- Research article
- Open Access
Systemic effects of epidural methylprednisolone injection on glucose tolerance in diabetic patients
© Zufferey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 17 August 2011
Accepted: 21 December 2011
Published: 21 December 2011
Several studies have shown that in diabetic patients, the glycemic profile was disturbed after intra-articular injection of corticosteroids. Little is known about the impact of epidural injection in such patients. The goal of this study was double, at first comparing the glycaemic profile in diabetic patients after a unique injection of 80 mg of acetate methylprednisolone either intra-articular or epidural and secondly to compare the amount of systemic diffusion of the drug after both procedures.
Seventeen patients were included. Glycemic changes were compared in 9 diabetic patients following intra-articular (4 patients) and epidural injections (5 patients).
Epidural injections were performed using the sacral route under fluoroscopic control in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Diabetes control had to stable for more than 10 days and the renal function to be preserved. Blood glucose was monitored using a validated continuous measuring device (GMS, Medtronic) the day before and for two days following the injection. Results were expressed in the form of daily glycemic profiles and as by mean, peak and minimal values +/- SD. The urinary excretion of methylprednisolone after the 2 routes of injection was analyzed in 8 patients (4 in each group). Urine samples were cropped one hour before the injections, then 4 times during the first day and 3 times a week for 2 weeks. The measurements included the free and conjugated fraction
The glycaemic profile remains unchanged with no significant changes in the group of the 5 diabetic patients receiving epidural injections.
On the other end, the average peak and and mean values were enhanced up to 3 mmol/l above baseline two days after the infiltration in the groups of the 4 diabetic patients infiltrated intra-articular. The mean urinary excretion of the steroid was about ten times higher in the intra-articular versus epidural group: 7000 ng/ml versus 700 ng/ml. Looking at each individual there were marked differences especially after intra-articular injections.
This is the first study to show that a single epidural steroid injection of 80 mg depot methylprednisolone had no effect on the glycemic control in diabetic patients. The absence of glycemic control changes correlated well with the very low urinary excretion of the drug after epidural injection.
Several studies [1–3] have shown that in diabetic patients, the glycaemic profile can be profoundly disturbed after an intra-articular corticosteroid injection. The elevation of blood glucose is attributed to diffusion of the injected drug from the joint into the systemic circulation. The amount of steroids in the systemic compartment and the duration of local and systemic effects are related to the solubility of the preparation, the dose injected and probably the degree of inflammation of the joint [3, 4]. Amstrong  have shown that plasma steroid levels could vary up to five times from one patient to another following injection into the knee joint. On the contrary, little is known about the kinetics of absorption and systemic diffusion of methylprednisolone or other steroid preparations after epidural injection. Jacob et al.  suggested that very little of the drug diffused outside the epidural space since they were not able the measure any significant plasma concentration of the drug after an epidural injection of 80 mg of acetate of methylprednisolone. Moreover, no study has evaluated, to our knowledge, the impact of epidural injection of an depot steroid on the glycaemic profile in diabetic patients.
In a former study , we have evaluated systemic diffusion of methylprednisolone, triamcilone and depot bethametasone in 25 patients either after intra articular or intra-muscular injections by measuring the urinary excretion of the compounds. The mean excretion after intra-articular was slightly lower than after intra- muscular but in the same range.
Our study had two objectives. Firstly, we wished to compare the effects on the glycaemic profile after an injection of 80 mg of methylprednisolone acetate either by the epidural route or intra-articularly, in diabetic patients. Secondly, we compared the systemic diffusion of steroids in the two procedures.
Due to the small number of patients in each group statistics were limited to Student Test comparison. P< 0.05 was considered as significant.
The protocole was approved by the ethical committee of the university of Lausanne Switzerland. Seventeen non consecutive patients and healthy subjects were included in the study between September 2008 and May 2010. All gave their informed consent.
Characteristics of the participants
Urinary excretion evaluation
Urinary excretion evaluation
Mean age [years] (SD)
Duration of the illness[years]
None of the patients had a renal impairment which could interfere with renal elimination of the steroids. The characteristics of Diabetes (duration of the illness type of treatment were similar in both groups) Fasting glycaemia had to be stable for at least 10 days before steroid injection and no changes in diabetic treatment or in life-style were permitted during the three days of the study.
Blood glucose was measured using a continuous device (CGMS, Medtronic, Switzerland) the day before [day 1] and for two days following the injection. The CGMS sensor was inserted under the abdominal skin. For the three days, the glycaemic profile was recorded every 5 min, and the data stored on a portable device attached to a belt. At the end of the evaluation, the data were transferred to a computer for analysis. The device permitted the test subject to take part in normal daily activities. The accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements taken by the CGMS sensor have been confirmed . Results were expressed in the form of daily glycaemic profiles as well as by mean, peak and minimal values +/- SD.
Eighty mg of acetate methylprednisolone [Depomedrol® MSD] was administered by either the intra-articular route or by epidural injection. The same experienced rheumatologist who was not in charge of the diabetes made all the infiltrations. Epidural injections were performed using the sacral route under fluoroscopic control with prior injection of contrast agent in order to confirm the exact localisation of the product . The indications for steroid injections were symptomatic spinal stenosis in all the patients. Intra-articular injections were performed in patients with either an inflammatory (3 times) or degenerative diseases (3 times) in the knee (6 times) according to standard procedure and in the shoulder under ultrasound guidance (2 times).
For urinary excretion measurements, urine samples were collected one hour before the injection, then 4 times during the first day and finally 3 times a week for 2 weeks each two days, between 7-9 h AM the morning. The measurements included the free and the conjugated fraction of the injected steroid and were all performed by the Swiss Laboratory for Doping Analyses according to a validated and published method [7, 10].
For this conjugated form, the mean of highest + 3 standard deviations was about ten times higher in the intra-articular versus epidural group: 7000 ng/ml versus 700 ng/ml (Figure 3). We noticed individual differences in the intra-articular group, not linked to the diabetic status. The range of excretion remained for 3 out 4 of them much higher than after epidural infiltration. They were no differences in the epidural group, between the 2 diabetic and the 2 non-diabetic patients. In all of them, the excretion was much lower than after intra-articular infiltrations (Figure 3)
Discussion and conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that a single epidural steroid injection of 80 mg depot methylprednisolone had no effect on the glycaemic profile. Different results were obtained after epidural injection of soluble betamethasone and soluble cortivazol [11, 12]. The authors of this study showed a significant increase of glycaemia in the evening following the injection. The glycaemic profile remained also higher for two following days but the increase was no longer significant. This difference between the two studies could be related to the type of steroid used [soluble versus depot steroid] which have been shown to have different metabolism and speediness of elimination in human and in experimental animal models .
On the contrary, intra-articular methylprednisolone at the same dose induced a trend to increases of blood glucose in the two days following intra-articular injection. Identical observations have been reported with the same and other depot steroids [1–3]. In most studies, the peak of glycaemia was reached within 48 h and declined rapidly afterwards [2, 3]. This could not be confirmed since, in our study, the observation was limited to 2 days after the injections. Most authors mentioned great individual variations as in our work. The small number of patients included in our study does not permit us to determine the causes of such differences. It could be due to the location of the joint infiltrated [knee, shoulder] and the type of arthropathy [inflammatory versus degenerative one].
The absence of blood glucose modification after epidural injection correlated well with the very low urinary excretion of the drug. Indeed the mean excretion was about ten times less than that observed in our patients after intra-articular infiltration and in a previous study  after intra-articular or intra muscular injections. These results suggest that following epidural injections, methylprednisolone remains mostly locally in the epidural space and only small amounts enter the systemic compartment. There is however no data in the literature as how corticosteroids injected in the epidural space are metabolized. The synovial membrane particularly when inflamed probably does not behave like the epidural membrane and the volume of dilution in the epidural space is much larger than in most synovial cavities.
After intra-articular injections, we observed important individual variations of urinary excretion which could in part explain the various glycaemic profiles. These variations cannot be explained by the localisation of the injections since 3 out of 4 patients were infiltrated in to the knee. They have been found with other steroid compounds but anyhow in most patients the urinary excretions remain much higher than the ones observed after epidural infiltrations [9, 10].
There are several limitations to this study. First the product used: acetate of methylprednisolone. Although it has been the most intensively studied steroid compound in epidural injections  is no longer officially recommended in some countries (Frances, Switzerland). This restriction is however also extended to most depot steroid because of a potential although poorly documented link between injections and rare cases of arachnoiditis. The second is the small number of patients included. However, in the epidural group, the results either for the glycaemic profile or the urinary excretion rate are so convergent that reliable conclusions can reasonably be drawn. Moreover the presence of diabetes does not influence urinary excretion, very low in all the patients. This is not the case in the intra-articular infiltrated groups. Potential causes of the discrepancies between patients in the post-injection glycaemic profile have been mentioned above. The same remarks can be made for urinary excretion rate. Moreover, as the patients infiltrated in the two parts of the study were not strictly identical no individual correlation between glycaemia and urinary excretion is feasible. For all these reason no definite conclusion about the risk of diabetic decompensation after an intra-articular at an individual level can be made.
In conclusion our data have shown that epidural injection with methylprednisolone can be considered as safe in diabetic patients. Further extensive studies are needed to draw similar conclusions after intra-articular injection.
To the lab of Forensic medicine in Lausanne that performed the urinary analysis of methylprednisolone
- Uboldi F, Carlo-Stella N, Belloli L, et al: Glucose blood levels after intra-articular steroid injection in diabetic and non diabetic patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2009, 28: 491-2. 10.1007/s10067-009-1091-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Habib G, Safia Al: The effect of intra-articular injection of betamethasone on glucose levels in controlled diabetic patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of knee. Clin Rheumatol. 2008, 28: 1023-9. 10.1007/s00296-008-0556-1.Google Scholar
- Habib G, Bashir M, Jabbour A: Increased blood glucose levels following intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone acetate in patients with controlled diabetes and symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008, 67: 1790-1791. 10.1136/ard.2008.089722.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mader R, Lavi I, Luboshitzky R: Evaluation of pituitary-adrenal axis function following single intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52: 924-8. 10.1002/art.20884.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amstrong RD, English J, et al: Adrenal suppression following extradural steroid. Annal Rheum Disease. 1981, 40: 571-574. 10.1136/ard.40.6.571.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs S, et al: Serum methylprednisolone levels following intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone acetate. Anesthesia. 1983, 10: 953-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bailloux I, Avois L, Desmarcheliers A, Lahaussois A, Méchin N, Gremion G, Saugy M, de Ceaurriz J: Elimination of seven synthetic glucocorticosteroids in urine according to the route of administration: preliminary results. 26nd Cologne Workshop on Dope Analysis. 2008, 24-29.Google Scholar
- Currie CJ, Poole CD, Papo NL: An overview and commentary on retrospective, continuous glucose monitoring for the optimisation of care for people with diabetis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009, 25: 2389-400. 10.1185/03007990903094452.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spaccarelli K: Lumbar and caudal epidural corticosteroid injections. Mayo clinic proceeding. 1996, 71: 169-78. 10.4065/71.2.169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Badoud E, Avois L, Boccard J, Guillarme D, Veuthey J, Rudaz S, Saugy M: Quantification of glucuronidated and sulfated steroids in human urine by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011, 400: 503-516. 10.1007/s00216-011-4779-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez P, Laker SR, Sullivan W, et al: The effects of epidural betamethasone on blood glucose in patients with diabetes mellitus. PMR. 2009, 4: 340-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Younes M, Neffati F, Touzi M, et al: Systemic effects of epidural and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2007, 74 (5): 472-6. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.10.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rull M, Clayburne G, Sieck M, et al: Intra-articular corticosteroid preparations: different characteristics and their effect during inflammation induced by monosodium urate crystals in the rat subcutaneous air pouch. Rheumatology. 2003, 42: 1093-100. 10.1093/rheumatology/keg305.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, et al: Systematic review of therapeutic lumbar. transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Physician. 2009, 12: 233-51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.