Open Access

Wii Fit U intensity and enjoyment in adults

  • Julien Tripette1,
  • Haruka Murakami1,
  • Takafumi Ando1,
  • Ryoko Kawakami1,
  • Noriko Tanaka1,
  • Shigeho Tanaka1 and
  • Motohiko Miyachi1Email author
BMC Research Notes20147:567

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-567

Received: 4 March 2014

Accepted: 14 August 2014

Published: 26 August 2014

Abstract

Background

The Wii Fit series (Nintendo Inc., Japan) provides active video games (AVGs) to help adults to maintain a sufficient level of daily physical activity (PA). The second generation of home AVG consoles is now emerging with new game modalities (including a portable mini screen in the case of the new Wii U). The present study was performed to investigate the intensity and enjoyment of Wii Fit U games among adults.

Findings

Metabolic equivalent (METs, i.e., intensity) of the Wii Fit U activities were evaluated using metabolic chambers in 16 sedentary adults (8 women and 8 men). A short version of the physical activity enjoyment scale was completed for each activity. Wii Fit U activities were distributed over a range from 2.2  ±  0.4 METs (Hula dance) to 4.7  ±  1.2 (Hip-hop dance). Seven activities were classified as light-intensity PA (<3 METs) and 11 activities as moderate-intensity PA (3 – 6 METs). The new portable mini screen game modality does not induce higher METs. Men exercised at higher intensities than women. There was no correlation between enjoyment and MET values in women or men.

Conclusions

More and more moderate-intensity activities are available through video gaming, but the average intensity (3.2  ±  0.6) is still low. Users should be aware that AVGs alone cannot fulfill the recommendations for PA, and the video games industry still must innovate further to enhance gaming intensity and make the tool more attractive to health and fitness professionals.

Keywords

Active video game Exergame Wii Fit Indirect calorimetry Metabolic chamber Enjoyment Physical activity

Findings

Background

Home-based active video games (AVGs) have been presented in recent years as a potential leisure physical activity (PA) [1]. Several single-session studies classified AVGs as light-to-moderate PA [2], which may not be sufficient to reach current recommendations for daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) [3]. Although intervention studies have failed to increase the total amounts of PA in children and adolescents [4, 5], there have been reports of beneficial effects of AVGs with regard to body composition outcomes, especially in the adult population [69]. As there is no consensus regarding the use of AVGs as a means to increase daily PA, and because the video game industry is still developing rapidly, data on AVG intensity and enjoyment must be frequently updated to help health and fitness professionals to include AVGs in exercise rehabilitation programs.

The popular Wii Fit series (Nintendo Inc., Japan) provides AVGs designed to help adults to maintain a sufficient level of daily PA. While the second generation of home AVG consoles is now emerging, the new Wii U system includes an independent portable monitor allowing a 360° motion game modality that may increase player movement, upper limb activation, and subsequent energy expenditure (EE). The present study was performed to investigate the intensity of each new Wii Fit U activity in adults. A standardized protocol using metabolic chambers (i.e., similar to that used for testing the activities in the previous Wii Fit series[10]) was used to facilitate data interpretation and comparison. Heart rate and enjoyment data are also provided.

Methods

Sixteen Japanese men (n  =  8) and women (n  =  8) aged between 30 and 45 years old participated in this study. According to Nintendo commercials and packaging materials, sedentary young and middle age adults have indeed been identified as the main target audience for the Wii Fit series. The subjects did not report any exercise habits (here defined as at least 30 min of structured physical exercise twice per week during the previous year), and are consequently referred as sedentary elsewhere in this manuscript. Subjects had limited experience with Wii Fit (no experience with the tested activities) and were therefore considered as beginners. No training sessions were scheduled before the experimental day. Subjects did not report any chronic diseases.

The standardized metabolic chamber protocol was described in detail elsewhere [10]. Briefly, subjects performed the 18 new activities of Wii Fit U at the beginner level. Each activity was continued for 8 min to obtain steady-state EE. Two open-circuit indirect metabolic chambers (15000 or 20000 L) were used to measure the metabolic equivalents for each activity (METs) as an index of intensity. Chambers were equipped with a TV, a video game console, a table, and a chair. Temperature was controlled at 25°C and relative humidity was set at 55%. The oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of the air supply and exhaust were measured by mass spectrometry (ARCO-1000A-CH; Arco System, Japan). The flow rate exhausted from the chamber was measured by pneumotachography (FLB1; Arco System, Japan). The oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were determined from the flow rate of exhausted air and the concentrations of the inlet and outlet air of the chamber. Data were recorded every 12 s. EE was determined using Weir’s equation [9]. Finally, MET values were calculated from resting EE and steady-state EE during each Wii Fit U activity. Heart rate (HR) was monitored throughout the protocol (BIOVIEW1000A PB1811; NEC Medical Systems, Japan).

Finally, a short version of the physical activity enjoyment scale (sPACES) was completed after each activity. Five items from the original 18-item test were chosen. The same items had been used previously by Graves et al. (2010) in a similar protocol [11]. Each item is presented as a 7-point Likert-type scale. The responses for the 5 items were summed to give a score ranging from 5 to 35, and the percentage enjoyment score was then calculated [11].

Statistical analysis was conducted at three levels:
  1. 1)

    For each activity: For intensity and enjoyment, the differences between activities and sexes were tested by two-way ANOVA with 18 repeated measures.

     
  2. 2)

    For each activity category: In accordance with the manufacturer’s label, activities were classified into three categories (Figure 1): balance activities vs. dance activities vs. aerobics activities. The differences between these three categories were investigated by one-way ANOVA. The Student–Newman–Keuls test was used for post hoc analysis.

     
  3. 3)

    For each game modality: Activities were assigned to one of the following modalities (2 modalities, see asterisk in Figure 1): new portable mini screen vs. other traditional Wii Fit game modalities (Wii remote and/or Wii balance board). The difference between the two modalities was tested by unpaired t test.

     
Figure 1

MET values and enjoyment in the 18 new Wii Fit series activities. *: Activities that use the portable monitor game modalities.

In addition, the correlations between intensity and enjoyment scores were investigated for women and men by the Pearson correlation test. METs values and enjoyment scores are shown in Figure 1 as means  ±  SD. Significance is shown as P  <  0.05 or P  <  0.001.

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Health and Nutrition and subjects gave their informed consent.

Results

The baseline characteristics of subjects are presented in the Table 1.
Table 1

Subject baseline characteristics

 

Females (n = 8)

Males (n = 8)

Age (years)

35 ± 2

38 ± 7

BMI (kg · m-2)

19.1 ± 1.8

25.0 ± 3.6

Resting metabolic rate (kcal · kg-1 · h-1)

0.88 ± 0.08

1.11 ± 0.20

Resting heart rate (bpm)

72 ± 9

70 ± 7

According to the repeated measures test, intensities were significantly different between activities (P  <  0.001). As indicated in Figure 1, the new Wii Fit U activities were distributed over a range from 2.2  ±  0.4 (Hula dance) to 4.7  ±  1.2 (Hip-hop dance) METs. Seven activities were classified as light-intensity PA (<3 METs) and 11 activities as moderate-intensity PA (3 – 6 METs). No activity was considered as vigorous PA (>6 METs). The average intensity was significantly higher in men than in women (3.5  ±  0.8 vs. 3.0  ±  0.5 METs, respectively, P  <  0.001; overall average: 3.2  ±  0.6). HR varied from 86  ±  14 bpm (Hula dance) to 109  ±  16 bpm (Hip-hop dance).

Dancing activities (3.5  ±  0.5 METs) were significantly more intense than balance (3.0  ±  0.2 METs, P  <  0.05) or aerobic activities (3.0  ±  0.3 METs, P  <  0.05). Finally, the activities with the new portable mini screen game modality were significantly less intense than those with the Wii remote or Wii balance board only (2.8  ±  0.5 vs. 3.4  ±  0.7 METs, respectively, P  <  0.001). These activities were rated as light-intensity PA (see asterisk in Figure 1).

Enjoyment scores were found to be relatively homogenous between activities, with the enjoyment scale varying from 55%  ±  21% to 74%  ±  13%. There were no significant differences between activities or sexes. Finally, no relations were found between intensity and enjoyment in women (R  =  –0.01) or men (R  =  –0.07).

Discussion

The new Wii Fit U game provides an extension of slightly higher intensity activities (2.2  ±  0.4 to 4.7  ±  1.2 METs, mean: 3.2  ±  0.6 METs) in comparison with activities included in the previous Wii Fit + (1.3  ±  0.4 to 5.6  ±  1.1 METs, mean: 2.5  ±  1.0 METs, see [10]). While the new portable mini screen did not result in higher intensity activity in the present study (mean: 2.8  ±  0.5 METs), more MVPAs are still available through activities that use the traditional Wii game modalities (i.e., the Wii balance board and/or Wii remote). Surprisingly, the dance activities were found to be more intense than the aerobic activities (3.5  ±  0.5 vs. 3.0  ±  0.3 METs, respectively). One reason is that most of the dances included in the Wii Fit U package are actually practiced as dance aerobic exercises. Another reason is that the experiment was performed in beginner mode, which could have significantly lowered the intensity of the activities, including aerobics activities. These observations emphasize the necessity for health and fitness professionals not to rely on the manufacturer’s labeling, as the terminology does not necessarily reflect the effective intensities of the activities and may be misleading.

Attempting to increase PA in adults is a huge challenge that requires multifaceted strategies, and the present results may support the inclusion of AVGs in such strategies. In the present study, adult men expended more energy than women playing the same video game. However, this result cannot be explained by a difference in enjoyment as there was no difference in sPACES score between the sexes. Finally, no relation was found between enjoyment and intensity, which could be a critical point to maintain subject adherence over longer periods. Both the scientific field (via longitudinal studies) and the video game industry should address this important issue.

Significant proportions of Wii Fit U activities are still rated as light-intensity PA (7 of the 18 new Wii Fit U activities tested; 53 of 86 overall, see [10]). While these activities cannot be relied upon to fulfill current recommendations for PA (that should be MVPAs) [3], they may still be valuable to break sedentary times, or for seniors who would have greater benefits from light-intensity PA compared to their younger counterparts [12]. However, further studies specifically designed to address these points are required.

Limitations and strengths

In the present study, all of the participants were invited to play at the beginner level, which may have lowered the game intensities. Indeed, Worley et al. [13] reported that playing Wii Fit games at an intermediate level significantly increased players’ EE. Another limitation is that the whole study was conducted in single-player mode. Multi-player modes, which may better reflect some real-life situations, have indeed been found to be more intense [1416]. However, the use of the single-player mode allows a fairly objective evaluation of each game intensity, providing important information to the players and health and fitness professionals who wish to select AVGs for their usage. On the other hand, in real-life situations, adult players are invited to play games with their relatives and at intermediate to expert levels to have greater benefits from their AVG sessions. Finally, the relative small sample size, population age, and characteristics (i.e., inexperienced), as well as the 8-min format chosen for each activity, may prevent generalization of our results. However, one strength of the present study was the use of the same standardized protocol as described previously [10], allowing study-to-study comparisons, thus providing information about the evolution of Wii Fit series intensity.

Conclusions

While the new Wii Fit U tends toward more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, the average intensity is still low (3.2  ±  0.6 METs). Users (including both players and health and fitness professionals) should be aware that active video games cannot be relied upon to entirely fulfill the recommendations for physical activity. Consequently, recommendations for sedentary people to engage in exercise should only be made for some selected games and must be considered as only one tool in a wider multifaceted strategy. On the other hand, innovative game modalities allowing more vigorous exertion could be developed to break the light-intensity physical activity/moderate-to-vigorous physical activity barrier more significantly and make these games more attractive for the purposes of health promotion.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the subjects for their participation in the study. Julien Tripette is supported by Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Santé and the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science. The study was partially funded by Nintendo Inc., Japan. Nintendo staff did not participate in the design, interpretation, or discussion of the results of the study. The authors therefore declare no competing or financial interests.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Health and Nutrition

References

  1. Lieberman DA, Chamberlin B, Medina E, Franklin BA, Sanner BM, Vafiadis DK: The power of play: innovations in getting active summit 2011 a science panel proceedings report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011, 123 (21): 2507-2516.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Peng W, Lin JH, Crouse J: Is playing exergames really exercising? A meta-analysis of energy expenditure in active video games. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011, 14 (11): 681-688.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A: Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007, 116 (9): 1081-1093.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. LeBlanc AG, Chaput J-P, McFarlane A, Colley RC, Thivel D, Biddle SJ, Maddison R, Leatherdale ST, Tremblay MS: Active video games and health indicators in children and youth: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (6): e65351-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Peng W, Crouse JC, Lin J-H: Using active video games for physical activity promotion a systematic review of the current state of research. Health Educ Behav. 2013, 40 (2): 171-192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jacobs K, Zhu L, Dawes M, Franco J, Huggins A, Igari C, Ranta B, Umez-Eronini A: Wii health: a preliminary study of the health and wellness benefits of Wii Fit on university students. Br J Occup Ther. 2011, 74 (6): 262-268.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mejia-Downs A, Fruth SJ, Clifford A, Hine S, Huckstep J, Merkel H, Wilkinson H, Yoder J: A preliminary exploration of the effects of a 6-week interactive video dance exercise program in an adult population. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2011, 22 (4): 5-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Tripette J, Murakami H, Gando Y, Kawakami R, Sasaki A, Hanawa S, Hirosako A, Miyachi M: Home-based active video games to promote weight loss during the postpartum period. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014, 46 (3): 472-478.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Trout J, Zamora K: Dance dance revolution: a physiological look at an interactive arcade game. Int Counc Health Phys Educ Recreation Sport Dance J Res. 2008, 3 (1): 67-72.Google Scholar
  10. Miyachi M, Yamamoto K, Ohkawara K, Tanaka S: METs in adults while playing active video games: a metabolic chamber study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010, 42 (6): 1149-1153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Graves LE, Ridgers ND, Williams K, Stratton G, Atkinson GT: The physiological cost and enjoyment of Wii Fit in adolescents, young adults, and older adults. J Phys Act Health. 2010, 7 (3): 393-401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Loprinzi PD, Lee H, Cardinal BJ: Evidence to support including lifestyle light-intensity recommendations in physical activity guidelines for older adults. Am J Health Promot. 2014, in pressGoogle Scholar
  13. Worley JR, Rogers SN, Kraemer RR: Metabolic responses to Wii Fit video games at different game levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2011, 25 (3): 689-693.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Staiano AE, Abraham AA, Calvert SL: Motivating effects of cooperative exergame play for overweight and obese adolescents. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012, 6 (4): 812-819.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Peng W, Crouse J: Playing in parallel: the effects of multiplayer modes in active video game on motivation and physical exertion. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013, 16 (6): 423-427.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Donovan C, Hirsch E, Holohan E, McBride I, McManus R, Hussey J: Energy expended playing Xbox Kinect and Wii games: a preliminary study comparing single and multiplayer modes. Physiotherapy. 2012, 98 (3): 224-229.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tripette et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement