Table 5 Base substitutions
From: Empirical assessment of sequencing errors for high throughput pyrosequencing data
Newbler | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
A | C | G | T | |
A | 0 (0%) | 74588 (11.2%) | 63823 (9.58%) | 92787 (13.93%) |
C | 26505 (3.98%) | 0 (0%) | 49970 (7.5%) | 41064 (6.17%) |
G | 23442 (3.52%) | 48670 (7.31%) | 0 (0%) | 51326 (7.71%) |
T | 53587 (8.05%) | 72148 (10.83%) | 68059 (10.22%) | 0 (%) |
Total substitutions: 665,969 | ||||
Celera | ||||
A | C | G | T | |
A | 0 (0%) | 314368 (9.48%) | 298435 (9%) | 454647 (13.71%) |
C | 215248 (6.49%) | 0 (0%) | 155494 (4.69%) | 220471 (6.65%) |
G | 214762 (6.48%) | 155015 (4.67%) | 0 (0%) | 214063 (6.46%) |
T | 449989 (13.57%) | 310634 (9.37%) | 312819 (9.43%) | 0 (0%) |
Total substitutions: 3,315,945 | ||||