Open Access

Antifungal and antioxidant activity of Crassocephalum bauchiense (Hutch.) Milne-Redh ethyl acetate extract and fractions (Asteraceae)

  • Raymond Simplice Mouokeu1Email author,
  • Rosalie A Ngono Ngane2,
  • Guy SS Njateng3,
  • Monique O Kamtchueng3 and
  • Jules-Roger Kuiate3
BMC Research Notes20147:244

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-244

Received: 7 March 2013

Accepted: 9 April 2014

Published: 17 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Crassocephalum bauchiense is a flowering plant, found in the West Region of Cameroon. Previous studied has highlighted the antibacterial and the dermal toxicological safety as well as the immunomodulatory activities of the ethyl acetate extract of its dry leaves. As an extension of the previous researches, the current work has been undertaken to evaluate the in vitro antifungal and antioxidant activities of C. bauchiense dried leaves ethyl acetate extract and fractions.

Methods

The extract was obtained by maceration in ethyl acetate and further fractionated into six fractions labeled F1 to F6 by flash chromatography. The antifungal activity of the extract and fractions against yeasts and dermatophytes was evaluated using broth microdilution method. Antioxidant activity was evaluated using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nitric oxide (NO) and β-carotene - linoleic acid assays.

Results

The extract (MIC = 0.125 - 4 mg/ml) was found to be more active on dermatophytes and yeasts compared to the fractions. The ethyl acetate extract and fractions exhibited strong scavenging activity on DPPH (CI50 = 28.57 - 389.38 μg/ml). The fractions F3 and F6 expressed best antioxidant activity on DPPH radicals compared to the crude extract.

Conclusion

The results of these findings clearly showed that C. bauchiense ethyl acetate extract has a significant antifungal and antioxidant activity. It is therefore a source of active compounds that might be used as antifungal and antioxidant agents.

Keywords

Antifungal activity Antioxidant activity Crassocephalum bauchiense Asteraceae

Background

Crassocephalum bauchiense is a species of flowering plant in the Asteraceae family. Earlier studies on this plant reported the immunomodulatory activity [1] as well as in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity [2]. Also the antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of some species of the Crassocephalum genus is well established [35].

In the last two decades, the incidence of infectious diseases caused by dermatophytes and yeasts has increased considerably worldwide [6]. These diseases are associated to great morbidity among humans with elderly and immuno-compromised patients being the most affected. The situation is more complicated in developing countries with poor hygienic conditions.

Free radical and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in several disorders in human. The harmful action of the free radicals can, however be blocked by antioxidant substances which scavenge the free radicals and detoxify the organism. Current research into free radicals has confirmed that foodstuffs rich in antioxidants play an essential role in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and cancers [7], and neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases [8] as well as inflammation. Therefore, plant-derived antioxidants are now receiving a special attention [9].

Plant extracts have been of great interest due to their potential uses as alternative remedies for the treatment of many infectious diseases. Particularly, the antimicrobial activities of plant extracts have formed the basis of many applications [10, 11]. The present work has been undertaken to explore the antifungal and antioxidant activities of the C. bauchiense leaves extract.

Method

Plant material

Crassocephalum bauchiense leaves were collected in Dschang (West region of Cameroon). The species was authenticated at the Cameroon National Herbarium in Yaounde where a voucher specimen was deposited with the reference number 7954/SRF/Cam.

Microorganisms

Fungal species used included eight yeast strains (Candida albicans ATCC 1663, ATCC 2091, ATCC 24433, C. krusei ATCC 6258, C. glabrata CIP 35, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, C. tropicalis ATCC 750 and Cryptococcus neoformans IP 95026), four dermatophytes strains (Trichophyton mentagrophytes E 1425, Trichophyton terrestre E 1501, Microsporum gypseum E 1420, Epidermophyton flocosum E 1423) and one clinical isolate of Microsporumaudouinii. This isolate was a gift from Pasteur Institute, Cameroon.

Preparation of the plant extract

C. bauchiense leaves were dried at laboratory temperature (20 ± 2°C) and ground into fine powder. The dried powdered leaves were macerated in hexane and further in ethyl acetate. For each solvent, the extraction time was 48 hours at ambient conditions. The ethyl acetate extract obtained was filtered and dried at 40°C using a vacuum evaporator. The yield was found to be 10.25 w/w of dry leaves powder. This extract was further fractionated using flash chromatography. In so doing, 50 g of the extract was fixed on silica gel (Merck, 70–230 mesh) and eluted throughout a silica gel column. The elution was done using increasing solvent polarity made of hexane, ethyl acetate and methanol mixture. Fractions of 500 ml for each polarity were collected and evaporated in a vacuum at 40°C, then mixed on the basis of their similarities on thin layer chromatography into six fractions labeled F1 to F6.

Antifungal activity

Yeast suspensions of about 1.5 × 108 CFU/ml (Mc Farland turbidity standard no. 0.5) were prepared from 48 hours culture in normal saline and diluted in Sabouraud broth culture medium (SDA, Conda, Madrid, Spanish) to obtain a 2.5 105 UFC/ml inoculums [12].

A suspension of conidia was prepared from 10 days old dermatophytes culture on SDA slants (SDA, Conda, Madrid, Espagne) by using sterile physiological saline solution. This solution was added to the slant tube culture and the colony surface was gently swabbed with a sterile bent glass rod to dislodge the conidia from the hyphal mat. The suspension was transferred to a sterile centrifuge tube. Upon centrifugation, the volume was adjusted to 10 ml with sterile normal saline. The final suspension of conidia was counted with a hemocytometer cell counting chamber and adjusted to 105 spores/ml [13].

The in vitro antifungal activity of the extract and fractions was performed by determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) using broth microdilution method [14]. The stock solutions of C. bauchiense extract and fractions were prepared in 5% tween 80. The antifungal susceptibility tests were performed in 96 well microplates. Serial two-fold dilutions of the extract/fractions were performed to obtain a final concentration ranging from 16 to 0.12 mg/ml in a total volume of 100 μl/well. Fungal suspension (100 μl) in Sabouraud broth culture medium was added in all the wells to a final volume of 200 μl/well. The plates were incubated at 35°C for 48 h (yeasts) and at 30°C for five days (dermatophytes). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were defined as the lowest concentrations of extract or fraction required to prevent the visual growth of the fungi at the end of the incubation time.

Minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFC) were determined by sub-culturing 10 μl aliquots of the medium drawn from wells which did not show any growth after incubation during MIC assay and incubated further for 48 hours at 35°C (yeasts) or five days at 30°C (dermatophytes) for the appearance of growth. The lowest concentration of the antifungal agent from which negative growth was recorded was considered as MFC [14].

The assays were carried out in triplicate. Nystatin and Griseofulvin were dissolved in 5% acetone and used as positive controls respectively for yeasts and dermatophytes.

Antioxidant activity

DPPH assay

The hydrogen atom or electron donation ability of the extract and fractions were measured from the bleaching of the purple colored methanol solution of DPPH. This spectrophotometric assay uses stable radical diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH) as reagent [15]. One hundred microlitres of various concentrations of the extract and fractions in methanol was added to 900 μl of a 250 mg/ml methanol solution of DPPH. After 30 min incubation period at room temperature, the absorbance was read against a blank at 517 nm. Percent scavenging of the DPPH free radical (I %) was measured using the following equation.
I % = A blank - A sample A blank × 100

Where Ablank is the absorbance of the control reaction (containing all reagents except the test compound), and Asample is the absorbance of the test compound.

Nitric oxide assay

Nitric oxide, generated from sodium nitroprusside in aqueous solution at physiological pH interacts with oxygen to produce nitrite ions which were measured by Griess reagent. Sodium nitroprusside (10 mM) in standard phosphate buffer saline solution (0.025 M, pH: 7.4) was incubated with different concentrations of extract or fractions (10–1000 μg/ml) and the tubes were incubated at 25°C for 5 hours. After the incubation time, 0.5 ml of incubated solution was removed and diluted with 0.5 ml of Griess reagent and incubated for 10 min. The absorbance was further read at 546 nm. Percentage inhibition (I %) was calculated using the above formula for DPPH assay [16].

β Carotene – linoleic acid assay

In this assay, antioxidant capacity is determined by measuring the inhibition of the volatile organic compounds and the conjugated diene hydroperoxides arising from linoleic acid oxidation [17]. A stock solution of β-carotene – linoleic acid mixture was prepared as follows: a solution of β carotene was prepared at 15 mg/ml using chloroform (HPLC grade), 75 μl linoleic acid and 600 mg Tween 80 was added to the solution. Chloroform was completely evaporated using a vacuum evaporator. Then, 150 ml distilled water saturated with oxygen (30 min) was added with vigorous shaking to yield an emulsion. A volume of 2680 μl of the emulsion was dispensed into test tubes and 320 ml of the extract or fraction prepared in ethanol at various concentrations was added and the absorbance was obtained at 492 nm immediately and following 105 min incubation at 55°C against blank. The antioxidative capacity (I %) of the extract and fractions was calculated using the following formula:
I % = ΔA blank - ΔA sample ΔA blank

ΔDO blank is the difference between the absorbance read at 0 and that read at 105 min of incubation of the blank

ΔDO sample is the difference between the absorbance read at 0 and that read at 105 min of incubation of the test sample

In each antioxidant test, the experiment was performed in triplicate. Ascorbic acid and synthetic antioxidant reagent butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were used as positive control. The effective concentration of extract and fractions required to scavenge radical by 50% (IC50 value) was obtained by linear regression analysis of dose–response curve plotting between percentage inhibition and concentrations.

Statistical analysis

Antioxidant experimental results are expressed as means ± SD. The data were analyzed by one way analysis of variance (p < 0.05) and the means separated by Waller Duncan multiple range tests (SPSS program).

Results

Antimicrobial activity

The results of the broth microdilution test are presented in Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of the extract range from 0.125 to 4 mg/ml while those of active fractions range from 0.5 to 8 mg/ml. It was realized that the extract was more active than the fractions. Among the fractions, F3, F4 and F5 were more active. Dermatophytes were more sensitive to C. bauchiense ethyl acetate extract with MIC values ranging from 0.125 to 0.250 mg/ml. Among yeasts, C. albicans (ATCC 2091) and C. glabrata were more sensitive to the extract while C. parapsilosis was most resistant. The CMF/CMI ratio was generally less than 4 for both yeasts and dermatophytes.
Table 1

Antifungal activity of C. bauchiense ethyl acetate extract and fractions

 

Parameters

Extract (mg/ml)

Fractions (mg/ml)

Reference (μg/ml)

   

F1

F2

F3

F4

F5

F6

 

Yeasts

         

C. albicans 1663

CMI

1

>16

>16

4

2

2

>16

1

CMF

16

>16

>16

>16

8

16

>16

1

CMI/CMF

16

-

-

-

4

8

-

1

C. albicans 2091

CMI

0.25

>16

>16

4

4

4

>16

1

CMF

>16

>16

>16

16

16

16

>16

1

CMI/CMF

-

-

-

4

4

4

-

1

C. albicans 24433

CMI

0.5

>16

>16

4

4

4

>16

1

CMF

2

>16

>16

16

16

16

>16

1

CMI/CMF

4

-

-

4

4

4

-

1

C. lusitania

CMI

2

>16

>16

8

8

4

>16

16

CMF

>16

>16

>16

>16

>16

16

>16

16

CMI/CMF

-

-

-

-

-

4

-

1

C. parapsilosis

CMI

4

>16

>16

4

4

4

>16

16

CMF

>16

>16

>16

8

16

>16

>16

16

CMI/CMF

-

-

-

2

4

-

-

1

C. krusei

CMI

2

>16

>16

4

4

4

>16

2

CMF

>16

>16

>16

8

>16

>16

>16

2

CMI/CMF

-

-

-

2

-

-

-

1

C. glabrata

CMI

0.25

>16

>16

4

4

4

>16

16

CMF

2

>16

>16

8

16

8

>16

16

CMI/CMF

8

-

-

2

4

2

-

1

C. tropicalis

CMI

1

>16

>16

>16

8

8

>16

8

CMB

>16

>16

>16

>16

>16

>16

>16

8

CMI/CMF

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1

C. neoformans

CMI

0.5

>16

>16

0.5

0.5

0.5

>16

1

CMF

>16

>16

>16

16

>16

>16

>16

1

CMI/CMF

-

-

-

32

-

-

-

1

Dermatophytes

T. rubrum

CMI

0.25

>16

>16

0.5

0.25

1

>16

1

CMF

2

>16

>16

1

0.5

2

>16

16

CMI/CMF

4

-

-

2

2

2

-

16

T. mentagrophytes

CMI

0 .25

>16

>16

0.5

0.5

1

>16

1

CMF

1

>16

>16

1

1

2

>16

>128

CMI/CMF

4

-

-

2

2

2

-

-

M. audouinii

CMI

0.125

>16

>16

0.5

0.5

0.5

>16

1

CMF

8

>16

>16

0.5

0.5

1

>16

>128

CMI/CMF

8

-

-

1

1

2

-

-

M. gypseum

CMI

0.125

>16

>16

0.5

0.5

1

>16

8

CMF

1

>16

>16

1

1

2

>16

128

CMI/CMF

8

-

-

2

2

2

-

16

E. flocosum

CMI

0.125

>16

>16

0.5

0.5

1

>16

1

CMF

1

>16

>16

0.5

0.5

1

>16

>128

CMI/CMF

8

-

-

1

1

1

-

-

Yeasts: reference = Nystatine; dermatophytes; reference = Gentamycin; - = undetermined, Fraction F1 was found to be inactive.

Antioxidant activity

C. bauchiense ethyl acetate extract and fractions exhibited free radical scavenging activity on DPPH, NO radicals and preserved β – carotene to oxidation (Table 2). The activity was more effective on DPPH radical with the fractions F3 and F6 being the most active. The scavenging activity of the extract on NO radicals and hydroperoxide radicals arising from linoleic acid peroxydation was not quite different. Upon fractionation, the scavenging activity varied considerably within the fractions. With NO assays, the fraction F2 was the most active while in β carotene – linoleic acid assay, the extract was more active than all the fractions. The onset of lipid oxidation in the model system used in this study was initiated by oxygen. The oxygen chelating activities of the extract and fractions corresponded to greater reduction in lipid oxidation.
Table 2

Effect of the C. bauchiense leaves ethyl acetate extract and its fractions on in vitro free radical scavenging and linoleic acid oxidation

 

DPPH

NO

β carotene - linoleic acid

Extract

55.79 ± 5,40c

190.22 ± 1.50d

185.62 ± 1.17b

F2

389.38 ± 3.55f

64.67 ± 2.80a

897.63 ± 2.00f

F3

30.95 ± 2.43b

166.25 ± 1.30c

306.04 ± 1.50c

F4

211.94 ± 2.44e

90.42 ± 2.00b

381.00 ± 1.00d

F5

104.11 ± 3.20d

297.70 ± 1.00e

1015.5 ± 2.00g

F6

28.57 ± 2.11b

1102.75 ± 2.10g

1086.66 ± 2.50h

L ascorbic acid

18.03 ± 4.15a

339.70 ± 1.15f

849.00 ± 2.13e

BHT

20.00 ± 1.00a

/

94.00 ± 1.00a

Data are expressed as Mean ± S.E.M.; Values for a given column followed by different letter as superscript are significantly different according to Waller Dunkan multiple comparison procedure (at P < 0.05). Fraction F1 was found to be inactive.

Discussion

The C. bauchiense ethyl acetate extract was found to express antifungal activity on dermatophytes and yeasts including T. rubrum, T. Mentagrophytes and Candida albicans with MIC varying between 0.125 and 1 mg/ml. This extract was more active than the fractions indicating unnecessary fractionation of the extract for antifungal use. The results are relevant since Candida albicans is the leading primary agent causing superficial and often fatal disseminated infections in immunocompromised patients [18]. On the other hand, Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes are the main cause of athlete’s foot and onychomycoses in human beings, the first one being the most prevalent superficial infection in the developed world population [19] and the second one, an infection that affect 2 – 13% of the population worldwide and up to 30% of groups at high risk such as the elderly people and diabetic patients [20].

The antifungal properties of C. bauchiense extract can be linked to the presence of alkaloids, phenols, tannins, triterpenes, and sterols. Indeed, members of these phytochemical classes of compounds are known to possess antimicrobial activities [21]. The fractions F3, F4 and F5 were found to be more active than other fractions. These fractions are similar in that they all contain alkaloids and sterols [2]. These groups of compounds may be responsible for the antifungal activity.

The CMF/CMI ratio was generally less than 4, indicating the fungicidal activity of the C. bauchiense extract on both dermatophytes and yeasts [22]. Also, these results may highlight similar mechanism of action of the active compound of the C. bauchiense ethyl acetate extract on both yeasts and dermatophytes.

Differences in sensibility among strains could be due to their genetic content. This is an evidence for the necessity of antibiogram prior to antifungal prescription. It is particularly important because inappropriate antifungal drugs enhance fungal resistance [23]. The results thus obtained could explain the traditional use of the C. bauchiense leaves in the treatment of gastrointestinal infections.

Free-radicals are generated continuously in the body due to metabolism and diseases [24]. In order to protect themselves against free radicals, organisms are endowed with endogenous (catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase/reductase) and exogenous (C and E vitamins, carotene, uric acid) defense systems. These defense systems are not sufficient in critical situations such as oxidative stress, contamination, UV exposure, microbial infections, etc. where the production of free radicals significantly increases [25]. There is increasing evidence that indigenous antioxidants may be useful in preventing the deleterious consequences of oxidative stress and there is increasing interest in the protective biochemical functions of natural antioxidants contained in spices, herbs and medicinal plants.

Many available methods are used to evaluate plant extracts for their antioxidant activity. Unfortunately, antioxidant activities of plant extracts cannot be evaluated by any single method, due to the complex nature of phytochemicals [26]. Two or more methods should always be employed in order to evaluate the total antioxidative effects of vegetables [27]. Therefore, three complementary test methods were used to evaluate the antioxidant capacities of the extract and fractions of C. bauchiense leaves. Diphenylpicrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Nitric oxide (NO) and β-carotene - linoleic acid. DPPH° radical scavenging method has been proven to be good because its results are not affected by substrate polarity. However, β- carotene/linoleic acid method has the advantage of adding effective in situ lipid oxidation to the system. It is a commonly used model to analyze the antioxidant activity of the plant extracts because β-carotene is extremely sensitive to free radical mediated oxidation of linoleic acid [28].

The extract and fractions were able to reduce the stable free radical of DPPH to the yellow coloured diphenylpicrylhydrazine. The potential decrease in the concentration of DPPH radical is due to the scavenging ability of the C. bauchiense leaves extract.

In the β – carotene/linoleic acid, oxidation of linoleic acid occurs due to the production of reactive oxygen species formed from halogenated water, this initiates β-carotene oxidation leading to discoloration [29]. The C. bauchiense extract and fractions inhibited β- carotene oxidation, suggesting that the extract and fractions inhibit the conjugated diene hydroperoxides arising from linoleic acid oxidation that are known to be carcinogenic. Especially, the extract and non polar fractions exhibited stronger activity than polar ones. This activity could be related to the polarity of tested compound which enable them to be well dissolved in the emulsion.

Nitric oxide (NO) has been associated with a variety of physiological processes in the human body since it was identified as a novel signal molecule [30]. Besides its role in physiologic processes, it also participates in pathogenic pathways underlying a large group of disorders including muscle diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, sepsis and septic shock, primary headaches, HIV-associated dementia, multiple sclerosis and stroke. Additionally, increasing evidence shows that NO modulates neurotoxin induced cell damage and is involved in neuronal cell death in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and other neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer disease [3133]. This undesired activity of NO is due to its ability to modulate iron catalyzed oxidation reactions such as the O2 – driven Fenton reaction, which produces powerful oxidants such as the hydroxyl radical (·OH) and metalloxo complexes. So, it is very important to investigate the NO scavenging potential of the plant extract. In the present study, the nitrite oxide produced by sodium nitroprusside in standard phosphate saline buffer at 25°C was reduced by the C. bauchiense extract and its fractions. This extract may have the property to counteract the effect of NO formation and in turn may be of considerable interest in preventing the ill effects of excessive NO generation in the human body. This may be due to the antioxidant principles in the extract which compete with oxygen to react with NO·, thereby inhibiting the generation of nitrite. Moreover, the scavenging activity may also help to arrest the chain of reactions initiated by excess generation of NO that are detrimental to human health.

Phenolic compounds are known as powerful chain breaking antioxidants. Phenols are very important plant constituents because of their scavenging ability due to their hydroxyl groups [34]. It has been recognized that flavonoids have antioxidant activity and their effects on human nutrition and health are considerable. The mechanisms of action of flavonoids are through scavenging processes [35]. These substances contain hydroxyl functional groups, responsible for antioxidant effect in plants [35].

The presence of phenols and flavonoids was reported in the ethyl acetate extract of dry leaves of C. bauchiense [1]. Thus, the antioxidant potential of the C. bauchiense extract and its fractions could be attributed to the presence of these classes of compounds. Indeed, for each antioxidant test, the most active fraction possesses at least one of the two classes of compounds [1].

Fractionation of C. bauchiense ethyl acetate extract enhanced antioxidant activity in some fractions. The greatest activity in these fractions could be related to the distribution of phenols and flavonoids compound. Considering the antioxidant activity of the C. bauchiense extract on the three systems used and the numerous origins of reactive oxygen species in human body, it may be unnecessary to fractionate this extract for its antioxidant property.

Conclusion

C. bauchiense leaves’ ethyl acetate extract contains compounds with antifungal properties, which can be used as antimicrobial agents in pharmaceuticals and natural therapies of infectious diseases in humans. The antioxidant activity of the C. bauchiense extract indicates that it has a protective effect against reactive oxygen species and can therefore be used as a natural preservative ingredient.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge the financial support of Aires Sud (Appuis Intégrés pour le Renforcement des Equipes Scientifiques du Sud), Ministère Français des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes, France, under the grant No. 7082 and the “Centre Pasteur du Cameroun” for their technical support and the National Herbarium of Yaoundé, Cameroon for plant identification.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Microbiology and Food Quality Control, Institute of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, University of Douala
(2)
Laboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences
(3)
Laboratory of Microbiology and Antimicrobial Substances, Faculty of Sciences

References

  1. Mouokeu RS, Ngono Ngane AR, Lunga PK, Koanga MM, Tiabou AT, Njateng GSS, Tamokou JDD, Kuiate JR: Antibacterial and dermal toxicological profiles of ethyl acetate extract from Crassocephalum bauchiense (Hutch.) Milne-Redh (Asteraceae). BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011, 11: 43-10.1186/1472-6882-11-43.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mouokeu RS, Ngono Ngane RA, Tume C, Kamtchueng MO, Njateng GSS, Dzoyem JP, Tamokou JD, Kuiate JR: Immunomodulatory activity of ethyl acetate extract and fractions from leaves of Crassocephalum bauchiense (Asteraceae). Pharmacol. 2013, 4 (1): 38-47.Google Scholar
  3. Yehouenou B, Wotto V, Bankole H, Sessou P, Noudogbessi JP, Sohounhloue D: Chemical study and antimicrobial activities of volatile extracts from fresh leaves of Crassocephalum rubens (juss & jack) s. moore against food-borne pathogens. St Cerc St CICBIA. 2010, 11 (3): pp. 341-pp. 349.Google Scholar
  4. Tabopda TK, Fotso GW, Ngoupayo J, Mitaine-Offer ACL, Ngadjui BT, Lacaille-Dubois MA: Antimicrobial Dihydroisocoumarins from Crassocephalum biafrae. Planta Med. 2009, 75 (11): 1258-1261. 10.1055/s-0029-1185545.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mukazayire MJ, Tomani JC, Okusa NP, Chalchat JC, Stevigny C, Duez P: Chemical composition and evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of Ocimum lamiifolium and Crassocephalum vitellinum essential oils. Planta Med. 2008, 74: 302-10.1055/s-2008-1034305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jessup CJ, Warner J, Isham N, Hasan I, Ghannoum MA: Antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: establishing of medium for inducing conidial growth and evaluation of susceptibility of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38 (1): 341-344.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerber M, Boutron-Ruault MC, Hercberg S, Riboli E, Scalbert A, Siess MH: Food and cancer: state of the art about the protective effect of fruits and vegetables. Bull Cancer. 2002, 89: 293-312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Matteo V, Esposito E: Biochemical and therapeutic effects of antioxidants in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2003, 2: 95-107. 10.2174/1568007033482959.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wenli Yaping Z, Bo S: The radical scavenging activities of Radix puerariae isoflavonoids: A chemiluminescence study. Food Chem. 2004, 86: 525-529. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.09.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lis-Balchin M, Deans SG: Bioactivity of selected plant essential oils against Listeria monocytogenes. J Appl Bacteriol. 1997, 82: 759-762. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00153.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Reynolds JEF, Martindale : The Extra Pharmacopoeia. The Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. 1996, London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1290-31Google Scholar
  12. Kim S, Kubec R, Musaha RA: Antibacterial and antifungal activity of sulfurcontaining compounds from Petiveria alliacea L. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 104: 188-192. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.072.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shin S, Lim S: Antifungal effects of herbal essential oils alone and in combination with ketoconazole against Trichophyton spp. J Appl Microbiol. 2004, 97: 1289-1296. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02417.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shadomy S, Paxton L, Espinel-Ingroff A, Shadomy HJ: In vitro studies with miconazole and miconazole nitrate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977, 3 (2): 147-152. 10.1093/jac/3.2.147.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Mensor LL, Menezes FS, Leitao GG, Reis AS, Dos Santos TC, Coube CS, Leitao SG: Screening of brazilian plant extracts for antioxydant activity by the use of DPPH free radical method. Phytother Res. 2001, 15: 127-130. 10.1002/ptr.687.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper P, Wish Nok JS, Tannenbaum SR: Analysis of nitrate and (15 N) nitrate. Anal Biochem. 1982, 126: 131-138. 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90118-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dapkevicius A, Venskutonis R, Van beek TA, Linssen PH: Antioxidant activity of extracts obtained by different isolation procedures from some aromatic herbs grown in Lithuania. J Sci Food Agric. 1998, 77: 140-146. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199805)77:1<140::AID-JSFA18>3.0.CO;2-K.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Staib P, Kretschmar M, Nichterlein T, Hof H, Morschhauser J: Differential activation of a Candida albicans virulence gene family during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 6102-6107. 10.1073/pnas.110031497.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans EG: Tinea pedis: clinical experience and efficacy of short treatment. Dermatology. 1997, 1: 3-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Levy LA: Epidemiology of onychomycosis in special risk populations. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1997, 87: 546-550.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowan MM: Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999, 12: 564-582.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lalitagauri D, Paul R, Thomas R, Helio S, Ronald N: Bactericidal activity of BAL9141 a novel parental cephalosporin against contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates. Diagn Microbiol Infec Dis. 2004, 50: 73-75. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2004.04.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Escalante MA, Santecchia CB, Lopez NS, Gattuso MA, Ravelo GA, Monache FA, Sierra GM, Zacchino AS: Isolation of antifungal saponins from Phytilacca tetramera, an argentina species in critic risk. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002, 82: 29-34. 10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00145-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yeum KJ, Aldini G, Chung HY, Krinsky NI, Russell RM: The activities of antioxidant nutrients in human plasma depend on the localization of attacking radical species. J Nutr. 2003, 133: 2688-2691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mondon P, Leclercq L, Lintner K: Evaluation of free-radical scavenger effects of Helianthus annus extracts using new ex vivo tripping methods. Cosmet Aerosol Toiletries Aust. 1999, 12: 87-98.Google Scholar
  26. Chu YH, Chang CL, Hsu HF: Flavonoid content of several vegetables and their antioxidant activity. J Sci Food Agric. 2000, 80: 561-566. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(200004)80:5<561::AID-JSFA574>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Nuutila AM, Puupponen-Pimia R, Aarni M, Oksman- Caldentey KM: Comparison of antioxidant activities of onion and garlic extracts by inhibition of lipid peroxidation and radical scavenging activity. Food Chem. 2003, 81: 485-493. 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00476-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Koleva II, Van Beek TA, Linssen JPH, de Groot A, Evstatieva LN: Screening of plant extracts for antioxidant activity: a comparative study on three testing methods. Phytochem Anal. 2002, 13: 8-17. 10.1002/pca.611.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gutierrez RMP, Luna HH, Garrido SH: Antioxidant activity of Tagetes erecta essential oil. J Chil Chem Soc. 2011, 51 (2): 883-886.Google Scholar
  30. Ebrahimzadeh MA, Nabavi SF, Nabavi SM, Pourmorad F: Nitric oxide radical scavenging potential of some Elburz medicinal plants. Afr J Biotechnol. 2006, 9 (32): 5212-5217.Google Scholar
  31. Aliev G, Palacios HH, Lipsitt AE, Fischbach K, Lamb BT, Obrenovich ME, Morales L, Gasimov E, Bragin V: Nitric Oxide as an initiator of brain lesions during the development of Alzheimer disease. Neurotox Res. 2009, 16: 293-305. 10.1007/s12640-009-9066-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang L, Dawson VL, Dawson TM: Role of nitric oxide in Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacol Ther. 2006, 109: 33-41. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.05.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Nath AK, Madri JA: The roles of nitric oxide in murine cardiovascular development. Dev Biol. 2006, 292: 25-33. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.039.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Shahidi F, Wanasundara PKJPD: Phenolic antioxidants. Crit Rev Food Sci. 1992, 32: 67-103. 10.1080/10408399209527581.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Cook NC, Samman S: Flavonoids - chemistry, metabolism, cardioprotective effects and dietary sources. J Nutr Biochem. 1996, 7: 66-76. 10.1016/0955-2863(95)00168-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mouokeu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement