Skip to main content

Case report of exercise and statin-fibrate combination therapy-caused myopathy in a patient with metabolic syndrome: contradictions between the two main therapeutic pathways



Lifestyle modifications including exercise are beneficial and fundamentally part of the therapy of metabolic syndrome, although in most of the cases medical interventions are also required to reach the target values in the laboratory parameters. Statin and fibrate combination therapy is considered to be safe and effective in dyslipidaemia and metabolic syndrome. However, increased physical activity can enhance the statin and fibrate-associated myopathy. Myositis and the rare but life-threatening rhabdomyolysis are causing a conflict between exercise and statin-fibrate therapy, which is yet to be resolved.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 43-year-old Caucasian man with metabolic syndrome who had the side-effect of exercise and drug-associated myositis. The patient had only transient moderate complaints and rhabdomyolysis could be avoided with the one-month creatine kinase control, a test which is not recommended routinely by the new guidelines.


We would like to turn the spotlight on the possible complications of statin-fibrate therapy and exercise, when strict follow-up is recommended. In this condition high number of patients can be affected and the responsibility of general practitioners is accentuated.


Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in developed countries. In adults besides body mass index above 30 kg/m2 or elevated waist circumference, the clustered presence of 2 or more cardiovascular risk factors from among high triglyceride and fasting blood glucose levels, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), raised blood pressure and the presence of treated hypertension or type 2 diabetes has been designated the “metabolic syndrome” (MetS) [1]. These components are the principal risk factors in the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Related to this high risk status, the treatment of patients with MetS is an important task of the basic healthcare.

There is substantial evidence that regular exercise has beneficial effects in physical and mental health and contributes to the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and several chronic diseases, like breast and colon cancer or diabetes [2]. Exercise improves a variety of lipid and lipoprotein variables [3] and is a fundamental part of the therapy of MetS.

The alternative of the lifestyle modifications is the use of tablets. For the correction of lipid disorders in MetS, recommendations, like the recent European guideline (European Society of Cardiology and the European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS 2011) [4]) aims a certain level of serum lipids. Not only statin or fibrate treatment, but their combination may be also required to achieve target lipid levels (cholesterol, LDL-C, triglycerides, HDL-C), which appears to confer additional cardiovascular risk – compared with LDL-C alone [5]. The combination therapy is especially recommended in MetS and diabetes with the administration of fenofibrate besides the statins [4].

Although the use of statins considered to be safe, some studies suggest that the frequency of statin myopathy is between 9% and 20% [68]. If muscle symptoms are accompanied by the elevation of creatine kinase (CK) levels, the condition is known as myositis [911]. Rhabdomyolysis is the most serious side-effect of the statin therapy, where renal insufficiency is present, as well. However, in some studies this side effect was found to be rare (affecting 0,1% of statin users) [1215], and moreover no cases of drug-related rhabdomyolysis were reported in some follow-up studies [16, 17]. Statins combined with fibrate also increase the incidence of statin-induced myopathies [11, 1820], suggested a 5.5-fold greater elevation compared with statin use alone [21].

In addition, physical exercise can also influence the occurrence of myopathy in patients using statins and fibrates. Muscle complaints may affect 25% of the statin users who exercise [22], and the prevalence of this phenomenon is 75% among athletes who take the drug [23].

Although the new ESC guideline on dyslipidaemias is expansively engaged in lifestyle modifications, it does not focus on the problem of the elevated risk of myopathy during statin-fibrate therapy and exercise [4]. This condition is not mentioned as a recommended reason for periodic CK control [4].

In our case report we present a patient with MetS who took statin and fibrate therapy and started parallel exercise leading to myositis with moderate symptoms but excessive CK elevation.

Case presentation

On routine laboratory examination dyslipidaemia was found in a 43-year-old man without symptoms, who presented in our general practitioner praxis in October 2011. The patient was obese (body mass index 31.7 kg/m2, waist circumference 104 cm), with the history of 25 pack-year smoking and 2 units (20 ml) of alcohol intake per week. His hypertension started 10 years ago and was controlled with 2.5 mg nebivolol per day. He was a blue-collar worker in a storehouse, and sometimes did manual work (not every day and not exhausting).

