen L, Rowe B, Sin D: Systematic review of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in severe stable COPD. Eur Respir J. 2007, 30 (2): 293-306. 10.1183/09031936.00145106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diaz O, Begin P, Torrealba B, Jover E, Lisboa C: Effects of noninvasive ventilation on lung hyperinflation in stable hypercapnic COPD. Eur Respir J Eur Respiratory Soc. 2002, 20 (6): 1490-1498.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robert D, Argaud L: Clinical review: long-term noninvasive ventilation. Crit Care. 2007, 11 (2): 210-10.1186/cc5714.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mehta S, Hill NS: Noninvasive ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med Am Thoracic Soc. 2001, 163 (2): 540-10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9906116.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Battisti A: Performance Characteristics of 10 Home Mechanical Ventilators in Pressure-Support Mode: A Comparative Bench Study. Chest. 2005, 27 (5): 1784-1792.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz AR, Kacmarek RM, Hess DR: Factors affecting oxygen delivery with bi-level positive airway pressure. Respir Care. 2004, 49 (3): 270-275.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thys F, Liistro G, Dozin O, Marion E, Rodenstein DO: Determinants of Fi, O2 with oxygen supplementation during noninvasive two-level positive pressure ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2002, 19 (4): 653-657. 10.1183/09031936.02.00263102.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miyoshi E: Effects of Gas Leak on Triggering Function, Humidification, and Inspiratory Oxygen Fraction During Noninvasive Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation. Chest. 2005, 128 (5): 3691-3698. 10.1378/chest.128.5.3691.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Liang B-M, Xu Z-B, Tang Y-J, Wang K, Xiao J, et al: Long-term non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J. 2011, 124 (23): 4063-4070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.