We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly. Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Endoscopically assisted laparoscopic local resection of gastric tumor

  • Christoforos Kosmidis1Email author,
  • Christoforos Efthimiadis1,
  • Georgios Anthimidis1,
  • Kalliopi Vasileiadou1,
  • Thomas Stavrakis2,
  • Georgia Ioannidou3 and
  • Georgios Basdanis1, 3
BMC Research Notes20136:410

DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-410

Received: 29 September 2012

Accepted: 6 September 2013

Published: 12 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive procedures have been applied in treatment of gastric submucosal tumors. Currently, combined laparoscopic - endoscopic rendezvous resection (CLERR) emerges as a new technique which further reduces operative invasiveness.

Case presentation

A-57-year-old female patient presented with epigastric pain. She was submitted to gastroscopy, which revealed a tumor located at the angle of His. Biopsy specimens demonstrated a leiomyoma. The patient underwent endoscopically assisted laparoscopic resection of the tumor. The operative time was 45 minutes. Diagnosis of leiomyoma was confirmed by the final histopathological examination. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged on the 2nd postoperative day.

Conclusion

Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic rendezvous resection appears as a promising alternative minimally invasive technique. It offers easy recognition of the tumor, regardless of location, safe dissection, and full thickness resection with adequate margins as well as less operative time.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Endoscopic Rendezvous Tumor Gastric Resection

Background

Minimally invasive surgery has become the gold standard in numerous procedures, including those associated with gastric disease. Laparoscopic approach has been applied in resection of gastric submucosal tumors. Still, combined laparoscopic - endoscopic rendezvous resection (CLERR) presents currently as a groundbreaking technique of gastric tumor resection.

We present herein a case of endoscopically assisted laparoscopic resection of a gastric intraluminal leiomyoma.

Case presentation

A-57-year-old female patient presented with epigastric pain. She was submitted to gastroscopy, which showed a tumor located at the angle of His. Biopsy specimens demonstrated the benign nature of the tumor, identifying it as leiomyoma. The patient underwent endoscopically assisted laparoscopic resection of the tumor along the lesser curvature, with adequate resection margins (2 cm) (Figures 1a, 1b). The operative time was 45 minutes. Diagnosis of leiomyoma was confirmed by the final histopathological examination. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged on the 2nd postoperative day.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-6-410/MediaObjects/13104_2012_Article_3546_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figures 1

a,b. Specimen of the tumor mass.

Operative technique

Under general anesthesia, the patient was placed in supine position. Both endoscopic and laparoscopic monitors were arranged near the head of the patient so that the surgeon could watch both of them. The first trocar was inserted in the midline, one third of the distance from the umbilicus to the xiphoid process, using the Hasson technique, for insertion of a laparoscopic 300 camera. Then, four trocars were inserted, one in each abdominal quadrant, as shown in Figure 2. The lesion had been marked preoperatively by endoscopic tattooing with India ink. The exact position of the tumor was constantly localized intraoperatively via endoscopic transillumination. The tumor was grasped with an atraumatic grasper, dissected and excised within adequate margins using Endo GIA stapler (Figures 3, 4). Careful hemostasis was carried out and the specimen was retrieved in a laparoscopically inserted endobag extractor (Figure 5).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-6-410/MediaObjects/13104_2012_Article_3546_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Trocar placement.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-6-410/MediaObjects/13104_2012_Article_3546_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Lift of the lesion with an atraumatic grasper.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-6-410/MediaObjects/13104_2012_Article_3546_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Excision of the lesion using Endo GIA stapler.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-0500-6-410/MediaObjects/13104_2012_Article_3546_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Retrieval of the specimen with a laparoscopically inserted endobag extractor.

Conclusions

Combined laparoscopic - endoscopic rendezvous resection is a new treatment method for gastric submucosal tumors. Yet, careful patient selection, accurate preooperative diagnosis and operative strategy are required. Parameters taken into account should include size and histological type of the tumor, depth of gastric wall invasion and expansion.

Specifically, small (diameter 1–2 cm) locally limited, benign gastric mucosal tumors may be considered for CLERR. Additionally, this method is indicated for certain premalignant tumors and small locally limited submucosal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). In fact, GISTs usually present as local gastric tumors without any infiltration of regional lymph nodes and consequently CLERR is clearly indicated in this respect [1]–[3].

On the other hand, CLERR is absolutely contraindicated for locally advanced and metastatic tumors, which should be managed using an open method [1, 2]. For that reason preoperative evaluation using endoscopic ultrasound, transabdominal ultrasound and/or computed tomography scan is necessary [4]–[8].

Although endoscopic mucosa resection is nowadays quite acceptable for the treatment of early gastric cancer [6, 9]–[12], CLERR emerges as an approach with the same or even more satisfactory results [6, 13]–[15]. Nevertheless, these results can not be evaluated yet due to limited number of series.

Nevertheless, endoscopy appears to be valuable in guiding laparoscopic gastric resection. The gastric tumor is marked preoperatively using endoscopic tattooing and the exact position of the tumor is constantly localized intraoperatively via endoscopic transillumination. Finally surgical removal is confirmed by the endoscopist.

In general, CLERR offers the common advantages of minimally invasive approach (less pain, less inflammatory response, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, less hospital charges, better quality of life) along with easier recognition and dissection of the tumor, regardless of its location, ensuring less operative time and complete haemostasis. It renders full thickness resection with adequate margins leading to therapy or at least a reliable histologic analysis which may guide further therapeutic decisions [5, 15, 16].

In conclusion, combined laparoscopic and endoscopic rendezvous resection appears to be a quite promising method with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. In any case, careful patient selection, correct preoperative diagnosis and appropriate operative planning are required.

Consent

“Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal”.

Abbreviations

CLERR: 

Combined laparoscopic - endoscopic rendezvous resection

GISTs: 

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Interbalkan European Medical Center
(2)
Department of Obstetrics, Interbalkan European Medical Center
(3)
Department of Radiology, “Agios Pavlos” General Hospital

References

  1. Adrales GL, Gandsas A, Mastrangelo MJ, et al: An introduction to laparoscopic gastric resection. Curr Surg. 2003, 60: 385-389. 10.1016/S0149-7944(03)00088-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Avital S, Brasesco O, Szomstein S, et al: Technical considerations in laparoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms. Surg Endosc. 2003, 17: 763-765. 10.1007/s00464-002-8585-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim CJ, Day S, Yeh KA: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: analysis of clinical and pathologic factors. Am Surg. 2001, 67: 135-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wakelin SJ, Deans C, Crofts TJ, et al: A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2002, 41: 161-167. 10.1016/S0720-048X(01)00418-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gurbuz AT, Peetz ME: Resection of a gastric leiomyoma using combined laparoscopic and gastroscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 1997, 11: 285-286. 10.1007/s004649900346.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hiki Y, Sakuramoto S, Katada N, et al: Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic procedure in stomach carcinoma. Chirurg. 2000, 71: 1193-1201. 10.1007/s001040051202.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hillemanns M, Hofler H: Current classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Chirurg. 2000, 71: 1327-1334. 10.1007/s001040051222.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Verreet PR, Clausing TA, Schoepp C: Principles of surgical management of stromal tumor. Chirurg. 2000, 71: 1335-1344. 10.1007/s001040051223.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tanabe S, Koizumi W, Mitomi H, et al: Clinical outcome of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy for early stage gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002, 56: 708-713. 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70121-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Miyamoto S, Muto M, Hamamoto Y, et al: A new technique for endoscopic mucosal resection with an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife improves the completeness of resection of intramucosal gastric neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002, 55: 576-581. 10.1067/mge.2002.122579.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K, et al: Success rate of curative endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision assisted by submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002, 56: 507-512. 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70434-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al: Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001, 48: 225-229. 10.1136/gut.48.2.225.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kobayashi T, Kazui T, Kimura T: Surgical local resection for early gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003, 13: 299-303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Seto Y, Yamaguchi H, Shimoyama S, et al: Results of local resection with regional lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2001, 182: 498-501. 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00747-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Otani Y, Ohgami M, Igarashi N, et al: Laparoscopic wedge resection of gastric submucosal tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000, 10: 19-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Siewert R: Operation, intervention, rendezvous maneuver. Chirurg. 2000, 71: 1191-1192.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kosmidis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement