Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies assessing the size of social networks including friendship networks

From: Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review

No.

Study description authors’ name, year, country

Sample with psychosis

Diagnostic criteria

Participants and Setting

Social network size assessment

Minimum frequency of contact and/or timescale

Type of social relationships considered

Network components reported

1

Angermeyer and Klusmann, 1987, Germany [55]

30

RDC

Recently discharged patients in community

Interview schedule for the assessment of social relationships

Once in the past week

Family, other patients and professional helpers

2

Becker et al., 1998, United Kingdom (UK) [47]

129

ICD-10

Patients in community

Social network achedule, SNS [35]

Once in the previous month

All relationships

Relatives, friends, and other contactsa

3

Cohen and Sokolovsky, 1978, United States (USA) [31]

32

Clinical assessment

Patients in community residences

Semi-structured “Network Profile Questionnaire”

Once per month in a preceeding 12 months

Exclusively formal contacts excluded (i.e.with psychiatrists and social workers)

Kin and non-kin

4

Cohen and Kochanowicz, 1989, USA [52]

47

DSM-III

Psychiatric clinic outpatients

Modified network analysis profile, NAP [30, 31]

Once in previous 3 month once in 12 months for important persons

All relationships

Kin, non-kin and formal sector

5

Cohen et al., 1996, USA [64]

117

DSM-III-R

Patients in community residences and psychiatric clinic outpatients

Network analysis profile, NAP [30, 31]

Notable interactionb within the past 3 months for non-kin; within 12 months for kin

All relationships

Formal and informal sectorc

6

Dozier et al., 1987, USA [65]

18

DSM-III

Outpatients of the intervention programme for young adults

Study specific semi-structured questionnaire

Once in the past 2 weeks

All important persons except hospital staff and other patients

7

Estroff et al., 1994, USA [48]

81

N/A

Inpatients and

patients in community

Study specific semi-structured questionnaire

All relationships

Relatives, friends and mental health professionals

8

Famiyuwa and Olatokunbo, 1984, Nigeria [43]

85

Feighner criteria

Outpatients of community based counseling service

Study specific semi-structured questionnaire

Twice per week

On-going relationships with family and co-workers

Family and co-workers

9

Hamilton et al., 1989, USA [56]

39

DSM-III

Outpatients of mental health clinic for veterans

Modified Pattison psychosocial kinship inventory, PPKI [36, 37]

Subjectivelly important relationships

Kin and non-kin

10

Harley et al., 2012, UK [13]

137

DSM-IV

Patients in community

Study specific semi-structured questionnaire

Once per week over the past 3 months

Friends defined as non kin, non-services providers with evidence of shared interests and activities

Friends only

11

Hernando et al., 2002, Spain [58]

32

DSM-III-R

Outpatients in mental health day centres

Study specific semi-structured questionnaire

All relationships

Professionals and othersd

12

Horan et al., 2006, USA [54]

89

DSM-III-R and

RDC

Inpatients

Study specific semi-structured questionnaire based on Hammer [41] and Randolph [42]

12 months

Frequent or important relationships except those with treatment providers and persons of less than 10 years of age

Patient is in conatc or close to,but less than 10-year-old and treatment providers

Kin

13

Kauranen et al., 2000, Finland [50]

29

DSM-III-R

Inpatients and outpatients

Klefbeck’s social network map [38]

_

All current relationships

Family, friends, co-workers and formal sector

14

Lipton et al., 1981, USA [45]

30

RDC

Inpatients

Modified network analysis profile, NAP [30, 31]

Once in the past year

All relationships

Kin, non –kin and formal sector

15

Meeks and Hammond, 2001, USA [57]

120

RDC

Patients in community

Modified network analysis profile, NAP [30, 31]

Once in the past 3 months for non-kin; once per year for kin and service providers if important

Persons known by name in kin, non-kin and service sector

Kin, non-kin and service sector

17

Pessoa Moreno Macedo et al., 2013, Brazil [49]

17

ICD-10

Outpatients in community based services

Semi-structured questionnaires based on Sluzki [40]

Family, friends, community and work/study sector

16

Pernice-Duca, 2008, USA [44]

103

DSM-IV

Patients in community participating in clubhouse programmes

Social network analysis approach by McCallister and Fischer [32, 33]

Important relationships

Family, friends, professionals, clubhouse staff and peers

18

Sawicka et al., 2013, Poland [46]

105

ICD-10

Patients in community using home care services

The map and the questionnaire of social support [39]

Individuals with whom patient is in contact

Persons in the same household, closest family, other relatives, colleagues, neighbours, other acquaintances, therapists, and other persons

19

Seidmann et al., 1987, USA [53]

15

DSM-III

2 years after 1st psychiatric hospitalisations

Modified network analysis profile, NAP [30, 31]

Once in the past 3 months

All individuals known by name

20

Sibitz et al., 2010, Austria [59]

157

ICD-10

Inpatients and day clinic care outpatients

A question about the number of friends

Friends based on self-defintion

Friends only

21

Thorup et al., 2007, Denmark [51]

578

ICD-10

Inpatients and

outpatients

Social network schedule, SNS [35]

Once in the past month

Friends based on self-defintion

Friends only

22

Tolsdorf, 1976, USA [66]

10

N/A

Inpatients

Study specific semi-structured questionnaire

Kin

23

Van Humbeeck et al., 2000, Belgium [67]

56

DSM-IV

Patients in supported living community residences

Modified social network scale by McCallister and Fischer [32, 33] and Fischer [34]

Important formal and informal persons

  1. aOther contacts: nonfriends such as acquaintances, shopkeepers, health or social or other service staff
  2. bExamples of notable interaction: a 15 min conversation; a material exchange such as goods or money, or social outing
  3. cInformal sector: kin, friends and acquaintances
  4. dFriends, acquintances, neighbours