- Short Report
- Open Access
Mud crab susceptibility to disease from white spot syndrome virus is species-dependent
© Somboonna et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 22 June 2010
- Accepted: 20 November 2010
- Published: 20 November 2010
Based on a report for one species (Scylla serrata), it is widely believed that mud crabs are relatively resistant to disease caused by white spot syndrome virus (WSSV). We tested this hypothesis by determining the degree of susceptibility in two species of mud crabs, Scylla olivacea and Scylla paramamosain, both of which were identified by mitochondrial 16 S ribosomal gene analysis. We compared single-dose and serial-dose WSSV challenges on S. olivacea and S. paramamosain.
In a preliminary test using S. olivacea alone, a dose of 1 × 106 WSSV copies/g gave 100% mortality within 7 days. In a subsequent test, 17 S. olivacea and 13 S. paramamosain were divided into test and control groups for challenge with WSSV at 5 incremental, biweekly doses starting from 1 × 104 and ending at 5 × 106 copies/g. For 11 S. olivacea challenged, 3 specimens died at doses between 1 × 105 and 5 × 105 copies/g and none died for 2 weeks after the subsequent dose (1 × 106 copies/g) that was lethal within 7 days in the preliminary test. However, after the final challenge on day 56 (5 × 106 copies/g), the remaining 7 of 11 S. olivacea (63.64%) died within 2 weeks. There was no mortality in the buffer-injected control crabs. For 9 S. paramamosain challenged in the same way, 5 (55.56%) died after challenge doses between 1 × 104 and 5 × 105 copies/g, and none died for 2 weeks after the challenge dose of 1 × 106 copies/g. After the final challenge (5 × 106 copies/g) on day 56, no S. paramamosain died during 2 weeks after the challenge, and 2 of 9 WSSV-infected S. paramamosain (22.22%) remained alive together with the control crabs until the end of the test on day 106. Viral loads in these survivors were low when compared to those in the moribund crabs.
S. olivacea and S. paramamosain show wide variation in response to challenge with WSSV. S. olivacea and S. paramamosain are susceptible to white spot disease, and S. olivacea is more susceptible than S. paramamosain. Based on our single-challenge and serial challenge results, and on previous published work showing that S. serrata is relatively unaffected by WSSV infection, we propose that susceptibility to white spot disease in the genus Scylla is species-dependent and may also be dose-history dependent. In practical terms for shrimp farmers, it means that S. olivacea and S. paramamosain may pose less threat as WSSV carriers than S. serrata. For crab farmers, our results suggest that rearing of S. serrata would be a better choice than S. paramamosain or S. olivacea in terms of avoiding losses from seasonal outbreaks of white spot disease.
- White Spot Syndrome Virus
- Challenge Dose
- White Spot Syndrome Virus Infection
- White Spot Syndrome Virus Challenge
White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) is the world's most serious disease threat to all species of cultivated shrimp, and is also known to infect many other crustacean species that can act as carriers [1, 2]. Among these carriers, mud crabs have been considered to be a particularly dangerous threat to shrimp farms because they are generally believed (based on a report for the species Scylla serrata) to be highly tolerant to WSSV and remain infected for long periods of time without signs of disease [2–4]. We wished to test this hypothesis by determining the degree of susceptibility and tolerance to WSSV infection in common Thai species of Scylla other than Scylla serrata. To do so, it was first necessary for us to develop a mitochondrial 16 S rDNA method to distinguish among 4 Scylla species found in Thailand, because species determination by morphology alone remains controversial [5–8].
To develop a species identification method based on mitochondrial 16 S rDNA sequences, reference sequences of S. serrata (GenBank Accession Number AF109318), S. paramamosain (AF109319), S. olivacea (AF109321) and S. tranquebarica (AF109320) were used to design primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and sequencing. The PCR primer 16sar-L (5' cgcctgtttatcaaaaacat 3') was designed by Imai et al. , and primer 16sar-R (5' ggtctgaactcagatcacgt 3') was designed in this study. Each PCR reaction consisted of 10×PCR buffer, 0.75 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM dNTPs, 0.15 μM of each primer, 2.5 U taq DNA polymerase and 100 ng DNA in a total volume of 100 μl reaction. The thermocycling profile was 2 min at 94°C followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 45°C for 30 sec and 72°C 1.5 min. Sequencing was performed by Macrogen Inc., Seoul, Korea. Each sequence was confirmed manually via electropherogram analysis (BioEdit 7.0.0, Carlsbad, CA) .
WSSV inoculum was kindly provided by the Shrimp Cultivation Research Center, Charoen Pokphand Group, Thailand. Number of WSSV copies was determined by real-time PCR (qPCR). For quantitation of WSSV stock and WSSV in the samples, DNA (100 ng) were used as the template in a total 20 μl reaction mixture containing 1× QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, the Netherlands) and 300 nM of each primer for qPCR using ABI 7500 SDS machine (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Primers 229F1 (5' gatggaaacggtaacgaatctgaa 3') and 447R1 (5' cagagcctagtctatcaatcat 3') were designed from the WSSV genome (GenBank Accession No. AF440570) . Each qPCR plate contained standard curve samples, triplicates of each DNA sample, and a no-template control. The thermocycling profile was 95°C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s and 72°C for 45 s . For all experiments, the specificity of the amplified products was verified by analyses of the dissociation curves to verify the melting temperature for each amplicon. The quantity was determined from the standard curve of Ct values and WSSV copy numbers. Results were expressed as mean copy numbers ± standard deviations (SDs) for triplicate samples.
For semi-quantitative estimation of WSSV copy numbers, the IQ2000™WSSV Detection and Prevention System (Farming IntelliGene Technology Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan) was used. Using 100 ng of total DNA as the template, infections could be classified as absent, very light, light, moderate and severe based on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis patterns of PCR amplicons, and these were approximately equal to the following respective WSSV copy numbers in the 100 ng template: 0 to <10, 10 to <20, 20 to <200, 200 to <2,000 and 2,000 to <20,000.
To measure WSSV loads in shrimp, hemolymph was withdrawn from the ventral sinus into a syringe containing anticoagulant I (ACI) (0.45 M NaCl, 0.1 M glucose, 30 mM Na-citrate, 26 mM citric acid, 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.0)  in a 1:2 volume-to-volume ratio. DNA was extracted following the manufacturer's protocols using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA). The DNA concentration and quality were measured by spectrophotometry at A260 and A280, and the amount of WSSV in the samples was determined as described above.
To verify virulence of the WSSV stock, 2 specific pathogen-free (SPF) whiteleg shrimp P. vannamei and 6 SPF black tiger shrimp P. monodon were injected with 5 × 106 copies/g tissue at the first abdominal segment. Shrimp mortality for P. vannamei and P. monodon was 50% and 100%, respectively, within 3-4 days after injection and moribund shrimp gave IQ2000 test results for severe WSSV infection levels. Matching qPCR results ranged from 2 × 104 - 1.3 × 106 copies/100 ng DNA (data not shown). This was equivalent to approximately 2 × 104 - 1.3 × 106 WSSV copies in 33.33 μl of infected shrimp hemolymph.
These results were similar to those previously published for these and other species of penaeid shrimp that usually show 100% mortality within 5-10 days after injection with similar doses of WSSV .
Because injection is considered an effective route of WSSV infection in crabs , different WSSV copies per gram of crab tissue in a total sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS) volume of 300 μl was injected into each crab at the coxa of the right swimming leg using a 26G1 syringe (Nipro Corporation Ltd.). A preliminary single-dose challenge test with 34 male S. olivacea was carried out to determine appropriate viral challenge doses for crabs. They were divided into three groups. One group (n = 9) was injected with a single dose of 1 × 105 WSSV copies per g, one group (n = 13) with 1 × 106 WSSV copies per g and one control group (n = 12) with buffer solution.
At the low injection dose (1×105), 4 of 9 (44%) died within 7 days while 5 of 9 (56%) survived for more than 30 days. However, at a higher dose (1×106), 6 of 13 died on day 3 post injection (46% mortality), 4 more died on day 4 (77% cumulative mortality), 2 more on day 5 (92% cumulative mortality) and 1 on day 7 (100% cumulative mortality in 7 days). None of the 12 buffer-injected crabs died over the 30 day experimental period. These results indicated that a single, high dose challenge with the WSSV inoculum was lethal for S. olivacea as it was for shrimp. This contrasted markedly with results from a previous report in which S. serrata challenged with WSSV showed severe WSSV lesions by histopathological analysis but no mortality [1, 3, 17].
Male mud crabs (500 g) were collected from Samutprakarn and Samutsongkram provinces, Thailand, and species was determined by 16 S rDNA analysis as described above. Each crab was free of WSSV, yellow head virus (YHV) and infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV) as determined using standard commercial kits for nested PCR and RT-PCR detection (IQ 2000 detection system, Gene Reach, Taiwan). Individual crabs were cultivated in separate plastic containers at room temperature with aeration . Every 24-30 h, crabs were fed with boiled fish at 10% of their body weight, and artificial seawater at 28 parts per thousand (ppt) salinity was replaced to the level where the crabs still had some area to come out of the water [1, 18].
For the challenge tests with each species, 18 crabs were acclimatized for 1-2 weeks after which it was expected that 10-12 each would be used for WSSV challenge and 5-6 each for PBS buffer-injected controls. However, since only 30 (not 36) remained in sufficiently good health for testing at the end of acclimatization (17 S. olivacea and 13 S. paramamosain), they were divided into 20 crabs (11 S. olivacea and 9 S. paramamosain) for challenge with WSSV, and 10 (6 S. olivacea and 4 S. paramamosain) as controls. They were numbered sequentially for each species (So 1 to 17 and Sp 1 to 13) but selected arbitrarily for inclusion in challenge or control groups. WSSV challenge began with 1 × 104 WSSV copies/g at day 0 followed every 14 days by increasing doses of 1 × 105, 5 × 105, 1 × 106 and ending with 5 × 106 WSSV copies/g at day 56. The crabs were observed for further 50 days after the final challenge dose (a total of 106 days for the whole challenge experiment).
For these tests, all the buffer-injected control crabs were healthy as defined by no appetite loss, no weight loss, reactive swimming and walking legs, and no mortality throughout the experimental period (106 days) plus the period of 4-10 days during which the crabs were acclimatized, screened for specific pathogens and subjected to PCR and sequencing for species identification. None of the controls for either species gave positive results for WSSV using the IQ2000 test kit, qPCR or histological analysis. For the test crabs given multiple challenges with WSSV, there were generally three types of outcomes as follows: (i) moribund at low dose (< 106 copies/g), (ii) moribund at high dose (5×106 copies/g), and (iii) survival at high dose (5×106 copies/g).
To quantify WSSV in each crab by qPCR or test kit (see above), hemolymph was withdrawn at the coxa of the right swimming leg using a 26G1" syringe (Nipro Corporation Limited, Bangkok, Thailand) containing the same anticoagulant used for shrimp above. DNA extraction was also carried out in the same manner.
The multiple challenge group at the highest challenge dose also died, gave test kit results for severe WSSV infections and also showed severe histopathology typical of WSSV. More difficult to explain is the mortality of the 2 S. olivacea specimens that died after an injection dose of 1 × 105 or fewer WSSV copies per g and gave negative results for WSSV by both test-kit assay and qPCR. We assume that they died as a result of some undetermined complication resulting from the WSSV injection, but not because of WSSV alone and not because of the injection process itself, since none of the control crabs died after buffer injections. Similar examples occurred with S. paramamosain (below). Most of the S. olivacea specimens were not examined histologically because the few examined gave consistent results for severe infections by histopathology and qPCR. We cannot explain the disparity between the test-kit result for severe WSSV infection and the qPCR result for a low WSSV load in specimen So6.
