Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics over all the accessions

From: A method for genotyping elite breeding stocks of leaf chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) by assaying mapped microsatellite marker loci

 

General statistics

H-statistics

F-statistics

Line

nPl

%

I

SM

na

ne

Ho

He

Ha

Fis

Fst

P04

11

40.74

0.240

0.968

1.407

1.301

0.144

0.177

0.186

0.189

0.693

P31

18

66.67

0.429

0.925

1.741

1.573

0.291

0.313

0.186

0.070

0.457

P33

16

59.26

0.379

0.927

1.615

1.472

0.260

0.280

0.193

0.073

0.513

P11

11

40.74

0.279

0.950

1.423

1.379

0.234

0.212

0.193

−0.102

0.632

S02

8

29.63

0.210

0.976

1.346

1.281

0.130

0.156

0.189

0.167

0.729

S03

23

85.19

0.404

0.952

2.111

1.382

0.218

0.255

0.186

0.144

0.557

S31IS3.2

13

48.15

0.298

0.972

1.519

1.371

0.196

0.222

0.186

0.115

0.615

S31IS3.4

10

37.04

0.240

0.930

1.370

1.313

0.183

0.181

0.186

−0.013

0.686

S31S5.2

19

70.37

0.449

0.926

1.778

1.588

0.328

0.320

0.186

−0.024

0.444

S31S3

12

44.44

0.286

0.957

1.444

1.377

0.194

0.216

0.186

0.098

0.625

S31S5.1

20

74.07

0.477

0.961

2.000

1.585

0.284

0.351

0.186

0.190

0.391

Z22

10

37.04

0.202

0.966

1.407

1.229

0.130

0.142

0.186

0.087

0.753

Z23

16

59.26

0.389

0.949

1.741

1.503

0.301

0.278

0.186

−0.084

0.518

Z31

10

37.04

0.253

0.957

1.407

1.344

0.174

0.187

0.186

0.072

0.674

Z33

15

55.56

0.174

0.984

1.630

1.131

0.111

0.101

0.186

−0.104

0.825

Z34

7

25.93

0.160

0.989

1.259

1.215

0.111

0.120

0.186

0.073

0.792

U22

9

33.33

0.202

0.979

1.346

1.256

0.135

0.150

0.189

0.101

0.740

U24

13

48.15

0.304

0.945

1.519

1.409

0.199

0.224

0.186

0.112

0.611

QC03

18

66.67

0.455

0.941

1.692

1.608

0.307

0.344

0.193

0.108

0.402

QC31

7

25.93

0.199

0.971

1.385

1.274

0.164

0.136

0.193

−0.203

0.764

CS441

12

44.44

0.287

0.949

1.444

1.379

0.207

0.216

0.186

0.043

0.624

CS501

6

22.22

0.148

0.992

1.231

1.194

0.139

0.111

0.189

−0.260

0.808

SC24

5

18.52

0.129

0.971

1.192

1.177

0.125

0.098

0.193

−0.274

0.830

SE802

21

77.78

0.693

0.924

2.704

1.966

0.403

0.433

0.186

0.070

0.247

SE902

16

59.26

0.326

0.943

1.852

1.356

0.194

0.208

0.186

0.067

0.638

SE111S6

11

40.74

0.226

0.965

1.423

1.276

0.115

0.164

0.193

0.297

0.715

SEG111

5

18.52

0.139

1.000

1.200

1.200

0.200

0.200

0.194

0.000

0.652

SE111S7

8

29.63

0.222

0.990

1.423

1.295

0.202

0.155

0.193

−0.302

0.730

SE412

17

62.96

0.403

0.928

1.630

1.540

0.285

0.303

0.186

0.060

0.473

SE501

9

33.33

0.216

0.974

1.333

1.285

0.102

0.162

0.186

0.372

0.718

13

12

44.44

0.320

1.000

1.462

1.462

0.462

0.308

0.189

−0.500

0.465

11

8

29.63

0.213

1.000

1.308

1.308

0.308

0.205

0.189

−0.500

0.644

17

6

22.22

0.160

1.000

1.231

1.231

0.231

0.154

0.189

−0.501

0.733

49

11

40.74

0.293

1.000

1.423

1.423

0.423

0.282

0.189

−0.500

0.510

20

5

18.52

0.124

1.000

1.185

1.170

0.167

0.117

0.186

−0.421

0.796

38

6

22.22

0.149

1.000

1.222

1.207

0.204

0.142

0.186

−0.435

0.753

86

11

40.74

0.282

1.000

1.407

1.407

0.407

0.272

0.186

−0.500

0.528

  1. The number of polymorphic loci (nPl), their frequency presented as percentage (%) of polymorphic loci on a total of 27 assayed, estimates of Shannon’s information index of phenotypic diversity (I), the genetic similarity coefficient or simple matching coefficient (SM), the average number of observed alleles (na) and the effective number of alleles (ne), the observed heterozygosity (Ho), the expected heterozygosity computed using Levene (He), the average heterozygosity (Ha), Wright’s inbreeding coefficients Fis and Fit and the fixation index (Fst)