Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression table for thinness of Jimma zone, Ethiopia (JLFSY2005-2006) (N = 2084)

From: Does dietary diversity predict the nutritional status of adolescents in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia?

Variables

Nutritional status by underweight (thinness)

Category

Thinness

COR

95% (CI)

AOR

95% (CI)

P-value

Yes

No

Resident

Urban (ref)

122

610

 

1

 

1

 

Semi urban

174

494

0.6

(1.6, 2.8)b

1.2

(1.2, 2.1)

0.056

Rural

169

384

0.8

(1.3, 2.3)b

1.6

(1.3, 2.2)***

0.0001

Mother educational status

No education (ref

21

111

 

1

 

1

 

Primary education

72

263

3.7

(0.9, 4)a

0.9

(0.6, 1.2)

0.520

Secondary education

74

254

0.9

(0.5, 1.1)

1.8

(0.6, 1.3)

0.607

College and above

298

858

2.8

(0.3, 0.9)

0.6

(0.4, 1.1)

0.122

Household food insecurity

Secure (ref)

166

588

 

1

 

1

 

Insecure

299

900

3.8

(0.6, 1.1)b

1.8

(0.6, 0.8)*

0.015

Adolescent food insecurity

Secure (ref)

44

178

 

1

 

1

 

Insecure

421

1310

1.7

(0.5, 1.2)a

2.6

(0.4, 0.9)

0.132

Dietary diversity score.

Low (ref)

165

614

 

1

 

1

 

Medium

77

256

0.8

(0.9, 1.6)b

1.2

(0.9, 1.5)

0.535

High

223

618

0.6

(0.7, 1.5)

1.3

(1.4, 1.6)

0.265

High work load of adolescents

No (ref)

87

344

 

1

 

1

 

Yes

378

1144

2.7

(0.6, 0.9)a

2.6

(1.2, 3.1)***

0.0001

Cooking place

Sleeping room (ref)

301

1049

 

1

 

1

 

Kitchen connected to living room

69

186

2.7

(0.7, 1.4)

1.07

(0.7, 1.6)

0.638

Separate place

95

253

0.9

(0.6, 1.9)a

0.8

(0.5, 1.1)

0.226

  1. * Significant results 1-reference category. Statistical significant (*p < 0.05), highly significant (*** p ≤ 0.0001, ** p ≤ 0.001), * p ≤ 0.05b, p ≤ 0.25a