In summary, the overall results suggested that S. olivace was generally as susceptible to mortality from WSSV as P. vannamei and P. monodon. However, the fact that approximately 50% of the S. olivacea specimens died within 3 days in the single dose challenge at 1 × 106 copies of WSSV per g but that 7 of 11 (63.64%) survived for 2 weeks after the same dose in the multiple challenge test indicates that a prior infection with WSSV could aid in the ability of the crabs to better survive a subsequent challenge. This is not surprising in the light of the fact that shrimp survivors from WSSV outbreak ponds have been shown to survive a WSSV challenge dose sufficient to kill uninfected shrimp [21, 22], and that prior injection of shrimp with inactivated WSSV can result in improved survival upon subsequent challenge . S. olivacea would be a good model for a molecular study on the comparative response of multiple-challenge crabs that survive the WSSV dose (1 × 106 copies/g) that was sufficient to kill naïve crabs.
Of 9 S. paramamosain specimens used for serial WSSV challenges (Figure 2b), 2 specimens died within 2 weeks after the 1st challenge dose (1×104). There was no additional mortality in the 2-week interval after the 2nd challenge dose (1×105), but 2 specimens died within 2 days and 1 specimen within 12 days after the 3rd challenge dose (5×105). As with S. olivacea, no subsequent mortality occurred within two weeks after challenge with a dose of 1 × 106 copies/g. Then, 2 specimens died within 17 days after the 5th and highest challenge dose (5×106), while the two remaining crabs were still alive and active at the end of the experiment on day 106. The mean time to death for those that died was 37.0 ± 27.5 days, and this was not significantly different (p = 0.11) from that for S. olivacea (55.9 ± 20.6). The Kaplan-Meier survival probability of S. paramamosain for 63 days was 0.44 (0.63 for S. olivacea) but for 70 to 106 days was 0.22 (0 for S. olivacea). Similar to S. olivacea, there was one group of crabs that died after low challenge doses and one (22.22%) that died after the highest challenge dose. Unlike S. olivacea, there was an additional group (22.22%) that did not die, even at the highest challenge dose. In addition, S. paramamosain showed a pattern of proportionally higher mortality at low WSSV doses and proportionally lower mortality at high doses, a pattern that was opposite to that for S. olivacea.
After the highest challenge dose of 5 × 106 copies per g, the 2 moribund crab specimens gave IQ2000 test kit results for severe WSSV infections and this corresponded to the qPCR results of 1.2 × 109 and 8.9 × 108 WSSV copies per 100 ng total DNA. The 2 remaining crabs that still survived at the end of the experiment (106 days) gave IQ2000 test kit results for a medium infection and a medium-to-severe infection, and the corresponding qPCR results gave 2.9 × 103 and 5.4 × 103 WSSV copies per 100 ng total DNA, respectively. None of these high-dose specimens were examined for WSSV histopathology, but the 2 crabs that survived to the end of the experiment (106 days) showed positive immunofluorescence in the cytoplasm of very few hemocytes on day 59 (data not shown) and most of the hemocytes on day 82 (Figure 4d), which was 26 days after the highest dose challenge on day 56. The nuclei of these hemocytes were condensed and often fragmented possibly indicating apoptosis leading to hemocyte depletion as previously reported for shrimp infected with WSSV .
Results for S. paramamosain are more difficult to interpret than those for S. olivacea because all 5 crabs that died at injection doses lower than 1 × 106 WSSV copies per g gave negative test results for WSSV infection using both the IQ2000 kit and qPCR. If they had died from WSSV, kit reactions for severe WSSV infections and qPCR results indicating high loads of WSSV would have been expected. Histopathological analysis for 3 of the 5 specimens revealed no WSSV lesions but instead severe lesions from at least 3 unknown pathogens that could have been the cause of their death. As with the 2 similar, low-dose challenge S. olivacea specimens described above, we assume that these S. paramamosain died as a result of some undetermined complication resulting from the WSSV injection, but not because of WSSV alone and not because of the injection process itself, since none of the control crabs died after buffer injections.
Although the S. paramamosain specimens did not show typical WSSV lesions with enlarged basophilic nuclei in normal WSSV-target tissues such as the subcuticular epidermis and gills, they did show immunopositive hemocytes, most with condensed or karyorrhectic nuclei indicative of apoptosis as previously reported for WSSV infections in shrimp . In addition, the two specimens (Sp12 and Sp13 representing 22.22% of the crabs) that survived the highest WSSV challenge dose showed WSSV immunopositive hemocytes after challenge on day 56, and the proportion of positive cells was higher on day 87 than on day 59, indicating that viral replication had occurred in the interim. For these specimens, the PCR test kit results were below the severe level and the WSSV loads by qPCR were low. Furthermore, the immunopositive reaction was in the hemocyte cytoplasm only, while WSSV virions are normally assembled in the nucleus. Using these facts to attempt to explain our results, we speculate that hemocytes may be the prime target for WSSV in S. paramamosain and that the virus may replicate there, but induce apoptosis before mature virions are assembled. The resulting depletion of hemocytes could impair the host ability to combat pre-existing infections or new infections by other pathogens, and that would explain the variety in the histopathology seen in the moribund S. paramamosain we examined. It would also explain why there was no mortality from other infectious agents in the control crabs injected with buffer only. At the same time, it would also suggest that the hemocytes play an important role in the S. paramamosain response to WSSV, and that they normally limit or clear WSSV, except when overwhelmed by a sufficient challenge dose. Thus, S. paramamosain challenged with WSSV may be a good model organism to study the process of WSSV clearance in crabs.
In summary, the results revealed great individual variation in the response of S. olivacea and S. paramamosain to WSSV. At the same time, both species are susceptible to white spot disease, in contrast with S. serrata that has been reported to show no mortality even in the presence of extensive WSSV lesions. In addition, S. olivacea was more susceptible to disease than S. paramamosain, since its survival probability at 70 days post-infection was 0 while that for S. paramamosain was 0.22. Thus, based on previous published work for S. serrata and on our results, we propose that susceptibility to white spot disease in the genus Scylla is species-dependent but may also be dose-history dependent as seen with S. olivacea. In practical terms for shrimp farmers, our results show that S. olivacea and S. paramamosain may be infected with WSSV for periods of several weeks or more and potentially act as carriers during that interval, but that they might pose less threat than S. serrata that is apparently unaffected by WSSV infection. For crab farmers, our results suggest that rearing of S. serrata would be a better choice than S. paramamosain or S. olivacea in terms of avoiding losses from seasonal WSSV outbreaks.
This work was supported by the National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), Thailand Research Fund (TRF), and Mahidol University.
- Rajendran KV, Vijayan KK, Santiago TC, Krol RM: Experimental host range and histopathology of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) infection in shrimp, prawns, crabs and lobsters from India. J Fish Dis. 1999, 22: 183-191. 10.1046/j.1365-2761.1999.00162.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flegel TW: Detection of major penaeid shrimp viruses in Asia, a historical perspective with emphasis on Thailand. Aquaculture. 2006, 258: 1-33. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.05.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kanchanaphum P, Wongteerasupaya C, Sitidilokratana N, Boonsaeng V, Panyim S, Tassanakajon A, Withyachumnarnkul B, Flegel TW: Experimental transmission of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) from crabs to shrimp Penaeus monodon. Dis Aquat Org. 1998, 34: 1-7. 10.3354/dao034001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Supamattaya K, Hoffmann RW, Boonyaratpalin S, Kanchanaphun P: Experimental transmission of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) from black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon to the sand crab Portunus pelagicus, mud crab Scylla serrata and krill Acetes sp. Dis Aquat Org. 1998, 32: 79-85. 10.3354/dao032079.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Estampador EP: Studies on Scylla (Crustacea: Portunidae), 'I. Revision of the genus.". Philipp J Sci. 1949, 78: 95-108.Google Scholar
- Stephenson W, Campbell B: The Australian Portunids (Crustacea: Portunidae) IV. Remaining genera. Aust J Mar Freshw Res. 1960, 11: 73-122. 10.1071/MF9600073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Overton JL, Macintosh DJ, Thorpe RS: Multivariate analysis of the mud crab Scylla serrata (Brachyura: Portunidae) from four locations in Southeast Asia. Mar Biol. 1997, 128: 55-62. 10.1007/s002270050068.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gopurenko D, Hughes JM: Regional patterns of genetic structure among Australian populations of the mud crab Scylla serrata (Crustacea: Decapoda): evidence from mitochondrial DNA. Mar Freshw Res. 2002, 53: 849-857. 10.1071/MF01225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Imai H, Cheng J, Hamasaki K, Numachi K: Identification of four mud crab species (genus Scylla) using ITS-1 and 16 S rDNA markers. Aquat Living Resour. 2004, 17: 31-34. 10.1051/alr:2004007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Somboonna N, Mead S, Liu J, Dean D: Discovering and differentiating new and emerging clonal populations of Chlamydia trachomatis with a novel shotgun cell culture harvest assay. Emerg Inf Dis. 2008, 14: 445-453. 10.3201/eid1403.071071.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M: MEGA3: Integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform. 2004, 5: 150-163. 10.1093/bib/5.2.150.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nei M, Kumar S: Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. 2000, New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Kimura M: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980, 16: 111-120. 10.1007/BF01731581.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srisala J, Tacon P, Flegel TW, Sritunyalucksana K: Comparison of white spot syndrome virus PCR-detection methods that use electrophoresis or antibody-mediated lateral flow chromatographic strips to visualize PCR amplicons. J Virol Meth. 2008, 153: 129-133. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.07.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Söderhäll K, Smith VJ: Separation of the haemocyte populations of Carcinus maenas and other marine decapods, and prophenoloxidase distribution. Dev Comp Immunol. 1983, 7: 229-239. 10.1016/0145-305X(83)90004-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flegel TW: Special topic review: major viral diseases of the black tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon) in Thailand. World J Microbiol Biotech. 1997, 13: 433-442. 10.1023/A:1018580301578.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flegel TW: Update on viral accommodation, a model for host-viral interaction in shrimp and other arthropods. Dev Comp Immunol. 2007, 31: 217-231. 10.1016/j.dci.2006.06.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin YC, Vaseeharan B, Chen JC: Identification of the extracellular copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (ecCuZnSOD) gene of the mud crab Scylla serrata and its expression following beta-glucan and peptidoglycan injections. Mol Immunol. 2008, 45: 1346-1355. 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.09.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958, 53: 457-481. 10.2307/2281868.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sriton A, Kanthong N, Gangnonngiw W, Sriurairatana S, Ubol S, Flegel TW: Persistent expression of shrimp-virus antigens in two insect cell lines challenged with two shrimp viruses. Fish Pathol. 2009, 44: 86-93. 10.3147/jsfp.44.86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Venegas CA, Nonaka L, Mushiake K, Nishizawa T, Muroga K: Quasi-immune response of Penaeus japonicus to penaeid rod-shaped DNA virus (PRDV). Dis Aquat Org. 2000, 42: 83-89. 10.3354/dao042083.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu JL, Nishioka T, Mori K, Nishizawa T, Muroga K: A time-course study on the resistance of Penaeus japonicus induced by artificial infection with white spot syndrome virus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2002, 13: 391-403. 10.1006/fsim.2002.0414.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Singh ISB, Manjusha M, Pai SS, Philip R: Fenneropenaeus indicus is protected from white spot disease by oral administration of inactivated white spot syndrome virus. Dis Aquat Org. 2005, 66: 265-270. 10.3354/dao066265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Flegel TW, Pasharawipas T: A proposal for typical eukaryotic meiosis in microsporidians. Can J Microbiol. 1995, 41: 1-11. 10.1139/m95-001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wongprasert K, Khanobdee K, Glunukarn S, Meeratana P, Withyachumnarnkul B: Time-course and levels of apoptosis in various tissues of black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon infected with white spot syndrome virus. Dis Aquat Org. 2003, 55: 3-10. 10.3354/dao055003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.