Open Access

Whole-exome sequencing identifies a de novo TUBA1A mutation in a patient with sporadic malformations of cortical development: a case report

  • Keiko Shimojima1, 2,
  • Aya Narita3,
  • Yoshihiro Maegaki3,
  • Akira Saito4,
  • Toru Furukawa2 and
  • Toshiyuki Yamamoto2Email author
BMC Research Notes20147:465

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-465

Received: 2 August 2013

Accepted: 14 July 2014

Published: 22 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Owing to the number of genetic mutations that contribute to malformations of cortical development, identification of causative mutations in candidate genes is challenging. To overcome these challenges, we performed whole-exome sequencing in this study.

Case presentation

A Japanese patient presented with microcephaly and severe developmental delay. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed the presence of colpocephaly associated with lateral ventricle dilatation and the presence of a simplified gyral pattern. Hypoplasia of the corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis were also noted. Because Sanger sequencing is expensive, laborious, and time-consuming, whole-exome sequencing was performed and a de novo missense mutation in TUBA1A (E27Q) was identified.

Conclusion

The novel mutation identified in this study was located in the genetic region that encodes the N-terminal domain of TUBA1A, a region of TUBA1A with few reported mutations. Retrospective assessment of the clinical and radiological features of this patient―i.e., microcephaly, lissencephaly (pachygyria) with cerebellar hypoplasia, and corpus callosum hypoplasia―indicated that the TUBA1A mutation did not lead to any contradictions. Because rapid and comprehensive mutation analysis by whole-exome sequencing is time- and cost-effective, it might be useful for genetic counseling of patients with sporadic malformations of cortical development.

Keywords

Whole-exome sequencing TUBA1A Malformations of cortical development Lissencephaly Microcephaly

Background

Malformations of cortical development (MCD) are a cause of motor and intellectual disabilities and severe epilepsy[1]. Although various types of MCD have been described, the most typical type is lissencephaly, a group of malformations caused by abnormal neuronal migration[2]. The gene encoding platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase isoform 1b regulatory subunit 1 (PAFAH1B1, formerly LIS1) was initially identified as the causative gene of lissencephaly. Advances in neuroradiological imaging and genetic diagnosis have since improved our understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of such diseases. Mutations in tubulin genes, encoding tubulin alpha 1a (TUBA1A), beta 2B class IIb (TUBB2B), and beta 3 class III (TUBB3), are now recognized as major causes of MCD[3, 4]. Moreover, the rapid development of new revolutionary molecular technologies has enabled us to identify rare genetic variants in sporadic MCD cases[5].

In this study, we examined a Japanese patient with sporadic MCD. As mentioned above, causative genes are difficult to identify, owing to the large number of MCD candidate genes. Sanger sequencing of potential causative genes is expensive, laborious, and time-consuming; thus, we performed whole-exome sequencing. Using this method, we identified a novel TUBA1A mutation. Here, we discuss the advantages of using whole-exome sequencing for the rapid detection of causative mutations and genetic counseling of patients with sporadic MCD.

Case presentation

Patient description

A Japanese baby girl was born at 41 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 3,400 g (+1.0 standard deviation [SD]), length of 49.5 cm (+0.5 SD), and an occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) of 31.5 cm (-1.0 SD). Her Apgar score was 7/8 (1 min/5 min). Her 30-year-old mother was gravida 0, para 0. At 22 weeks of gestation, fetal microcephaly was detected by echosonography. Soon after delivery, the sucking ability of the infant was good despite mild muscle hypotonia. She showed marked posterior sloping of the forehead, a high-arched palate, and microretrognathia. At 6 days after birth, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed colpocephalic configulation of the lateral ventricle dilatation associated with a simplified gyral pattern (Figure 1).The sucking ability of the infant gradually decreased; at 2 months of age, tube feeding was initiated. At this age, she weighed 4.7 kg (-0.8 SD) and measured 59.4 cm (+1.2 SD) in length, with an OFC of 34.0 cm (-3.3 SD), indicating severe microcephaly. She could not pursue objects. Although her muscle tone was within normal limits, she often showed an opisthotonic posture. At the age of 3 months, brain MRI examination was performed again, and brain hypoplasia associated with diffuse pachygyria and lateral ventricle dilatation was found, which is atypical for lissencephaly patients (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Brain magnetic resonance imaging of the patient. T2-weighted sagittal (A) and T1-weighted axial (B) images at 6 days after birth indicate hypoplastic vermis of the cerebellum, cortical dysgenesis with a simplified gyral pattern, and dilatation of the lateral ventricles. T1-weighted (C and E) and T2-weighted (D and F) axial images at 3 months of age indicate colpocephalic appearance associated with dilatation of the lateral ventricles. Cortical gyration is poor and reduced volume of the white matter is apparent.

Conventional karyotyping revealed a normal female karyotype with 46,XX. Because this child was the first born, genetic counseling was provided and both parents expressed a desire for their daughter to be genotyped.

We searched for the causative mutation(s) by whole-exome sequencing by using a next generation sequencer. After obtaining written informed consent, we obtained blood samples from the patient and her biological parents. This study was approved by the ethical committee at Tokyo Women’s Medical University.

Whole-exome sequencing

Genomic DNA collected from the patient and her parents were used as trio samples for whole-exome sequencing. DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Using a SureSelect whole exon kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), 3 μg of DNA was processed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Captured DNA molecules were analyzed using a SOLiD3® system by paired-end analysis (Life Technologies, Foster City, CA).

Color space reads were mapped to the UCSC hg19 reference genome using SOLiD® BioScope™ software (version 1.3; Life Technologies). Single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were subsequently called by the DiBayes algorithm using medium call stringency. Small insertions and deletions (indels) were detected using the SOLiD Small InDel Tool (Life Technologies). Called SNVs and indels were filtered based on depth and quality, combined, and the annotated using ANNOVAR and a custom analysis pipeline[6]. Data for annotations was downloaded from the UCSC database (http://genome.ucsc.edu/).

As a priority, we focused only on non-synonymous coding variants, splice acceptor and donor site mutations, and frameshift indels. We extracted the candidate variants that were not observed in the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.1000genomes.org/) and the dbSNP 132 database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/). Because we assumed that an autosomal dominant trait existed in this family, variants identified only in the proband, and not in the unaffected parents (de novo variants), were selected. Missense mutations were tested for mutational effects by using amino acid substitution prediction tools such as PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) and SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/)[7, 8]. The flow chart used to select candidate genes is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Flow chart indicating the validation process for variants. After 5 steps of validation, 16 genetic variants are finally selected.

The potential genetic variants identified by whole-exome sequencing were reconfirmed using standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-direct sequencing analysis (Sanger sequencing), as described previously[9, 10]. The effects of the identified amino acid changes were analyzed using web-based software such as Pôle Bioinformatique Lyonnais Network Protein Sequence Analaysis (http://doua.prabi.fr/) and PSIPRED Protein Sequence Analysis Workbench (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/).

Whole-exome sequencing generated an average of 223 × 106 mapped reads that could be mapped to the reference genome—98% could be mapped accurately—with a mean coverage of 93 (Table 1). After filtering, 1 indel and 15 SNVs remained for the de novo mutation model (Table 2). For this model, the status of both parents was required to define the wild-type state. No genetic variation remained for the X-linked recessive and autosomal recessive models.
Table 1

Whole-exome sequencing output

Sample

Proband

Father

Mother

Total reads

406,845,894

437,902,198

396,963,736

Mapped reads

252,829,848

214,184,732

201,932,294

Properly mapped reads

248,030,760

209,714,312

197,748,762

Total bases mapped

9,844,652,145

9,331,887,457

8,502,528,820

Total bases uniquely mapped

7,330,875,865

6,294,992,574

5,842,891,532

Total bases mapping to target

5,449,744,981

4,422,564,459

4,033,208,506

Mean target coverage

109.336672

88.706873

81.004891

% target bases with ≥10x coverage

85.51%

85.04%

83.56%

Table 2

Filtered variations

Chromosome

Position

Region

Gene

Function

dbSNP132

1000G_2010Nov_ALL

PolyPhen2

SIFT

ref_allele

alter_allele

Proband

Father

Mother

chr1

223,175,758

exonic

DISP1

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

1

0

G

A

×

×

chr1

240,371,141

exonic

FMN2

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.76515

0

C

T

×

×

chr1

247,615,260

exonic

OR2B11

Deletion and frameshift > premature terminal codon

-

-

  

A

-

×

×

chr2

189,860,860

exonic

COL3A1

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.784653

0

G

A

×

×

chr2

190,718,672

exonic

PMS1

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.996

0

G

A

×

×

chr6

30,861,156

exonic

DDR1

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.16

0.03

G

A

×

×

chr6

105,824,051

exonic

PREP

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.241

0

C

T

×

×

chr8

113,277,807

exonic

CSMD3

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.985

0

C

T

×

×

chr11

124,267,132

exonic

OR8B3

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.275

0.02

A

G

×

×

chr12

49,580,541

exonic

TUBA1A

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.777136

0

C

G

×

×

chr16

75,682,281

exonic

TERF2IP

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.214

0.02

G

A

×

×

chr17

74,288,545

exonic

QRICH2

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.995

0.01

C

G

×

×

chr19

1,055,329

exonic

ABCA7

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.996

0

A

G

×

×

chr21

10,942,950

exonic

TPTE

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.999

0.01

T

C

×

×

chr22

25,011,077

exonic

GGT1

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

0.318

0.01

C

T

×

×

chrX

153,008,788

exonic

ABCD1

nonsynonymous SNV

-

-

1

0

G

A

×

×

ref, reference; alter, alteration; exonic, exonic region; SNV, single nucleotide variation; , heterozygous; ×, no SNV.

Among the 16 candidate variants in the de novo mutation model, a TUBA1A variant, E27Q, was included. The damaging effects of the variations were scored by PolyPhen-2 and SIFT; the TUBA1A E27Q variant showed a possible damaging effect. We considered the TUBA1A variant as the strongest candidate mutation. Subsequent Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of this variant in the proband and absence in the genomes of both parents (Figure 3A). No variants in the other candidate genes related to MCD were observed. Therefore, we concluded that MCD in this patient was the consequence of a de novo mutation in TUBA1A. The risk of recurrence in this family was estimated to be the same as that for the general population.
Figure 3

Results of Sanger sequencing and a map of the identified mutation locus. (A) A Sanger sequencing electropherogram identifying the missense mutation, c.79G > C (E27Q), is shown. (B) A genome map of the locus surrounding the mutation captured from the UCSC genome browser is depicted. Because TUBA1A is encoded in an antisense manner, the reverse-complement nucleotide sequence is shown. The affected amino acid is indicated by a red rectangle. The c.79C residue is conserved among many species as shown.

Discussion

MCD is the consequence of abnormal neuronal migration, which results in intellectual impairment and epilepsy[11]. Many of the genes responsible for MCD are related to autosomal dominant traits caused by de novo mutations—e.g., mutations in PAFAH1B1, TUBA1A, TUBB2B, and TUBB3. However, some genes are related to autosomal recessive MCD phenotypes, including the genes encoding reelin (RELN), very-low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR), tubulin alpha-8 (TUBA8), as well as X-linked genes encoding doublecortin (DCX), aristaless related homeobox (ARX), and filamin A alpha (FLNA)[1, 12, 13]. Therefore, molecular diagnostic testing in patients with MCD is an important prerequisite for genetic counseling, because the risk of recurrence cannot be estimated in cases that lack a definitive molecular diagnosis.

In this study, we successfully identified a de novo TUBA1A mutation in a patient with sporadic MCD using whole-exome sequencing of trio samples. Among the genes in the tubulin family, TUBA1A was the first to be identified as a causative factor of MCD. The TUBA1A protein is thought to function as a scaffold protein[14].

Although there are at least 34 known TUBA1A mutations, and many of these mutations are located in the C-terminal half of the amino acid sequence[3, 11, 1427], this report is the first to describe the E27Q mutation (Additional file1: Figure S1). In contrast to most of the previously reported mutations, this mutation is located in the N-terminal region (Additional file1: Figure S1). Because the mutation is located in a conserved region of tubulin (Additional file1: Figure S1), and the mutated residue is conserved among many species (Figure 3B), we predicted that this mutation might be pathogenic. We analyzed the effects of this mutation by using web-based tools to predict the secondary structure of the mutated protein. Of the two different computational simulations, one predicted a significant change in the structure of TUBA1A (Additional file2: Figures S2 and Additional file3: Figure S3), suggesting that this mutation is likely pathogenic.

Amino acid substitutions may affect heterodimer stability and/or microtubule dynamics by altering the structure of tubulin during nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis. Microtubule stability may be diminished during the critical process of cell migration[28]. All mutations reported thus far in TUBA1A, TUBB2B, and TUBB3 are heterozygous missense mutations[3, 4, 2931]. Missense mutations in the absence of nonsense mutations, frameshifts, or genomic deletions support altered protein function, rather than haploinsufficiency, as the primary genetic etiology of these tubulin-related disorders[28].

Retrospectively, we evaluated the MRI findings of this patient. Brain MRI showed a colpocephalic appearance of the lateral ventricle dilatation associated with a simplified gyral pattern. Hypoplastic corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis hypoplasia were also noted. According to the classification proposed by Kumar et al.[11], lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia (LCH) in group 3 would be most compatible with this patient, because of the involvement of the corpus callosum and cerebellum. Ross et al. proposed genotype-phenotype correlations in LCH cases encompassing heterogeneous disorders such as those classified as LCH types a—d[32]. LCHa cases are related to mutations in PAFAH1B1 or DCX, whereas LCHb cases are linked to a mutation in RELN. Based on the LCH pattern of the patient presenting microcephaly (≤ - 3 SD), this case may be classified as LCHd, which could be related to a mutation in TUBA1A. Therefore, no contradiction in the etiology of the TUBA1A mutation was observed.

Generally, young couples whose first child has been afflicted with a sporadic case of severe disease are eager to have a healthy child in their next pregnancy[33]. Therefore, a precise genetic diagnosis is necessary. However, many MCD candidate genes have been identified, and Sanger sequencing for predicted causative genes is rather expensive, laborious, and time-consuming[34]. In comparison, in this study, we show that whole-exome sequencing is rapid and comprehensive[35]. We further emphasize that the results of this method provided us not only with confirmation of the causative genes but also simultaneously rules out mutations in other candidate genes. Therefore, we could completely negate the contribution of other candidate genes in this patient. In the future, targeted panel sequencing rather than whole-exome sequencing may become the standard method used to evaluate human disorders derived from multiple candidate genes.

Conclusion

We successfully identified a causative TUBA1A mutation in a patient with sporadic MCD associated with a simplified gyral pattern by using whole-exome sequencing. The identified novel mutation (E27Q) was located in the N-terminal region of the amino acid sequence. Rapid and comprehensive mutation analysis by using whole-exome sequencing may be useful for genetic counseling in sporadic cases of human disorders derived from multiple candidate genes.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. Blood samples from the patient and her biological parents were obtained with parental consent. This study was approved by the ethical committee at our institution.

Abbreviations

MCD: 

Malformations of cortical development

LCH: 

Lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia

PAFAH1B1: 

Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase isoform 1b regulatory subunit 1

TUBA1A: 

Tubulin alpha 1a

TUBB2B: 

Tubulin beta 2B class IIb

TUBB3: 

Tubulin beta 3 class III

SD: 

Standard deviation

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

SNV: 

Single-nucleotide variant

indel: 

Insertions and deletion

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

RELN: 

Reelin

VLDLR: 

Very-low-density lipoprotein receptor

TUBA8: 

Tubulin alpha-8

DCX: 

Doublecortin

ARX: 

Aristaless related homeobox

FLNA: 

Filamin A alpha

LCH: 

Lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the patient and their parents for their cooperation. This work was partially supported by the JST PRESTO program (KS) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovated Areas “Foundation of Synapse and Neurocircuit Pathology” and Grant-in-Aid for scientific research from the Health Labor Sciences Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan (TY).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
(2)
Tokyo Women’s Medical University Institute for Integrated Medical Sciences
(3)
StaGen Co., Ltd.
(4)
Division of Child Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University

References

  1. Liu JS: Molecular genetics of neuronal migration disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011, 11 (2): 171-178.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkovich AJ, Guerrini R, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Dobyns WB: A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development: update 2012. Brain. 2012, 135 (Pt 5): 1348-1369.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cushion TD, Dobyns WB, Mullins JG, Stoodley N, Chung SK, Fry AE, Hehr U, Gunny R, Aylsworth AS, Prabhakar P, Uyanik G, Rankin J, Rees MI, Pilz DT: Overlapping cortical malformations and mutations in TUBB2B and TUBA1A. Brain. 2013, 136 (Pt 2): 536-548.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Poirier K, Saillour Y, Bahi-Buisson N, Jaglin XH, Fallet-Bianco C, Nabbout R, Castelnau-Ptakhine L, Roubertie A, Attie-Bitach T, Desguerre I, Genevieve D, Barnerias C, Keren B, Lebrun N, Boddaert N, Encha-Razavi F, Chelly J: Mutations in the neuronal ss-tubulin subunit TUBB3 result in malformation of cortical development and neuronal migration defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2010, 19 (22): 4462-4473.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Poirier K, Lebrun N, Broix L, Tian G, Saillour Y, Boscheron C, Parrini E, Valence S, Pierre BS, Oger M, Lacombe D, Genevieve D, Fontana E, Darra F, Cances C, Barth M, Bonneau D, Bernadina BD, N’Guyen S, Gitiaux C, Parent P, des Portes V, Pedespan JM, Legrez V, Castelnau-Ptakine L, Nitschke P, Hieu T, Masson C, Zelenika D, Andrieux A, et al: Mutations in TUBG1, DYNC1H1, KIF5C and KIF2A cause malformations of cortical development and microcephaly. Nat Genet. 2013Google Scholar
  6. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H: ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (16): e164-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR: A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010, 7 (4): 248-249.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC: Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4 (7): 1073-1081.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Okumura A, Hayashi M, Shimojima K, Ikeno M, Uchida T, Takanashi JI, Okamoto N, Hisata K, Shoji H, Saito A, Furukawa T, Kishida T, Shimizu T, Yamamoto T: Whole-exome sequencing of a unique brain malformation with periventricular heterotopia, cingulate polymicrogyria and midbrain tectal hyperplasia. Neuropathology. 2012Google Scholar
  10. Shimojima K: Novel compound heterozygous mutations of POLR3A revealed by whole-exome sequencing in a patient with hypomyelination. Brain Dev. in pressGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumar RA, Pilz DT, Babatz TD, Cushion TD, Harvey K, Topf M, Yates L, Robb S, Uyanik G, Mancini GM, Rees MI, Harvey RJ, Dobyns WB: TUBA1A mutations cause wide spectrum lissencephaly (smooth brain) and suggest that multiple neuronal migration pathways converge on alpha tubulins. Hum Mol Genet. 2010, 19 (14): 2817-2827.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Moon HM, Wynshaw-Boris A: Cytoskeleton in action: Lissencephaly, a neuronal migration disorder. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2013, 2 (2): 229-245.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Friocourt G, Marcorelles P, Saugier-Veber P, Quille ML, Marret S, Laquerriere A: Role of cytoskeletal abnormalities in the neuropathology and pathophysiology of type I lissencephaly. Acta Neuropathol. 2011, 121 (2): 149-170.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Keays DA, Tian G, Poirier K, Huang GJ, Siebold C, Cleak J, Oliver PL, Fray M, Harvey RJ, Molnar Z, Pinon MC, Dear N, Valdar W, Brown SD, Davies KE, Rawlins JN, Cowan NJ, Nolan P, Chelly J, Flint J: Mutations in alpha-tubulin cause abnormal neuronal migration in mice and lissencephaly in humans. Cell. 2007, 128 (1): 45-57.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Poirier K, Keays DA, Francis F, Saillour Y, Bahi N, Manouvrier S, Fallet-Bianco C, Pasquier L, Toutain A, Tuy FP, Bienvenu T, Joriot S, Odent S, Ville D, Desguerre I, Goldenberg A, Moutard ML, Fryns JP, van Esch H, Harvey RJ, Siebold C, Flint J, Beldjord C, Chelly J: Large spectrum of lissencephaly and pachygyria phenotypes resulting from de novo missense mutations in tubulin alpha 1A (TUBA1A). Hum Mutat. 2007, 28 (11): 1055-1064.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bahi-Buisson N, Poirier K, Boddaert N, Saillour Y, Castelnau L, Philip N, Buyse G, Villard L, Joriot S, Marret S, Bourgeois M, Van Esch H, Lagae L, Amiel J, Hertz-Pannier L, Roubertie A, Rivier F, Pinard JM, Beldjord C, Chelly J: Refinement of cortical dysgeneses spectrum associated with TUBA1A mutations. J Med Genet. 2008, 45 (10): 647-653.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Fallet-Bianco C, Loeuillet L, Poirier K, Loget P, Chapon F, Pasquier L, Saillour Y, Beldjord C, Chelly J, Francis F: Neuropathological phenotype of a distinct form of lissencephaly associated with mutations in TUBA1A. Brain. 2008, 131 (Pt 9): 2304-2320.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Najm J, Lachmeijer AM, Sztriha L, Martins M, Kuechler A, Haug V, Zeschnigk C, Martin P, Santos M, Vasconcelos C, Omran H, Kraus U, Van der Knaap MS, Schuierer G, Kutsche K, Uyanik G: Refining the phenotype of alpha-1a Tubulin (TUBA1A) mutation in patients with classical lissencephaly. Clin Genet. 2008, 74 (5): 425-433.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lecourtois M, Poirier K, Friocourt G, Jaglin X, Goldenberg A, Saugier-Veber P, Chelly J, Laquerriere A: Human lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia due to mutations in TUBA1A: expansion of the foetal neuropathological phenotype. Acta Neuropathol. 2010, 119 (6): 779-789.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tian G, Jaglin XH, Keays DA, Francis F, Chelly J, Cowan NJ: Disease-associated mutations in TUBA1A result in a spectrum of defects in the tubulin folding and heterodimer assembly pathway. Hum Mol Genet. 2010, 19 (18): 3599-3613.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jansen AC, Oostra A, Desprechins B, De Vlaeminck Y, Verhelst H, Regal L, Verloo P, Bockaert N, Keymolen K, Seneca S, De Meirleir L, Lissens W: TUBA1A mutations: from isolated lissencephaly to familial polymicrogyria. Neurology. 2011, 76 (11): 988-992.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sohal AP, Montgomery T, Mitra D, Ramesh V: TUBA1A mutation-associated lissencephaly: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurol. 2012, 46 (2): 127-131.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Okumura A, Hayashi M, Tsurui H, Yamakawa Y, Abe S, Kudo T, Suzuki R, Shimizu T, Shimojima K, Yamamoto T: Lissencephaly with marked ventricular dilation, agenesis of corpus callosum, and cerebellar hypoplasia caused by TUBA1A mutation. Brain Dev. 2013, 35 (3): 274-279.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Poirier K, Saillour Y, Fourniol F, Francis F, Souville I, Valence S, Desguerre I, Marie Lepage J, Boddaert N, Line Jacquemont M, Beldjord C, Chelly J, Bahi-Buisson N: Expanding the spectrum of TUBA1A-related cortical dysgenesis to Polymicrogyria. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013, 21 (4): 381-385.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zanni G, Colafati GS, Barresi S, Randisi F, Talamanca LF, Genovese E, Bellacchio E, Bartuli A, Bernardi B, Bertini E: Description of a novel TUBA1A mutation in Arg-390 associated with asymmetrical polymicrogyria and mid-hindbrain dysgenesis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2013, 17 (4): 361-365.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hikita N, Hattori H, Kato M, Sakuma S, Morotomi Y, Ishida H, Seto T, Tanaka K, Shimono T, Shintaku H, Tokuhara D: A case of TUBA1A mutation presenting with lissencephaly and Hirschsprung disease. Brain Dev. 2014, 36 (2): 159-162.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Romaniello R, Arrigoni F, Cavallini A, Tenderini E, Baschirotto C, Triulzi F, Bassi MT, Borgatti R: Brain malformations and mutations in alpha- and beta-tubulin genes: a review of the literature and description of two new cases. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014, 56 (4): 354-360.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tischfield MA, Cederquist GY, Gupta ML, Engle EC: Phenotypic spectrum of the tubulin-related disorders and functional implications of disease-causing mutations. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011, 21 (3): 286-294.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaglin XH, Poirier K, Saillour Y, Buhler E, Tian G, Bahi-Buisson N, Fallet-Bianco C, Phan-Dinh-Tuy F, Kong XP, Bomont P, Castelnau-Ptakhine L, Odent S, Loget P, Kossorotoff M, Snoeck I, Plessis G, Parent P, Beldjord C, Cardoso C, Represa A, Flint J, Keays DA, Cowan NJ, Chelly J: Mutations in the beta-tubulin gene TUBB2B result in asymmetrical polymicrogyria. Nat Genet. 2009, 41 (6): 746-752.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Cederquist GY, Luchniak A, Tischfield MA, Peeva M, Song Y, Menezes MP, Chan WM, Andrews C, Chew S, Jamieson RV, Gomes L, Flaherty M, Grant PE, Gupta ML, Engle EC: An inherited TUBB2B mutation alters a kinesin-binding site and causes polymicrogyria, CFEOM and axon dysinnervation. Hum Mol Genet. 2012, 21 (26): 5484-5499.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Romaniello R, Tonelli A, Arrigoni F, Baschirotto C, Triulzi F, Bresolin N, Bassi MT, Borgatti R: A novel mutation in the beta-tubulin gene TUBB2B associated with complex malformation of cortical development and deficits in axonal guidance. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012, 54 (8): 765-769.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Ross ME, Swanson K, Dobyns WB: Lissencephaly with cerebellar hypoplasia (LCH): a heterogeneous group of cortical malformations. Neuropediatrics. 2001, 32 (5): 256-263.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yamamoto T, Nishikawa T, Yamanaka M, Takada F, Kurosawa K: Couple’s decision-making after birth of a child with an unbalanced chromosomal translocation. J Pediatr Neurol. 2008, 6: 203-208.Google Scholar
  34. Metzker ML: Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing. Genome Res. 2005, 15 (12): 1767-1776.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mardis ER: A decade’s perspective on DNA sequencing technology. Nature. 2011, 470 (7333): 198-203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Shimojima et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement