Open Access

TIP peptide inhalation in oleic acid-induced experimental lung injury: a post-hoc comparison

  • Erik K Hartmann1Email author,
  • Alexander Bentley1,
  • Bastian Duenges1,
  • Klaus U Klein1, 2,
  • Stefan Boehme1, 2,
  • Klaus Markstaller1, 2 and
  • Matthias David1
BMC Research Notes20136:385

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-385

Received: 21 May 2013

Accepted: 25 September 2013

Published: 27 September 2013

Abstract

Background

The lectin-like domain of TNF-α mimicked by an inhaled TIP peptide represents a novel approach to attenuate a pulmonary edema in respiratory failure, which is on the threshold to clinical application. In extension to a previously published study, which reported an improved pulmonary function following TIP peptide inhalation in a porcine model of lavage-induced lung injury, a post-hoc comparison to additional experiments was conducted. This analysis addresses the hypothesis that oleic acid injection-induced capillary leakage and alveolar necrosis blunts the previously reported beneficial effects of TIP peptide inhalation in a porcine model.

Findings

Following animal care committee approval lung injury was induced by oleic acid injection in six pigs with a setting strictly according to a previously published protocol that was used for lung-lavaged pigs. Ventilation/perfusion-distribution by multiple inert gas elimination, parameters of gas exchange and pulmonary edema were assessed as surrogates of the pulmonary function. A significantly improved ventilation/perfusion-distribution following TIP inhalation was recognized only in the bronchoalveolar lavage model but not following oleic acid injection. The time course after oleic acid injection yielded no comparable impact of the TIP peptide on gas exchange and edema formation.

Conclusions

Reported beneficial effects of the TIP peptide on gas exchange and pulmonary edema were not reproducible in the oleic acid injection model. This analysis assumes that sustained alveolar epithelial necrosis as induced by oleic acid injection may inhibit the TIP-induced edema resolution. Regarding the on-going clinical development of the TIP peptide this approach should hardly be effective in states of severe alveolar epithelial damage.

Keywords

Lung injury Pulmonary edema TIP peptide Lectin-like domain Porcine model

Findings

Background

In extension to a previously published study[1] a post-hoc comparison to additionally acquired data was performed. The lectin-like domain of TNF-α mimicked by an inhaled TIP peptide is a novel pharmacologic approach for treatment of edematous respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)[2]. In several experimental models TIP peptides were shown to attenuate pulmonary edema formation[36]. The TIP peptide primarily stimulates epithelial sodium channels on type II alveolar cells to enhance sodium transfer across the alveolar epithelium. This generates an osmotic gradient and allows the absorption of an alveolar edema, whereas this effect can be inhibited by pharmacologic blockade of the epithelial sodium channels[35]. Furthermore, the TIP peptide reduces microvascular hyperpermeability, which prevents a further edema formation[4, 7], and was found to reduce inflammatory response and reactive oxygen species generation in rat model of ischemia and reperfusion-related lung injury[6]. Despite proceeding to the early clinical study phase only few data of TIP peptide application are available from clinical-like in vivo models. Our group found a significantly improved pulmonary function when an inhaled TIP peptide was compared to placebo in a porcine model of lung lavage/surfactant-depletion (LAV)-induced lung injury[1]. This finding was primarily attributed to resolution of pulmonary edema through the TIP peptide as driven by epithelial sodium channels and the basolateral Na+-K+-ATPase in the intact alveolar epithelium. Hence, an intact alveolar epithelium should be critical for the efficiency and clinical benefit of the TIP peptide in an in vivo setting. Oleic acid injection (OAI) is another proven ARDS model that is primarily based on inducing capillary leakage and epithelial necrosis[8].

We hypothesized that beneficial effect of the TIP peptide would be blunted by OAI. A post-hoc analysis therefore compared lung injured pigs by OAI to a previous study[1].

Material and methods

Following approval of the state and institutional animal care committee (Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz, Koblenz, Germany) six pigs were prospectively examined and post-hoc compared to six randomly selected animals with LAV-induced lung injury to provide further insights of model-dependent characteristics of the TIP peptide.

Anesthesia, experimental procedure, monitoring and ventilator settings were strictly adapted to the previous study. The OAI group (n = 6) received an intravenous application of oleic acid solved in balanced electrolyte solution in a ratio of 1:10. The oleic acid was then applied in fractions of 1–2 ml over thirty minutes. Short-term hemodynamic instability, which regularly occurs immediately after injection, was treated by norepinephrine boli of 5–10 μg. To provide comparable baseline conditions the procedure was continued until the quotient of arterial partial pressure of oxygen and inspired oxygen fraction was < 250 mmHg over 30 minutes or a dose maximum of 0.3 ml kg-1 was administered. Starting with the lung injury induction, all animals were ventilated in a constant mode that aims to avoid lung protective effects: tidal volume 10 ml kg-1, positive end-expiratory pressure 0 cmH2O, fraction of inspired oxygen 1.0 and respiratory frequency 25–35 min-1 targeted to an end-tidal carbon dioxide level < 60 mmHg. The TIP peptide (1 mg kg-1; AP301, APEPTICO, Vienna, Austria) was prepared and administered by nebulization once stable ARDS conditions were achieved. The animals were monitored over three hours after TIP peptide inhalation. The ventilation/perfusion-distribution (VA/Q) measured by micropore membrane inlet mass spectrometry – multiple inert gas elimination (MMIMS-MIGET, Oscillogy LLC, PA, USA) was assessed as main parameter in a previously described manner[9, 10]. VA/Q data was also available from the previous study. Additionally, parameters of gas exchange, extravascular lung water by transpulmonary thermodilution and respiratory mechanics (dynamic lung compliance) were examined. At the end of the protocol the animals were killed in deep general anesthesia by central venous potassium injection (20 mval).

Parameters are given as median and interquartile range. Intergroup comparison of the ventilation/perfusion-distribution was conducted by the Mann–Whitney-U-Test. Time courses of main parameters from the OAI group were analyzed by Friedman-Test with post-hoc Dunn-Test. P values lower than 0.05 were regarded as different. Comparisons between the previously published study at baseline and after three hours and the OAI group were drawn at baseline and after three hours by non-parametric testing in explorative manner with descriptive P values (Table 1).
Table 1

Study data

Parameter

ARDS-baseline

3 hours

 
 

OAI

LAV[1]

OAI

LAV [[1]]

paO2/FiO2 [mmHg]

172 (91)

157 (59)

203 (151)

260 (63)*

EVLWI [ml kg-1]

14 (4)

15 (2)

13 (2)

13 (1)*

Cdyn[ml cmH2O-1]

16 (2)

15 (3)

13 (3)*

17 (4)

Vt [ml kg-1]

9.9 (0.5)

10.0 (0.2)

10.2 (0.5)

9.8 (1.4)

PEEP [cmH2O]

0.6 (0.1)

0.5 (0.1)

0.7 (0.6)

0.7 (0.4)

RR [min-1]

27 (3)

25 (4)

27 (4)

26 (4)

Pendinsp [cmH2O]

16 (2)

19 (4)

20 (4)

18 (2)

FiO2

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

etCO2 [mmHg]

43 (4)

38 (4)

36 (2)

37 (4)

PaCO2 [mmHg]

68 (12)

59 (9)

48 (18)

45 (4)

MAP [mmHg]

97(13)

108 (15)

82 (5)

86 (16)

MPAP [mmHg]

45 (7)

20 (7) #

31 (5)*

19 (5) #

CO [l min-1]

3.9 (0.2)

4.0 (1.0)

3.4 (0.3)

3.6 (0.5)

PVR [dyn s cm-5]

584 (265)

187 (158) #

349 (175)*

183 (124) #

Data expressed as median (interquartile range). * indicates P < 0.05 vs. ARDS baseline value, # indicates P < 0.05 in intergroup comparison vs. OAI.

Results and conclusions

Comparable baseline conditions for the two models (LAV, OAI) were achieved in terms of VA/Q, gas exchange, pulmonary edema. Hemodynamics remained stable without vasopressor support over three hours in both groups. Ventilator settings and hemodynamics showed no relevant differences other than higher values of mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance in the OAI group, which can be explained by different model features respectively specific characteristics of OAI (Table 1). Within three hours after TIP inhalation the overall lung function as measured by VA/Q distribution approved a significantly higher fraction of normal ratios (P = 0.004 vs. OAI group) and a lower amount a poorly ventilated lung areas (low VA/Q, P = 0.009 vs. OAI group; Figure 1) in the LAV group. As previously reported[1] the LAV group showed an increase of oxygenation and decrease of extravascular lung water content after TIP inhalation (Table 1). These findings were not reproducible in the OAI group (Figure 2). In the OAI group an on-going worsening of dynamic lung compliance was also registered (Figure 2). Despite the improved VA/Q in the LAV group and the clearly opposing time courses (Table 1) no intergroup differences of these additional surrogate parameters were detectable in the post-hoc comparison.
Figure 1

Ventilation/perfusion-distribution (V A /Q) in both groups. Comparable baseline conditions (left) and significantly improved VA/Q in the LAV group within three hours (right).

Figure 2

Time courses of oxygenation (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ), dynamic lung compliance (C dyn ) and extravascular lung water content (EVLWI). # indicates P < 0.05 vs. baseline value.

The study has some limitations. At first, only a post-hoc comparison to another study[1] was performed. The availability of additional VA/Q as well as previously published data, a small but distinct hypothesis and animal care reasons may though justify this approach. Experimental setup, TIP peptide dosage and physiologic variables were accordingly predetermined.

Different model kinetics may interfere with these results. However, the histopathological correlates of LAV and OAI in pigs have been characterized in detail by our group: accordingly, a higher grade of epithelial necrosis occurs in the OAI model, though not necessarily a more severe gas exchange impairment[11]. OAI also interacts with the Na+-K+-ATPase on the basolateral side of type II alveolar cells and therefore prohibits the alveolar fluid clearance[12]. The LAV model, however, to some extent maintains the alveolar epithelial function[8, 11, 13]. A sustained improvement was found within three hours in the LAV model[1]. This analysis indicates that in contrast the time course of the OAI model yields no measurable effect after TIP inhalation. Furthermore, the VA/Q was significantly ameliorated in the LAV group in comparison to the OAI group. This different response pattern may possibly be related to the higher amount of epithelial destruction in the OAI model. Our hypothesis therefore was approved. These data vice versa can be interpreted as confirmation that in porcine models the enhancement of the alveolar fluid clearance rather than attenuation of hyperpermeability or inflammatory response is the main mechanism of TIP peptide inhalation. The apical side of the alveolar epithelium represents the TIP peptide’s main side of action[5, 6]. Due to the ongoing clinical development of the TIP peptide these findings may have further relevancy: based on these considerations regarding the model characteristics the TIP peptide should require an intact alveolar epithelial function. Further research needs to determine, if this new approach can be effective in states of profound alveolar destruction like in longer established or persisting ARDS or only in early states that are primarily characterized by edematous respiratory failure and less alveolar necrosis. In summary, this report further elucidates the underlying mechanisms of the TIP peptide inhalation as potential pharmacotherapy in respiratory failure or ARDS.

Abbreviations

ARDS: 

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

Cdyn: 

Dynamic compliance

CO: 

Cardiac output

etCO2: 

End-tidal carbon dioxide

EVLWI: 

Extravascular lung water index

FiO2: 

Fraction of inspired oxygen

LAV: 

Bronchoalveolar lavage/surfactant depletion

MAP: 

Mean arterial pressure

MPAP: 

Mean pulmonary artery pressure

OAI: 

Oleic acid injection

PaCO2: 

Arterial partial pressure of CO2

PaO2: 

Arterial partial pressure of oxygen

PEEP: 

Positive end-expiratory pressure

Pendinsp: 

End-inspiratory airway pressure

PVR: 

Pulmonary vascular resistance

RR: 

Respiratory rate

TIP: 

Synthetic peptide mimicking the lectin-like domain of TNF-α

VA/Q: 

Ventilation/perfusion-distribution

Vt: 

Tidal volume.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

All experiments were performed at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Anaesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University
(2)
Department of Anaesthesia, General Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Medical University of Vienna

References

  1. Hartmann EK, Boehme S, Duenges B, Bentley A, Klein KU, Kwiecien R, Shi C, Szczyrba M, David M, Markstaller K: An inhaled tumor necrosis factor-alpha-derived TIP peptide improves the pulmonary function in experimental lung injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013, 57 (3): 334-341. 10.1111/aas.12034.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Yang G, Hamacher J, Gorshkov B, White R, Sridhar S, Verin A, Chakraborty T, Lucas R: The dual role of TNF in pulmonary edema. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2011, 1 (1): 29-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Elia N, Tapponnier M, Matthay MA, Hamacher J, Pache JC, Brundler MA, Totsch M, De Baetselier P, Fransen L, Fukuda N, et al: Functional identification of the alveolar edema reabsorption activity of murine tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003, 168 (9): 1043-1050. 10.1164/rccm.200206-618OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Vadasz I, Schermuly RT, Ghofrani HA, Rummel S, Wehner S, Muhldorfer I, Schafer KP, Seeger W, Morty RE, Grimminger F, et al: The lectin-like domain of tumor necrosis factor-alpha improves alveolar fluid balance in injured isolated rabbit lungs. Crit Care Med. 2008, 36 (5): 1543-1550. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816f485e.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Tzotzos S, Fischer B, Fischer H, Pietschmann H, Lucas R, Dupre G, Lemmens-Gruber R, Hazemi P, Prymaka V, Shabbir W: AP301, a synthetic peptide mimicking the lectin-like domain of TNF, enhances amiloride-sensitive Na(+) current in primary dog, pig and rat alveolar type II cells. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2013, 26 (3): 356-363. 10.1016/j.pupt.2012.12.011.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamacher J, Stammberger U, Roux J, Kumar S, Yang G, Xiong C, Schmid RA, Fakin RM, Chakraborty T, Hossain HM, et al: The lectin-like domain of tumor necrosis factor improves lung function after rat lung transplantation–potential role for a reduction in reactive oxygen species generation. Crit Care Med. 2010, 38 (3): 871-878. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cdf725.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Xiong C, Yang G, Kumar S, Aggarwal S, Leustik M, Snead C, Hamacher J, Fischer B, Umapathy NS, Hossain H, et al: The lectin-like domain of TNF protects from listeriolysin-induced hyperpermeability in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells - a crucial role for protein kinase C-alpha inhibition. Vascul Pharmacol. 2010, 52 (5–6): 207-213.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang HM, Bodenstein M, Markstaller K: Overview of the pathology of three widely used animal models of acute lung injury. Eur Surg Res. 2008, 40 (4): 305-316. 10.1159/000121471.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartmann EK, Boehme S, Bentley A, Duenges B, Klein KU, Elsaesser A, Baumgardner JE, David M, Markstaller K: Influence of respiratory rate and end-expiratory pressure variation on cyclic alveolar recruitment in an experimental lung injury model. Crit Care. 2012, 16 (1): R8-10.1186/cc11147.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartmann EK, Duenges B, Baumgardner JE, Markstaller K, David M: Correlation of thermodilution-derived extravascular lung water and ventilation/perfusion-compartments in a porcine model. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39 (7): 1313-1317. 10.1007/s00134-013-2915-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang HM, Bodenstein M, Duenges B, Ganatti S, Boehme S, Ning Y, Roehrig B, Markstaller K: Ventilator-associated lung injury superposed to oleic acid infusion or surfactant depletion: histopathological characteristics of Two porcine models of acute lung injury. Eur Surg Res. 2010, 45 (3–4): 121-133.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Vadasz I, Morty RE, Kohstall MG, Olschewski A, Grimminger F, Seeger W, Ghofrani HA: Oleic acid inhibits alveolar fluid reabsorption: a role in acute respiratory distress syndrome?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005, 171 (5): 469-479. 10.1164/rccm.200407-954OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Matute-Bello G, Frevert CW, Martin TR: Animal models of acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008, 295 (3): L379-L399. 10.1152/ajplung.00010.2008.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hartmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement