Table 4 Percentage of enriched participants for each direct comparison
Direct comparisons | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLB vs LIT | PLB vs VPA | PLB vs LTG | PLB vs IMP | PLB vs FLX | PLB LIT+IMP | PLB vs ARP | PLB vs OLZ | PLC vs QTP | PLB RisLAI | PLB vs PAL | LIT vs VPA | LIT vs CBZ | LIT vs LTG | LIT vs IMP | LIT vs LX | LIT vs LIT+IMP | LIT vs LIT+VPA | LIT vs LIT+OXC | LIT vs OLZ | LIT vs QTP | VPA vs LIT+VPA | VPA vs VPA+ARP | LTG vs VPA+LTG | LTG vs ARP+LTG | IMP vs LIT+IMP | OLZ vs RisLAl | |
Manic (%) | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | – | 0 | 100 | 58 | 42 | 72 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | – | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 41 | 100 |
Depression (%) | 0 | 0 | 79 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 0 | 100 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 46 | 0 |