Skip to main content

Table 1 Effects of PEF process to reduce microbe contamination in milk

From: Microbial analysis and virulence genes detection of milk preserved using heat-assisted pulsed electric field

Producers

Process

TPC

MPN

Salmonella spp.

S. aureus

B. cereus

L. monocytogenes (qualitative)

(colony/ml)

Enterobacter

(qualitative)

 

(MPN/ml)

 

A

Raw milk

> 3 × 107

 > 110

V

4 × 105

2.7 × 103

Less than 1

 

Heating (60 °C)

4.7 × 102

 < 0.3

Less than 1

4.8 × 101

1.3 × 103

Less than 1

 

PEF

less than 1

 < 0.3

Less than 1

8.5

9.3 × 102

Less than 1

 

Cooling (50 oC)

7.1 × 101

< 0.3

Less than 1

5.1 × 101

2.6 × 103

Less than 1

B

Raw milk

2.5 × 107

12

V

 > 3 × 106

 < 100

Less than 1

 

Heating (74 °C)

2.6 × 103

< 0.3

Less than 1

6.3 × 101

4.5 × 102

Less than 1

 

PEF(50 kV, 10 s)

3.5 × 104

< 0.3

Less than 1

less than 1

5.8 × 102

Less than 1

 

Cooling (50 °C )

2.8 × 104

< 0.3

Less than 1

less than 1

7.2 × 101

Less than 1

C

Raw milk

2.3 × 106

> 110

Less than 1

2.8 × 103

less than 1

Less than 1

 

Heating (60 °C)

7.8 × 106

> 110

Less than 1

4.9 × 105

less than 1

Less than 1

 

PEF 1

3.5 × 105

> 110

Less than 1

2.5 × 105

less than 1

Less than 1

 

PEF 2 (55 °C)

1.5 × 105

> 110

Less than 1

2.4 × 103

less than 1

Less than 1

 

PEF 3 (60 °C)

4.6 × 103

2.3

Less than 1

2.1 × 102

Less than 1

Less than 1

 

Mixing (50 °C)

< 4

< 0.3

Less than 1

1.8 × 102

Less than 1

less than 1

D

Raw milk

> 3 × 107

> 110

V

3.4 × 105

Less than 1

Less than 1

 

Thermal Pasteurization (65–70 °C)

1.6 × 102

< 0.3

Less than 1

6.3 × 100

Less than 1

Less than 1

 

Cooling (room temperature)

2 × 102

3.5

Less than 1

Less than 1

Less than 1

Less than 1

E

UHT milk

Less than 1

Less than 1

Less than 1

less than 1

Less than 1

Less than 1

 

UHT milk

Less than 1

Less than 1

Less than 1

less than 1

Less than 1

Less than 1