Skip to main content

Effect of controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate on motility parameters of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa

Editor's Note

This article has been retracted. The retraction notice can be found here:

  • The Erratum to this article has been published in BMC Research Notes 2012 5:319



Ram spermatozoa are sensitive to extreme changes in temperature during the freeze-thaw process. The degree of damage depends on a combined effect of various factors including freezing temperature. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two cooling method (controlled-rate and uncontrolled-rate) on pre-freezing and post-thaw sperm motility parameters.


Ejaculates were collected using the artificial vagina from four Chal rams and three replicates of the ejaculates were diluted with a Tris-based extender and packed in 0.25 ml straws. Then, sample processed according to the two methods. Method 1: straws cooled from 37 to 5°C, at a liner rate of -0.3°C/min in a controlled-rate cooling machine (custom-built) and equilibrated at 5°C for 80 min, then the straws were frozen at rate of -0.3°C/min from 5°C to -10°C and -25°C/min from -10°C to -150°C and plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage. Method 2: straws were transferred to refrigerator and maintained at 5°C for 3 h, then the straws were frozen in liquid nitrogen vapor, 4 cm above the liquid nitrogen for 15 min and plunged into liquid nitrogen. Computer-assisted sperm motility analysis was used to analyze sperm motion characteristics.


Controlled rate of freezing (Method 1) significantly improve the pre-freezing and post-thaw total and progressive motility compared to uncontrolled rate (Method 2). In specific kinetic parameters, Method 1 gives significantly higher value for VSL and VCL in comparison with Method 2. There are no significant differences between the two methods for VAP and LIN. In conclusion, controlled rate of cooling conferred better cryopreserving ability to ram spermatozoa compared to uncontrolled rate of cooling prior to programmable freezing.


Considerable effort has been directed towards developing techniques for artificial insemination (AI) using frozen ram semen. Its potential in sheep breeding has become evident following the development of controlled reproduction procedures and more intensive management systems. The widespread application of AI depends largely on the use of frozen semen and thus on the availability of techniques that result in acceptable fertility in a selective breeding control programme. AI with frozen semen dispensed through the cervix gives quite low fertility rates in ram and use of laparoscopy with thawed semen is more costly and time-consuming but it improve the fertility rate significantly. The need to prepare a large number of doses of ram's semen each year requires the development of a rapid and effective method for freezing semen [1]. Spermatozoa are not adapted to survive cryopreservation, and therefore have variable responses to cooling and rewarming depending both on individual male and species [2, 3]. Ram spermatozoa are susceptible to various stresses during cryopreservation [4]. The physiological and functional changes that occur in spermatozoa such as an irreversible reduction in motility, viability and acrosome integrity [57] cause changes similar to capacitation and acrosome reaction in the surviving population [8]. Damage to sperm membranes primarily occurs during the freezing and thawing process over the temperature range -15°C to -60°C and not during storage in liquid nitrogen [9]. In the case of ram spermatozoa, most damage occurs between -10°C and -25°C, the region of ice crystallization [6]. The process of cell dehydration that accompanies slow freezing is potentially beneficial for cell survival, whereas rapid freezing rates are considered more likely to cause cell death [5].

Of considerable importance in the cooling regime is the cooling rate through the critical temperature range, defined as the range when ice crystal formation and consequent cell dehydration is occurring. The cooling rate determines whether the cells remain in equilibrium with their extracellular environment or become progressively super cooled with the increasing possibility of intracellular ice formation [10]. Freezing of ram spermatozoa in cell freezer has been commonly carried out from 5°C after precooling of straws up to 5°C in the cold chamber [1117].

Computer-controlled cooling machine was built in the laboratory to achieve rapid cooling of samples in straws under controlled conditions. A protocol based on controlled-rate cooling and freezing of ram semen in straws has been reported to improve ram semen freezing technique but the post-thaw attributes of spermatozoa were evaluated by subjective assessment [10]. Computer-aided semen analysis (CASA) technique provides precise and validated objective assessment of sperm motion characteristics [1820] and has been applied for short-term [21] and long-term preservation of ram.

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of two cooling methods (controlled-rate and uncontrolled-rate) on pre-freezing and post-thaw sperm motility parameters.


Animals and semen collection

Semen samples were collected from four mature Chal rams (3-4 years) maintained at the Animal Breeding Center Farm of IRAN. After collection, the ram semen samples were transferred within a minute to the laboratory and kept in a water bath at 37°C for examination. The rams were fed 0.91 kg of concentrate daily and good quality hay and water were supplied ad libitum. Ejaculates were collected from the rams using the artificial vagina twice a week during the breeding season (autumn to early winter).

Cryobiological procedures

General aspects

Some general procedures were established for the two methods. The volume of ejaculates was measured in a conical tube graduated at 0.1 ml intervals. The sperm concentration was determined by means of a haemocytometer and sperm motility was estimated using phase contrast microscopy (400 × ). Only ejaculates containing a semen volume varying between 1 and 2 ml, spermatozoa with >80% forward progressive motility and concentrations higher than 2.5 × 109 spermatozoa/ml were mixed in a pool balancing the sperm contribution of each male to eliminate individual differences [22]. Tris-citrate modified solution (Tris 27.1 g/l, citric acid 14.0 g/l, fructose 10.0 g/l, egg yolk 10% (v/v) glycerol 5% (v/v): 300 mOsM, pH 6.8, was used as the base extender (freezing extender). Each mixed ejaculate was split into two equal aliquots and diluted at 37°C with the base extender to a final concentration of approximately 4 × 108 spermatozoa per milliliter, in one step, in a 10 ml-glass centrifuge tube. Diluted samples were aspirated into 0.25 ml (medium-sized) French straws and sealed with polyvinyl alcohol powder. The sample processed according to the following methods and evaluated pre-freezing and post -thawing.

Semen cooling and freezing methods

Method 1: straws cooled from 37 to 5°C, at a liner rate of -0.3°C/min in a controlled-rate cooling machine (custom-built), and equilibrated at 5°C for 80 min. After equilibration, the straws were frozen in same machine at rate of -0.3°C/min from 5°C to -10°C and -25°C/min from -10°C to -150°C, then the straws were plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage. The Thermocouples of the custom-built cool in machine record the chamber temperature via a computer program and drives a motor to open and close the entrance of the nitrogen vapor source.

Method 2: straw transferred to refrigerator and maintained at 5°C for 3 h, then the straws were frozen in liquid nitrogen vapor, 4 cm above the liquid nitrogen, for 15 min and plunged into liquid nitrogen [23].

Semen thawing

Frozen straws were thawed individually at 37°C for 20 s in a water bath for evaluation immediately after thawing [23].

Evaluation of percentage of motile cells, recovery rate and kinetic parameters

A computer-assisted sperm motility analysis (CASA, Version 12 IVOS, Hamilton-Thorne Biosciences, Beverly, MA, USA) was used to analyze sperm motion characteristics. CASA was set up as follows: phase contrast; frame rate - 60 Hz; minimum contrast - 70; low and high static size gates - 0.6 to 4.32; low and high intensity gates - 0.20 to 1.92; low and high elongation gates 7 to 91; default cell size - 10 pixels; default cell intensity - 80. Semen was diluted (5 μl semen +95 μl extender) in a Tris-based extender (without egg yolk) and evaluated immediately after dilution. A 4 μl sample of diluted semen was put onto a pre-warmed chamber slide (Leja 4, Leja Products, Luzernestraat B.V., Holland) and sperm motility characteristics were determined with a 10 × objective at 37°C. Percentages of total motility and progressive motility were recorded. For both parameters the recovery rate of motility after thawing with respect to before freezing was calculated (post-thaw motility/pre-freeze motility). For thawed semen, VSL (straight linear velocity, μm/s), VCL (curvilinear velocity, μm/s), VAP (average path velocity, μm/s) and LIN = VSL/VCL × 100 (linearity, %) were noted as specific parameters of sperm motility. For each evaluation, 10 microscopic fields were analyzed to include at least 300 cells.


The results were analyzed by Analysis of Variance with semen samples as replicates, using the following model:Y = μ+αi+eij


As shown in Tables 1 controlled rate of freezing (method 1) significantly improve the pre-freezing and post-thaw total and progressive motility of ram spermatozoa compared to uncontrolled rate of freezing (method 2). The changes observed in motility are reflected in the recovery rate which indicates that method 1, preserve sperm motility better, showing significant difference with respect to the method 2. In general, it may be noted that the total motility is preserved better than progressive motility with recovery rates of 0.89 and 0.74, respectively.

Table 1 Kinetic parameters (CASA) of pre-freezing and post-thawing ram sperm for two freezing methods

In specific kinetic parameters, method 1 gives significantly higher value for VSL and VCL in comparison with method 2. There are no significant differences between the two methods for VAP and LIN (additional file 1).


The cryopreservation cycle for semen samples includes the entire process from sperm preparation and dilution through to the post-thawing maintenance of functional capacity. At each of these stages, spermatozoa need to maintain a range of functional attributes that ensure their fertilizing capacity [5]. Maintenance of sperm function during freezing and thawing depends upon several interrelated factors that include cooling rate, equilibration period and freezing method [4, 8, 13, 24] but their adverse effects are manifested on thawing. The degree of cryo-damage also depends on several factors [5, 25] which limit the survival of spermatozoa during incubation. Under the best experimental conditions about half of the population of motile sperm survives the freeze-thaw process [5, 24, 26]. In the present study it was observed that controlled rate of cooling and freezing resulted in significantly higher sperm total and progressive motility, compared to uncontrolled rate of cooling and freezing. The overall good post-thaw may be attributed to the efficacy of controlled rate freezing protocol and the criteria of processing only those ejaculates for cryopreservation which have thick consistency, >80% initial motility, >2.5 × 109 spermatozoa per ml.

The recovery rate indicates that motility is better preserved with Method 1. The fact that progressive motility is more affected by the freezing process than individual motility implies that these parameters measure different aspects of cell physiology and in particular, that the physiological basis for the progressive motility parameter is more sensitive to cryobiological damage [1]. The controlled-rate cooling protocol, besides providing complete automation in the cryopreservation process, might also protect spermatozoa against some adverse effect caused by minor fluctuation in temperature imposed by the transfer of cooled straws from cold cabinet to cell freezer as done in the uncontrolled cooling rate ram semen freezing protocol.

Apart from identifying motile and static spermatozoa CASA can also categorize spermatozoa on the basis of velocity of each motile sperm, measure the mean sperm velocity and related sperm track dimensions [20]. The measurement of sperm velocity has been considered as an indirect indicator of mitochondrial function in spermatozoa. During cryopreservation spermatozoal mitochondria undergo damages [27, 28] resulting in the decrease of respiratory rate of frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa [29]. In the present study, the mean VCL and VSL of post-thaw spermatozoa were significantly higher in samples cooled at a controlled rate (method 1), compared to samples cooled at an uncontrolled-rate (method 2), VAP of post-thaw was higher in sample cooled at method 1 but the effect was not significant thereby implying that the magnitude of mitochondrial damage was almost similar under both the cooling treatments.

Ram spermatozoa can tolerate a wide range of freezing rates [10, 13, 30]. In this study, the overall cooling rate of straws achieved under uncontrolled conditions was approximately at the rate of 0.15°C/min from 25 to 5°C, which was close to the approximate cooling rate of 0.14°C/min on cooling straws from 30 to 5°C in the cold chamber. However, under uncontrolled conditions, cooling over the period of 135 min was not at a linear rate, commencing at the rate of 0.4°C/min from 25°C for 15 min, and continuing at the rate of 0.2°C/for 15 min, 0.13°C/min for 60 min and thereafter progressed at the rate of 0.06°C/min for 45 min up to 5°C. Kumar et al. (2003) observed optimal cryosurvival of ram spermatozoa when cooled at the rate of 0.2°C/min from 22 to 5°C over a period of 90 min followed by freezing at the rate of 30°C/min from 5 to -50°C and concluded that careful control of the cooling and freezing rates are essential for maximal recovery of viable and functional cells.


The results indicated that controlled rate of cooling had significant effect on percentage of motile cells (total and progressive motility) pre-freezing and post-thawing and kinetic parameters of post-thawing ram spermatozoa, compared to uncontrolled rate of cooling prior to programmable freezing. Further research efforts are needed to comparatively assess the fertilizing ability of ram semen frozen by controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate cryopreservation protocols.


  1. 1.

    Anel L, de Paz P, Alvarez M, Chamorro CA, Boixo JC, Manso A, Gonzalez M, Kaabi M, Anel E: Field and in vitro assay of three methods for freezing ram semen. Theriogenology. 2003, 60: 1293-1308. 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00140-7.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Holt WV: Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: the importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology. 2000, 53: 47-58. 10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00239-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thurston LM, Siggins K, Mileham AJ, Watson PF, Holt WV: Identification of amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism markers linked to genes controlling boar sperm viability following cryopreservation. Biol Reprod. 2002, 66: 545-554. 10.1095/biolreprod66.3.545.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Anel L, Alvarez M, Martinez-Pastor F, Garcia-Macias V, Anel E, de Paz P: Improvement strategies in ovine artificial insemination. Reprod Domest Anim. 2006, 41 (Suppl 2): 30-42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Watson PF: Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1995, 7: 871-891. 10.1071/RD9950871.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Salamon S, Maxwell WM: Storage of ram semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000, 62: 77-111. 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00155-X.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Medeiros CM, Forell F, Oliveira AT, Rodrigues JL: Current status of sperm cryopreservation: why isn't it better?. Theriogenology. 2002, 57: 327-344. 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00674-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bailey JL, Bilodeau JF, Cormier N: Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: a damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J Androl. 2000, 21: 1-7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mazur P: Causes of Injury in Frozen and Thawed Cells. Fed Proc. 1965, 24: S175-182.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kumar S, Millar JD, Watson PF: The effect of cooling rate on the survival of cryopreserved bull, ram, and boar spermatozoa: a comparison of two controlled-rate cooling machines. Cryobiology. 2003, 46: 246-253. 10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00040-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fiser PS, Fairfull RW: Combined effects of glycerol concentration, cooling velocity, and osmolality of skim milk diluents on cryopreservation of ram spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 1986, 25: 473-484. 10.1016/0093-691X(86)90057-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fiser PS, Fairfull RW, Marcus GJ: The effect of thawing velocity on survival and acrosomal integrity of ram spermatozoa frozen at optimal and suboptimal rates in straws. Cryobiology. 1986, 23: 141-149. 10.1016/0011-2240(86)90005-2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pontbriand D, Howard JG, Schiewe MC, Stuart LD, Wildt DE: Effect of cryoprotective diluent and method of freeze-thawing on survival and acrosomal integrity of ram spermatozoa. Cryobiology. 1989, 26: 341-354. 10.1016/0011-2240(89)90058-8.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Soderquist L, Madrid-Bury N, Rodriguez-Martinez H: Assessment of ram sperm membrane integrity following different thawing procedures. Theriogenology. 1997, 48: 1115-1125. 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00344-0.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Byrne GP, Lonergan P, Wade M, Duffy P, Donovan A, Hanrahan JP, Boland MP: Effect of freezing rate of ram spermatozoa on subsequent fertility in vivo and in vitro. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000, 62: 265-275. 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00121-4.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Gil J, Soderquist L, Rodriguez-Martinez H: Influence of centrifugation and different extenders on post-thaw sperm quality of ram semen. Theriogenology. 2000, 54: 93-108. 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00328-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bag S, Joshi A, Naqvi SM, Mittal JP: Effect of post-thaw incubation on sperm kinematics and acrosomal integrity of ram spermatozoa cryopreserved in medium-sized French straws. Theriogenology. 2004, 62: 415-424. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.10.018.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Holt WV, Palomo MJ: Optimization of a continuous real-time computerized semen analysis system for ram sperm motility assessment, and evaluation of four methods of semen preparation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1996, 8: 219-230. 10.1071/RD9960219.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Verstegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K: Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology. 2002, 57: 149-179. 10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00664-1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Joshi A, Naqvi SM, Bag S, Dang AK, Sharma RC, Rawat PS, Mittal JP: Sperm motion characteristics of Garole rams raised for a prolonged period in a semi-arid tropical environment. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2003, 35: 249-257. 10.1023/A:1023347514476.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kasimanickam R, Kasimanickam V, Pelzer KD, Dascanio JJ: Effect of breed and sperm concentration on the changes in structural, functional and motility parameters of ram-lamb spermatozoa during storage at 4 degrees C. Anim Reprod Sci. 2007, 101: 60-73. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.09.001.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Gil J, Lundeheim N, Soderquist L, Rodriiuez-Martinez H: Influence of extender, temperature, and addition of glycerol on post-thaw sperm parameters in ram semen. Theriogenology. 2003, 59: 1241-1255. 10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01177-9.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bucak MN, Atessahin A, Varisli O, Yuce A, Tekin N, Akcay A: The influence of trehalose, taurine, cysteamine and hyaluronan on ram semen Microscopic and oxidative stress parameters after freeze-thawing process. Theriogenology. 2007, 67: 1060-1067. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.12.004.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Curry MR: Cryopreservation of semen from domestic livestock. Rev Reprod. 2000, 5: 46-52. 10.1530/ror.0.0050046.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Watson PF: The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000, 60-61: 481-492. 10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00099-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sanchez-Partida LG, Windsor DP, Eppleston J, Setchell BP, Maxwell WM: Fertility and its relationship to motility characteristics of spermatozoa in ewes after cervical, transcervical, and intrauterine insemination with frozen-thawed ram semen. J Androl. 1999, 20: 280-288.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Gillan L, Maxwell WM, Evans G: Preservation and evaluation of semen for artificial insemination. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2004, 16: 447-454. 10.1071/RD04034.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Peris SI, Morrier A, Dufour M, Bailey JL: Cryopreservation of ram semen facilitates sperm DNA damage: relationship between sperm andrological parameters and the sperm chromatin structure assay. J Androl. 2004, 25: 224-233.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Windsor DP: Mitochondrial function and ram sperm fertility. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997, 9: 279-284. 10.1071/R96109.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Colas G: Effect of initial freezing temperature, addition of glycerol and dilution on the survival and fertilizing ability of deep-frozen ram semen. J Reprod Fertil. 1975, 42: 277-285. 10.1530/jrf.0.0420277.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Animal Breeding Center of IRAN for supplying the rams and instrument of cryopreservation.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iraj Ashrafi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

IA carried out the design of the study and performed the cryopreservation process and analyze the sample. HK participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. HN helped to sample collection and cryopreservation process. MB helped to the cryopreservation process. HM make the programmable cooling machine. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

A retraction note to this article can be found online at

An erratum to this article is available at

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashrafi, I., Kohram, H., Naijian, H. et al. Effect of controlled and uncontrolled cooling rate on motility parameters of cryopreserved ram spermatozoa. BMC Res Notes 4, 547 (2011).

Download citation


  • Sperm Motility
  • Artificial Insemination
  • Semen Sample
  • Progressive Motility
  • Sperm Velocity