Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of characteristics among types of hypertrigeliceridemic waste phenotype

From: Dietary inflammatory index (DII) may be associated with hypertriglyceridemia waist circumference phenotype in overweight and obese Iranian women: a cross sectional study

Variables

Hypertriglyceridemic waist circumference phenotypes

P value*

P value**

NWNT

N = 15

EWNT

N = 88

NWET

N = 14

EWET

N = 109

Age (year)

32.08 ± 8.08a,4

36.87 ± 9.78

36.20 ± 7.18

37.17 ± 8.661

0.06

0.17

PA (MET h/week)

682 ± 832.81

973.86 ± 1158.23

1972 ± 4117.85

1277.48 ± 2171

0.29

0.22

Blood parameters

 Insulin (µIU/mL)

1.21 ± 0.18

1.19 ± 0.234

1.37 ± 0.18

1.29 ± 0.242

0.01

0.01

 HOMA-IR

3.32 ± 1.354

3.09 ± 1.033,4

4.72 ± 1.322

4.14 ± 1.561,2

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 TC (mg/dL)

168.81 ± 26.56

188.05 ± 38.15

173.37 ± 29.49

187.70 ± 35.52

0.06

0.73

 HDL-C (mg/dL)

49.56 ± 10.71

45.75 ± 11.16

46.66 ± 11.51

46.74 ± 10.60

0.63

0.97

 LDL-C (mg/dL)

86.68 ± 18.82

94.70 ± 26.51

93.41 ± 20.33

97.10 ± 23.65

0.40

0.76

 TG (mg/dL)

93.32 ± 27.133,4

92.34 ± 27.793,4

189.00 ± 30.411,2

213.52 ± 49.521,2

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 SGOT (mg/dL)

17.62 ± 5.48

18.11 ± 7.72

16.29 ± 5.05

18.40 ± 8.41

0.67

0.63

 SGPT (mg/dL)

13.93 ± 6.24

20.22 ± 13.92

17.37 ± 8.01

20.09 ± 15.13

0.30

0.62

Body composition parameters

 Weight(cm)

65.88 ± 3.452,4

83.06 ± 11.681,3

65.44 ± 3.012,4

83.85 ± 11.641,3

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 Height(cm)

159.26 ± 4.84

161.78 ± 5.793

156.70 ± 4.792,4

161.55 ± 5.963

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 BMI (kg/m2)

25.96 ± 0.862,4

31.76 ± 4.131,3

26.72 ± 1.262,4

32.11 ± 4.121,3

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 SMM (kg)

22.08 ± 2.192,4

25.75 ± 3.141,3

22.48 ± 1.952,4

26.26 ± 3.521,3

 < 0.001

0.002

 FFM (kg)

40.81 ± 3.662,4

46.79 ± 5.091,3

41.44 ± 3.392,4

47.73 ± 5.931,3

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 WHR

0.86 ± 0.18

1.48 ± 6.98

0.86 ± 0.02

0.94 ± 0.04

0.68

 < 0.001

 WC (cm)

84.66 ± 2.162,3,4

101.74 ± 8.991,3

85.02 ± 1.852,4

101.60 ± 8.971,3

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Qualitative variables

 Economic status

  Poor

2 (5.0%)b

13 (32.5%)

2 (5.0%)

20 (57.5%)

0.18***

0.65

  Moderate

7 (7.8%)

33 (41.9%)

6 (6.6%)

47 (43.7%)

  Good

5 (5.8%)

27 (41.3%)

6 (7.1%)

38 (45.8%)

  Excellent

1 (5.0%)

15 (75.1%)

0 (0%)

4 (19.9%)

 Education status

  Illiterate

0 (0.0%)

1 (25.0%)

1 (25.0%)

4 (50.0%)

0.31

0.88

  Diploma

1 (2.0%)

17 (36.7%)

2 (4.1%)

31 (57.2%)

  University educated

14 (7.0%)

70 (43.3%)

11 (6.1%)

74 (43.6%)

 Marital status

  Single

5 (7.3%)

36 (52.3%)

3 (3.7%)

29 (36.7%)

0.05

0.47

  Married

10 (5.9%)

52 (38.5%)

11 (7.0%)

80 (48.6%)

 Familial obesity history

  Yes

7 (5.2%)

56 (39.7%)

9 (6.7%)

85 (48.4%)

0.17

0.92

  No

8 (9.3%)

32 (47.2%)

5 (5.5%)

24 (38%)

  1. Bold values indicate the significant range as a tabular foot
  2. NWNT normal waist normal triglyceride, EWNT enlarged waist normal triglyceride, NWET normal waist enlarged triglyceride, EWET enlarged waist enlarged triglyceride, PA physical activity, HOMA-IR Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance, TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG triglyceride, SGOT serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, SGPT Serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, BMI body mass index, SMM skeletal muscle mass, FFM fat free mass, WHR waist to hip ratio, WC waist circumference
  3. * P value resulted from ANOVA analysis
  4. ** P value reported after adjusting age, energy intake, BMI and physical activity with ANCOVA analysis
  5. *** P value resulted from chi-squared test analysis
  6. aMean ± SD
  7. bN(%), P value ≤ 0.05 is significant
Back to article page

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us