Skip to main content

Table 2 Duck management and their possible access to antibiotic residues (n = 26)

From: Antibiotic susceptibilities of indicator bacteria Escherichia coli and Enterococci spp. isolated from ducks in Morogoro Municipality, Tanzania

Parameter assessed

Response category

Number (%)

Duck flock size

5–50

21 (80.8)

 

51–120

5 (19.2)

Duck management (feeding system)

Extensive

15 (57.7)

 

Intensive given maize bran and kitchen wastes

2 (7.7)

 

Both

9 (34.6)

Ducks scavenging areas

Around homestead areas and neighbouring households areas

21 (80.8)

 

Around homestead areas

5 (19.2)

Number of dumps the ducks access during scavenging

One dumping place

6 (23.1)

 

Two dumping places

9 (34.6)

 

Three dumping places

9 (34.6)

 

Four dumping places

2 (7.7)

Duck treatment

Yes

0 (0.0)

 

No

26 (100.0)

Keeping other animals apart from ducks

Yes

24 (92.3)

 

No

2 (7.7)

Treatment of other animals

Yes

13 (50.0)

 

No

13 (50.0)

Antibiotic used in treatment of other animals

Tetracycline/oxytetracyclines

4 (15.4)

 

Sulfonamides

3 (11.5)

 

Oxytetracyclines, sulfonamides, penicillin dihydrostreptomycin

2 (7.7)

 

Other antibiotic not known

4 (15.4)

 

No treatment

13 (50.0)

Commonly used antibiotics in humans

Tetracycline

4 (15.4)

 

Ampicillin

2 (7.7)

 

More than one antibiotic (tetracyclines, ampicillin, amoxicillin, sulphonamides)

8 (30.8)

 

Other antibiotic not known

12 (46.2)

Drug containers and unused medicine disposal system

Dump

13 (50.0)

 

Latrines

7 (26.9)

 

Burn

6 (23.1)