Skip to main content

Table 2 Automated calculation of growth rates from different genome reduced C. glutamicum strains with comparison to literature

From: Automated growth rate determination in high-throughput microbioreactor systems

Strain Growth rate [h−1]
Literature This study (95% CI)
DM1933 0.32 ± 0.01 0.30 (0.29–0.30)
DM1933 ΔCGP1 0.30 ± 0.03 0.30 (0.29–0.31)
DM1933 ΔCGP2 0.31 ± 0.03 0.32 (0.31–0.32)
DM1933 ΔCGP3 0.31 ± 0.02 0.32 (0.31–0.32)
DM1933 ΔCGP123 0.33 ± 0.03 0.33 (0.32–0.34)
GRLP16 0.31 ± 0.02 0.35 (0.34–0.35)
GRLP23 0.33 ± 0.02 0.31 (0.30–0.32)
GRLP41 0.31 ± 0.01 0.29 (0.28–0.30)
GRLP42 0.36 ± 0.06 0.30 (0.29–0.31)
GRLP46 0.30 ± 0.04 0.32 (0.32–0.33)
GRS37 0.45 ± 0.03 0.51 (0.51–0.52)
GRS40 0.44 ± 0.03 0.50 (0.49–0.51)
GRS41 0.41 ± 0.04 0.47 (0.46–0.47)
GRS42 0.39 ± 0.01 0.47 (0.46–0.48)
GRS46 0.43 ± 0.03 0.50 (0.49–0.50)
GRS45 0.31 ± 0.02 0.34 (0.34–0.34)
GRS47 0.41 ± 0.03 0.48 (0.47–0.49)
GRS48 0.45 ± 0.01 0.49 (0.49–0.50)
GRS53 0.44 ± 0.03 0.47 (0.47–0.48)
MB001 0.43 ± 0.04 0.48 (0.47–0.48)
GRS16 0.44 ± 0.03 0.49 (0.48–0.50)
GRS23 0.46 ± 0.02 0.47 (0.47–0.48)
WTa 0.43 ± 0.04 0.46 (0.45–0.46)
0.46 (0.45–0.46)
  1. Data originates from a BioLector raw data set and results are compared to previously reported data collections [13, 14]
  2. Data from literature is given as mean ± standard deviation. Strain order corresponds to Additional file 2
  3. CI confidence interval
  4. aFor strain WT two data sets from growth duplicates were processed