Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlates of any type of IPV among FP clients at the AGBEF Clinic from March to June 2014, Conakry, Guinea (N = 232)

From: Prevalence and correlates of intimate partner violence among family planning clients in Conakry, Guinea

 

IPV positive

N (%)

Unadjusted

OR (95 % CI)

Adjusteda OR (95 % CI)

P-value

Total

232

232

232

 

Age, years

28.5 (7.9)

0.98 (0.92–1.03)

0.93 (0.82–1.05)

0.222

Marital status

0.954

 Married

86 (91.5)

1

1

 

 Not married

127 (92.0)

1.07 (0.41–2.78)

0.96 (0.23–3.92)

 

Woman’s level of education

 None

67 (91.8)

2.79 (0.82–9.49)

0.75 (0.06–9.02)

0.820

 Primary

51 (92.7)

3.19 (0.82–12.36)

1.59 (0.18–14.31)

0.681

 Secondary and vocational

71 (95.9)

5.92 (1.37–25.51)

8.44 (1.22–58.47)

0.031

 Higher

24 (80.0)

1

1

 

Woman’s occupation

 Housewife

20 (95.2)

3.26 (0.37–28.27)

12.92 (0.44–72.38)

0.139

 Workwoman

38 (95.0)

3.09 (0.60–15.80)

7.18 (0.51–100.21)

0.143

 Seller

80 (94.1)

2.60 (0.78–8.70)

9.69 (0.77–99.46)

0.078

 Employee

32 (88.9)

1.30 (0.35–4.83)

2.56 (0.36–18.33)

0.349

 Student

43 (86.0)

1

1

 

Residence

0.016

 Dixinn

111 (87.4)

1

1

 

 Other communes

102 (97.1)

4.90 (1.39–17.31)

5.60 (1.37–22.85)

 

Partner occupation

 Unemployed

32 (86.5)

1

1

0.291

 Workman

35 (92.1)

1.82 (0.40–8.25)

2.83 (0.41–19.50)

0.306

 Seller

71 (92.2)

1.85 (0.52–6.51)

2.33 (0.46–11.85)

0.269

 Employee

60 (93.8)

2.34 (0.59–9.34)

2.75 (0.46–16.64)

0.783

 Student

15 (93.8)

2.34 (0.25–21.86)

0.63 (0.02–16.28)

 

Partner’s level of education

 None

64 (94.1)

2.42 (0.61–9.64)

3.77 (0.57–24.68)

0.166

 Primary

33 (86.8)

1

1

0.859

 Secondary and vocational

70 (90.9)

1.51 (0.45–5.13)

0.87 (0.18–4.22)

0.105

 Higher

46 (93.9)

2.32 (0.52–10.41)

7.00 (0.67–73.74)

 

Number of live children

2.45 (1.8)

1.16 (0.87–1.55)

1.55 (0.85–2.85)

0.155

FP method adopted

 Injectable

166 (95.4)

4.86 (1.85–12.77)

4.54 (1.22–16.83)

0.024

 Non injectable

47 (81.0)

1

1

 

Duration of FP use (months)

6.9 (10.6)

1.04 (0.97–1.11)

1.08 (0.99–1.19)

0.093

  1. Hosmer–Lemeshow test for goodness-of-fit: chi2 (8 d.f.) = 7.64; p = 0.470
  2. Woman’s occupation and Partner’s occupation were not included in bivariate and multivariate analyses because of correlation with respectively woman and partner’s level of education
  3. OR odds ratios, CI confidence interval, IUD intra uterine device
  4. aMultivariate analysis adjusting for possible confounding factors