His values were: total cholesterol 277.7 mg/dL, triglycerides 448.2 mg/dL, HDL-C 36.7 mg/dl, fasting plasma glucose level was 5.68 mmol/L. LDL-C could not have been evaluated, because the elevated serum triglyceride level disturbed the measurement. Based on data above, the patient fulfilled the requirements of MetS (central obesity, raised serum triglycerides, reduced HDL-C, treated hypertension and upper range of normal fasting glucose level were present). Other parameters, like creatine kinase (CK), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) were in the normal range (117 U/l, 26 U/l, 23 U/l and 36 U/l, respectively). Renal function (blood urea nitrogen: 7.6 mmol/l, serum creatinine: 97 μmol/L, glomerular filtration rate: >60 ml/min) was also normal. Past medical history included laparoscopic cholecystectomy in his 30s. From family history hypertension, hypercholesterinaemia and obesity of both parents must be mentioned. None of them had any side effect for drug administration (both of them took statins).

After informing the patient about his elevated cardiovascular risk, he ensured us to cooperate regarding taking the prescribed medications (except for aspirin, because of bad family experience). About lifestyle modifications he did not see possibilities for exercise because of his exhausting job. On the other hand, about diet he said, that he tried to decrease the calorie intake long ago, but because of his manual work he often felt hungry and required extra meals. He promised to keep this kind of diet in the future as well, which apparently was not enough. Due to the high triglycerides and lack of lifestyle modification possibilities, 160 mg fenofibrate per day was applied. The patient was also informed about the possible side-effects of the lipid-lowering therapy. Because of smoking, varenicline therapy was prescribed as well, as the patient previously failed to give up smoking with lifestyle modifications and the use of nicotine patch.

The patient came for one-month control without any symptoms, and mentioned that he had begun taking varenicline only one week earlier. Laboratory parameters revealed the efficacy of the therapy. Serum triglycerides were reduced, but remained above the target level (349 mg/dL), CK was in the normal range (121 U/l), but cholesterol showed further increase (310.5 mg/dL). Taking the lipid levels and the high cardiovascular risk of the patient due to MetS into consideration, 20 mg atorvastatin per day was added to the therapy. Similarly, a control laboratory test was set one month later.

The patient was also asymptomatic at the second control. This time both the values of triglycerides and cholesterol showed improvement, 154.1 and 249.8 mg/dL, respectively. However, in the CK level a more than 150-fold elevation was observed (18979 U/l). Kept on asking the possible symptoms, the patient told us that he had changed his mind about exercise and one week ago he bought body-building equipment. After he worked out with all kind of dumb-bells, he had moderate pain and stiff feeling everywhere in his chest and in both arms and legs and dark urine was observed parallel. The pain lasted for three days, than the symptoms disappeared. At the time of the control he had no muscle complaints.

He had stopped taking varenicline after 2 weeks, and had taken the three types of medicines together (statin, fibrate and varenicline) only one week long. He did not smoke since then. The irregular moderate alcohol consumption was continued during taking the prescribed medications, as well.

The findings of the physical examinations were normal. The electrocardiography did not show any relevant pathological abnormalities. Based on these data, the patient was sent to the emergency care unit of the territorial hospital with the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis. He was admitted to the Department of Cardiology.

In the hospital on the day of admission in blood test results ALT (131.5 U/l) and AST (247.7 U/l) were elevated, while GGT remained in the normal range (38 U/l). The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was also increased, 463 U/l. Statin and fibrate medications were stopped, and altogether 2 litres of Salsol infusion was administered. On the next days CK showed decreasing tendency (5134, 1823 U/l), and reduction was observed in one of the levels of liver transaminases (AST: 131.3; ALT: 95.5 U/l), and in LDH (386 U/l). Serum cholesterol level remained elevated (257.2 mg/dL), triglycerides reached the normal range (151.5 mg/dL). Kidney function parameters did not show any abnormalities, and the thyroid function test was also normal (thyroid-stimulating hormone 1.42 μU/ml). As the patient remained asymptomatic, and the laboratory controls indicated improvement, he was discharged following 2 days of hospitalization. Strict alcohol abstinence, 180 grams/day carbohydrate diet with low fat and salt intake were recommended at emission, completed with fish oil capsules and dietary sources of omega-3 fatty acids. Future contraindication of statin-fibrate combination therapy was stated, and laboratory control was advised in two days.

The control showed further improvement in the levels of transaminases, CK and LDH, but they were still moderately elevated (AST 58.8 U/l, ALT 72.1 U/l, CK 526 U/l, LDH 417 U/l). One month later the laboratory control was repeated in our praxis: CK and transaminases were normal, dyslipidaemia was reduced (total cholesterol and triglycerides levels were 238.3 and 216.1 mg/dL, respectively). Since that time the patient has been asymptomatic, keeps diet, exercises regularly (with no marked CK elevation), takes 1 gram omega-3 fatty acid per day, and thanks to the varenicline therapy he does not smoke.

The diagnosis of drug-induced myositis was reported to the Hungarian National Institute of Pharmacy.

According to the recommendation of ESC/EASC guideline for the management of dyslipidaemias, it is always appropriate to advise patients to engage in regular physical exercise of moderate intensity [24]. Lifestyle modification is recommended as the first step treating MetS, as well [4]. In fact, physical activity is one of the most cost-effective ways to prevent cardiovascular diseases.

However, lifestyle interventions considered being difficult to be maintained, and drugs are frequently prescribed as it is influenced by pharmaceutical industry pressure, as well [25]. Moreover, statin therapy has been suggested to be a fundamental tool of the prevention of coronary artery disease [26]. There is a growing concern that this total focus on statin use may distract attention from simple lifestyle changes and also interfere with exercise [22, 27].

In our patient fibrate and later statin-fibrate medications were initiated because of the limited lifestyle changing possibilities. However, the patient changed his mind and started exercise which led to severe myositis but only moderate symptoms.

Although the patient had been already on combination therapy when the myositis started but the main cause of it was probably the atrovastatin as compared with gemfibrozil, fenofibrate were found to be less prone to make complications when used together with statins [28]. However, the pathophysiological role of fenofibrate or the exaggerating effect in the extent of CK elevation cannot be excluded.

Our case report shows the emerging problem of parallel application of exercise and statin-fibrate therapy. Although this problem is not new but still some questions are opened. It is not clear, what kind of exercise is safe and can be recommended besides statin-fibrate use. Especially prolonged exercise, like weight bearing and those which require eccentric muscular contractions (for example downhill treadmill walking) seem to exacerbate muscle injury [2932]. So far no study has addressed the risk of exercise during statin and fibrate use or the possibly recommended type of gymnastics which are safe, but still beneficial in this condition.

Amongst other possible pathophysiological factors the moderate alcohol consumption of our patient probably did not influence the exercise-induced statin-myopathy as in low amounts (12.7-38.1 ml of ethanol per day in men) it was not found to be harmful [24].

Another question arises whether the statin-fibrate therapy-induced rhabdomyolysis could be connected to varenicline intake. The theoretical background of this interaction is based on the observation of Obrach et al., who found two metabolites in human excreta of varenicline: one of them is the N-carbamoylglucuronide, catalyzed by the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-2B7 (UGT2B7) [33]. Fenofibrate is also glucuronidated by this enzyme [34]. Thus a varenicline-fenofibrate interaction is theoretically possible. In our case, 3 weeks after starting the fibrate therapy the patient began to take varenicline, and one week later atorvastatin. He took altogether a 2-week dose of varenicline where in the second week he took fenofibrate and atorvastatin, as well. The symptoms started two weeks after the stop of varenicline, so it probably had no role in the side effect.

Statin-fibrate combination should be prescribed with caution to patients who also receive other drugs that are metabolized through CYP 450. [4] Although the aromatic hydroxylation of nebivolol takes place in CYP 2D6 [35], a single nucleotid polymorphism of this type of cytochrome enzyme (the presence of CYP 2D6*4 allele) was also found to be associated with statin-induced muscle effects [36]. Although interaction between statins and nebivolol has not been published yet, nebivolol might have influenced the development of rhabdomyolysis in our patient. Unfortunately we did not have the opportunity to check the presence of this CYP 2D6*4 phenotype in our patient.

According to the guidelines, although pre-treatment CK level is required to be measured, routine monitoring of the enzyme without symptoms of myopathy/rhabdomyolysis, or risk factors is not necessary [4]. Furthermore, recent studies have suggested, that routine examinations for side effects are not cost-effective [10, 37]. However, in our patient, who had no symptoms at the regular visits, the routine laboratory CK control indicated the severe myopathy and with the urgent intervention the development of acute renal failure and other severe complications could be prevented. Based on our case, the control of CK should also be added to lipid function control 4–6 weeks after the initiation of statin-fibrate combined therapy especially in those patients who do exercise parallel.

Finally, we must mention some emerging critical aspects of our medical attendance. With more impressions, the patient might have been convinced about the necessity of lifestyle modifications before the drug administrations. Unfortunately the patients' attitude and the insufficiency of time which can be expended for each patient in the office of a general practitioner sometimes limit our success. Secondly, fenofibrate was administered first instead of atrovastatin. This choice also can be debated, but we have chosen fibrate because of the more, than 3-fold higher triglyceride and the moderately elevated total cholesterol at the beginning. Third, unfortunately at the first blood test LDL-cholesterol could not have been evaluated because of the disturbing effect of raised triglyceride. Later at the control blood tests only total cholesterol was measured. LDL-cholesterol is an essential parameter of cardiovascular risk stratification and must be the part of the general laboratory protocol.


In conclusion, although fenofibrate and statin combination therapy is supposed to be safe, myopathy, myositis and rhabdomyolysis still can develop. Exercise, as a part of lifestyle modifications can increase the risk of muscle side effects besides drug therapy providing a conflict between the two main therapeutic pathways of MetS. Further studies are required to define the types of exercise which are safe together with lipid lowering medications. The incidental interaction of nebivolol with statins or fibrates is also need to be clarified in the future. Moreover, also by asymptomatic patients the one-month CK control is important when exercise is present besides statin-fibrate therapy. In our case this test prevented the development of further serious complications.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the Case report. A copy of a written consent is available for review by the Series Editor of this journal.



Metabolic syndrome




High-density lipoprotein cholesterol


European Society of Cardiology and the European Atherosclerosis Society


Creatine kinase


Aspartate transaminase


Alanine transaminases


Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase


Lactate dehydrogenase


Cytochrome P enzyme


Glomerular filtration rate.


  1. Alberti KG, Zimmer P, Shaw J, IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group: The metabolic syndrome - a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 2005, 366 (9491): 1059-62. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67402-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS: Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Cmaj. 2006, 174 (6): 801-809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kraus WE, Houmard JA, Duscha BD, Knetzger KJ, Wharton MB, McCartney JS, Bales CW, Henes S, Samsa GP, Otvos JD, et al: Effects of the amount and intensity of exercise on plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347 (19): 1483-1492. 10.1056/NEJMoa020194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiner Z, Catapano AL, De Backer G, Graham I, Taskinen MR, Wiklund O, Agewall S, Alegria E, Chapman MJ, Durrington P, et al: ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Hear J. 2011, 32 (14): 1769-1818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanek EJ, Sarawate C, Willey VJ, Charland SL, Cziraky MJ: Risk of cardiovascular events in patients at optimal values for combined lipid parameters. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007, 23 (3): 553-563. 10.1185/030079906X167660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Sauvage Nolting PR, Buirma RJ, Hutten BA, Kastelein JJ: Two-year efficacy and safety of simvastatin 80 mg in familial hypercholesterolemia (the Examination of Probands and Relatives in Statin Studies With Familial Hypercholesterolemia [ExPRESS FH]). Am J Cardiol. 2002, 90 (2): 181-184. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02449-9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Franc S, Dejager S, Bruckert E, Chauvenet M, Giral P, Turpin G: A comprehensive description of muscle symptoms associated with lipid-lowering drugs. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2003, 17 (5–6): 459-465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kashani A, Phillips CO, Foody JM, Wang Y, Mangalmurti S, Ko DT, Krumholz HM: Risks associated with statin therapy: a systematic overview of randomized clinical trials. Circulation. 2006, 114 (25): 2788-2797. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.624890.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomlinson SS, Mangione KK: Potential adverse effects of statins on muscle. Phys Ther. 2005, 85 (5): 459-465.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sniderman AD: Is there value in liver function test and creatine phosphokinase monitoring with statin use?. Am J Cardiol. 2004, 94 (9A): 30F-34F.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vaklavas C, Chatzizisis YS, Ziakas A, Zamboulis C, Giannoglou GD: Molecular basis of statin-associated myopathy. Atherosclerosis. 2009, 202 (1): 18-28. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.05.021.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dirks AJ, Jones KM: Statin-induced apoptosis and skeletal myopathy. Am J Physiol. 2006, 291 (6): C1208-1212. 10.1152/ajpcell.00226.2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ucar M, Mjorndal T, Dahlqvist R: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and myotoxicity. Drug Saf. 2000, 22 (6): 441-457. 10.2165/00002018-200022060-00003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Omar MA, Wilson JP: FDA adverse event reports on statin-associated rhabdomyolysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2002, 36 (2): 288-295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruckert E, Hayem G, Dejager S, Yau C, Begaud B: Mild to moderate muscular symptoms with high-dosage statin therapy in hyperlipidemic patients–the PRIMO study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2005, 19 (6): 403-414. 10.1007/s10557-005-5686-z.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grundy SM, Vega GL, Yuan Z, Battisti WP, Brady WE, Palmisano J: Effectiveness and tolerability of simvastatin plus fenofibrate for combined hyperlipidemia (the SAFARI trial). Am J Cardiol. 2005, 95 (4): 462-468. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth EM, McKenney JM, Kelly MT, Setze CM, Carlson DM, Gold A, Stolzenbach JC, Williams LA, Jones PH: Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid combination therapy versus simvastatin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized, double-blind study. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010, 10 (3): 175-186. 10.2165/11533430-000000000-00000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McClure DL, Valuck RJ, Glanz M, Murphy JR, Hokanson JE: Statin and statin-fibrate use was significantly associated with increased myositis risk in a managed care population. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60 (8): 812-818. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruno-Joyce J, Dugas JM, MacCausland OE: Cerivastatin and gemfibrozil-associated rhabdomyolysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2001, 35 (9): 1016-1019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips PS, Phillips CT, Sullivan MJ, Naviaux RK, Haas RH: Statin myotoxicity is associated with changes in the cardiopulmonary function. Atherosclerosis. 2004, 177 (1): 183-188. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2004.06.014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davidson MH, Armani A, McKenney JM, Jacobson TA: Safety considerations with fibrate therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007, 99 (6A): 3C-18C.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mascitelli L, Pezzetta F: Physical activity in statin-treated patients. Int J Cardiol. 2009, 134 (1): 136-137. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sinzinger H, O'Grady J: Professional athletes suffering from familial hypercholesterolaemia rarely tolerate statin treatment because of muscular problems. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004, 57 (4): 525-528. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02044.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, Boysen G, Burell G, Cifkova R, Dallongeville J, De Backer G, Ebrahim S, Gjelsvik B, et al: European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007, 14 (2): E1-40. 10.1097/01.hjr.0000277984.31558.c4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. LaRosa JC: Means and ends of statins and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 50 (5): 419-420. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Domanski MJ: Primary prevention of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357 (15): 1543-1545. 10.1056/NEJMe078183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mascitelli L, Pezzetta F: Statins for primary prevention of coronary artery disease. Lancet. 2007, 369 (9567): 1078-1079. author reply 1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones PH, Davidson MH: Reporting rate of rhabdomyolysis with fenofibrate + statin versus gemfibrozil + any statin. Am J Cardiol. 2005, 95 (1): 120-122. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.076.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson PD, Zmuda JM, Domalik LJ, Zimet RJ, Staggers J, Guyton JR: Lovastatin increases exercise-induced skeletal muscle injury. Metab Clin Exp. 1997, 46 (10): 1206-1210. 10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90218-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brancaccio P, Maffulli N, Limongelli FM: Creatine kinase monitoring in sport medicine. Br Med Bull. 2007, 81–82: 209-230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Clarkson PM, Kearns AK, Rouzier P, Rubin R, Thompson PD: Serum creatine kinase levels and renal function measures in exertional muscle damage. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006, 38 (4): 623-627. 10.1249/01.mss.0000210192.49210.fc.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kearns AK, Bilbie CL, Clarkson PM, White CM, Sewright KA, O'Fallon KS, Gadarla M, Thompson PD: The creatine kinase response to eccentric exercise with atorvastatin 10 mg or 80 mg. Atherosclerosis. 2008, 200 (1): 121-125. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Obach RS, Reed-Hagen AE, Krueger SS, Obach BJ, O'Connell TN, Zandi KS, Miller S, Coe JW: Metabolism and disposition of varenicline, a selective alpha4beta2 acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, in vivo and in vitro. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006, 34 (1): 121-30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Corsini A, Bellosta S, Davidson MH: Pharmacokinetic interactions between statins and fibrates. Am J Cardiol. 2005, 96 (9A): 44K-49K. discussion 34K-35K

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Peer ASE, Woestenborghs R: Clinical pharmacokinetics of nebivolol. A review. Drug Invest. 1991, 3 (Suppl. 1): 25-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Frudakis TN, Thomas MJ, Ginjupalli SN, Handelin B, Gabriel R, Gomez HJ: CYP2D6*4 polymorphism is associated with statin-induced muscle effects. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2007, 17 (9): 695-707. 10.1097/FPC.0b013e328012d0a9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson PD, Clarkson PM, Rosenson RS: An assessment of statin safety by muscle experts. Am J Cardiol. 2006, 97 (8A): 69C-76C.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Authors acknowledge the contribution of Lászlóné Hárshegyi, who helped in the care of the patient and in the data acquisition. No authors had any source of funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to László Kalabay.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AL has collected the required data of the patient and has written the manuscript. LK revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. JN treated and followed the patient and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

László, A., Kalabay, L. & Nemcsik, J. Case report of exercise and statin-fibrate combination therapy-caused myopathy in a patient with metabolic syndrome: contradictions between the two main therapeutic pathways. BMC Res Notes 6, 52 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: