Open Access

Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease phenotype related to C9ORF72 repeat expansions: contribution of the neuropsychological assessment

  • Mariam Annan1, 2,
  • Émilie Beaufils2, 3, 4,
  • Ursule-Catherine Viola1,
  • Patrick Vourc’h2, 5, 6,
  • Caroline Hommet2, 3, 4, 5 and
  • Karl Mondon2, 3, 4, 5Email author
BMC Research Notes20136:343

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-343

Received: 20 April 2013

Accepted: 29 August 2013

Published: 29 August 2013

Abstract

Background

Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeats in the non-coding region of the C9ORF72 gene was recently identified as being responsible for over 40% of the cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration, in various extrapyramidal syndromes including supranuclear gaze palsy and corticobasal degeneration, and in addition, has been found to be a rare genetic cause of isolated Parkinsonism. To our knowledge, there is no published data concerning the neuropsychological evaluation of patients diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease related with C9ORF72 repeat expansions.

Case presentation

We report the results of the comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation in a newly described case in the literature (the sixth) of a patient presenting isolated idiopathic Parkinson’s disease associated with C9ORF72 repeat expansions.

The decrease in the patient’s prefrontal functions resulted in a slight decrease in global efficiency. These abnormalities did not appear to be different, with respect to the deficit observed and the intensity of the cognitive impairment, from those classically observed in cases of sporadic idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Our patient also exhibited a significant impairment in visual gnosis.

Conclusions

If confirmed in other patients, visuoperceptive deficits in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease could represent a red flag that should prompt the clinician to perform addition diagnostic procedures. A thorough neuropsychological assessment may prove to be useful for detecting idiopathic Parkinson’s disease in patients who are suspected of having repeat abnormalities of C9ORF72 expansions.

Keywords

C9ORF72 repeat expansion Parkinson’s disease Cognition

Background

Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeats in non-coding regions of the C9ORF72 gene was recently identified as being responsible of over 40% of the cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration [1, 2].

Recent publications have shown involvement of C9ORF72 repeat expansions in various extrapyramidal syndromes including supranuclear gaze palsy and corticobasal degeneration [3] and has also be found to constitute a rare genetic cause of isolated parkinsonism [4] in some patients who fulfil the UK Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank [5] criteria for idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD).

To our knowledge, there is no published data on the contribution of the neuropsychological assessment in these last-mentioned patients.

We report the results of the thorough neuropsychological assessment of a newly described case in the literature (the sixth) of a patient presenting isolated IPD associated with C9ORF72 repeat expansions.

Case presentation

A 63 year-old woman was referred to our department because of a strong family history of neurological diseases: her mother had died at the age of 59 years with Alzheimer’s dementia and her two sisters had died at age 69 and 59 y respectively with a diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration associated with minor symptoms of parkinsonism. A C9ORF72 repeat expansion was found by genetic analysis in the youngest sister.

Her personal medical history included appendectomy, diabetes mellitus, and a complete excision of a melanoma.

Parkinsonism was first diagnosed in 2009 at the age of 63 years when left akinesia and tremor appeared. Her symptoms responded poorly to levodopa, and the response rate was estimated to be approximately 20% by both the patient and her husband, and progressively worsened. At the onset, neurological examination revealed a resting tremor associated with akinesia. The Parkinsonism was bilateral but was clearly predominant on the left side. Rapid and alternative movements in the left hand were severely hypometric. Her left lower extremity was also akinetic, and she had severe difficulties in performing repetitive movements. She had no limitation in oculomotor movements and no gait disorder. She never developed motor fluctuations or dyskinesias. The patient fulfilled the criteria for IPD according to the UK Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank [5]: i/ the parkinson’s syndrome was defined by bradykinesia, with a 4–6 Hz resting tremor associated with muscular rigidity; ii/ no exclusion criteria were observed; iii/ the clinical presentation included more than 3 supportive prospective criteria (unilateral onset, rest tremor, progressive clinical course, persistent asymmetry affecting the side most affected at the onset of the disease).

A complete neuropsychological assessment two years after the onset of the disease (2011) revealed preservation of global cognitive efficiency (MATTIS DRS score: 137/144 [6]), difficulties in the executive functions (with a score at 10/18 on the Frontal Assessment Battery [7]), no difficulty in mental flexibility (Trail making test [8]) or sensitivity to interference (stroop test [9]), and global slowness (Coding subtest of the WAIS [10]).

After the discovery of the disease, we asked the patient for permission to test for the C9ORF72 gene abnormality. The number of repeat expansions was superior to 30 and was therefore considered to be abnormal.

In 2012, a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment was performed (see results in Table 1) and revealed: a slight decrease in global cognitive efficiency (MATTIS DRS score [6]), normal efficiency in long-term verbal episodic (free and cued recall test [11]) and visual (modified Taylor complex figure [12]) memories, language (oral denomination [13]), praxis (Mahieux’s battery [14] and visuospatial skills (Modified Taylor complex figure - copy [12]); low scores in short-term memory (WAIS-III digit span subtest [10]), and the prefrontal functions including verbal initiation (verbal fluencies [15]), and conflicting task (stroop test [9]). Unfortunately, our patient also exhibited significant difficulties in visual gnosis (Poppelreuter [16] and PEGV [17]).
Table 1

Results of the neuropsychological assessment

Cognitive domain / Neuropsychological test (Range)

Score*

Global efficiency

 
 

MATTIS DRS (0–144)

133

Memory

  
 

Free and cued recall test

 
 

    Immediate recall (0–16)

13

 

    Free recall (0–48)

25

 

    Total recall (0–48)

44

 

    % sensitivity (0–100)

83%

 

WAIS-R digit span subtest (direct)

4

 

WAIS-R digit span subtest (reverse)

3

 

Modified Taylor Complex figure (memory) (0–36)

17

Language

  
 

DO-80 (0–80)

78

 

Letter fluency task 2 min (>0)

21

 

Semantic fluency task 2 min (>0)

5

Visuospatial skills

 
 

Modified Taylor Complex figure (copy) (0–36)

29

Visual gnosis

 
 

Poppelreuter (0–8)

4

 

PEGV (0–36)

27

Prefrontal functions

 
 

TMT A (time in s)

99

 

TMT B (time in s)

223

 

Stroop conflictual task (sec)

146

Limb praxis

 
 

Mahieux’s battery (0–20)

17

Visuomotor speed

 
 

WAIS-R coding subtest (0–133)

26

*in bold caps: abnormal scores.

Conclusions

We report the case of a patient diagnosed with IPD according to the usual criteria, who presented neuropsychological impairment early in the clinical course. Her primary difficulties included impaired prefrontal functions resulting in a slight decrease in global efficiency. These abnormalities are similar, in terms of deficit and intensity, to the cognitive impairment classically observed in sporadic cases of IPD [18]. Our patient also exhibited significant impairment in visual gnosis. An alteration in visuomotor and visuoperceptive functions have been described in IPD, but the deficit is usually mild when it occurs in non-demented patients [19]. If confirmed in other patients, this unusually severe deficit in IPD could represent a red flag, alerting the clinician to perform additional diagnostic procedures.

A thorough neuropsychological assessment could prove to be useful for detecting in IPD patients who are suspected of having C9ORF72 repeat expansions abnormalities.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr Donald SCHWARTZ who revised the English version.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of neurology, University hospital center of Tours
(2)
University of Tours
(3)
Memory Clinic, University hospital center of Tours
(4)
Department of geriatrics, University hospital center of Tours
(5)
INSERM U930
(6)
Department of biochemistry and molecular biology, University hospital center of Tours

References

  1. Renton AE, Majounie E, Waite A, Simón-Sánchez J, Rollinson S, Gibbs JR, Schymick JC, Laaksovirta H, van Swieten JC, Myllykangas L, Kalimo H, Paetau A, Abramzon Y, Remes AM, Kaganovich A, Scholz SW, Duckworth J, Ding J, Harmer DW, Hernandez DG, Johnson JO, Mok K, Ryten M, Trabzuni D, Guerreiro RJ, Orrell RW, Neal J, Murray A, Pearson J, Jansen IE, et al: A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron. 2011, 72: 257-268. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.010.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Baker M, Rutherford NJ, Nicholson AM, Finch NA, Flynn H, Adamson J, Kouri N, Wojtas A, Sengdy P, Hsiung G-YR, Karydas A, Seeley WW, Josephs KA, Coppola G, Geschwind DH, Wszolek ZK, Feldman H, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Miller BL, Dickson DW, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR, Rademakers R: Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron. 2011, 72: 245-256. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.011.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Le Ber I, Camuzat A, Guillot-Noel L, Hannequin D, Lacomblez L, Golfier V, Puel M, Martinaud O, Deramecourt V, Rivaud-Pechoux S, Millecamps S, Vercelletto M, Couratier P, Sellal F, Pasquier F, Salachas F, Thomas-Antérion C, Didic M, Pariente J, Seilhean D, Ruberg M, Wargon I, Blanc F, Camu W, Michel B-F, Berger E, Sauvée M, Thauvin-Robinet C, Mondon K, Tournier-Lasserve E, et al: C9ORF72 Repeat Expansions in the Frontotemporal Dementias Spectrum of Diseases: A Flow-chart for Genetic Testing. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013, 34: 485-499.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lesage S, Le Ber I, Condroyer C, Broussolle E, Gabelle A, Thobois S, Pasquier F, Mondon K, Dion PA, Rochefort D, Rouleau GA, Dürr A, Brice A: C9orf72 repeat expansions are a rare genetic cause of parkinsonism. Brain. 2013, 136 (Pt 2): 385-391.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ: Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1992, 55: 181-184. 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Mattis S: Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patient. Geriatric psychiatry. Edited by: Bellak L, Karasu TB. 1970, New York: Grune & Stratton, 77-121.Google Scholar
  7. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B: The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000, 55: 1621-1626. 10.1212/WNL.55.11.1621.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. REITAN RM: The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. J Consult Psychol. 1955, 19: 393-394.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Stroop JR: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol. 1935, 18: 643-662.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wechsler D: Echelle D’intelligence de Wechsler Pour Adultes, Forme Révisée (WAIS-R). 1989, Paris: Edition du centre de psychologie appliquéeGoogle Scholar
  11. Grober E, Buschke H, Crystal H, Bang S, Dresner R: Screening for dementia by memory testing. Neurology. 1988, 38: 900-903. 10.1212/WNL.38.6.900.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor LB: Localisation of cerebral lesions by psychological testing. Clin Neurosurg. 1969, 16: 269-287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Deloche G, Hannequin D: DO80. Epreuve de Dénomination Orale D’images. 1997, Paris: Edition du centre de psychologie appliquéeGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahieux-Laurent F, Fabre C, Galbrun E, Dubrulle A, Moroni C: [Validation of a brief screening scale evaluating praxic abilities for use in memory clinics. Evaluation in 419 controls, 127 mild cognitive impairment and 320 demented patients]. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2009, 165: 560-567. 10.1016/j.neurol.2008.11.016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Cardebat D, Doyon B, Puel M, Goulet P, Joanette Y: Formal and semantic lexical evocation in normal subjects. Performance and dynamics of production as a function of sex, age and educational level. Acta Neurol Belg. 1990, 90: 207-217.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Poppelreuter W: Die Psychischen Schadigungen durch Kopfschuss im Kriege. 1917, Leipzig: Voss LGoogle Scholar
  17. Agniel A, Joanette Y, Doyon B, Duchein C: Protocole Montréal-Toulouse d’Examen Des Gnosies Visuelles (PEGV) et Des Gnosies Auditives (PEGA). 1992, Isbergues: Ortho-EditionGoogle Scholar
  18. Dubois B, Pillon B: Cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 1997, 244: 2-8. 10.1007/PL00007721.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanna-Pladdy B, Jones K, Cabanban R, Pahwa R, Lyons KE: Predictors of mild cognitive impairment in early-stage Parkinson’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2013, 3: 168-178. 10.1159/000351421.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Annan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement