- Open Access
Calculation of partial isotope incorporation into peptides measured by mass spectrometry
- Ingo Fetzer†1Email author,
- Nico Jehmlich†4,
- Carsten Vogt3,
- Hans-Hermann Richnow3,
- Jana Seifert2,
- Hauke Harms1,
- Martin von Bergen2 and
- Frank Schmidt2, 4
© Fetzer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 4 May 2010
Accepted: 24 June 2010
Published: 24 June 2010
Stable isotope probing (SIP) technique was developed to link function, structure and activity of microbial cultures metabolizing carbon and nitrogen containing substrates to synthesize their biomass. Currently, available methods are restricted solely to the estimation of fully saturated heavy stable isotope incorporation and convenient methods with sufficient accuracy are still missing. However in order to track carbon fluxes in microbial communities new methods are required that allow the calculation of partial incorporation into biomolecules.
In this study, we use the characteristics of the so-called 'half decimal place rule' (HDPR) in order to accurately calculate the partial13C incorporation in peptides from enzymatic digested proteins. Due to the clade-crossing universality of proteins within bacteria, any available high-resolution mass spectrometry generated dataset consisting of tryptically-digested peptides can be used as reference.
We used a freely available peptide mass dataset from Mycobacterium tuberculosis consisting of 315,579 entries. From this the error of estimated versus known heavy stable isotope incorporation from an increasing number of randomly drawn peptide sub-samples (100 times each; no repetition) was calculated. To acquire an estimated incorporation error of less than 5 atom %, about 100 peptide masses were needed. Finally, for testing the general applicability of our method, peptide masses of tryptically digested proteins from Pseudomonas putida ML2 grown on labeled substrate of various known concentrations were used and13C isotopic incorporation was successfully predicted. An easy-to-use script  was further developed to guide users through the calculation procedure for their own data series.
Our method is valuable for estimating13C incorporation into peptides/proteins accurately and with high sensitivity. Generally, our method holds promise for wider applications in qualitative and especially quantitative proteomics.
An important aspect of microbial ecology is to link specific microorganisms to microbially-driven processes in the natural environment . Indeed, these questions can be addressed with more accuracy by using isotopically labeled substrates to follow metabolic carbon flux within microbial cultures. Subsequently, the incorporation of the label into the biomass may be followed by analysis of either fatty acids , deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)  or ribonucleic acid (RNA) . Unfortunately, those techniques are limited in their ability to resolve low levels of isotopic labeling and their absolute incorporation. Essentially, the information about low level labeling as well as the assignment of distinct incorporation levels to various species is needed in order to understand the metabolic interdependencies within complex microbial communities.
One method of calculation is to compare12C and13C isotopologue distributions in one MS-spectrum and estimate13C incorporation by calculating the mass difference between the monoisotopic12C mass peak and the highest mass peak of the13C isotopologue. This procedure depends on a proper pre-fractionation, since the corresponding mass peaks can be rather difficult to identify. Alternative calculation methods are necessary to find the matching pairs at low incorporation levels .
Therefore, an improved method based on the comparison of theoretical and experimentally determined isotopic envelopes of peptides with known sequences was developed [11, 12]. However, both methods require a priori peptide identification to accurate determine the dynamic labeling of heavy stable isotopes. In order to reliable quantify partial13C incorporation into peptides, we developed a method based on the "half decimal place rule" (HDPR) (Figure 1C). Information about the dynamic incorporation levels in proteins from different microbial species can be used to elucidate the structure and function of the microbial community (Figure 1D). With this information, the carbon fluxes throughout the community may be followed and enables to deduce species interactions and activities (Figure 1E) [13, 14].
In this study, we describe a new and easy-to-apply algorithm for the determination of absolute heavy stable isotope incorporation (13C) into peptides/proteins by taking advantage of high-resolution MS data [15, 16], and the characteristic pattern arising from the decimal residuals of incorporated heavy stable carbon isotopes . Annotated sequence information for measured peptides is no longer necessary for the calculation of13C incorporation that is an important consideration when analyzing uncultivable or incompletely sequenced bacteria. Moreover, we provide an easy-to-apply script set written in the statistical programming language R , enabling scientific researchers to calculate13C incorporation into peptides/proteins.
In the past, mass spectrometers suffered from their low resolution and accuracy, restricting the possibility to predict chemical element contents based on the mass signals. Higher accuracy allows to create exact fitting curves describing the behavior of a mass signal as a function of both the mass and the e.g. sulfur content . With up-coming of high resolution MS devices, a linear relationship between tryptic peptide masses and the decimal residuals (=digits behind the mass' decimal point) has been firstly observed by Mann  (for additional references see [19, 21]). Closer investigation of this mass mapping phenomenon by Schmidt et al. , led to the definition of the linear relationship of tryptic peptides and the corresponding decimal places, the so-called "half decimal place rule" (HDRP).
This rule declares that the decimal place of a tryptic peptide is near the half of the first digit for tryptic peptides in the range of 500-1,000 Dalton (Da), near the half of the first two digits for the range of 1,000-1,999 Da and again near the half of the first digit for masses from 2,000-3,000 Da. The rule was found to be helpful for e.g. the detection of non-peptide contaminants in mass spectrometric measurements and the recalibration of peptide masses . Since only the digits behind the decimal point are necessary as information in order to identify some artifacts of tryptic peptides.
During the metabolic incorporation of13C amino acid precursors into proteins,13C atoms are gradually replaced12C atoms. This elemental substitution increases each peptide mass by exactly 1.003355 Da (= the difference between12C and13C atomic mass) per substituted carbon atom. In terms of decimal places for peptides, each incorporated heavy carbon atom result in a mass shift of exactly 0.003355 Da. Applying the HDRP to partly or fully labeled peptides, the linear relationship between peptide masses and their decimal places will result in an increase of the corresponding slope. The steepness of the slope increases in proportion with the amount of incorporated heavy stable isotopes. This effect can be used for the exact estimation of the amount of incorporation for any given set of measured peptide masses. The detection of these small mass shifts, however, requires highly accurate measurements. This is now possible with modern mass spectrometers such as a fourier transformation ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR), linear ion trap with an Orbitrap (LTQ-Orbitrap) or quadruple time-of-flight (Q-TOF) instrument.
Calculation of isotopic composition of peptides
Processing of reference dataset
Since proteogenic amino acids are universal within all bacterial species, any high-resolution dataset can be used for referencing the theoretical decimal place calculation (as reference data and for calibration). An existing tryptic peptide dataset of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv was used  that originally contained ~4,000 encoding genes of which 3,924 were identified as proteins . The complete FASTA protein dataset is freely available from the Sanger Institute . After a tryptic in-silico digest by MS-Digest , peptides between the mass range m/z 300-6,000 were considered for further analysis, resulting in 315,579 peptide fragment sequences. Further, we restricted the dataset to include only those tryptic peptides with a ChemScore ≥ 10 (ChemScore = sum of total free protein binding energy (for further details see [26–28]) and without missing cleavage sites or modifications. After this screening, the dataset was reduced to 90,637 remaining peptide sequences containing lengths between 2 and 40 amino acids. The monoisotopic mass of each sequence was calculated with given atomic masses of12C = 12.000000 Da,14N = 14.003074 Da,16O = 15.994915 Da,1H = 1.007825 Da,32S = 31.972071 Da to obtain the masses of 'light' (0 atom %13C incorporation) amino acids. Subsequently, by counting the numbers of carbons for each sequence and replacing the12C mass for the heavier13C (13.003355 Da), a dataset for the theoretical 100 atom %13C incorporation was obtained. The advantage of calculating the weight by counting C atom numbers is that the same procedure can be used to easily calculate a wide range of different13C incorporation levels.
Data classification and modification
Data plotting and linear slope estimation
with DR = decimal residual, PM = peptide mass, and n = number of peptide masses . Slopes for 0 atom % and 100 atom %13C incorporation were estimated with an accuracy of 6 decimal digits and served as references for partial13C incorporation calculation.
All methods described above are summarized as easy-to-follow R-scripts which can be run under the statistical platform R . 'Script 1' enables calculation of own reference dataset for 0% atom and 100% atom13C from any other protein mass dataset while reference slope calculation of can be done with help of 'Script 2'. Both scripts can be downloaded under .
Calculation of13C incorporation from practical mass spectrometric measurements
In order to estimate13C incorporation from experimentally derived datasets, processing occurred as described above. However, k-means clustering with very small datasets sometimes failed, because the algorithm required that at least one data point in each cluster to be present. In order to circumvent this difficulty, a set of dummy data containing one data point with values at the exact centers were added. Prior to13C incorporation calculation, those dummy points are removed again and, thus, have no influence on the following calculation.
In a second step, a linear fitting was conducted. While the standard linear fit by minimizing SSE is sufficient for large datasets, it is not feasible for smaller datasets like many user data consisting of relatively few peptide masses. Moreover, these data are often irregularly distributed and can contain outliers with extreme values characterized by strong deviations from linearity. In such cases, standard linear fitting is neither appropriate nor robust. Moreover, commonly applied SSE-based methods rely on the assumption that data residuals are normally distributed that, within user data is rarely found in practice. With datasets containing high variability and/or outliers, classical linear approximation methods often perform poorly [32, 33]. Therefore, we applied the more accurate and robust linear fitting algorithm (rlm) provided by the MASS package  in R that are better suited for small and highly variable datasets.
The rlm fitting approximation is using an iterative process examining which points cause strong shifts in the slope, and inversely re-weighting the data points during the least squares fitting process (IWLS-method [32, 34]). Using likelihood estimators, statistically robust methods minimize small deviations from model assumptions [30, 34].
with13CUser % = relative isotope incorporation values from user data, buser = slope of regression estimated for practical data, b12C and b13C =12C and13C regression slope value for 0 atom %13C and 100 atom %13C incorporation, respectively.
We developed an easy-to-use R script for the estimation of13C atom % incorporation for user datasets which can be downloaded under  as 'script 3'.
User data have to be provided as an ASCII .txt file. The file should have the values of the peptide masses containing one peptide mass (z = 1 after deconvolution) per line with no header and/or row names. Measurements can be provided with comma or point decimal markers.
Accuracy of the method
General applicability of the method
The general applicability of our method was tested using a dataset from Pseudomonas putida ML2 growing on fully labeled13C-benzene (0.6 mM) until the stationary growth phase. The detailed experimental conditions are explained by Jehmlich et al., . After protein extraction, peptides were analyzed by nano-LC-LTQ Orbitrap-MS. From these dataset, information form 150 tryptically-digested peptide masses were taken and the heavy stable isotopes incorporation was estimated.
Results and Discussion
For the calibration of the unlabeled and completely labeled incorporation, a dataset of M. tuberculosis containing atomic masses of > 90,000 peptide fragments were used. Plotting unlabeled peptide masses directly against their decimal residuals. As a result, up to m/z values of ~2,000 a first point cloud increased linearly with corresponding decimal residuals approaching values close to 1 (Figure 2A). When the decimal residuals reaching 1, the next residual digits start to fill up and thus start at 0 again. Therefore, increases across values of 1 leads to the development of the next point cloud with values close to 0. For m/z ranges between 300 and 5,000, new point clouds begin. Especially, for fully labeled peptide masses, these breaks occur at slightly lower values of ~1,800 Da, ~3,200 Da, and ~4,800 Da, since overall slopes of scatter plots here become slightly steeper (Figure 2B). However, variations in the molecular composition of each theoretical peptide mass impeded a simple separation into groups in order to create a continuous linear plot. Therefore, transient transformation using formula (1) was required. During the transformation process, peptide masses with small residual values (i.e. those close to 0) are comparatively altered very little, while those with big values (close to 1) experience strong shifts towards the ordinate and thus result in the expected increase of slope steepness for each group (Figures 3A and 3B). Subsequent to transformation with formula (1), allows straightforward separation of the point clouds for both the unlabeled and the fully labeled dataset, and the clustering algorithm was able to separate all data points into distinct classes. Misgrouping occasionally occurred with higher peptide masses, where points become more dispersed within the group. However, misgrouping occurred only in less than 0.1% of all data points.
After separation into groups, and the addition of 0, 1, 2 and 3 Da according to the group affiliation of each data point, two separated linear point clusters with distinctive slopes were obtained (Figure 4). Two characteristics can be observed: (i) the two point clouds display heteroscedastic characteristics. The initially compact plot becomes more dispersed at higher peptide masses, with higher inclination from the ideal linearity. However, peptide masses have increased variance; (ii) since the used database also contains short-chained amino acid sequences, the point clouds also become less dense with increasing peptide masses.
Linear slopes and estimation of relative isotope incorporation
The accurate slope value for the unlabeled dataset was estimated as b0% = 5.1357e-4 and for the fully labeled dataset b100% = 6.3347e-4. These two values were used in further calculations as our standards for the 0 atomic % and 100 atomic % incorporation.
By applying formula (4), we were able to calcuate incomplete heavy stable isotope incorporation into peptides of user data. However, standard linear fitting depending on minimizing SSE turned out to be strongly influenced by outliers. Strong deviation of the expected slope caused by outliers occurred most frequently in scenarios with inhomogeneous distribution of the measurements along the m/z range. In the presence of outliers, especially with high values, traditional methods are inefficient and biased because the least squares predictions are often heavily dragged towards these outliers. While every added point in the traditional SSE method has a direct influence on the slope, SSE has a breakdown point value of 0 and signifying that every added point has the same influences on the slope value. Our recommended robust linear model algorithm has a breakdown point value of 0.5, meaning that at least 50% of the data need to be altered to cause the slope estimation to change. Thus, when peptide masses with high mass strongly deviated from the linear reference slope, the final slope completely affected by these values. Using the robust linear fitting (rlm) algorithm, the slope for the calculation can only altered if more than 50% of all used data points varied. Therefore, the rlm algorithm is more robust and stable if outliers are used in the dataset.
Accuracy of method
The accuracy of incorporation is strongly depends on the considered number of peptide masses. As expected, the accuracy was very poor with small datasets (when using only 10-30 peptide masses). The prediction accuracy was only < 25% at known 0, 50, and 100 atom %13C incorporation (Figure 6). However, after including more than 50 peptides, the prediction asymptotically approached less than 10% precision. After incorporation of about 100 peptide masses, the accuracy became better than 5%. However, the inclusion of more peptide masses (> 200) did not improve the accuracy further.
General applicability of the method
The method can be applied to a broad range of bacterial taxa. Data from other bacteria than the M. tuberculosis reference strain proved also to be very successful. In order to validate the method, we used peptides of the bacterium P. putida ML2 grown on fully labeled substrate in a batch culture. Obtained mass spectra were analyzed by a LTQ-Orbitrap and the incorporation of13C into the peptides was calculated applying our method. After data points fitting a graph with a slope of 6.2910e-4 was generated that corresponds to 97.3% ± 0.3%13C incorporation. This value of13C incorporation is quite comparable with other MS-based methods where the labeling efficiency was estimated as 98.6% ± 0.2% for13C labeled peptides . However, in comparison of our algorithm with other MS-based methods, generally for the latter a much higher effort for estimating incorporation values is needed.
We demonstrated that our method can be used to estimate the13C incorporation into peptides/proteins accurately and sensitively. The method requires about 100 peptide masses in order to achieve an accuracy of less than 5%.
Generally, our method holds promise for wider applications in qualitative and quantitative proteomics. Comprehensive proteomic analyses of mixed communities would enable microbial ecologist to link community composition, physiology, function, ecology, interaction, and evolutionary processes . Metaproteome analyses were performed by either gel-based  or by LC-MS based approaches  and would go one-step further with the combination of metabolic labeling and proteome analysis (Protein-SIP) by obtaining the metabolic activity of various species in microbial communities.
We would like to thank Christine Schumann and Michaela Öhler for excellent technical assistance. We gratefully want to thank Brandon E. Morris for kindly revising the English of this manuscript. Part of the work was funded by a grant within the priority programme SPP1319 provided by the German Research Foundation (DFG).
- UFZ Leipzig. [http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=18365]
- Neufeld JD, Wagner M, Murrell JC: Who eats what where and when? Isotope-labelling experiments are coming of age. Isme J. 2007, 1 (2): 103-110. 10.1038/ismej.2007.30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boschker HTS, Nold SC, Wellsbury P, Bos D, de Graaf W, Pel R, Parkes RJ, Cappenberg TE: Direct linking of microbial populations to specific biogeochemical processes by C-13-labelling of biomarkers. Nature. 1998, 392 (6678): 801-805. 10.1038/33900.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Radajewski S, McDonald IR, Murrell JC: Stable-isotope probing of nucleic acids: a window to the function of uncultured microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003, 14 (3): 296-302. 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00064-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Manefield M, Whiteley AS, Griffiths RI, Bailey MJ: RNA stable isotope probing a novel means of linking microbial community function to phylogeny. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68 (11): 5367-5373. 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5367-5373.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jehmlich N, Schmidt F, Hartwich M, von Bergen M, Richnow HH, Vogt C: Incorporation of carbon and nitrogen atoms into proteins measured by protein-based stable isotope probing (Protein-SIP). Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22 (18): 2889-2897. 10.1002/rcm.3684.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jehmlich N, Schmidt F, Taubert M, Seifert J, von Bergen M, Richnow HH, Vogt C: Comparison of methods for simultaneous identification of bacterial species and determination of metabolic activity by protein-based stable isotope probing (Protein-SIP) experiments. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23 (12): 1871-1878. 10.1002/rcm.4084.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cargile BJ, Bundy JL, Grunden AM, Stephenson JL: Synthesis/degradation ratio mass spectrometry for measuring relative dynamic protein turnover. Analytical Chemistry. 2004, 76 (1): 86-97. 10.1021/ac034841a.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papageorgopoulos C, Caldwell K, Shackleton C, Schweingrubber H, Hellerstein MK: Measuring protein synthesis by mass isotopomer distribution analysis (MIDA). Analytical Biochemistry. 1999, 267 (1): 1-16. 10.1006/abio.1998.2958.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McIlwain S, Page D, Huttlin EL, Sussman MR: Using dynamic programming to create isotopic distribution maps from mass spectra. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (13): i328-336. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm198.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choudhary K, Spicer VL, Donald LJ, Duckworth HW, Ens W, Loewen PC, Standing KG: Method for estimating the isotopic distributions of metabolically labeled proteins by MALDI-TOFMS: Application to NMR samples. Analytical Chemistry. 2006, 78 (15): 5419-5423. 10.1021/ac060507d.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snijders APL, de Koning B, Wright PC: Perturbation and interpretation of nitrogen isotope distribution patterns in proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research. 2005, 4 (6): 2185-2191. 10.1021/pr050260l.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacob U, Brey T, Fetzer I, Kaehler S, Mintenbeck K, Dunton K, Beyer K, Struck U, Pakhomov EA, Arntz WE: Towards the trophic structure of the Bouvet Island marine ecosystem. Polar Biology. 2006, 29 (2): 106-113. 10.1007/s00300-005-0071-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jehmlich N, Schmidt F, von Bergen M, Richnow HH, Vogt C: Protein-based stable isotope probing (Protein-SIP) reveals active species within anoxic mixed cultures. Isme J. 2008, 2 (11): 1122-1133. 10.1038/ismej.2008.64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brun V, Dupuis A, Adrait A, Marcellin M, Thomas D, Court M, Vandenesch F, Garin J: Isotope-labeled protein standards: toward absolute quantitative proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007, 6 (12): 2139-2149. 10.1074/mcp.M700163-MCP200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Domon B, Aebersold R: Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science. 2006, 312 (5771): 212-217. 10.1126/science.1124619.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt F, Schmid M, Jungblut PR, Mattow J, Facius A, Pleissner KP: Iterative data analysis is the key for exhaustive analysis of peptide mass fingerprints from proteins separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2003, 14 (9): 943-956. 10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00345-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- R project. [http://www.r-project.org/]
- Gay S, Binz PA, Hochstrasser DF, Appel RD: Modeling peptide mass fingerprinting data using the atomic composition of peptides. Electrophoresis. 1999, 20 (18): 3527-3534. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3527::AID-ELPS3527>3.0.CO;2-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mann M: 43rd ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Applied Topics: 1995; Atlanta GA. 1995: 639-640.Google Scholar
- Karty JA, Ireland MM, Brun YV, Reilly JP: Artifacts and unassigned masses encountered in peptide mass mapping. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002, 782 (1-2): 363-383. 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00550-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mattow J, Schmidt F, Hohenwarter W, Siejak F, Schaible UE, Kaufmann SH: Protein identification and tracking in two-dimensional electrophoretic gels by minimal protein identifiers. Proteomics. 2004, 4 (10): 2927-2941. 10.1002/pmic.200400908.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon SV, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry CE: Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998, 393 (6685): 537-544. 10.1038/31159. 3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanger Institute. [ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/tb/sequences/TB.pep]
- ProteinProspector - MS Digest. [http://prospector.ucsf.edu/prospector/cgi-bin/msform.cgi?form=msdigest]
- Baxter CA, Murray CW, Clark DE, Westhead DR, Eldridge MD: Flexible docking using Tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity. Proteins. 1998, 33 (3): 367-382. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<367::AID-PROT6>3.0.CO;2-W.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP: Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1997, 11 (5): 425-445. 10.1023/A:1007996124545.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parker KC: Scoring methods in MALDI peptide mass fingerprinting: ChemScore and the ChemApplex program. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13 (1): 22-39. 10.1016/S1044-0305(01)00320-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hartigan JA, Wong MA: A k-means clustering algorithm. Applied Statistics. 1979, 28 (1): 100-108. 10.2307/2346830.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Venables W, Ripley B, (eds.): Modern Applied Statistics with S. 2002, New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Crawley MJ, (ed.): Statistical Computing - An Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-Plus. 2002, Wiley-VCHGoogle Scholar
- Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ, Stahel WA, (eds.): Robust Statistics - The Approach Based on Influence Functions. 2005, Wiley-VCHGoogle Scholar
- Rousseeuw PJ, Leroy AM, (eds.): Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. 2003, Wiley-VCHGoogle Scholar
- Huber PJ, (eds): Robust Statistics. 1981, New York: Wiley-VCHGoogle Scholar
- Snijders APL, de Vos MGJ, Wright PC: Novel approach for peptide quantitation and sequencing based on N-15 and C-13 metabolic labeling. Journal of Proteome Research. 2005, 4 (2): 578-585. 10.1021/pr0497733.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wilmes P, Bond PL: Microbial community proteomics: elucidating the catalysts and metabolic mechanisms that drive the Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009, 12 (3): 310-317. 10.1016/j.mib.2009.03.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benndorf D, Balcke GU, Harms H, von Bergen M: Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater. Isme Journal. 2007, 1 (3): 224-234. 10.1038/ismej.2007.39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ram RJ, VerBerkmoes NC, Thelen MP, Tyson GW, Baker BJ, Blake RC, Shah M, Hettich RL, Banfield JF: Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm. Science. 2005, 308 (5730): 1915-1920. 10.1126/science. 1109070.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.