Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of balance training frequency on measures of static and dynamic balance in adolescents

From: Effect of balance training on static and dynamic balance performance in male adolescents: role of training frequency

Measure

BT-2x/wk (n = 16)

BT-3x/wk (n = 16)

p-value (ηp2)

Pretest

Posttest

Pretest

Posttest

Group

Test

Group × Test

OLS

 OLS time; EC-FI [s]

38.4 ± 18.6

49.2 ± 18.7

24.5 ± 24.7

41.7 ± 22.3

0.103 (0.09)

0.001 (0.29)

0.426 (0.02)

 OLS time; EO-FO [s]

48.7 ± 18.7

60.0 ± 0.2

53.6 ± 14.0

56.8 ± 7.1

0.800 (0.01)

0.016 (0.18)

0.166 (0.06)

 OLS time; EC-FO [s]

4.7 ± 2.9

9.6 ± 12.6

4.7 ± 2.5

13.7 ± 15.9

0.446 (0.02)

0.008 (0.21)

0.401 (0.02)

YBT-LQ

 YBT-LQ: AT reach [% LL]

67.9 ± 5.4

70.3 ± 5.1

65.6 ± 4.8

69.5 ± 5.4

0.388 (0.03)

 < 0.001 (0.52)

0.175 (0.06)

 YBT-LQ: PM reach [% LL]

107.3 ± 4.1

111.9 ± 4.1

106.0 ± 5.0

112.7 ± 5.8

0.858 (0.01)

 < 0.001 (0.69)

0.134 (0.07)

 YBT-LQ: PL reach [% LL]

101.2 ± 7.1

108.1 ± 4.5

100.8 ± 7.1

106.8 ± 5.6

0.676 (0.01)

 < 0.001 (0.63)

0.595 (0.01)

 YBT-LQ: CS [% LL]

92.1 ± 3.9

96.8 ± 3.6

90.8 ± 4.4

96.3 ± 4.3

0.521 (0.01)

 < 0.001 (0.80)

0.349 (0.03)

  1. Data represent means ± standard deviations. Values are p-values and effect sizes (ηp2) in brackets with 0.02 ≤ ηp2 ≤ 0.12 indicating small, 0.13 ≤ ηp2 ≤ 0.25 indicating medium, and ηp2 ≥ 0.26 indicating large effects. AT anterior; CS composite score; EC eyes closed; EO eyes opened; FI firm ground; FO foam ground; LL leg length; OLS One-Legged Stance test; PL posterolateral; PM posteromedial; YBT-LQ Lower Quarter Y Balance test