Skip to main content

Table 2 Automated calculation of growth rates from different genome reduced C. glutamicum strains with comparison to literature

From: Automated growth rate determination in high-throughput microbioreactor systems

Strain

Growth rate [h−1]

Literature

This study (95% CI)

DM1933

0.32 ± 0.01

0.30 (0.29–0.30)

DM1933 ΔCGP1

0.30 ± 0.03

0.30 (0.29–0.31)

DM1933 ΔCGP2

0.31 ± 0.03

0.32 (0.31–0.32)

DM1933 ΔCGP3

0.31 ± 0.02

0.32 (0.31–0.32)

DM1933 ΔCGP123

0.33 ± 0.03

0.33 (0.32–0.34)

GRLP16

0.31 ± 0.02

0.35 (0.34–0.35)

GRLP23

0.33 ± 0.02

0.31 (0.30–0.32)

GRLP41

0.31 ± 0.01

0.29 (0.28–0.30)

GRLP42

0.36 ± 0.06

0.30 (0.29–0.31)

GRLP46

0.30 ± 0.04

0.32 (0.32–0.33)

GRS37

0.45 ± 0.03

0.51 (0.51–0.52)

GRS40

0.44 ± 0.03

0.50 (0.49–0.51)

GRS41

0.41 ± 0.04

0.47 (0.46–0.47)

GRS42

0.39 ± 0.01

0.47 (0.46–0.48)

GRS46

0.43 ± 0.03

0.50 (0.49–0.50)

GRS45

0.31 ± 0.02

0.34 (0.34–0.34)

GRS47

0.41 ± 0.03

0.48 (0.47–0.49)

GRS48

0.45 ± 0.01

0.49 (0.49–0.50)

GRS53

0.44 ± 0.03

0.47 (0.47–0.48)

MB001

0.43 ± 0.04

0.48 (0.47–0.48)

GRS16

0.44 ± 0.03

0.49 (0.48–0.50)

GRS23

0.46 ± 0.02

0.47 (0.47–0.48)

WTa

0.43 ± 0.04

0.46 (0.45–0.46)

0.46 (0.45–0.46)

  1. Data originates from a BioLector raw data set and results are compared to previously reported data collections [13, 14]
  2. Data from literature is given as mean ± standard deviation. Strain order corresponds to Additional file 2
  3. CI confidence interval
  4. aFor strain WT two data sets from growth duplicates were processed