Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of means or medians between CA-125, FASN, GLS, CA-125 + FASN, CA-125 + GLS, and CA-125 + FASN + GLS serums levels for the suboptimal and optimal cytoreduction groups and cut off point, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each variable

From: The role of CA-125, GLS and FASN in predicting cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian cancers

Variable

Group

P value

Cut off point

Sensitivity

Spesificity

Accuracy rate

Positive predictive value

Negative predictive value

P value

Suboptimal cytoreduction

Optimal cytoreduction

N = 56

N = 53

CA-125

0.0001

248.55

73.2%

73.6%

73.3%

74.5%

72.2%

0.0001

 Mean ± Std

1157.62 ± 2105.195

237.52 ± 319.431

        

 Median

600.00

120.30

        

 Range (min–max)

4.29–9934.00

5.10–1941.90

        

FASN

0.006

0.445

62.5%

60.4%

61.4%

62.5%

60.4%

0.017

 Mean ± Std

0.58 ± 0.271

0.46 ± 0.288

        

 Median

0.50

0.37

        

 Range (min–max)

0.11–1.59

0.03–1.19

        

GLS

0.0001

22.895

73.2%

75.5%

74.3%

75.9%

72.7%

0.0001

 Mean ± Std

25.19 ± 5.415

20.83 ± 5.562

        

 Median

25.25

20.08

        

 Range (min–max)

14.27–37.50

10.81–38.01

        

Combination CA-125 + FASN

0.0001

0.69

71.4%

71.7%

71.6%

72.7%

70.4%

0.0001

 Mean ± Std

1.02 ± 0.581

0.55 ± 0.314

        

 Median

0.93

0.49

        

 Range (min–max)

0.21–3.18

0.03–1.58

        

Combinantion CA-125 + GLS

0.0001

29.16

82.1%

73.6%

77.9%

76.6%

79.6%

0.0001

 Mean ± Std

42.93 ± 12.913

25.83 ± 9.807

        

 Median

44.99

22.47

        

 Range (min–max)

17.15–75.00

10.81–53.52

        

Combination CA-125 + FASN + GLS

0.0001

0.83

87.5%

73.6%

80.7%

77.8%

84.8%

0.0001

 Mean ± Std

1.70 ± 0.967

0.66 ± 0.388

        

 Median

1.48

0.66

        

 Range (min–max)

0.22–4.68

0.03–2.16