- Research article
- Open Access
Daily versus intermittent iron supplementation in pregnant women
https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-444
© Barat et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 14 July 2011
- Accepted: 25 October 2011
- Published: 25 October 2011
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study was compare of daily iron supplementation in three time frames- daily, weekly and three time weekly supplementation in preventing anemia in healthy pregnant women.
Method
The present study was a prospective simply randomized clinical trial. During January 2006- January 2008, 150 healthy pregnant women without anemia, in their 16th week of pregnancy were randomly allocated into three equal groups. The first group (n = 50) received a 50 mg-ferrous sulfate tablet daily, second group (n = 50) received a 50 mg-ferrous sulfate tablet three times a week, and the third group (n = 50) received two 50 mg-ferrous sulfate tablets (100 mg) weekly, respectively for 12 consecutive weeks. Serum hemoglobin, ferritin, and iron were measured before and after the supplementation. Paired t and ANOVA tests were used as appropriated.
Results
There were no significant differences between the pre- and post-treatment hemoglobin levels with iron supplementation in the three group (P = 0.518, P = 0.276, respectively). The mean serum iron level before and after treatment with iron supplementation in the three groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.962, P = 0.970, respectively). Although the mean serum ferritin level before and after treatment with iron supplementation was statistically significant in the three groups, no significant differences were found comparing the three groups (P = 0.827, P = 0.635 respectively).
Conclusions
This results suggested, three times a week or weekly iron supplementation is as effective as daily supplementation for healthy pregnant women without anemia.
Trial Registration
ISRCTN: IRCT201101093820N1
Keywords
- Pregnant Woman
- Ferritin
- Serum Ferritin
- Iron Deficiency Anemia
- Iron Supplementation
Background
Iron requirements increase during pregnancy [1, 2]. And this requirement may lead to anemia in pregnant women [3, 4]. Lower hemoglobin cut off is 11.0 g/dL in the first and last trimester and 10.5 g/dL in the second trimester. Therefore, any level below 10.5 g/dL should be considered as anemia [5]. Iron consumption for pregnant women is undesirable, because of the side effects. The probable cause is the effect of oxidative stress of high doses of Iron, which leads to gastrointestinal intolerance [3]. As gut mucosal turnover rates is about three days, administering iron during these days may lead to lower iron absorption. Periodic iron supplementation may let the mucosa to heal and gets better iron absorption [6–8]. Previous studies reported, continuous administration of oral iron impairs the absorption of a subsequent iron dose [9]. A few experimental studies demonstrated that alternative efficacious iron supplementation regimens might reduce the undesirable side-effects [10]. Significant equality and reduced side effects have been reported in several epidemiological studies in comparing the weekly prescription of iron with daily supplementation [3–7]. In the other studies, there was not found difference between daily and twice-weekly iron supplementation regimens in preventing iron deficiency anemia in children, non-pregnant women, and pregnant women in their early trimesters [12–14]. And in another study, intermittent regimen was shown to be superior to daily regimen [3–15]. In human beings, gut mucosal turnover occurs every 3 days. Thus, weekly rather than daily administration of iron has been proposed as a safe, beneficent, and cost-effective method to prevent and alleviate anemia in pregnant women [12–17]. As mentioned above there are different study which studied effect of iron separately in daily use and weekly and three times. Thus authors aimed to compare the effects of daily, three times a week, and weekly iron supplementation regimens on hematological markers in pregnant women without anemia.
Methods
The present study was a prospective simply randomized clinical trial conducted during January 2006-January 2008 in six health centers affiliated to Babol University of Medical Sciences northern Iran. The centers were selected through a cluster randomization out of the 40 centers affiliated to the University. Serum hemoglobin (Hycel cell counter, France), serum ferritin (radioimmunoassay technique, Genesis factory, USA), and serum iron (Pars azmoon, Iran) levels were measured for all pregnant women who attended the antenatal clinics in their 14th week of gestation. Women with hemoglobin levels less than 11 g/dL, chronic hematological disorders (thalassemia, etc.), and multiple pregnancies were excluded from the study.
Hundred fifty pregnant women without exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study in their 16 th week of gestation. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. The Ethics Committee of the University approved the study protocol. The women were divided to three equal groups. All the groups were matched in terms of age, numbers of pregnant, income, and education. The first group (n = 50) received a 50 mg-ferrous sulfate tablet (Darou Pakhsh, Iran) daily, the second group (n = 50) received a 50 mg-ferrous sulfate tablet three times a week, and the third group (n = 50) received two 50 mg-ferrous sulfate tablets (100 mg) weekly, respectively.
Iron supplementation was prescribed in 16th week of gestation and was continued according to the mentioned regimens for 12 weeks (until 28th weeks of gestation). Serum hemoglobin, serum ferritin, and serum iron levels were measured for all the participants at the end of the trial period. And patients who were diagnosed as having anemia were treated according to the standard protocol.
Statistical analyses
Data were recorded on a pre-designed form. All of the entries were checked twice. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS software version 13. Serum sample levels of hemoglobin, iron, and ferritin before and after treatment were evaluated using paired t test. ANOVA was used to compare the mean values of serum hemoglobin, ferritin, and iron between the three groups. P value<0.05 considered as statistically significant.
Results
Totally 150 participate, enrolled in the study, among total sample eight women were excluded because of abortion, premature labor, and immigration. Therefore the study continued with 50 pregnant women in daily regimen, 43 in three-time a week regimen, and 49 in weekly regimen groups. There were not reported any side effects related to iron consumption such as nausea, vomiting, and bowel disturbances.
Serum levels of hemoglobin, iron, and ferritin before and after the three supplementation regimens
Daily (n = 50) | P value | Three-time a week (n = 43) | P value | Weekly (n = 49) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hemoglobin(g/dL, mean ± SD) | Before supplementation | 12/44 ± 0/99 | P<0/001* | 12/62 ± 0/78 | P = 0/541 | 12/53 ± 0/77 | P<0/001* |
After supplementation | 11/084 ± 0/82 | 14/03 ± 14/68 | 11/62 ± 0/82 | ||||
Serum iron (μg/dl, mean ± SD) | Before supplementation | 96/74 ± 34/31 | P = 0/948 | 94/21 ± 31/14 | P = 0/516 | 97/28 ± 31/65 | P = 0/942 |
After supplementation | 97/14 ± 40/06 | 99/90 ± 53/33 | 96/57 ± 62/62 | ||||
Serum ferritin (μg/L, mean ± SD) | Before supplementation | 59/66 ± 45/32 | P = 0/005* | 58/82 ± 33/6 | P = 0/00* | 56/53 ± 33/33 | P = 0/002* |
After supplementation | 39/90 ± 4/51 | 32/86 ± 32/78 | 37/87 ± 34/95 |
Comparison of serum hemoglobin, iron, and ferritin levels before and after the three supplementation regimens
Daily (mean ± SD) | Three times a week (mean ± SD) | Weekly (mean ± SD) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hemoglobin level(g/dL) | Before supplementation | 12/44 ± 0/99 | 12/62 ± 0/78 | 12/53 ± 0/77 | 0.518 |
After supplementation | 11/084 ± 0/82 | 14/03 ± 14/68 | 11/62 ± 0/82 | 0.276 | |
Serum iron level(μg/dl) | Before supplementation | 96/74 ± 34/31 | 94/21 ± 31/14 | 97/28 ± 31/65 | 0.962 |
After supplementation | 97/14 ± 40/06 | 99/90 ± 53/33 | 96/57 ± 62/62 | 0.970 | |
Serum ferritin level (μg/L)' | Before supplementation | 59/66 ± 45/32 | 58/82 ± 33/6 | 56/53 ± 33/33 | 0.827 |
After supplementation | 39/90 ± 4/51 | 32/86 ± 32/78 | 37/87 ± 34/95 | 0.635 | |
The mean serum iron level before and after supplementation with iron in the three groups was
not statistically significant (P = 0.962, P = 0.970, respectively, (Table 2) Although the mean serum ferritin level before and after supplementation with iron was statistically significant in the three groups, no significant differences were found comparing the three groups (P = 0.827, P = 0.635 respectively, (Table 2).
Discussion
In the current study, Authors found daily, three times a week, and weekly iron supplementation regimens were comparably effective in pregnant women without anemia. Serum ferritin and hemoglobin levels decreased after 12 weeks of supplementation. Serum ferritin decreased after supplementation with all three regimens. Because of more iron need during that period. However such decrease was not statistically significant.
Mukhopadhyay and colleagues compared daily consumption of 100 mg elemental iron (n = 55) with weekly consumption of 200 mg elemental iron (n = 56) in India. They found no significant difference in serum hemoglobin levels after 17 weeks of supplementation between their two groups [3]. In another study in Indonesia, Muslimatun and colleagues compared the effects of daily prescription of 60 mg elemental iron (n = 123) with weekly prescription of 120 mg elemental iron (n = 122) in preventing iron deficiency anemia. No significant difference was observed between the groups and the authors concluded that weekly supplementation of iron was as effective as daily supplementation in preventing anemia in pregnant women [11]. In the study by Haidar in Ethiopia, weekly iron supplementation was as effective as daily regimen in preventing anemia in breast feeding women [19]. In another study in Mexico by Casanueva and co-workers to compare the daily prescription of 60 mg elemental iron (n = 56) with weekly prescription of 120 mg elemental iron, both regimens were equally effective in preventing anemia in pregnancy. Our findings are in line with these studies [16]. In similar studies by Young and others in rural areas of Malawi and by Galloway and colleagues, 60 mg daily regimens were as effective as 120 mg weekly regimens for preventing anemia [18–20]. And similar to our study, serum hemoglobin levels were not different after 8 weeks of treatment.
In a randomized clinical trial in 2001, Goonewarden and co-workers compared the effects of daily (n = 31), three times a week (n = 35), and weekly (n = 26) prescription of 100 mg elemental iron. They measured serum hemoglobin, hematocrit, and ferritin before and after the intervention and stated that the risk of development of iron deficiency anemia was significantly higher in three times a week and weekly supplementation of iron compared with daily regimen [21]. These findings contrast with our results. The reason may be the smaller sample size, and differences in race and nutritional habits of the participants in Goonewarden's study. Mumtaz and others showed in a clinical trial that daily iron supplementation was more effective than weekly supplementation in Pakistani pregnant women. They randomly assigned 191 pregnant women with anemia (Hgb<11 g/dl) to two groups. One group received 200 mg elemental iron daily and the other group received 400 mg elemental iron twice a week. Serum hemoglobin increased significantly in women receiving daily iron supplementation. Moreover, serum ferritin was elevated only in the daily regimen [15]. The variation observed in this study can be attributed to the fact that Mumtaz and colleagues studied women who already had anemia before pregnancy. Additionally, racial, geographical, and nutritional factors could be responsible for the differences observed.
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated all of three regimens of iron supplementation; daily, three times a week and weekly are effective for prevention of anemia during pregnancy in pregnant women without anemia. Therefore, results suggested health care providers adapt weekly regimens because of the better patients' compliance. This finding can partly be explained by the expansion of plasma volume and increased need to Iron by the fetus, which usually occur in the second trimester of pregnancy. Although iron supplementation by all three regimens could not change the level to normal, it could prevent further iron deficiency anemia.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to thank the Research's Vice chancellor of the University for their financial support. We also appreciate the collaborations of the Health's Vice chancellor for as well as all the staff working in the related health centers.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Hallberge L: Iron balance in pregnancy and lactation. Nutrition Anemias. Nestle Nutrition Workshop Series. Edited by: Fomon SJ, Zlotkin S. 1992, New York. Raven Press, 13-28.Google Scholar
- Bothwell TH: Iron requirements in pregnancy and strategies to meet them. Am J Clin Nur. 2000, 72: 257-264.Google Scholar
- Mukhopadhyay A, Bhatla N, Kriplani A, Pandey RM, Saxena R: Daily versus intermittent iron supplementation in pregnant women. Hematological and pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004, 30: 409-417.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schaefer RM, Huch R, Krafft A: Current recommendations for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia. Rev Med Suisse. 2007, 3: 784-800.Google Scholar
- Breymann , Christian : Iron Deficiency and Anaemia in pregnancy : modern aspects of diagnosis and therapy. Blood cells molecules and disease. 2002, 29 (3): 506-515. 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0597.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Viteri FE, Liu XN, Martin A, Tolomeik : True absorption and retention of supplemental iron is more efficient when administered every-three- days rather than daily to iron- normal and iron-dedicient rats. J Nutr. 1995, 125: 82-91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Solomens NM: Weekly versus daily oral iron administration. Nutr Rev. 1995, 53: 326-327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frazer DM, Anderson GJ: The orchestration of body iron intake: How and where do enterocytes receive their cues?. Blood cells Mol Dis. 2003, 30: 288-297. 10.1016/S1079-9796(03)00039-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O Neil-Cutting MA, Crosby WH: Blocking of iron absorption by a preliminary oral dose of iron. Arch Intern Med. 1987, 147: 489-491. 10.1001/archinte.147.3.489.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bread JL: Effectiveness and strategies of iron supplementation during pregnancy. Am J Nutr. 2000, 71: 1288-1294.Google Scholar
- Muslimatum S, Schmidt MK, Schultink W, West CE, Hautvast JA, Cross R, Muhilal : Weekly supplementation with iron and vitamin A during pregnancy increases hemoglobin concentration but decreases serum ferritin concentration in Indonesian pregnant women. J Nutr. 2001, 131: 85-90.Google Scholar
- Ridwan E, Schultink W, Dillon D, Gross R: Effects of weeks iron supplementation on pregnant Indonesian women are similar to those of daily supplementation. Amyclin Nutr. 1996, 63: 884-890.Google Scholar
- Berger J, Aguayo VM, Tellez W, Lujan C, Traissac P, San Miguel JL: Weekly iron supplementation is as effective as 5 day per week iron supplementation in Bolivian school children living at high altitude. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997, 51: 381-386. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600418.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schultink W, Gross R: Use of daily compared with weekly iron supplementation. JClin Nutr. 1999, 69: 739-742.Google Scholar
- Mumtaz Z, Shahab S, Butt N, Rab MA, Demuynck A: Daily iron supplementation is more effective than twice weekly iron supplementation in pregnant women in Pakistan in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Nutr. 2000, 130: 2697-2702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Casanueva E, Viteri FE, Mares-Galindo M, Meza-camacho C, Loria A, Schnaas L, Valdes-Ramos R: Weekly iron as a safe alternative to daily supplementation for noanemic pregnant women. Arch med Res. 2006, 37: 674-820. 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.11.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu XN, Zhang JL, Yen HL, Viteri FE: Haemoglobin and serum feritin levels in pregnant Chinese women in response to weekly iron supplements(Abstract). proceeding of 7th Asian Congress on Nutrition; October7-11.1995, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
- Young MW, Lupafya E, Kapenda E, Bobrow EA: The effectiveness of weekly iron supplementation in pregnant women of rural northern Malawi. Trop Doct. 2000, 30: 84-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haidar J, Omwega AM, Muroki NM, Ayana G: Daily versus weekly iron supplementation and prevention of iron deficiency anaemia in lactating women. East Afr Med J. 2003, 80: 11-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galloway R, Mc Guire J: Daily versus weekly: How many iron pills do Pregnant women need?. Nutr Rev. 1996, 54: 318-323.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goone Wardene M, Liyanage C, Fernando R: Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Ceylon Med J. 2001, 46: 132-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
