Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Cervical Ectropion and Intra-Uterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD): a five-year retrospective study of family planning clients of a tertiary health institution in Lagos Nigeria

  • Kikelomo Ololade Wright1, 2Email author,
  • Ahmadu Shehu Mohammed2,
  • Olajumoke Salisu-Olatunji2 and
  • Yetunde Abiola Kuyinu1, 2
BMC Research Notes20147:946

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-946

Received: 27 December 2013

Accepted: 17 December 2014

Published: 23 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Cervical ectropion (also known as cervical erosion) is a common finding on routine pelvic examination during the fertile years. The decision to treat or not remains controversial. According to studies in support of routine treatment of cervical erosion, there is a possible relationship between squamous metaplasia and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. To determine the prevalence of cervical ectropion and associated risk factors among clients with intra-uterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) attending a family planning clinic of a tertiary health institution in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods

A 5-year retrospective study was conducted by assessing existing clinic records from years 2007–2011. Clients with IUCDs undergo routine pelvic examination during check-up visits. A total of 628 clients’ records were seen within the stated time frame. This study was approved by the ethical committee of the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH) and the collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 19.0.

Results

The mean age of the IUCD users was 34.7 ± 6.52 years, while 517 (82.3%) had secondary education. On routine pelvic examination, seventy-nine clients (12.6%) had cervical ectropion. Thirty-nine (6.2%) clients had presented with a history of abnormal vaginal bleeding while 12.1% had vaginal discharge. Treatments offered to cases of cervical ectropion include cervical painting with gentian violet (89.9%) and antibiotics prescription (58.2%). On bivariate analysis, previous hormonal contraceptive use (P = 0.041) and vaginal discharge (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with developing cervical ectropion. Clients with ectropion were significantly more likely to receive prescriptions for antibiotics (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Less than one fifth of the clients had cervical erosion. However, routine pelvic examination could aid the detection and control of latent reproductive health problems such as cervical ectropion which may require further investigations for example, pap smears, to exclude potentially lethal conditions and to determine appropriate treatment modality.

Keywords

CervicalEctropionIntra-uterine contraceptive device

Background

Cervical ectropion which is also called cervical ectopy or erosion occurs when eversion of the endocervix exposes columnar epithelium to the vaginal milieu [1]. The prevalence of cervical ectropion ranges from 17% to 50% [15]. A prevalence study in China among female users of family planning services reported that 43.2% of the women had cervical ectropion [6]. Another study on women using oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) and IUCDs in Benghazi, Libya also observed that cervical ectropion was the commonest gynecological disorder among the women (54.9%) [7]. Ectropion is considered to be a common physiological condition in adolescents and pregnant women [1, 8, 9].

Cervical ectropion has been associated with both the combined oral contraceptive pill and chlamydia trachomatis [1, 8, 10, 11]. In a study among women attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic in USA, cervical ectropion was positively associated with oral contraception and Chlamydia trachomatis infection [8]. Inflammation and trauma have also been implicated in the etiology of cervical ectropion [8, 12]. This is important considering the fact that IUCD usage could be linked to inflammation and trauma of the cervix. In view of the fact that vaginal discharge is a common symptom of IUCD users, [9] changing the method of contraception is a common practice for women who are unable to accept the increase in physiological discharge associated with cervical ectropion [13].

Reproductive tract infection is one of the major complications caused by prolonged usage of IUCDs [14]. A Turkish study showed that 14.7% of women using IUCDs had cervical ectropion. Cervical ectropion and vaginal discharge were also found to be significantly higher among IUCD users compared with women on OCPs [15].

Furthermore, ectropion has been found in 5% to 25% of women presenting with postcoital bleeding [16]. Differentiating between cervical ectropion and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia macroscopically is difficult [17]. In addition, available literature concerning treatment for cervical ectropion can be described as controversial [12, 13]. Some arguments advanced in support of routine treatment include the relationship between squamous metaplasia and induction of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix [18]. Pre-cancerous lesions often develop at the squamous-columnar junction, hence theoretically, treating cervical ectropion may prove to be protective against the incidence of cervical cancer [18]. Proponents of routine treatment have also argued that some sexually transmitted microorganisms such as Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea preferentially infect glandular epithelium [10, 15, 19]. Thus ectropion would, by exposing this epithelium, aid an infective process [10, 15, 19]. Several treatment modalities have been used for cases of ectropion including use of antibiotics, microwave tissue coagulation, laser coagulation, infrared light, an interferon-alpha suppository, electrocautery or cryotherapy [2, 12, 13, 20, 21].

Based on the fore-going, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of cervical ectropion and associated risk factors among clients with IUCDs of a family planning clinic in a tertiary health institution in Lagos Nigeria.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted by assessing existing clinic records between years 2007–2011. Clients with IUCDs undergo routine pelvic examination during check-up visits. A total of 628 clients using IUCDs were seen within the stated time frame. Clinical records of all 628 clients were assessed. Data from the clinical records were collected using a register on the following information: socio-demographic and gynecological characteristics of the clients, gynecological symptoms, presence or absence of ectropion and the type of treatment offered. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 19.0 for windows. Descriptive statistics were calculated for variables. Chi square test and multiple logistic regression tests were used to test for association between variables with level of significance set at P < 0.05.

This study was approved by the ethical committee of the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH).

Study limitations

  1. 1.

    Years 2009–2011 were characterized by periodic industrial actions accounting for the drop in clientele.

     
  2. 2.

    Furthermore, the obstetrics and gynecology clinics within the hospital complex have been undergoing structural renovation since year 2010 reducing the capacity and services of the family planning clinic to the bearest minimum in an improvised mini-clinic.

     
  3. 3.

    The study was retrospective; relying on records, with no control over exposure or outcome. It was also hospital-based and may not be readily generalizable to the Nigerian population. However, it provides useful information considering the paucity of research works on cervical ectropion in Nigeria, in addition to highlighting the need for future studies using stronger study designs.

     

Results

The majority (88.2%) of the clients were seen between 2007 and 2008. (Table 1). The age of the IUCD users ranged between 16 and 58 years with a mean of 34.7 ± 6.5 years, while 517 (82.3%) had secondary education, the majority (81.4%) were Christians (Table 2).
Table 1

Frequency distribution of clients by year of registration at family planning clinic

Year

Frequency

Percentage (%)

2007

227

36.1

2008

327

52.1

2009

18

2.9

2010

25

4.0

2011

31

4.9

Total

628

100.0

Table 2

Socio-demographic characteristics of clients

Characteristic

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Age group (years)

  

  15 - 20

4

0.6

  21 - 25

32

5.1

  26 - 30

144

22.9

  31 - 35

188

29.9

  36 - 40

143

22.8

  >40

113

18.0

  No data

4

0.6

  Total

628

100.0

Educational level

  

  None

17

2.7

  Primary

35

5.6

  Secondary

517

82.3

  Tertiary

46

7.3

  No data

13

2.1

  Total

628

100.0

Religion

  

  Christianity

511

81.4

  Islam

103

16.4

  No data

14

2.2

  Total

614

100.0

Age (Mean = 34.7 years, Median = 34 years, Mode = 35 years, Standard Deviation = 6.52). The majority (75.6%) of respondents were between ages 26 and 40 years conforming averagely to the reproductive age range.

The mean parity of clients using IUCD was 3.2 ± 1.5, with a parity of 3–5 amongst 58.4% of the clients (Table 3). Four hundred and one (65.3%) clients using IUCD had never used any modern contraception previously while 131 (20.9%) had used hormonal contraceptives in the past (Table 3). Most (90.3%) clients had a 25–30 day menstrual cycle while 570 (90.8%) had their menstruation lasting for 3–5 days. Thirty-nine (6.2%) clients had history of abnormal vaginal bleeding while 12.1% had vaginal discharge (Table 4).
Table 3

Gynecological characteristics of clients

Characteristic

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Parity

  

  Nulliparous

4

0.6

  1 - 2

207

33.0

  3 - 5

367

58.4

  >5

38

6.1

  No data

12

1.9

  Total

628

100.0

Previous contraceptive method

  

  None

410

65.3

  Natural

8

1.3

  Barrier

50

8.0

  Oral

40

6.4

  Injectable

77

12.3

  Implant

14

2.2

  No data

29

4.6

  Total

628

100.0

History of hormonal contraceptives use

  

  Yes

131

20.9

  No

468

74.5

  No data

29

4.6

  Total

628

100.0

Parity (Mean = 3.19, Median = 3, Mode = 3, Standard Deviation = 1.51).

Table 4

Gynecological symptoms presented by clients

Symptom

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Abnormal bleeding

  

  Yes

39

6.2

  No

589

93.8

  Total

628

100.0

Vaginal discharge

  

  Yes

76

12.1

  No

553

87.9

  Total

628

100.0

Table 5

Prevalence of cervical erosion among clients

Presence of cervical erosion

Frequency

Percentage (%)

  Yes

79

12.6

  No

549

87.4

  Total

628

100.0

Pelvic examination revealed that 79 (12.6%) clients had cervical ectropion (Table 5).

Treatments offered to cases of cervical ectropion include cervical painting with gentian violet paint (89.9%) and antibiotics (58.2%). Forty two clients who had cervical ectropion received both cervical painting with gentian violet and antibiotics (Table 6).
Table 6

Treatment received by clients with cervical erosion (N = 79)

Treatment

Yes

No

Chi square

No. (%)

No. (%)

P value

GV painting

71 (89.9)

8 (10.1)

X2 = 28.3 df = 2

Antibiotics

46 (58.2)

33 (41.8)

95% CI = 0.02 to 5.99

GV paint with antibiotics

42 (53.2)

37 (46.8)

P < 0.001

Table 7

Association between clients’ age and cervical erosion

Age group (Years)

Cervical erosion

Chi square P value

Yes frequency (%)

No frequency (%)

Total frequency (%)

15 - 20

0 (0.0)

4 (100.0)

4 (100)

 

21 - 25

5 (15.6)

27 (84.4)

32 (100)

X2 = 5.44

26 - 30

15 (10.4)

129 (89.6)

144 (100)

df = 5

31 - 35

18 (9.6)

170 (90.4)

188 (100)

95% CI = 0.554 to

36 - 40

21 (14.7)

122 (85.3)

143 (100)

11.07

>40

19 (16.8)

94 (83.2)

113 (100)

P = 0.357

Total

78 (12.5)

546 (87.5)

624 (100)

 
There was no statistically significant association between age group of clients and presence of cervical erosion (P>0.05, Table 7). On bivariate analysis, previous hormonal contraceptive use (P = 0.041) and vaginal discharge (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with developing cervical ectropion (Tables 8 and 9). Clients with ectropion were more likely to receive prescriptions for antibiotics (P < 0.001).
Table 8

Association between gynecological history and cervical erosion

Gynecological history

Cervical erosion

Chi square P value

Yes frequency (%)

No frequency (%)

Total frequency (%)

Parity

    

  Nulliparous

1 (25.0)

3 (75.0)

4 (100)

X2 = 7.23

  1 - 2

16 (7.7)

191 (92.3)

207 (100)

df = 3

  3 - 5

55 (15.0)

312 (85.0)

367 (100)

95% CI = 0.115 to

  >5

6 (15.8)

32 (84.2)

38 (100)

7.81

Total

78 (12.7)

538 (87.3)

616 (100)

P = 0. 065

Previous hormonal contraceptive

    

  No

51 (10.9)

417 (89.1)

468 (100)

X2 = 4.19

  Yes

23 (17.6)

108 (82.4)

131 (100)

df = 1

  Total

74 (12.4)

525 (87.6)

599 (100)

95% CI = 0.0 to 3.84 P = 0.041

Table 9

Association between gynecological symptoms and cervical erosion

Gynecological symptom

Cervical erosion

Chi square P value

Yes frequency (%)

No frequency (%)

Total frequency (%)

Abnormal bleeding

    

  No

75 (12.7)

514 (87.3)

589 (100)

X2 = 0.204

  Yes

4 (10.3)

35 (89.7)

39 (100)

df = 1

  Total

79 (12.6)

549 (87.4)

628 (100)

95% CI = 0.0 to 3.84 P = 0. 806

Vaginal discharge

    

  No

55 (10.0)

497 (90.0)

552 (100)

X2 = 28 .38

  Yes

24 (31.6)

52 (68.4)

76 (100)

df = 1

  Total

79 (12.6)

549 (87.4)

628 (100)

95% CI = 0.0 to 3.84 P <0.001

Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed to predict the probability that a client would have cervical ectropion. The predictor variables were client’s age, parity, history of previous use of hormonal contraceptives, presence of abnormal vaginal bleeding and presence of vaginal discharge. A test of the full model versus a model with intercept only was statistically significant, χ2 = 33.337, d.f. = 5, p < 0.001.

Table 10 shows the Multiple logistic regression coefficient, Wald test, odds ratio and 95% confidence interval of odds ratio for each of the predictors. Employing a P < 0.05 criterion of statistical significance, only presence of vaginal discharge had a statistically significant partial effect on the presence of cervical ectropion. The odds ratio for presence of vaginal discharge indicates that when holding all other variables constant, a client with vaginal discharge is 2.56 times more likely to have cervical ectropion than is a client without vaginal discharge. Although previous use of hormonal contraceptive was statistically significantly associated with cervical ectropion on bivariate analysis, this significant association was lost after multivariate analysis.
Table 10

Multiple logistic regression predicting cervical ectropion from age, parity, hormonal contraceptives use, abnormal vaginal bleeding, and vaginal discharge

Predictor

B

Wald χ2

p

Odds ratio

95% CI for odds ratio

Age

0.025

1.185

0.276

1.026

0.98

1.074

Parity

0.112

1.214

0.271

1.119

0.916

1.366

Hormonal contraceptives use

0.525

3.229

0.072

1.69

0.953

2.997

Abnormal vaginal bleeding

-0.583

0.851

0.356

0.558

0.162

1.926

Vaginal discharge

1.52

26.433

< 0.001

4.571

2.561

8.158

Omnibus Test of Model Coefficient (χ2 = 33.337, d.f. = 5, p < 0.001).

Discussion

The prevalence of cervical ectropion among women using IUCDs varies widely in the literature. In China the prevalence in this group of women was 43.2% compared to the 12.6% observed in this study [6]. The prevalence was higher (26%) among IUCD users in a family planning clinic at Edinburgh [1]. In a study to assess the effects of IUCD and oral contraceptives on vaginal flora and epithelium conducted in Turkey however, the prevalence of ectropion among IUCD users was 14.6%, which is close to what has been observed in this study [15]. Notwithstanding the fact that previous studies observed higher prevalence of ectropion among IUCD users, the 12.6% prevalence rate observed in this study indicates that ectropion is a fairly common occurrence in this group of women. A possible explanation for the occurrence of cervical ectopy in IUCD users is the constant friction between the hanging string and the cervical os.

This study observed that women were significantly more likely to have developed an abnormal vaginal discharge if they had cervical ectropion compared with those without ectropion. A previous research has demonstrated an association between use of the IUCD and cervical inflammation and ectropion, either of which could potentially lead to abnormal discharge [4]. Vaginal samples for Trichomonas vaginalis and other sexually transmitted diseases were not obtained as part of this study. Therefore, it was not possible to differentiate vaginal discharge due to pelvic infection from that which may have been solely due to the ectropion. However, it is known that prolonged use of IUCD is associated with increased risk of pelvic infection [15].

Studies have suggested that cervical ectropion is common among those taking estrogen-containing contraceptives [1, 11, 22]. The observation from this study that women who had a previous history of hormonal contraceptive use were more likely to develop ectropion (P < 0.05) however disappeared when other factors were taken into consideration (P = 0.072). This finding is supported by a study which observed that cervical ectropion was more common among IUCD users than hormonal contraceptive users [15]. This suggests therefore that previous use of hormonal contraceptives does not confer additional risk of ectropion to IUCD users.

The tendency towards treating cervical ectropion is strong as has been demonstrated in this study. Most of the clients with ectropion in this study received some form of treatment. Several treatment modalities are currently used in the clinical management of cervical ectropion [13]. However the two modalities used in this study comprise of the use of antibiotics and painting of the cervix with gentian violet. The 12.6% prevalence of ectropion means that a substantial number of women were exposed to antibiotics. A contrary argument on the current treatment modality is that inappropriate use of antibiotics increases the risk of antimicrobial resistance and places an unnecessary financial burden on patients [23, 24]. Moreover, in the context of cervical erosion being a non-infective and physiological condition, it may resolve spontaneously without medical intervention.

Conclusions

The study findings indicate that cervical ectropion may be a common occurrence among women using IUCD. Reproductive health clinics offer screening opportunities for various groups of women in the society. Therefore, routine pelvic examination should be emphasized for all family planning clients as it could aid the detection and control of latent reproductive health problems such as cervical ectopy which may require further investigations such as microscopy, culture and sensitivity as well as pap smears to exclude potentially lethal conditions and to determine appropriate treatment modality.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Community Health and Primary Health Care, Lagos State University College of Medicine
(2)
Department of Community Health and Primary Health Care, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH)

References

  1. Goldacre MJ, Loudon N, Watt B, Grant G, Loudon JD, McPherson K, Vessey MP: Epidemiology and clinical significance of cervical erosion in women attending a family planning clinic. Br Med J. 1978, 1 (6115): 748-750. 10.1136/bmj.1.6115.748.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hua X, Zeng Y, Zhang R, Wang H, Diao J, Zhang P: Using platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of symptomatic cervical ectopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012, 119 (1): 26-29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Pandit D, Prabha R, Shanbhag S, Mayekar R: Morbidity pattern of women attending screening program in an urban slum in Mumbai. Indian J Community Med. 2005, 30 (4): 134-135.Google Scholar
  4. Neale R, Knight I, Keane F: Do users of the intrauterine system (Mirena) have different genital symptoms and vaginal flora than users of the intrauterine contraceptive device?. Int J STD AIDS. 2009, 20 (6): 423-424. 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008391.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack AE, Wright TC: Prevalence of visible disruption of cervical epithelium and cervical ectopy in African women using Depo-Provera. Contraception. 1999, 59 (6): 363-367. 10.1016/S0010-7824(99)00049-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Shu-Fang M, Yan-Wei G, Xing-Cha W: Survey on the prevalence of cervical erosion among women looking for family planning services at nosocomial clinics. Matern Child Health Care China. 2006, 15:Google Scholar
  7. Singh R, Legnain MM: Profile of oral contraceptive and intrauterine device users at Benghazi. Malays J Reprod Health. 1990, 8 (1): 5-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Critchlow CW, Wolner-Hanssen P, Eschenbach DA, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA, Stevens CE, Holmes KK: Determinants of cervical ectopia and of cervicitis: age, oral contraception, specific cervical infection, smoking, and douching. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 173 (2): 534-543. 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90279-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang AR: ‘Erosion’ of the uterine cervix; an anachronism. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991, 31 (4): 358-362. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1991.tb02822.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Morrison CS, Bright P, Wong EL, Kwok C, Yacobson I, Gaydos CA, Tucker HT, Blumenthal PD: Hormonal contraceptive use, cervical ectopy, and the acquisition of cervical infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2004, 31 (9): 561-567. 10.1097/01.olq.0000137904.56037.70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bright PL, Norris Turner A, Morrison CS, Wong EL, Kwok C, Yacobson I, Royce RA, Tucker HO, Blumenthal PD: Hormonal contraception and area of cervical ectopy: a longitudinal assessment. Contraception. 2011, 84 (5): 512-519. 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang K, Li J, Liu Y, Ma B, Roberts H, Tan J, Wu T, Zhang P: Microwave therapy for cervical ectropion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, 4: CD006227-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Machado Junior LC, Dalmaso AS, Carvalho HB: Evidence for benefits from treating cervical ectopy: literature review. Sao Paulo Med J. 2008, 126 (2): 132-139. 10.1590/S1516-31802008000200014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Caliskan E, Ozturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S: Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2003, 8 (3): 150-155. 10.1080/ejc.8.3.150.155.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ocak S, Cetin M, Hakverdi S, Dolapcioglu K, Gungoren A, Hakverdi AU: Effects of intrauterine device and oral contraceptive on vaginal flora and epithelium. Saudi Med J. 2007, 28 (5): 727-731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Selo-Ojeme DO, Dayoub N, Patel A, Metha M: A clinico-pathological study of postcoital bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004, 270 (1): 34-36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Casey PM, Long ME, Marnach ML: Abnormal cervical appearance: what to do, when to worry?. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011, 86 (2): 147-151. 10.4065/mcp.2010.0512.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hwang LY, Ma Y, Shiboski SC, Farhat S, Jonte J, Moscicki AB: Active squamous metaplasia of the cervical epithelium is associated with subsequent acquisition of human papillomavirus 16 infection among healthy young women. J Infect Dis. 2012, 206 (4): 504-511. 10.1093/infdis/jis398.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Geisler WM, Chow JM, Schachter J, McCormack WM: Pelvic examination findings and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic young women screened with a nucleic acid amplification test. Sex Transm Dis. 2007, 34 (6): 335-338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gay C, Riehl C, Ramanah R, Desmoulin G, Violaine B: Cryotherapy in the management of symptomatic cervical ectopy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006, 34 (3): 214-223. 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.01.030.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Schiffman M, Garcia FM, Long RL, Budihas SR, Herrero R, Burk RD, Jeronimo J: Treatability by cryotherapy in a screen-and-treat strategy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009, 13 (3): 174-181. 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181909f30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobson DL, Peralta L, Farmer M, Graham NM, Gaydos C, Zenilman J: Relationship of hormonal contraception and cervical ectopy as measured by computerized planimetry to chlamydial infection in adolescents. Sex Transm Dis. 2000, 27 (6): 313-319. 10.1097/00007435-200007000-00003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. World Health Organisation: Antimicrobial Resistance: A Threat to Global Health Security. 2005, Geneva, WHA58/2005/REC/1Google Scholar
  24. Thomas LJ, Coleman JJ: The medic’s guide to prescribing: rational prescribing. Student BMJ. 2007, 15 (5): 144-145.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Wright et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement