Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Bile duct stone formation around a nylon suture after gastrectomy: A case report

  • Chiyo Maeda1Email author,
  • Naoyuki Yokoyama1,
  • Tetsuya Otani1,
  • Tomohiro Katada1,
  • Natsuru Sudo1,
  • Yoshinobu Ikeno1,
  • Fumiaki Matsuura1,
  • Akira Iwaya1,
  • Toshiyuki Yamazaki1,
  • Shirou Kuwabara1 and
  • Norio Katayanagi1
BMC Research Notes20136:108

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-108

Received: 18 July 2012

Accepted: 16 November 2012

Published: 22 March 2013

Abstract

Background

Many cases of choledocholiths formed around sutures and clips used during cholecystectomy have been reported. We describe a case of gallstone formation around a nylon suture after non-biliary surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of such a case.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old Japanese man, who had undergone distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer and reconstruction with the Billroth II method 8 years earlier, presented with gastric discomfort. Abdominal ultrasonography was conducted and we diagnosed cholecysto-choledocholithiasis with dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct. He underwent cholecystectomy and cholangioduodenostomy for choledocholith removal. Gallstones, which had formed around a nylon suture used during the previous gastrectomy, were found in the bile duct. Sutures of the same material had also been placed on the duodenum. Chemical analysis revealed that the stones were composed of calcium bilirubinate. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 19, and choledocholithiasis has not recurred thus far.

Conclusion

The findings from this case suggest that standard, non-resorbable sutures used in gastrectomy may be associated with the formation of bile duct stones; therefore, absorbable suture material may be required to avert gallstone formation even in the case of gastrectomy.

Keywords

CholedocholithiasisAbsorbable sutureGastrectomy

Background

Some of the risk factors for gallstones are obesity, female gender, genetics, pregnancy, and surgery for gastric cancer[13]. It has also been shown that migration of suture material can cause gallstones[46].

In 1897, Homans reported the first case of migration of silk sutures into the common bile duct and formation of gallstones[4]. Thus far, many cases of bile duct stone formation around sutures or end clips used in cholecystectomy have been reported[5, 6]. However, the mechanism of bile stone formation is unknown.

Gallstone formation is one of the most common complications after gastric cancer surgery. It was reported that the type of gastrectomy and reconstruction had no significant effect on the incidence of gallstone, but the extent of lymph node dissection was a significant contributing factor[3].

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard for the treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis[7]. It is relatively difficult to carry out endoscopic treatment with Roux-en-Y anastomosis and the Billroth II method because of the surgically altered anatomy[8]. The success rate of ERCP using the Billroth II method is lower in patients with choledocholithiasis (63–93%) than in patients with an intact stomach (87–97%)[9]. A single- or a double-balloon endoscope is considered useful for such patients[7, 10, 11]. However, endoscopic procedures are still difficult to perform; they need to be performed by highly experienced endoscopists and require the use of special equipment[912]. In cases where ERCP is not successful, a surgical approach may be required.

Herein, we describe a rare case of common bile duct stone formation around a nylon suture after non-biliary surgery, namely, gastrectomy.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old Japanese man with a 1-month history of epigastric discomfort was referred to our department. He had undergone gastrectomy with D1 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer 8 years earlier. Laboratory data revealed hepatic dysfunction. The results of laboratory tests were as follows: total bilirubin, 0.3 mg/dL; glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase, 341 IU/L; glutamate-pyruvate transaminase, 301 IU/L; gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase, 861 IU/L; and alkaline phosphatase, 1093 IU/L. Abdominal ultrasonography showed cholecysto-choledocholithiasis with dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging also showed gallbladder and bile duct stones (Figure 1). ERCP was not performed because the patient’s stomach had been reconstructed using the Billroth II method and because of non-availability of an experienced endoscopist and the required equipment in our hospital. Based on our findings, we concluded that cholecystectomy and cholangioduodenostomy were appropriate for this patient.
Figure 1

Abdominal magnetic resonance image (T2) taken at the time of admission. The arrows indicate bile duct stones.

Under general anesthesia, a laparotomy was performed via a right subcostal incision. Although adhesion around the bile duct was not strong, the dilated common bile duct was compressed by surrounding tissues. Several nylon sutures used during the earlier gastrectomy of the duodenum were identified (Figure 2). A small incision was made into the common bile duct. Five stones in the bile duct were extracted, using an intraoperative cholangioscope. The stone at the bottom of the common bile duct contained the tip of a nylon suture, which was made of the same material as the sutures on the duodenum (Figure 3). After the stones were extracted, cholecystectomy and cholangioduodenostomy were performed.
Figure 2

The nylon sutures used during an earlier gastrectomy placed around the duodenum.

Figure 3

A calcium bilirubinate stone containing a nylon suture.

The patient was discharged on postoperative day 19. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he recovered without any complications. Choledocholithiasis has not recurred after the surgery.

Chemical analysis revealed that the stones were composed of calcium bilirubinate and fatty acid calcium. Microscopic examination revealed chronic cholecystitis with formation of Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses.

Conclusions

The formation of gallstones is thought to be multifactorial, but obesity, genetics, pregnancy, and gastric surgery have been found to be predisposing factors; women are also thought to be more predisposed to gallstones than men[13]. In addition, suture materials that have migrated to another part of the body are known to act as a nidus for stone formation after biliary surgery, although the mechanism underlying this is unknown[1214]. We have presented here a rare case of bile duct stone formation around a suture used during gastrectomy. In this patient, not only gastrectomy but also migration of a suture was considered as the causative factor for stone formation.

One hypothesis stipulates that chronic compression by surrounding tissues may result in the formation of bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Kitamura et al. suggested that when the clipped cystic duct is compressed by surrounding tissues, the duct is inverted into the lumen of the common bile duct, and finally, the necrotic stump of the cystic duct is covered by the surrounding tissues[12, 15]. This migration allows bile crystals to adhere to the foreign body. Another hypothesis suggests that choledocholithiasis may be caused by bile leakage[6, 15]. The clip may be improperly applied during surgery, leading to incomplete closure of the cystic duct and allowing for the development of a biloma. When this biloma later drains off into the common bile duct via the cystic duct, the clip also migrates into the common bile duct. However, as Tsumura et al. showed, in 75% cases, the clips migrate without bile leakage[16]. This latter hypothesis does not apply to our patient. Our patient had undergone gastrectomy, a non-biliary surgery; therefore, our findings may be explained using the first hypothesis. We believe that the surrounding tissues compressed the common bile duct, resulting in ischemic parietal damage at the site of chronic compression. This process likely allowed the nylon suture to migrate into the bile duct.

It has been suggested that absorbable suture material be used for biliary tract surgery[6, 12, 13, 17]. However, absorbable material can also act as a nucleus for subsequent bile duct stone formation until it is absorbed[5, 18]. In the case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Jain et al. have recommended the use of an ultrasonically activated scalpel instead of clips to decrease the chances of morbidity[19]. Tsumura et al. revealed that the period between laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appearance of the first symptoms of clip migration ranged from 7 to 17 months[6, 16]. In our patient, although the time of stone formation is unclear, gallstone formation may have been avoided if absorbable sutures had been used during the surgery.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a case of choledocholithiasis in which the stone formed around a suture used during gastrectomy. We therefore suggest that absorbable suture materials be used even in gastrectomy to prevent gallstone formation.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Series Editor of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, Niigata City, Japan

References

  1. Barbara L, Sama C, Morselli Labate AM, Taroni F, Rusticali AG, Festi D, Sapio C, Roda E, Banterle C, Puci A: A population study on the prevalence of gallstone disease: the Sirmione Study. Hepatology. 1987, 7: 913-917. 10.1002/hep.1840070520.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR: Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1999, 117: 632-10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70456-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fukagawa T, Katai H, Saka M, Morita S, Sano T, Sasako M: Gallstone formation after gastric cancer surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009, 13: 886-889. 10.1007/s11605-009-0832-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Homans J: Gall-stones formed around silk sutures twenty months after recovery from cholecystostomy. Ann Surg. 1897, 26: 114-116.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Onghena T, Vereecken L, Van den Dwey K, Van Loon C: Common bile duct foreign body: an unusual case. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992, 2: 8-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Raoul JL, Bretagne JF, Siproudhis L, Heresbach D, Campion JP, Gosselin M: Cystic duct clip migration into the common bile duct: a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy treated by endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992, 38: 608-611. 10.1016/S0016-5107(92)70531-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Iwamoto S, Ryozawa S, Yamamoto H, Taba K, Ishigaki N, Harano M, Iwano H, Sakaida I: Double balloon endoscope facilitates endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in roux-en-y anastomosis patients. Dig Endosc. 2010, 22: 64-68. 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00920.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tae NK, Si HL: Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation combined with guidewire-assisted precut papillotomy for the treatment of choledocholithiasis in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. Gut and Liver. 2011, 5: 200-203. 10.5009/gnl.2011.5.2.200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Eul JJ, Dae HK, Dong UK, Cheol WC, Jae SE, Woo JJ, Pyo JK, Yong WK, Kyung SJ, Yong MB, Mong C: Percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotomy as a rescue therapy for removal of bile duct stones in Billroth II gastrectomy patients who are difficult to perform ERCP. Europian Journal of Gastroenterology &Hepatology. 2009, 21: 1358-1362. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328326caa1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Itoi T, Ishii K, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Moriyasu F, Sakai Y: Ultrathin endoscope-assisted ERCP for inaccessible peridiverculumenteroscpoe in a patient with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Dig Endosc. 2010, 22: 334-336. 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01028.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang AY, Sauer BG, Behm BW, Ramanath M, Cox DG, Ellen KL, Shami VM, Kahaleh M: Single-balloon enteroscopy effectively enables diagnostic and therapeutic retrograde cholangiography in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010, 71: 641-649. 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.051.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Nakatani H, Ichikawa D, Shimotsuma M, Yamane T: Why do cystic duct clips migrate into the common bile duct?. Lancet. 1995, 346: 965-966. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91585-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Walker WE, Avant GR, Reynold VH: Cholangitis with a silver lining. Arch Surg. 1979, 114: 214-215. 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370260104019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ormann W: A thread as a nidus of a common bile duct calculus-findings during endoscopic lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 1989, 21: 191-192. 10.1055/s-2007-1012940.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolay K, Alis H, Soylu A, Altaca G, Aygun E: Migrated endoclip and stone formation after cholecystectomy: a new danger of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13: 6446-6448. 10.3748/wjg.13.6446.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tsumura H, Ichikawa T, Kagawa T, Nishihara M, Yoshikawa K, Yamamoto G: Failure of endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones due to endo-clip migration following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J HepatobiliaryPancreatSurg. 2002, 9: 274-277.Google Scholar
  17. Kinoshita H, Sajima S, Hashino K, Hashimoto M, Sato S, Kawabata M: Case of intrahepatic gallstone formation around nylon suture for hepatectomy. Kurume Med J. 2000, 47: 235-237. 10.2739/kurumemedj.47.235.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Cetta F, Baldi C, Lombardo F, Monti L, Stefani P, Nuzzo G: Migration of metallic clips used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and formation of gallstones around them: surgical implications from a prospective study. J LaparoendoscAdvSurg Tech. 1997, 7: 37-46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jain SK, Tanwar R, Kaza RC, Agarwal PN: A prospective, randomized study of comparison of clipless cholecystectomy with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011, 21: 203-208. 10.1089/lap.2010.0455.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Maeda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement