Skip to main content

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus associated with docetaxel chemotherapy: a case report



Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus is an uncommon disorder associated with the use of pharmacological agents including systemic chemotherapy.

Case presentation

We report a case of docetaxel-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in a 60-year-old Caucasian female with Sjögren’s syndrome diagnosed 2 months after receiving docetaxel as part of the adjuvant FEC-D (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel) chemotherapy protocol for early stage breast cancer. Although the exact mechanisms behind the autoimmune response elicited by docetaxel are unclear, the involvement of anti-SSA/Ro antibodies has been implicated.


This case highlights the symptom severity and clinical course of docetaxel-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and highlights the importance of recognizing this uncommon but potentially severe chemotherapy-associated cutaneous reaction.


Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a type of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, most commonly characterized by photodistributed, non-scarring, papulosquamous or polycyclic annular plaques. SCLE is often associated with high titers of anti-SSA/Ro antibodies in the serum, and roughly 20% of newly diagnosed cases of SCLE are attributed to a drug or another exacerbating agent[1]. Development of drug-induced SCLE has been linked to a number of pharmacological agents including thiazide diuretics, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and taxanes[2, 3]. Taxanes, such as docetaxel and paclitaxel, belong to the anti-microtubule class of chemotherapeutic agents and are commonly used in the systemic treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and many other solid tumor malignancies[3]. In this case report, we describe a case of docetaxel-induced SCLE in a 60 year old female with Sjögren’s syndrome diagnosed 2 months after receiving docetaxel as part of the adjuvant FEC-D (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel) chemotherapy protocol for early stage breast cancer, and highlight its severity, clinical course, and importance in recognizing this uncommon chemotherapy-associated cutaneous reaction.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old post-menopausal Caucasian woman with Stage IIB (T2 N1) invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast commenced adjuvant chemotherapy with the FEC-D (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide for 3 cycles, followed by docetaxel for 3 cycles) protocol with G-CSF support (peg-filgrastim) after undergoing breast-conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection. Her past medical history is significant for chronic benign neutropenia and Sjögren’s syndrome primarily manifested by dry eyes, myalgias, and arthralgias, without a pre-existing history of lupus or other connective tissue disorders. She reports no known drug allergies aside from a rash from adhesive tapes, and her medication profile consists of duloxetine, hydroxyquinine, and celecoxib. Two days following the administration of the first cycle of FEC chemotherapy, she developed an exanthema described as a mild erythematous maculopapular pruritic rash on her extensor forearms and anterior trunk, which was felt to be characteristic of a typical chemotherapy-associated rash, given its near complete resolution prior to her subsequent chemotherapy cycle. Nonetheless, the rash did recur with subsequent cycles of FEC chemotherapy, and the switchover to docetaxel after 3 cycles of FEC chemotherapy was delayed by 1 week to allow for its improvement with supportive measures including anti-histamines and a topical corticosteroid. The decision was then made to begin her docetaxel treatment with standard dexamethasone pre-medication. Shortly after the first cycle of docetaxel, however, she developed a moderately severe, erythematous desquamating rash initially located on her forearms and anterior trunk. The severity and extent of this rash differed from that seen with FEC. With the second cycle of docetaxel, despite the addition of a course of prednisone, the rash progressed to involve her scalp, cheeks, ears, neck, back, as well as membranes of the nose and vagina resulting in epistaxis and vaginal bleeding (Figure 1). This was associated with severe burning pains, and facial and peri-orbital edema. Due to the severity of her presentation, an urgent dermatology consultation was obtained, with a working diagnosis of Stevens – Johnson syndrome (Table 1). A biopsy was performed on her right forearm, and demonstrated an interface dermatitis with dermal mucin deposition (Figure 2). This pathology was consistent with a diagnosis of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus, which was felt to be most likely precipitated by the docetaxel exposure. Laboratory and serologic data revealed an ANA speckled pattern with a titre of 1/2560, high positive levels of anti-SSA/Ro 60 antigen at a value of 88 AU/mL (>81 AU/mL is high positive), moderately positive levels of anti-SSB/La at a value of 66 AU/mL (moderate range is 51-80 AU/mL), and elevated rheumatoid factor at 113 kU/L. A decision was made to discontinue chemotherapy after the second cycle of docetaxel, and following its discontinuation, the rash fully resolved after two months, with supportive measures including topical betamethasone cream. During her treatment course, no discernible worsening of her Sjögren’s syndrome was reported, which may have been underreported due to concurrent chemotherapy-related toxicities.

Figure 1
figure 1

Severe erythematous desquamating rash. The rash involved the forearms, anterior trunk, scalp, cheeks, ears, neck, back, as well as membranes of the nose and vagina resulting in epistaxis and vaginal bleeding.

Table 1 Clinical and Histological features of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE)
Figure 2
figure 2

Photomicrographs of a skin biopsy. Photomicrographs show an interface dermatitis with associated mid-dermal peri-vascular lymphocytic inflammation (A: hematoxylin and eosin, 100X) and dermal mucin deposition (B: Hale’s colloidal iron, 100X).


Drug-induced SCLE is an uncommon cutaneous reaction associated with chemotherapy use. In the case presented, given the temporal relationship of the patient’s dermatological toxicities to her chemotherapy treatment, we postulate that the taxane docetaxel is the most likely culprit. In the current literature, there have been eight reported cases of SCLE associated with docetaxel, and five reported cases of SCLE associated with paclitaxel chemotherapy[113]. Many of the patients in these cases had a background of preceding autoimmune disease with positive anti-SSA/Ro antibodies[15, 8, 10, 11]. It has been suggested that the presence of serum anti-SSA/Ro antibodies may be involved in a mechanism that predisposes patients to a higher risk of developing drug-induced SCLE[4, 14]. As taxanes are hypothesized to lead to the appearance or increase in serum anti-SSA/Ro antibodies[10], the risk of drug-induced SCLE would be further heightened given a patient with pre-existing positive titres due to an autoimmune disorder. Docetaxel targets dividing cells and acts to stabilize microtubule assembly, which leads to G2/M phase cell cycle arrest followed by apoptosis[15]. Apoptotic products can then in turn incite an immunogenic response against DNA-histone and RNA-protein complexes[16]. Therefore, in an individual with a pre-existing auto-immune disorder in which antibodies against nucleoproteins already exist (such as anti-SSA/Ro), increased levels of apoptotic products from chemotherapy could stimulate an exacerbated immune response, and manifest as severe cutaneous lesions[17].

Drug-induced SCLE does not differ from idiopathic SCLE in its clinical, immunological, and histopathological characteristics[15]. Therefore, the diagnosis of drug-induced SCLE is characterized by the development of diffuse cutaneous lesions following administration of an offending agent, and its resolution upon discontinuation of the drug. In the present case, the clinical and pathological features are compatible with drug-induced SCLE, most likely secondary to docetaxel. The use of dexamethasone likely masked the true severity of the rash. Despite the addition of a course of systemic corticosteroids with prednisone with her second cycle of docetaxel, the rash rapidly progressed. The patient’s history of Sjögren’s syndrome with high levels of serum anti-SSA/Ro antibodies likely predisposed her to the development of the extensive and severe cutaneous lesions. Anti-SSA/Ro antigens have been seen to preferentially relocate to the surface of cultured keratinocytes that had been irradiated with ultraviolet radiation[18]. It should be noted that her skin lesions were distributed over photo-exposed areas of her body, suggesting that induction of photosensitivity may have been a contributing mechanism to the development of her skin eruptions. Lastly, the patient also had a history of chronic benign neutropenia, and was given peg-filgrastim with her chemotherapy cycles to support her white blood cell and neutrophil counts. The increased number of circulating white blood cells and neutrophils may also have contributed to a heightened immune response, further exacerbating her cutaneous reaction to the docetaxel.

Although SCLE is classically characterized as either idiopathic or drug-induced, there has been sufficient evidence in the literature to consider certain cases of SCLE to have a paraneoplastic etiology[19]. There have been multiple reports of SCLE arising in the setting of internal malignancy including two cases in breast adenocarcinomas[20]. Like other paraneoplastic dermatoses, presentations of paraneoplastic SCLE follow the criteria in that the cutaneous findings appear temporally after development of the malignancy, and their clinical courses typically run parallel[21]. As such, paraneoplastic SCLE tends to resolve after successful treatment of the malignancy. However, because of the role of chemotherapy treatments in causing tumor regression and the timing of its administration, it may sometimes be difficult to differentiate drug-induced SCLE from paraneoplastic SCLE. This is especially true if the appearance of skin eruptions occurs shortly after beginning systemic chemotherapy. However, if the lesions regress quickly after discontinuing chemotherapy, as was observed in this case, then the etiology would be most compatible with drug-induced SCLE. Regardless, it is important to also consider paraneoplastic SCLE in the differential diagnosis.

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is an uncommon but potentially severe disease state associated with docetaxel chemotherapy. The clinician needs to recognize and consider this entity in the differential diagnosis of chemotherapy-associated cutaneous reactions, given its severity, and the importance of discontinuing the offending agent as primary management. Although the exact mechanisms behind drug-induced SCLE remain unclear, patients with a pre-existing autoimmune disorder appear to have a higher incidence when exposed to offending agents including chemotherapy. The identification and discontinuation of the offending agent is essential in the management of drug-induced autoimmune reactions.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.



Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus


5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel chemotherapy


Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor


Anti-nuclear antibody


Deoxyribonucleic acid


Ribonucleic acid.


  1. Callen J: Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus – filling the gap in knowledge. JAMA Dermatol. 2013, 149 (9): 1075-1076. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen M, Crowson A, Woofter M, Luca M, Magro C: Docetaxel (Taxotere) induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: report of 4 cases. J Rheumatol. 2004, 31 (4): 818-820.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lebeau S, Tambe S, Sallam M, Alhowaish A, Tschanz C, Masouye I, Borradori L: Docetaxel-induced relapse of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and chilblain lupus. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013, 1109: 871-874.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adachi A, Horikawa T: Paclitaxel-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus in patients with serum anti-SSA/Ro antibody. J Dermatol. 2007, 34 (7): 473-476. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2007.00313.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasanu C, Alexandrescu D: Systemic lupus erythematosus associated with paclitaxel use in the treatment of ovarian cancer. South Med J. 2008, 101 (11): 1161-1162. 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31818956f6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Funke A, Kulp-Shorten C, Callen J: Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus exacerbated or induced by chemotherapy. JAMA Dermatol. 2010, 146 (10): 1113-1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gantzer A, Regnier S, Cosnes A, Ortonne N, Wolkenstein P, Bagot M, Duong T: Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and cancer: two cases and literature review. Annales de Dermatologieet de Venereologie. 2011, 138 (5): 409-417. 10.1016/j.annder.2011.02.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamond N, Younis T, Purdy K, Dorreen M: Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus associated with nab – paclitaxel therapy. Curr Oncol. 2013, 20 (5): 484-487. 10.3747/co.20.1546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lortholary A, Cary-Ten Have Dallinga M, El Kouri C, Morineau N, Ramee J: Paclitaxel-induced lupus. Presse Med. 2007, 36 (9): 1207-1208. 10.1016/j.lpm.2007.02.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchetti M, Noland M, Dillon P, Greer K: Taxane associated subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Dematol Online J. 2013, 19 (8): 19259-published online July 2013, doj_19259

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pham A, Berz D, Karwan P, Colvin G: Cremophor-induced lupus erythematosus-like reaction with taxol administration: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol. 2011, 4: 526-530. 10.1159/000334233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Renner R, Sticherling M: Incidental cases of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in association with malignancy. Eur J Dermatol. 2008, 18 (6): 700-704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vihinen P, Paija O, Kivisaari A, Koulu L, Aho H: Cutaneous lupus erythematosusafter treatment with paclitaxel and bevacizumab for metastatic breast cancer: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011, 5: 243-10.1186/1752-1947-5-243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Srivastava M, Rencic A, Diglio G, Santana H, Bonitz P, Watson R, Ha E, Anhalt G, Provost T, Nousari C: Drug induced, Ro/SSA-positive cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol. 2003, 139 (1): 45-49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lowe G, Henderson C, Hansen C, Sontheimer R: A systematic review of drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Brit J Dermatol. 2011, 164 (3): 465-472.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stollar B, Stephenson F: Apoptosis and nucleosomes. Lupus. 2002, 11: 787-789. 10.1191/0961203302lu318oa.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahman A, Stollar B: Origin and structure of autoantibodies and antigens in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Lupus. 2008, 17: 232-235. 10.1177/0961203307088246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Igarashi T, Itoh Y, Fukunaga Y, Yamamoto M: Stress-induced cell surface expression and antigenic alteration of the Ro/SSA autoantigen. Autoimmunity. 1995, 22 (1): 33-42. 10.3109/08916939508995297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans KG, Heymann WR: Paraneoplasticsubacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: an underrecognized entity. Cutis. 2013, 91: 25-29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaheen B, Milne G, Shaffrali F: Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus associated with breast carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009, 34: 480-481. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03549.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McLean D: Cutaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Arch Dermatol. 1986, 122: 765-767. 10.1001/archderm.1986.01660190043013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Y Tsang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

NY Wong drafted and revised the manuscript. LM Parsons was involved in the dermatological aspects of the case. MJ Trotter was involved in the pathological aspects of the case. RY Tsang provided oncological care of the patient, conceived the case report, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, N.Y., Parsons, L.M., Trotter, M.J. et al. Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus associated with docetaxel chemotherapy: a case report. BMC Res Notes 7, 785 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: