Skip to main content
Download PDF

Intravaginal practices and microbicide acceptability in Papua New Guinea: implications for HIV prevention in a moderate-prevalence setting

BMC Research Notes volume 5, Article number: 613 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The acceptability of female-controlled biomedical prevention technologies has not been established in Papua New Guinea, the only country in the Pacific region experiencing a generalised, moderate-prevalence HIV epidemic. Socio-cultural factors likely to impact on future product uptake and effectiveness, such as women’s ability to negotiate safer sexual choices, and intravaginal hygiene and menstrual practices (IVP), remain unclear in this setting.

Methods

A mixed-method qualitative study was conducted among women and men attending a sexual health clinic in Port Moresby. During in-depth interviews, participants used copies of a hand-drawn template to indicate how they wash/clean the vulva and/or vagina. Interviewers pre-filled commercially available vaginal applicators with 2-3mL KY Jelly® to create a surrogate vaginal microbicide product, which was demonstrated to study participants.

Results

A total of 28 IDIs were conducted (women=16; men=12). A diverse range of IVP were reported. The majority of women described washing the vulva only with soap and water as part of their daily routine; in preparation for sex; and following sexual intercourse. Several women described cleaning inside the vagina using fingers and soap at these same times. Others reported cleaning inside the vagina using a hose connected to a tap; using vaginal inserts, such as crushed garlic; customary menstrual ‘steaming’ practices; and the use of material fragments, cloth and newspaper to absorb menstrual blood. Unprotected sex during menstruation was common. The majority of both women and men said that they would use a vaginal microbicide gel for HIV/STI protection, should a safe and effective product become available. Microbicide use was considered most appropriate in ‘high-risk’ situations, such as sex with non-regular, transactional or commercial partners. Most women felt confident that they would be able to negotiate vaginal microbicide use with male sexual partners but if necessary would be prepared to use product covertly.

Conclusions

Notional acceptability of a vaginal microbicide gel for HIV/STI prevention was high among both women and men. IVP were diverse in nature, socio-cultural dimensions and motivators. These factors are likely to impact on the future acceptability and uptake of vaginal microbicides and other biomedical HIV prevention technologies in this setting.

Background

Women bear a disproportionate burden of HIV, constituting over 50% of all those living with HIV worldwide and nearly 60% in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. In many countries, gender inequity means that women are unable to negotiate condom use, especially within marriage. Safe, effective, affordable HIV prevention methods that are initiated and controlled by women have therefore been seen as a high priority for HIV prevention. Vaginal microbicides are gels, cream or other topical preparations applied by a woman to reduce her risk of acquiring HIV sexually [2]. Some preparations have been designed for application immediately before and/or after each vaginal sex act (e.g. gels, dispersible tablets, films), whilst others such as intravaginal rings are intended to be placed in the vagina and to release microbicide over several weeks, providing protection independent of the timing of sexual activity. The past two decades have seen a number of trials of candidate microbicides, but until recently, none had been proven to be safe and effective in clinical trials [3–5]. A major breakthrough occurred in 2010 when the CAPRISA 004 trial in South Africa found that vaginally-administered tenofovir gel reduced HIV acquisition in women by 39% overall (and by 54% in those with high adherence), and was safe, acceptable and well tolerated [6]. Furthermore, the gel provided a similar level of protection to women against acquisition of Herpes simplex type-2 (HSV-2). Should these results be confirmed in a second trial [7], a new era in HIV prevention can truly begin.

The availability of a new prevention technology however, raises new questions for public health policy makers. In order for tenofovir gel and other tenofovir-based microbicides currently in development (such as vaginal films and dispersible pessaries [8–10]) to have the greatest impact, research is required to understand the diverse socio-cultural, behavioural and structural contexts into which such products could be introduced [11]. Information is also required on their acceptability to women and their sexual partners, and the impact that vaginal microbicide use may have on other HIV prevention strategies, particularly condom acceptability and use [11–14]. For example, research in Africa showed that although vaginal microbicides were conceived as female controlled methods that could be used covertly and not require male consent, in practice most women inform their partners, showing that acceptability and use need to be seen in the context of couple relationships [13]. The same research further showed how cultural preference for specific sexual practices interacted with microbicide acceptability [15]. A study among female sex workers (FSWs) in Uganda [16] found that foaming microbicide tablets and sponges were the most popular delivery mechanisms, and gel and film the least. Participants found the gel too messy and worried that the film would not dissolve. They liked the sponges because they could insert them in the morning and would be prepared for unexpected sex. Alternatively, in the MDP301 trial [4], married women in the same area of Uganda were very positive about study gel because it enhanced sexual enjoyment due to increased lubrication. It is possible that these differences were related to the different kinds of sexual relationships that the women in the two studies had and/or to the different physical properties of the two gels. This suggests that different products will be preferred in different contexts, and that acceptability research is necessary in different potential target groups.

Intravaginal hygiene and menstrual practices (IVP) have been recognised as possible risk factors for HIV and STI acquisition in women [17–23] and important influences on the acceptability and efficacy of vaginal microbicides in HIV prevention trials [24–28]. Research from a variety of developed and developing countries indicates that IVP are common among women at different levels of HIV/STI acquisition risk [15, 17, 24, 27–35]. For example, in a study among women working in food and recreational facilities in Mwanza, Tanzania, Allen et al. (2010) found that intravaginal cleansing using fingers, water and soap was considered necessary to remove vaginal secretions, menstrual blood and post-coital discharge, and was carried out within 2 hours of 45% of reported sex acts [24]. A household survey among 3610 women in Mozambique, South Africa, Indonesia and Thailand found that the prevalence, type, frequency, and motivations for IVP varied significantly by setting, with intravaginal cleansing and insertion of traditional products most common in African study sites and oral ingestion of products considered to have vaginal effects most common in Asia [29]. IVP have the potential to negate the protective efficacy of vaginal microbicides for HIV prevention either by creating an adverse intravaginal environment (e.g. by altering intra-luminal pH) or by mechanical means (e.g. microbicide gel is washed out immediately after sex) [24]. They are also likely to impact on the acceptability and preference of different microbicide products in different settings (e.g. gels may be preferred in settings where vaginal ‘wetness’ is desirable and where women enhance lubrication through IVP; intravaginal rings or film formulations may be preferred in settings where women are concerned about partner perceptions of ‘excessive’ vaginal lubrication and where they use IVP to induce a ‘drier’ vagina prior to sex) [27, 35, 36].

Although overall HIV prevalence is below 1% in virtually all Asia-Pacific countries, the region is second only to sub-Saharan Africa in terms of the number of people living with HIV [37]. The HIV epidemic in Asia has been largely concentrated in people who inject drugs, sex workers and their clients and men who have sex with men, but increases in heterosexually-acquired HIV infection have been reported from a number of countries, including Bangladesh [38, 39], China [40, 41], Indonesia [42–44] and Pakistan [45, 46]. Of particular note has been the increase in the proportion of women living with HIV in the region from 19% in 2000 to 35% in 2008, with striking increases observed in China [40] and India [47]. There are emerging, generalized heterosexual HIV epidemics in PNG and in neighbouring Tanah Papua Province in Indonesia, with estimates of adult HIV prevalence in the range 1-2% in these settings [48]. Other countries in the Pacific have to date experienced modest HIV epidemics but very high prevalences of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have been reported both among FSWs and in community-based surveys [48–53]. The HIV epidemic in PNG is primarily linked to heterosexual transmission and shows significant heterogeneity, with over half the reported HIV diagnoses coming from three of its 22 provinces [54], placing women in some locations and socio-cultural contexts at considerably higher risk of HIV infection than others [48, 54–58]. Some models have forecast that under certain scenarios, adult HIV prevalence in PNG could reach 10% over the next 15 years [59, 60]. In Indonesia, Tanah Papua Province is experiencing a generalized HIV epidemic that has many parallels with the epidemic in neighbouring PNG. HIV prevalence among men and women aged 15–49 years in Tanah Papua was recently estimated at 2.4%, the highest in Indonesia and approximately 15 times the national average [61]. Among ethnic Papuans, HIV prevalence was almost twice that of other residents (2.8%, 1.5% respectively).

In these settings, new, female-initiated HIV prevention agents are potentially very appealing to both women at risk and to public authorities responsible for prevention. Apart from some limited trials of earlier candidate microbicides in two sites in Thailand [62–66] and India [66–72], virtually all of the recent trials of microbicides have been conducted in African countries. Asia-Pacific countries have been considered to have HIV incidence that is too low to justify efficacy trials, but high enough in some areas for microbicides to play an important role in prevention once they are proven safe and efficacious.

In this paper we report findings from the first study conducted in a moderate-prevalence setting in the Pacific region to investigate intravaginal practices and vaginal microbicide acceptability, and discuss the implications of our findings on future HIV prevention policy and research priorities.

Methods

This study was conducted over a nine-month period in 2010–11. Fieldwork and data collection were carried out from April – June 2010, followed by the interview data transcription, translation, coding and qualitative data analysis.

The study was conducted at Nine-Mile Sexual Health Clinic in Port Moresby, PNG (Figure 1), which is located in a disadvantaged urban area and administered by a non-governmental organization (HOPE Worldwide, PNG) on behalf of the National Capital District Department of Health. In addition to providing services to women and men from the general community, the clinic has an active community outreach and peer support program developed in collaboration with Family Health International (FHI) PNG that is designed to facilitate service uptake by people at increased risk of HIV/STI acquisition, particularly male and female sex workers and men who have sex with men. Clinic staff provided an overview of the study to potential participants as part of routine health talks (tok save) given at the start of each day to clients attending the clinic. Peer educators provided similar information to potential study participants through their community outreach activities. Those who expressed an interest in hearing more about the study and potentially taking part were invited to participate in preliminary group discussions at the clinic in which they were provided with more detailed information about the study by trained researchers and clinic staff. Clients who expressed an interest in study participation were then invited to take part in an in-depth interview (IDI), which took place at a location of their choice following the completion of informed consent procedures. This study location was selected because of the high proportion of women and men at increased HIV/STI acquisition risk who attend this clinic, including FSWs and their clients, and vulnerable individuals living in illegal urban settlement areas. Separate IDI guides were developed for interviews with women and men by the research team, in consultation with clinic staff. IDI guides included four thematic areas of inquiry: background information; sexual behaviour and sexual health; intravaginal and menstrual practices; and female-controlled methods of HIV protection. All interviews were conducted by trained, experienced and gender-appropriate interviewers in tok pisin (VF, HA).

Figure 1
figure1

Nine-Mile Sexual Health Clinic, Port Moresby, PNG.

Full size image

Socio-demographic and sexual behavioural data, including experience of male and female condom use, were collected from all participants. To facilitate discussion on intravaginal hygiene and menstrual practices (IVP), women were invited to use copies of a hand-drawn template to indicate how they wash/clean their vulva and/or vagina, and to provide commonly-used, locally-appropriate names for anatomical structures by labelling the drawing. Templates were developed by the research team in consultation with clinic staff and piloted with volunteers from the clinic for appropriateness and acceptability prior to use. Women were also asked to comment on practices they had heard other women in the community were conducting and to indicate these using the template. Men were asked whether they were aware of their sexual partners conducting such practices or if they had heard about other women in the community conducting such practices, and to use the template to indicate these. Participants indicated IVP using marker pens, highlighter pens, biro and/or pencils provided by the study team and if literate, were asked to write the names of anatomical structures onto the sheet. Where participants were unable to read or write, interviewers wrote down participant’s comments / anatomical names on the sheet on their behalf, using English and/or tok pisin depending on the language used by individual participants.

Men and women were shown male and female condoms, which interviewers’ opened and encouraged participants to handle and comment on. Participants were asked to reflect on their experiences of condom use; the factors that had determined use in different contexts and behavioural scenarios; their personal views of condom acceptability; and their views about acceptability and use among women and men in the wider community.

Interviewers introduced the concept of a vaginal microbicide to participants and demonstrated a surrogate microbicide gel and applicator, prepared prior to each interview by research staff using commercially available vaginal applicators that were pre-filled with 2-3mL KY Jelly® (Figure 2 and 3). This volume was selected based on earlier microbicide efficacy trials, in particular the MDP301 trial [4]. Interviewers demonstrated how such a product would be used in practice, based on information provided to MDP301 trial participants [73]. Participants were invited to handle the surrogate microbicide and to ask any questions they may have regarding future use of such a product.

Figure 2
figure2

Products used to make ‘dummy’ microbicide gel and applicator.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure3

Demonstrating microbicide surrogate to study participants.

Full size image

Interviewer: ‘Now I’d like to talk to you about new methods of protection being developed. We hope that women will be able to use these to protect themselves against HIV and sexually transmitted infections in future. These products are known as ‘vaginal microbicides’ and will probably be available in the form of vaginal gels or creams. We hope that an effective microbicide will become available in the next 3–5 years. I have here an example of what a vaginal microbicide gel might look like ( Hold up pre-loaded dummy applicator ). In future, women could insert a gel like this into the vagina, either daily or just before each sex act, to protect them against HIV and sexually transmitted infections.” ( Demonstrate how applicator would be inserted into the vagina; different positions she could use for insertion; gel volume and consistency. Give her the applicator to handle. Encourage her to ask questions about microbicides ).

Interviewers then asked participants to reflect on their views of personally using such a product in future, in the context of their individual sexual lives and reported IVP e.g. would they tell their husband / sexual partner(s) that they were using such a product or might they in some situations consider covert use? Similarly, they were asked to reflect on how such a product would be perceived and used by the wider community.

All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and where necessary translated from tok pisin (a lingua franca of PNG) into English at the PNG Institute of Medical Research (PNG IMR) in Goroka. All personal identifiers were removed from the interview transcripts and pseudonyms given to each participant. Following data cleaning and initial review of interview transcripts, a preliminary coding framework was developed by the research team to capture data relevant to each key thematic area of inquiry (e.g. respondents views on the frequency of IVP among women in their community were coded ‘IVP-freq-comm’; individual motivators for IVP were coded ‘IVP-mot-self’). The research team then hand-coded printed interview transcripts. The coding framework was periodically reviewed as data coding proceeded and additional codes and/or sub-codes added in an iterative data management process. Themes were derived from the data during preliminary analysis of the coded transcripts, which was led by senior members of the research team (LF, AV), prior to critical review and discussion with the wider group e.g. to seek alternative themes and explanations arising from the data. A summary of key findings and their interpretation was then drafted (AV, LF) and illustrative quotes selected from individual interview transcripts in order to exemplify specific issues and concepts that had emerged across the dataset.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Research Advisory Committee (MRAC) in PNG and from the Human Research Ethics Committees of the University of Queensland and the University of New South Wales in Australia. All participants provided written informed consent in either English or tok pisin. All participants were advised that they could withdraw from the study at any time without prejudice. The study was conducted in accordance with the RATS guidelines on qualitative research (http://www.biomedcentral.com/ifora/rats).

Results

Twenty-eight IDIs were conducted with women (n=16) and men (n=12) from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds (Table 1). The majority of participants (19/28) lived in urban settlements at the time of the study. Two women who self-identified as FSWs took part in this research.

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants
Full size table

Traditional customs and norms relating to women’ bodies

Traditional customs and norms surrounding women’s bodies were described by both male and female participants. Such traditions were reported as common among people from communities in the Highlands of PNG, where menstruating women isolate themselves from male family members, not touching or preparing food, or having sexual intercourse, for fear that maternal blood could ‘contaminate’ or weaken men. Male participants drew on traditional stories of men being weakened in warfare and becoming sick if they ate food prepared by, or had sex with, menstruating women. Several men described providing support to their wives during their monthly menses, in order to support customary practices, for example:

“I’m an old man and at this time now. In the past when women have their menstruation like my wife, when having her flow and she cooks, I will not eat the food she cooked …the food will not taste good and we will vomit. She will not walk in front of me or close to where food will be prepared. She will stay on her own for until one or two weeks later she can hold or serve food. She can bring food from the garden but I will cook for the family. That is our traditional behaviour”. John, male

“So when this thing [period] comes I use to tell my wife, let me cook, and you rest for four or five days”. Mego, male

Women talked about the importance of flow of menstrual blood from the womb, and how flow could be ‘blocked’ by sexual intercourse during menstruation. Female participants described learning cultural practices from female family and village members. Some participants lamented the discontinuation of traditional customs, especially those who had moved away from their village. A number of participants described how they themselves did not follow all traditional cultural practices, for example, by engaging in sexual intercourse during menstruation.

“The women when we have our monthly flow, we must not cook food and give to our family members especially our husbands. That is a very important thing. I will not cook food and give. I must not come close to the kitchen or the chair where my husband sits. I must stay outside and they will give me food. It’s a very big taboo for us to have sex with our husbands during that time …it’s a belief that when he goes to the village he will not have money, food or all these things [if sex during menstruation occurs]”. Pate, female

Intra-vaginal hygiene and menstrual practices (IVP)

A diverse range of IVP were reported by female participants using the pre-tested template (Figure 4). Many anatomical structures were referred to using descriptive terms and did not appear to have specific names in tok pisin (e.g. bean for clitoris; grass for pubic hair) and there was no common term for vulva. Vagina was commonly referred to as rot blong pikinini [Lit: ‘baby’s road’] by both men and women; but kan used only infrequently e.g. among sex workers.

Figure 4
figure4

Example IVP templates completed by female study participants.

Full size image

A typology or classification framework of IVP has recently been proposed, based on research conducted as part of a WHO Gender, Sexuality and Vaginal Practices (GSVP) Study, within which the results of the current study have been summarised (Table 2) [30].

Table 2 Summary of intravaginal practices reported by women and men taking part in this study, using the classification proposed in the WHO Gender, Sexuality and Vaginal Practices Study [29]1
Full size table

The majority of women in PNG described washing the vulva only with soap and water as part of their daily routine; in preparation for sex; and following sexual intercourse. Several women described cleaning inside the vagina using fingers and soap at these same times. Others reported cleaning inside the vagina using a hose connected to a tap; use of vaginal inserts (such as crushed garlic for improved genital health or ‘virgin soap’ for intravaginal tightening); customary ‘steaming’ practices associated with menstruation; and the use of material fragments, cloth, newspaper, baby nappies and sanitary towels to absorb menstrual blood. Unprotected sex during menstruation appeared common and was reported by both women and men.

Washing was undertaken for the purposes of hygiene, to avoid ‘bad smell’, to remove ‘dirt’, to prevent ‘sickness’, and to ‘protect the womb’. Female participants learnt about vaginal hygiene from their mothers and grandmothers as part of traditional rites of passage. For those living in urban localities, friends were the main source of information. It was acknowledged that urban residents had more access to water and hence washed more regularly than rural residents. Most described cleaning as a private matter not discussed with male partners, although a few participants did discuss IVP with their partners, with some male partners actively helping partners to wash.

“No I soap my outside body and wash it… I don’t push it right in [the vagina] but just enough to wash it”. Seguto, female

“I don’t think all women do this because when I walk past them, I smell their body odour…they don’t wash it [vagina] properly…dirt is still there and it comes down on the underwear and bad air comes from it that causes the bad smell… Personally I fear of getting sick inside the womb so the way I wash myself is that, I open my two legs and I put my hand right inside. I put my hand right inside and wash it…not all the fingers but only one or two fingers…I put inside and soap it. I soap it, wash and rinse it properly. I open my legs like this and I wash it. I’m scared of diseases. So I wipe it with a towel when washing and clean it properly”. Napoga, female

“..when they pass you it will smell and you will say ‘she must not have washed…she is smelly’…they must wash every morning and afternoon. It is good they keep their bodies and vaginas clean to protect themselves and to have children easily”. Mego, male

A number of intravaginal practices were associated with menstruation. The choice of menstrual products was associated with price, availability and cultural norms. Sanitary products were described as expensive and difficult to access. It was uncommon for women to use internal menstrual products. Participants who practiced traditional customs associated with menstruation discussed the importance of releasing menstrual blood and did not use tampons or other internal products for fear that these would ‘stop the flow’ of blood and cause sickness. To aid the flow of blood, a few women described traditional ‘smoking’ practices using burnt coconut leaves, and ‘steaming’, which involved sitting over hot water infused with herbs and garlic, or leaves from lemon, guava and avocado trees.

“I think that when wearing modes [sanitary pads] or toilet roll and all this, it blocks the bad air back inside and by this I think it will cause sickness inside”. Napoga, female

“Some women tear off pieces of cloth and put it into their underwear or such. They can’t afford to buy [sanitary products] so, they use newspapers. Okay some women wear laplaps [cloth wrap-around skirt]. They just roll down or put it to their back. Women in the village wear these laplaps to stop themselves staining their trousers or skirts. Some women stay inside the house”. Kakana, female

“I pour the water [herbal infusion] into a bucket, sit down on the bucket and the steam will go inside. It will clean the dirt inside and you will see it in the water. After steaming, you will feel light and nice. When we wear pads, it blocks the bad blood inside. When you steam the blood will come outside …the dish will be full of it’ Napoga, female

Several female respondents reported hearing of women cutting up soap bars (e.g. ‘Klina’ soap available in PNG) into small blocks and inserting them into the vagina prior to menstruation. When menstrual blood appears, the soap is washed out.

Many female participants reported sex during menstruation, often under pressure from their male partners, and despite cultural taboos relating to these practices and to the importance of menstrual exclusion among women from Highlands communities. Women and men from cultural groups that traditionally considered sex during menstruation taboo reported engaging in such practices, whilst recognising the conflict between their contemporary and customary beliefs. Several male and female respondents said they would not consider using a condom when having sex during menstruation due to concerns about the condom ‘blocking rubbish to come out’:

“And when I have my period, he asks to use a condom but I use to say no. When he has sex with me during my menstruation time, it stops, I don’t have my period. He stops it and I get afraid of that because he puts back inside; the rubbish. So I will get sick, it worries me. Napoga, female

IVP for contraception and to induce abortion were also described. Eating the bark and leaves of a certain tree was discussed as a form of contraception, or a means to induce abortion e.g. in combination with the intravaginal insertion of soap. Others described tying ‘a rope around the belly, and putting soap inside the vagina’ to cause abortion.

“Yeah they usually mix hot water with soap and egg and drink it… They drink it and it comes out like blood”. Dorothy, female

‘Virgin soap’ was discussed by female participants as an increasingly popular vaginal insert used by ‘mothers’ or ‘married’ women to tighten the vagina. The soap was seen as a proactive method to keep male partners faithful by making sexual intercourse more pleasurable for them. One participant who had tried the soap described a painful, burning experience:

“They said when we women give birth to children, our muscles become weak but his soap will cause it to tighten the women’s muscles. …I bought [virgin soap] from one woman; they sold it for 5 Kina [approx. USD 2.00]. It was a small bit they sold and they said it was virginity soap. They said if wash with this soap, it will contract your muscles and you will become small and 16 again and when you have sex with your husband, he will really like it. So they convinced me and I bought one and used it only one time. I soaped myself and they told me to put it into the vagina for around 30 or 20 seconds and it just burned me. It really burned me and I just stopped and rinsed myself and I said that I won’t use it again”. Kakana, female

In contrast to other settings [15, 24, 25], none of the women interviewed reported inserting lemon, lime, herbs or other substances (e.g. to increase or decrease vaginal lubrication) and both women and men were unaware of such use in the wider community. The use of vulval inserts was described by one female participant (“they used to shave the hair of the vagina and put earrings along the sides”), which she considered a practice carried out mainly by women who engage in sex work. Anecdotal accounts of such practices were also reported by health care workers at Nine-Mile Clinic.

Female condom use and acceptability

The majority of men and women said they had not previously seen or handled a female condom but said they would consider using one in future, primarily with non-regular partners because they trusted their spouse or long term partner. The dominant sexual practice discussed was ‘straight sex’or ‘skin to skin’, that is, vaginal sex without a condom. Although some participants had used male condoms, mainly for contraception, few did so regularly and few used male condoms for protection against STIS/HIV. Condoms were described as being for unmarried people, or those not in ‘trusting’ relationships.

“We think that condoms are for promiscuous people… so we don’t think of using condoms: we do it skin to skin”. Kakana, female

“We don’t usually use them [condoms]. He used to talk about using it [a condom] but I usually say ‘I am not your prostitute’ and ‘I have what kind of sick?’ and I used to get cross with him; chase him away from the house”. Napoga, female

When shown a female condom in the interview context many participants were very interested in learning about them, especially female participants, some of whom were worried about their partner’s infidelity. Only three women reported using a female condom in the past, all of whom said that they would continue to use and to negotiate use with their partners in future.

Vaginal microbicide gel acceptability

The majority of both women and men said that they would use a product like the surrogate gel and applicator to provide protection against genital infections, STIs and HIV, should a safe and effective product become available in future. Many participants said that they would use a future product because they thought it would not only provide protection against STIs and HIV, but also enhance the ‘health of the womb’ more broadly or ‘prevent us getting sicknesses like other kinds of infection or sexual disease or pregnancy’.

The majority of women and men interviewed in the study thought that future microbicide use would be most appropriate in perceived as ‘high-risk’ situations, such as sex with non-regular, transactional or commercial partners (‘two Kina meri’). Many respondents thought it unnecessary to use a microbicide with ‘trusted’ partners, as the following quotes illustrate:

“The sex workers who go around having sex, these kinds of women usually get the sick and give it to the men, so it’s good that they bring this medicine now so that it will help us, the married couple. These women have sex with our husbands and they spoil our married life. The married man will bring the sick, so it’s more good that the medicine will come and the women will use this, and the sick will not come into the married couple. I want this medicine to come”. Napoga, female

“I won’t tell her [my wife] to use it because she trusts me and I trust her” Moko, male

“I trust him [steady boyfriend]…I will use it only with some other partners” Daisy, female

Most women felt confident that they would be able to negotiate future vaginal microbicide use with their sexual partners but if necessary, would be prepared to use products covertly. Covert use was considered empowering for married women who were worried about their husband’s infidelity. Some female participants however, questioned covert use for fear of inciting male partner anger or violence.

“I like what you said about using this gel. You know I am a housewife and the man is working and he goes out. Sometimes when I insist to use a condom during sex he will say, ‘I’m not your boyfriend’ and he will throw it away. I like what you talked about the gel and my husband will not know about it if I use, knowing that he’s having affairs outside”. Pate, female

“It’s my secret so I will insert it [vaginal microbicide] and we will have sex. I will not tell them because some have diseases and are thinking to give it to me. If I put this medicine in [with their knowledge] they will be cross, get upset and hit me.’ Dorothy, female

When shown the surrogate microbicide most women agreed that the product would be easy to use, and could be applied in various geographical locations before sex. Some women expressed concerns that applicators might be difficult to use without initial counselling and support from health care staff; that incorrect use could result in vaginal trauma; that gel might leak out when urinating or standing up; that gel use could affect a woman’s ability to conceive.

“If we don’t put it in properly it might go right inside…might damage the vagina”. Dorothy, female

Many women asked questions regarding the ‘wetness’ that the gel would cause, and what the reaction of male partners might be to this, especially if gel were being used covertly. ‘Wetness’ was associated with menstruation or having an STI, and some female participants feared the reaction of male partners if extra wetness were perceived. One female participant however described how increased vaginal lubrication might make sex more pleasurable for women.

“Yeah when I insert this medicine inside and when we want to have sex, he will ask me about the wetness. He will ask me if I’m having my monthly menstruation”. Dorothy, female

“Some men when they want to have sex they prefer the woman’s vagina is dry and if this thing is put inside and it becomes watery, the men will ask the women to clean it and there’s no choice”. Seguto, female

“If our husbands don’t agree and we use this medicine, we put it and they thinks it is too greasy and they find out, this too will bring some problems into the family”. Kakana, female

One female participant questioned the use of the microbicide for fear that it would ‘block’ the flow of maternal blood, and cause sickness to the womb:

“…when we put this thing inside, it will block this monthly flow to come outside and will cause some kind of problem to the womb. It will go and damage the tube inside where the flow comes”. Daisy, female

Male participants were generally positive about the potential benefits of a vaginal microbicide for the health of their female partners and for their own protection against STIs/HIV, however two male participants suggested that the use of a vaginal microbicide might cause more ‘promiscuous’ sexual behaviours.

“I think that we must not put it in public; we must give it to the people who come to the clinic only. If they want to use it they must use it themselves …putting it public will make them think that the medicine have come already so they can do it [have sex] and when they continue to do that it might increase the HIV rate in PNG. I saw in the newspapers that the HIV rate of Australia is 0.02% or something and PNG is 2% or 3% and up. We have a small population and they introduced condoms in public and this has made it worse so how will this [microbicides] reduce this?” Mego, male

Discussion

Intra-vaginal hygiene and menstrual practices (IVP) were diverse in nature, socio-cultural dimensions and motivators in this setting. A dynamic combination of traditional and contemporary practices were reported, with some women engaging in new practices that they recognised as being in conflict with traditional norms and beliefs(e.g. the use of ‘virgin soap’; sex during menstruation). Broad reproductive health concerns (maintaining genital cleanliness, removal of ‘dirt’, preventing ‘bad smell’, maintaining a ‘healthy womb’) appeared to be more important motivators of vaginal practices than specific concerns focussed on enhancing sexual pleasure or on the prevention of HIV and STIs. The WHO Gender, Sexuality and Vaginal Practices (GSVP) Study included a household survey on IVP conducted among 3610 women aged 18–60 years in Mozambique, South Africa, Indonesia and Thailand [29, 30], and found that the prevalence, motivators and contexts of vaginal practices varied markedly between countries. IVP in participating African sites appeared to be motivated primarily by a desire to maintain male partner commitment and to increase male and female sexual pleasure. Conversely, in participating sites in Asia, genital hygiene and femininity were primary motivators. Researchers in a variety of settings [15, 24, 29, 30, 33, 74] have similarly distinguished ‘sexual-related’ and ‘hygiene-related’ IVP, and highlighted the potential of vaginal washing, insert and other practices (conducted at different time points, and driven by different motivators), to modulate susceptibility to HIV/STI acquisition and transmission. For example, women who use lime or lemon juice intravaginally (e.g. as a traditional contraceptive; for protection against genital infections; or for enhanced male sexual pleasure [24, 34, 75]) are likely to be at increased risk of cervical dysplasia, cervical epithelia disruption and HIV acquisition, based on recent laboratory and clinical trials data [76–80]. The use of soaps, detergents, and other products used as part of daily genital hygiene or carried out before and/or after sex, could potentially result in vaginal irritation, inflammation or epithelial disruption, thereby increasing infection risk. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 studies in Africa and the USA concluded that intravaginal practices do not appear to protect women from STIs, genital infections or HIV, and that there is inconclusive evidence whether some practices may increase acquisition risk [22].

Depending on their nature and timing, vaginal practices also have the potential to negate the protection afforded by vaginal microbicides, either by mechanical means (e.g. microbicide gel is diluted or washed out) or through chemical interaction (e.g. vaginal insert chemically reacts with microbicide product or alters intravaginal environment sufficiently to reduce product effectiveness). Although we attempted to clarify the temporal relationship between IVP and vaginal sex in this study, it was not possible to establish precise estimates during in-depth interviews with participants. Vaginal insert practices appeared uncommon in this setting and no respondents reported the insertion of lemon or lime juice. Sex during menses was however common and has the potential to increase the risk of HIV infection due to blood exposure (particularly transmission to uninfected male partners [81–85]), and to reduce microbicide effectiveness due to altered vaginal pH and other physiological changes [86–88]. Further research is warranted, using combinations of behavioural research methods as utilised in other settings [24, 74, 89–91], to better understand these inter-relationships and their implications for future microbicide uptake, adherence and effectiveness in PNG.

Notional acceptability of vaginal microbicide gels for HIV/STI prevention was high among both women and men in this study. Microbicide acceptability was perceived within a broad reproductive health framework i.e. that use would promote a ‘healthy womb’ or help ‘prevent sickness or pregnancy’, in addition to preventing HIV. This perception was held by women and men and is in contrast to advice provided by the research team. Conversely, one female respondent was concerned that gel could ‘block’ menstrual flow and cause sickness in the womb. Many women and men thought that microbicides would best be used by sex workers and considered use between ‘trusted partners’ unnecessary. Most women were confident that they would be able to negotiate gel use with their sexual partners in future and many were prepared to use microbicides covertly should their partner refuse. Other women were concerned that increased vaginal ‘wetness’ would make truly covert use difficult and could expose them to increased risk of physical or sexual violence. There were mixed views on the potential of microbicide gels to modify sexual pleasure for women and their male partners. Some women reported that their partners preferred ‘their vagina dry’ and that men would ‘ask women to clean it [out]’ should they use gel; one woman reported that increased vaginal lubrication would make sex more pleasurable for women. Women were confident that they could use a product similar to the surrogate microbicide in future but some were concerned that initial use might be problematic without appropriate counseling and support from health workers. These findings clearly have implications for future microbicides research and for the introduction of safe and effective vaginal microbicides for HIV prevention in PNG.

Low levels of awareness and lack of experience using female condoms are cause for concern, but also represent an important opportunity for comprehensive HIV prevention programs in PNG, given that notional acceptability was high among women and men in this study. Further research to clarify in-use acceptability and adherence of female condoms, including gendered sexual dynamics, socio-cultural contexts and motivators influencing use, are warranted to inform female condom promotion programs in this setting.

A challenge in countries such as PNG that have great geographic, linguistic and cultural diversity is to develop culturally-nuanced and innovative strategies for HIV prevention. This study has shown that women and men from a variety of socio-cultural backgrounds, who are at increased risk of HIV/STI acquisition, are notionally supportive of vaginal microbicides for HIV prevention in this setting. The need to engage male partners in microbicides research and in strategies for future product introduction has been recognized [13, 27] and is essential in countries such as PNG where sexual dynamics are particularly male dominated. It remains unclear how other microbicide formulations currently in development (such as intra-vaginal rings, dispersible vaginal tablets and films [8–10]) would be perceived and most effectively incorporated into people’s individual sexual lives in this setting. In-use acceptability research planned by our group will address these issues in future.

What are the implications of our research findings for HIV prevention in PNG and other Asia-Pacific countries? Firstly, our findings need to be interpreted with caution given the modest sample size, purposively selected from a population of women and men attending an urban sexual health clinic in a disadvantaged area of Port Moresby, making generalisability problematic. This population is however considered representative of people at increased risk of HIV and STI acquisition in PNG, a key potential target group for the future introduction of vaginal microbicides and other biomedical prevention technologies. Other limitations are that the notional acceptability of alternative vaginal microbicide formulations and dosing regimens were not evaluated in this study (including coitally-independent products such as intravaginal rings); and because this research was conducted prior to the successful CAPRISA 004 trial result becoming available, gel acceptability was not evaluated in the knowledge that a safe and effective vaginally-administered product had been identified. Although biomedical prevention technologies such as male circumcision and vaginal microbicides are expected to play an important role in comprehensive HIV prevention strategies in high-burden settings, their role in moderate prevalence settings is less clear. A key challenge having investigated notional acceptability and the determinants of acceptability will be to decide how future interventions could best be implemented in order to ensure the greatest public health impact. Population-level implementation of a moderately-effective vaginal microbicide is likely to be less cost-effective in lower burden settings than targeted introduction among those most at-risk of HIV acquisition [92–94], such as women in HIV sero-discordant relationships or female sex workers [95]. The ethical and moral hazards of not making such products widely available to all women clearly also need to be considered, particularly in countries where women’s sexual agency may be very limited, but should be balanced against potential risks such as condom migration [12, 14] and the emergence of antiretroviral drug resistance [96]. Comprehensive guidance on these issues for low and moderate burden settings is not currently available but is urgently required to guide HIV prevention policy outside Africa. Complementary health systems research [97, 98] and epidemiological mathematical modeling [92, 93] being conducted by our group are assisting policy makers and development partners in PNG to develop evidence-based policy. This approach may represent a model for other moderate-burden countries considering a combination of biomedical prevention technologies for HIV prevention.

Conclusions

Notional acceptability of a vaginal microbicide gel for HIV prevention was high among women and men at increased risk of HIV and STI acquisition attending a sexual health clinic in PNG. Further research is warranted to investigate the in-use acceptability and adherence of different microbicide formulations in this setting, and to establish the role of vaginal microbicides and other biomedical prevention technologies in countries experiencing moderate-burden HIV epidemics.

Consent

We obtained verbal consent from all those in the photograph.

References

  1. 1.

    UNAIDS: UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic 2010. 2010, Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McCormack S, Hayes R, Lacey CJ, Johnson AM: Science, medicine, and the future. Microbicides in HIV prevention. BMJ. 2001, 322: 410-413.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Balzarini J, Van Damme L: Microbicide drug candidates to prevent HIV infection. Lancet. 2007, 369 (9563): 787-797. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60202-5.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    McCormack S, Ramjee G, Kamali A, Rees H, Crook AM, Gafos M, Jentsch U, Pool R, Chisembele M, Kapiga S, et al: PRO2000 vaginal gel for prevention of HIV-1 infection (Microbicides Development Programme 301): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Lancet. 2010, 376 (9749): 1329-1337. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61086-0.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nuttall J, Romano J, Douville K, Galbreath C, Nel A, Heyward W, Mitchnick M, Walker S, Rosenberg Z: The Future of HIV Prevention: Prospects for an Effective Anti-HIV Microbicide. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2007, 21 (1): 219-239. 10.1016/j.idc.2007.01.009.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Karim QA, Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, Mansoor LE, Kharsany AB, Sibeko S, Mlisana KP, Omar Z, et al: Effectiveness and Safety of Tenofovir Gel, an Antiretroviral Microbicide, for the Prevention of HIV Infection in Women. Science. 2010, 329: 1168-1174. 10.1126/science.1193748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    CONRAD: FDA and CONRAD Chart U.S. Regulatory Path for 1% Tenofovir Gel for HIV Prevention. 2010, Available at: http://www.conrad.org/media/news/88_CONRAD%20FDA%20Meeting%20Release%2020%20Final.doc

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Akil A, Dezzutti C, Moncla B, Parniak M, Graebing P, Cost M, Dumanli I, Rohan LC: Quick-dissolve films as drug delivery systems for combination microbicides. International Microbicides Conference 2010. 22-25 May 2010, USA: Pittsburgh PA

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang L, Dezzutti C, Moncla B, Parniak M, Mallipeddi R, Friend D, Rohan LC: Formulation of a Tenofovir containing quick-dissolve film product. International Microbicides Conference 22–25 May 2010. 2010, USA: Pittsburgh PA

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Garg S, Gupta J, Othman A, Singh S: Development and evaluation of novel solid dosage forms of Tenofovir. International Microbicides Conference 22–25 May 2010. 2010, USA: Pittsburgh PA

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Mantell JE, Myer L, Carballo-Dieguez A, Stein Z, Ramjee G, Morar NS, Harrison PF: Microbicide acceptability research: current approaches and future directions. Soc Sci Med. 2005, 60 (2): 319-330. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.011.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Foss AM, Vickerman PT, Heise L, Watts CH: Shifts in condom use following microbicide introduction: should we be concerned?. AIDS. 2003, 17 (8): 1227-1237. 10.1097/00002030-200305230-00015.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Montgomery CM, Lees S, Stadler J, Morar NS, Ssali A, Mwanza B, Mntambo M, Phillip J, Watts C, Pool R: The role of partnership dynamics in determining the acceptability of condoms and microbicides. AIDS Care. 2008, 20 (6): 733-740. 10.1080/09540120701693974.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wilson DP, Bodine EN, Smith RJ, Blower SM: Care should be taken when promoting microbicide use among sex workers who are able to use condoms consistently. AIDS. 2005, 19 (17): 2044-2046. 10.1097/01.aids.0000191920.24185.cb.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gafos M, Mzimela M, Sukazi S, Pool R, Montgomery CM, Elford J: Intravaginal insertion in KwaZulu Natal: new insights into sexual practices and preferences in the context of microbicide gel use. Cult Health Sex. 2010, 12 (8): 929-42. 10.1080/13691058.2010.507876.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pool R, Whitworth J, Green G, Mbonye AK, Harrison S, Wilkinson J, Hart G: An acceptability study of female controlled methods of protection against HIV and STDs in south-western Uganda. Internat J STD AIDS. 2000, 11 (3): 162-167. 10.1258/0956462001915606.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Myer L, Denny L, De Souza M, Barone MA, Wright TC, Kuhn L: Intravaginal practices, HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases among South African women. Sex Transm Dis. 2004, 31 (3): 174-179. 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000114942.41998.58.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Myer L, Kuhn L, Stein ZA, Wright TC, Denny L: Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and women’s susceptibility to HIV infection: epidemiological evidence and biological mechanisms. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005, 5 (12): 786-794. 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70298-X.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Myer L, Denny L, de Souza M, Wright TC, Kuhn L: Distinguishing the temporal association between women’s intravaginal practices and risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection: a prospective study of South African women. Am J Epidemiol. 2006, 163 (6): 552-560. 10.1093/aje/kwj071.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    van de Wijgert JH, Morrison CS, Cornelisse PG, Munjoma M, Moncada J, Awio P, Wang J, Van der Pol B, Chipato T, Salata RA, et al: Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal yeast, but not vaginal cleansing, increase HIV-1 acquisition in African women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008, 48 (2): 203-210. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181743936.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    van de Wijgert JH, Morrison CS, Brown J, Kwok C, Van Der Pol B, Chipato T, Byamugisha JK, Padian N, Salata RA: Disentangling contributions of reproductive tract infections to HIV acquisition in African Women. Sex Transm Dis. 2009, 36 (6): 357-364. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a4f695.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hilber AM, Francis SC, Chersich M, Scott P, Redmond S, Bender N, Miotti P, Temmerman M, Low N: Intravaginal practices, vaginal infections and HIV acquisition: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (2): e9119-10.1371/journal.pone.0009119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Low N, Chersich MF, Schmidlin K, Egger M, Francis SC, van de Wijgert JH, Hayes RJ, Baeten JM, Brown J, Delany-Moretlwe S, et al: Intravaginal practices, bacterial vaginosis, and HIV infection in women: individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2011, 8 (2): e1000416-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000416.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Allen CF, Desmond N, Chiduo B, Medard L, Lees SS, Vallely A, Francis SC, Ross DA, Hayes RJ: Intravaginal and menstrual practices among women working in food and recreational facilities in Mwanza, Tanzania: implications for microbicide trials. AIDS Behav. 2010, 14 (5): 1169-1181. 10.1007/s10461-010-9750-8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Braunstein S, van de Wijgert J: Preferences and practices related to vaginal lubrication: implications for microbicide acceptability and clinical testing. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005, 14 (5): 424-433. 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Priddy FH, Wakasiaka S, Hoang TD, Smith DJ, Farah B, del Rio C, Ndinya-Achola J: Anal sex, vaginal practices, and HIV incidence in female sex workers in urban Kenya: implications for the development of intravaginal HIV prevention methods. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011, 27 (10): 1067-72. 10.1089/aid.2010.0362.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Woodsong C, Alleman P: Sexual pleasure, gender power and microbicide acceptability in Zimbabwe and Malawi. AIDS Educ Prev. 2008, 20 (2): 171-187. 10.1521/aeap.2008.20.2.171.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lees S, Desmond N, Allen C, Bugeke G, Vallely A, Ross D: Sexual risk behaviour for women working in recreational venues in Mwanza, Tanzania: considerations for the acceptability and use of vaginal microbicide gels. Cult Health Sex. 2009, 11 (6): 581-595. 10.1080/13691050902721846.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hull T, Hilber AM, Chersich MF, Bagnol B, Prohmmo A, Smit JA, Widyantoro N, Utomo ID, Francois I, Tumwesigye NM, et al: Prevalence, motivations, and adverse effects of vaginal practices in Africa and Asia: findings from a multicountry household survey. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011, 20 (7): 1097-1109. 10.1089/jwh.2010.2281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Martin Hilber A, Hull TH, Preston-Whyte E, Bagnol B, Smit J, Wacharasin C, Widyantoro N: A cross cultural study of vaginal practices and sexuality: implications for sexual health. Soc Sci Med. 2010, 70 (3): 392-400. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.023.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Reed BD, Ford K, Wirawan DN: The Bali STD/AIDS study: association between vaginal hygiene practices and STDs among sex workers. Sex Transm Infect. 2001, 77 (1): 46-52. 10.1136/sti.77.1.46.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Reiff M, Wade C, Chao MT, Kronenberg F, Cushman LF: Health practices and vaginal microbicide acceptability among urban black women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008, 17 (8): 1345-1351. 10.1089/jwh.2008.0886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Scorgie F, Smit JA, Kunene B, Martin-Hilber A, Beksinska M, Chersich MF: Predictors of vaginal practices for sex and hygiene in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: findings of a household survey and qualitative inquiry. Cult Health Sex. 2011, 13 (4): 381-398. 10.1080/13691058.2010.550321.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Turner AN, Morrison CS, Munjoma MW, Moyo P, Chipato T, Van De Wijgert JH: Vaginal practices of HIV-negative Zimbabwean women. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Veldhuijzen N, Nyinawabega J, Umulisa M, Kankindi B, Geubbels E, Basinga P, Vyankandondera J, Van De Wijgert J: Preparing for microbicide trials in Rwanda: focus group discussions with Rwandan women and men. Cult Health Sex. 2006, 8 (5): 395-406. 10.1080/13691050600859302.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sharma A, Bukusi E, Posner S, Feldman D, Ngugi E, Cohen CR: Sex preparation and diaphragm acceptability in sex work in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Health. 2006, 3 (4): 261-268. 10.1071/SH06021.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    UNAIDS/WHO: AIDS epidemic update: December 2009. 2009, Geneva: UNAIDS/WHO

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Azim T, Khan SI, Haseen F, Huq NL, Henning L, Pervez MM, Chowdhury ME, Sarafian I: HIV and AIDS in Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2008, 26 (3): 311-324.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Azim T, Rahman M, Alam MS, Chowdhury IA, Khan R, Reza M, Chowdhury EI, Hanifuddin M, Rahman AS: Bangladesh moves from being a low-prevalence nation for HIV to one with a concentrated epidemic in injecting drug users. Int J STD AIDS. 2008, 19 (5): 327-331. 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007269.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Lu L, Jia M, Ma Y, Yang L, Chen Z, Ho DD, Jiang Y, Zhang L: The changing face of HIV in China. Nature. 2008, 455 (7213): 609-611.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Wang L, Wang N, Li D, Jia M, Gao X, Qu S, Qin Q, Wang Y, Smith K: The 2007 Estimates for People at Risk for and Living With HIV in China: Progress and Challenges. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009, 50 (4): 414-418. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181958530.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Iskandar S, Basar D, Hidayat T, Siregar IM, Pinxten L, van Crevel R, Van der Ven AJ, De Jong CA: High risk behavior for HIV transmission among former injecting drug users: a survey from Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 472-10.1186/1471-2458-10-472.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jacubowski N: Marriage is not a safe place: heterosexual marriage and HIV-related vulnerability in Indonesia. Cult Health Sex. 2008, 10 (1): 87-97. 10.1080/13691050601058573.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Magnani R, Riono P, Nurhayati A, Saputro E, Mustikawati D, Anartati A, Prabawanti C, Majid N, Morineau G: Sexual risk behaviours, HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Indonesia. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86 (5): 393-9. 10.1136/sti.2009.038059.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Khan AA, Awan AB, Qureshi SU, Razaque A, Zafar ST: Large sharing networks and unusual injection practices explain the rapid rise in HIV among IDUs in Sargodha. Pakistan. Harm Reduct J. 2009, 6: 13-10.1186/1477-7517-6-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Khan AA, Khan A: The HIV epidemic in Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010, 60 (4): 300-307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    NACO: UNGASS country progress report 2008: India. 2008, New Delhi: National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vallely A, Page A, Dias S, Siba P, Lupiwa T, Law G, Millan J, Wilson D, Murray JM, Toole M, et al: The prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in Papua New Guinea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (12): e15586-15510.11371/journal.pone.0015586.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Fotinatos N, Warmington A, Walker T, Pilbeam M: Trichomonas vaginalis in Vanuatu. Aust J Rural Health. 2008, 16 (1): 23-27. 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2007.00932.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Haddow LJ, Sullivan EA, Taylor J, Abel M, Cunningham AL, Tabrizi S, Mindel A: Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection in women attending an antenatal clinic in the South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu. Sex Transm Dis. 2007, 34 (5): 258-261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Zenner D, Russell S: Sexually transmitted diseases and HIV/AIDS in Vanuatu: a cause for concern and action. N Z Med J. 2005, 118 (1220): U1610-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Cliffe SJ, Tabrizi S, Sullivan EA: Chlamydia in the Pacific region, the silent epidemic. Sex Transm Dis. 2008, 35 (9): 801-806. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318175d885.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    WPRO: Second Generation Surveillance Surveys of HIV, other STIs and Risk Behaviours in 6 Pacific Island Countries (2004–2005). 2006, Manila: World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Office

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    National AIDS Council Secretariat and National Department of Health: The 2007 Estimation Report on the HIV Epidemic in Papua New Guinea. 2007, Port Moresby: National AIDS Council of Papua New Guinea

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sladden T: Twenty years of HIV surveillance in the Pacific - what do the data tell us and what do we still need to know?. Pacific Health Dialogue. 2005, 12 (2): 23-37.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Duke T: HIV in Papua New Guinea: the need for practical action, and a focus on human resources and health systems for women and children. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008, 44 (11): 611-612. 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01396.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    UNAIDS/WHO: Oceania: AIDS epidemic update. Regional Summary. 2008, Geneva, Switzerland: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO)

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    National_AIDS_Council: Papua New Guinea National Strategic Plan on HIV/AIDS, 2006–2010. 2005, Port Moresby: National AIDS Council

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Worth H, Henderson K: AIDS is a tear in the social fabric of PNG: HIV and its impact 2005–2025. Health Sociology Review. 2006, 15 (13): 293-304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    AusAID: Impacts of HIV/AIDS 2005–2025 in Papua New Guinea, Indonesia and East Timor. Final Report of HIV Epidemiological Modelling and Impact Study. 2006, Canberra, Australia: Australian Agency for International Development, Commonwealth of Australia

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Vallely A, Shagi C, Kasindi S, Desmond N, Lees S, Chiduo B, Hayes R, Allen C, Ross D: The benefits of participatory methodologies to develop effective community dialogue in the context of a microbicide trial feasibility study in Mwanza. Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2007, 7: 133-10.1186/1471-2458-7-133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Whitehead SJ, Kilmarx PH, Blanchard K, Manopaiboon C, Chaikummao S, Friedland B, Achalapong J, Wankrairoj M, Mock P, Thanprasertsuk S, et al: Acceptability of Carraguard vaginal gel use among Thai couples. AIDS. 2006, 20 (17): 2141-2148. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32801086c9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kilmarx PH, van de Wijgert JH, Chaikummao S, Jones HE, Limpakarnjanarat K, Friedland BA, Karon JM, Manopaiboon C, Srivirojana N, Yanpaisarn S, et al: Safety and acceptability of the candidate microbicide Carraguard in Thai Women: findings from a Phase II Clinical Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006, 43 (3): 327-334. 10.1097/01.qai.0000243056.59860.c1.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Kilmarx PH, Blanchard K, Chaikummao S, Friedland BA, Srivirojana N, Connolly C, Witwatwongwana P, Supawitkul S, Mock PA, Chaowanachan T, et al: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the safety and acceptability of use of carraguard vaginal gel by heterosexual couples in Thailand. Sex Transm Dis. 2008, 35 (3): 226-232. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815d6e0d.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Jones HE, Chaikummao S, van de Wijgert JH, Friedland BA, Manopaiboon C, Witwatwongwana P, Wankrairot M, Chantharojwong N, Kilmarx PH: Acceptability of a carrageenan-based candidate vaginal microbicide and matching placebo: findings from a phase II safety trial among women in Chiang Rai, Thailand. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009, 18 (7): 1003-1010. 10.1089/jwh.2008.0862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Bentley ME, Fullem AM, Tolley EE, Kelly CW, Jogelkar N, Srirak N, Mwafulirwa L, Khumalo-Sakutukwa G, Celentano DD: Acceptability of a microbicide among women and their partners in a 4-country phase I trial. Am J Public Health. 2004, 94 (7): 1159-1164. 10.2105/AJPH.94.7.1159.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Malonza IM, Mirembe F, Nakabiito C, Odusoga LO, Osinupebi OA, Hazari K, Chitlange S, Ali MM, Callahan M, Van Damme L: Expanded Phase I safety and acceptability study of 6% cellulose sulfate vaginal gel. AIDS. 2005, 19 (18): 2157-2163. 10.1097/01.aids.0000194797.59046.8f.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Joshi S, Solomon S, Mayer K, Mehendale S: Preparing for efficacy trials of vaginal microbicides in Indian women. Indian J Med Res. 2005, 121 (4): 502-509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Joshi S, Joglekar N, Ghate M, Unni J, Risbud A, Bentley M, Shepherd M, Bollinger R, Mehendale S: Phase I safety & preliminary acceptability of nonoxynol-9 vaginal pessary as a vaginal microbicide in low risk women in Pune, India. Indian J Med Res. 2003, 117: 152-157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Joglekar NS, Joshi SN, Deshpande SS, Parkhe AN, Katti UR, Mehendale SM: Acceptability and adherence: findings from a Phase II study of a candidate vaginal microbicide, ‘Praneem polyherbal tablet’, in Pune, India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010, 104 (6): 412-415. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.12.007.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Joglekar N, Joshi S, Kakde M, Fang G, Cianciola M, Reynolds S, Mehendale S: Acceptability of PRO2000 vaginal gel among HIV un-infected women in Pune, India. AIDS Care. 2007, 19 (6): 817-821. 10.1080/09540120601133576.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Greene E, Batona G, Hallad J, Johnson S, Neema S, Tolley EE: Acceptability and adherence of a candidate microbicide gel among high-risk women in Africa and India. Cult Health Sex. 2010, 12 (7): 739-54. 10.1080/13691051003728599.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Vallely A, Lees S, Shagi C, Kasindi S, Soteli S, Kavit N, Vallely L, McCormack S, Pool R, Hayes RJ: How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza. Tanzania. BMC Med Ethics. 2010, 11: 10-10.1186/1472-6939-11-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lees S, Cook C, Vallely A, Desmond N, Allen C, Kiro K, Wamoyi J, Medard L, Pool R, Hayes RJ, et al: Comparison of sexual behavior data collected using a coital diary and a clinic-based interview during a microbicide pilot study in Mwanza, Tanzania. Sex Transm Dis. 2010, 37 (8): 497-501.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Short RV: New ways of preventing HIV infection: thinking simply, simply thinking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006, 361 (1469): 811-820. 10.1098/rstb.2005.1781.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Anukam KC, Reid G: In vitro evaluation of the viability of vaginal cells (VK2/E6E7) and probiotic Lactobacillus species in lemon juice. Sex Health. 2009, 6 (1): 67-74. 10.1071/SH08037.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Fletcher PS, Harman SJ, Boothe AR, Doncel GF, Shattock RJ: Preclinical evaluation of lime juice as a topical microbicide candidate. Retrovirology. 2008, 5: 3-10.1186/1742-4690-5-3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Hemmerling A, Potts M, Walsh J, Young-Holt B, Whaley K, Stefanski DA: Lime juice as a candidate microbicide? An open-label safety trial of 10% and 20% lime juice used vaginally. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007, 16 (7): 1041-1051. 10.1089/jwh.2006.0224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Mauck CK, Ballagh SA, Creinin MD, Weiner DH, Doncel GF, Fichorova RN, Schwartz JL, Chandra N, Callahan MM: Six-day randomized safety trial of intravaginal lime juice. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008, 49 (3): 243-250. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318186eae7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Sagay AS, Imade GE, Onwuliri V, Egah DZ, Grigg MJ, Musa J, Thacher TD, Adisa JO, Potts M, Short RV: Genital tract abnormalities among female sex workers who douche with lemon/lime juice in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2009, 13 (1): 37-45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC: Sexual exposure to blood and increased risks for heterosexual HIV transmission in Cape Town, South Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2004, 8 (2): 55-58. 10.2307/3583177.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Malamba SS, Wagner HU, Maude G, Okongo M, Nunn AJ, Kengeya-Kayondo JF, Mulder DW: Risk factors for HIV-1 infection in adults in a rural Ugandan community: a case–control study. AIDS. 1994, 8 (2): 253-257. 10.1097/00002030-199402000-00014.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Mattson CL, Bailey RC, Agot K, Ndinya-Achola JO, Moses S: A nested case–control study of sexual practices and risk factors for prevalent HIV-1 infection among young men in Kisumu, Kenya. Sex Transm Dis. 2007, 34 (10): 731-736.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Sarkar K, Bal B, Mukherjee R, Niyogi SK, Saha MK, Bhattacharya SK: Epidemiology of HIV infection among brothel-based sex workers in Kolkata, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2005, 23 (3): 231-235.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Tanfer K, Aral SO: Sexual intercourse during menstruation and self-reported sexually transmitted disease history among women. Sex Transm Dis. 1996, 23 (5): 395-401. 10.1097/00007435-199609000-00009.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Brabin L, Roberts SA, Fairbrother E, Mandal D, Higgins SP, Chandiok S, Wood P, Barnard G, Kitchener HC: Factors affecting vaginal pH levels among female adolescents attending genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect. 2005, 81 (6): 483-487. 10.1136/sti.2005.014621.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Farage MA, Neill S, MacLean AB: Physiological changes associated with the menstrual cycle: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009, 64 (1): 58-72. 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181932a37.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Weinberg A, Enomoto L, Marcus R, Canniff J: Effect of menstrual cycle variation in female sex hormones on cellular immunity and regulation. J Reprod Immunol. 2011, 89 (1): 70-77. 10.1016/j.jri.2010.11.009.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Pool R, Montgomery CM, Morar NS, Mweemba O, Ssali A, Gafos M, Lees S, Stadler J, Crook A, Nunn A, et al: A mixed methods and triangulation model for increasing the accuracy of adherence and sexual behaviour data: the Microbicides Development Programme. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (7): e11600-10.1371/journal.pone.0011600.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Pool R, Montgomery CM, Morar NS, Mweemba O, Ssali A, Gafos M, Lees S, Stadler J, Crook A, Nunn A, et al: Assessing the accuracy of adherence and sexual behaviour data in the MDP301 vaginal microbicides trial using a mixed methods and triangulation model. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (7): e11632-10.1371/journal.pone.0011632.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Allen CF, Lees SS, Desmond NA, Der G, Chiduo B, Hambleton I, Knight L, Vallely A, Ross DA, Hayes RJ: Validity of coital diaries in a feasibility study for the microbicides development programme trial among women at high risk of HIV/AIDS in Mwanza, Tanzania. Sex Transm Infect. 2007, 83 (6): 490-496. 10.1136/sti.2007.024810. discussion 496–497

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Gray RT, Murray JM, Vallely A, Lote N, Lupiwa T, Millan J, Daoni E, Kaldor J, Siba P, Wilson D: The PNG HIV Model: Explaining the past, describing the present, and forecasting the future of the HIV epidemic in PNG. Australasian HIV/AIDS Conference, 26 - 28 September 2011. 2011, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Gray RT, Murray JM, Wilson DP, Vallely A, Kaldor J: The PNG HIV Model - Summary and Results: Explaining the past, describing the present, and forecasting the future of the HIV epidemic in PNG. 2011, Sydney, Australia: The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Wilson DP, Coplan PM: Mathematical models and health economic aspects of microbicides. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2008, 3: 587-592. 10.1097/COH.0b013e328305b959.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Smith RJ, Bodine EN, Wilson DP, Blower SM: Evaluating the potential impact of vaginal microbicides to reduce the risk of acquiring HIV in female sex workers. AIDS. 2005, 19: 413-421. 10.1097/01.aids.0000161771.44276.92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Wilson DP, Coplan PM, Wainberg MA, Blower SM: The paradoxical effects of using antiretroviral-based microbicides to control HIV epidemics. Proc Nat Acad Sciences. 2008, 105 (28): 9835-9840. 10.1073/pnas.0711813105.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Tynan A, Vallely A, Kelly A, Law G, Milan J, Siba P, Kaldor J, Hill P: Vasectomy as a proxy: extrapolating health system lessons to male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy in Papua New Guinea. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012, 12 (1): 299-10.1186/1472-6963-12-299.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Tynan A, Vallely A, Kelly A, Kupul M, Law G, Milan J, Siba P, Kaldor J, Hill PS: Health workers, health facilities and penile cutting in Papua New Guinea: Implications for male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy. PNG Med J. 2012, In Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the women and men who participated in this research for their sharing their experiences and for their valuable contribution to microbicides research in Papua New Guinea.

The authors would also like to acknowledge the support and generosity of the PNG National Department of Health; HOPE Worldwide, PNG; and Family Health International; without whom this study would not have been possible.

Funding

This research was conducted as part of the Male Circumcision Acceptability and Impact Study (MCAIS), PNG, which is supported by a development research award from the Australian Government’s Overseas Aid Program (AusAID); and by a research grant from the University of Queensland, Australia.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Andrew Vallely & John M Kaldor

  2. Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea

    Andrew Vallely, Voletta Fiya, Herick Aeno, Angela Kelly, Martha Kupul, James Neo & Peter Siba

  3. School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Lisa Fitzgerald

  4. International HIV Research Group, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Angela Kelly

  5. HOPE Worldwide, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

    Joyce Sauk

  6. Sexual Health and Disease Control Branch, National Department of Health, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

    John Millan

Authors
  1. Andrew Vallely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa Fitzgerald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Voletta Fiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Herick Aeno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Angela Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joyce Sauk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Martha Kupul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. James Neo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. John Millan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Peter Siba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. John M Kaldor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Vallely.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no Conflicts of Interests.

Authors’ contributions

AV, LF and AK conceived, designed and coordinated the study, conducted the literature review and drafted the manuscript. JN, JM, JS, MK, PS and JK participated in the design and coordination of the study and helped draft the manuscript. VF, HA, JS participated in the design and coordination of the study, conducted in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vallely, A., Fitzgerald, L., Fiya, V. et al. Intravaginal practices and microbicide acceptability in Papua New Guinea: implications for HIV prevention in a moderate-prevalence setting. BMC Res Notes 5, 613 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-613

Download citation

Keywords

  • Vaginal microbicide
  • Acceptability
  • HIV prevention
  • Papua New Guinea

BMC Research Notes

ISSN: 1756-0500

Contact us