Skip to main content

En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature



Retroperitoneal lipomas are an extremely rare condition with only 17 cases described in the literature since 1980. They can reach enormous size and cause significant abdominal symptoms. The most important differential diagnosis is the well-differentiated liposarcoma, which preoperatively often may not definitely be ruled out.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 73 year-old Caucasian patient with a giant retroperitoneal lipoma of 9 kg measuring 55 cm in diameter. The patient presented with abdominal pain and swelling that had been slowly progressive for the last 15 years. On computerized tomography an immense retroperitoneal tumor was revealed. Intraoperatively, the tumor did not show any signs of infiltrative growth, therefore sole tumor extirpation was performed.


Retroperitoneal lipomas are not clearly distinguishable from well-differentiated liposarcomas on imaging and even biopsies may be misleading. Moreover, abdominal symptoms, i.e. pain, obstipation and dysphagia may occur due to mechanical displacement. Therefore, surgical exploration with complete oncological resection is the therapy of choice if malignity cannot be ruled out.


Lipomas are benign tumors of mature adipocytes [1] which are commonly located in the subdermal tissue of the trunk and extremities, but rarely retroperitoneally [2,3]. The etiology of lipomas remains unclear. Lately a positive adipocyte stem cell turnover has been supposed as the underlying mechanism [4]. Retroperitoneal lipomas are a rare condition and only 17 cases of retroperitoneal lipomas in adults have been described in the literature since 1980 [5-20] (Table 1). Here we present the case of a 73 year-old female with a giant retroperitoneal lipoma filling great parts of the abdomen and measuring 55 x 40x 10 cm. While retroperitoneal lipomas are rare by themselves, only few retroperitoneal lipomas of greater size have been reported in the literature.

Table 1 Summary of all case reports describing retroperitoneal lipomas resected in adults since 1980

Case presentation

A 73 year-old, Caucasian female was referred to our center with a giant retroperitoneal mass. The patient complained about significant abdominal swelling and recurrent episodes of abdominal pain and obstipation. The tumor had been slowly progressive over the past 15 years. On physical examination the patient’s abdomen was greatly distended and non-tender on palpation. Blood tests showed no significant pathologies. A computerized tomography (CT) scan showed the giant retroperitoneal mass (Figure 1). CT-guided core biopsy samples of this mass demonstrated histology of a benign lipoma with no signs of malignancy. Due to the massive size the mass was considered as radiologically highly suspect for low grade liposarcoma. After interdisciplinary discussion of this case in our sarcoma tumor board, exploratory laparotomy was indicated with the aim of complete tumor resection for potential malignancy or at least tumor debulking to reduce abdominal symptoms.

Figure 1

The tumor on computerized tomography and on 3D-reconstruction. On the left the tumor is displayed on coronal plane, showing massive shifting of the intestines and kidneys. On the right the tumor is shown on 3D-reconstruction, nearly filling the whole abdomen with encasement of the inferior mesenteric artery (white arrow).

Intraoperatively a giant, clearly demarcated fatty tumor adherent to the right retroperitoneal fatty tissue measuring 55 x 40 x 10 cm was evident (Figure 2). Although the tumor was distending the mesenteric artery the mass was completely extirpated without resection of adjacent tissue or organs. The patient’s postoperative course was complicated due to prolonged paralytic ileus and intestinal distention, which was successfully managed conservatively. The patient was discharged on the 18th postoperative day from the hospital. The pathologic specimen showed a lipomatous tumor weighing 8.95 kg with mature adipocytes and without signs of nuclear atypia. The staining for MDM2 (MDM2 proto-oncogene) and CDK4 (cyclin-dependent kinase 4) was negative, therefore the lesion was diagnosed as a lipoma.

Figure 2

The tumor shortly after en bloc-resection. On the left the tumor is shown with a metric tape measure of 30 cm. On the right the tumor is being held by one of the operators shortly after en-bloc resection.


Giant retroperitoneal lipomas in adults are scarce, with a total number of 17 cases described in the literature since 1980 [5-20] (Table 1). Subcutaneous lipomas are associated with hypercholesterolemia [21,22], obesity [23-25] and trauma [26], whereas such data does not exist for retroperitoneal lipomas. Moreover, the patient was not described positive for any of these factors. [27]. Retroperitoneal lipomas are usually asymptomatic for a long time before they cause abdominal swelling or symptoms due to obstruction or shifting of adjacent organs and structures. At this point, they may have already reached enormous size. This may be explained by the great retroperitoneal space that allows them to grow before they get symptomatic and the slowness of their enlargement. The diagnosis is based on a MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) or CT-scan, yet both imaging modalities may not exclude a well-differentiated liposarcoma. Furthermore, biopsies often remain inconclusive. The incidence of soft-tissue sarcomas in general is described with 4 cases per 100.000 and year [28], of which liposarcomas are the most common and are located in one third of cases in the retroperitoneum [29]. The incidence of retroperitoneal lipomas on the other hand is thought to be extremely rare. Hence, a well-differentiated liposarcoma may not be ruled out preoperatively, even if a benign lipoma is clinically suspected. Therefore, intraoperative judgment about tumor characteristics and subsequent decision making about the extent of resection is of great importance. Resection with negative margins (R0) is crucial to the patient’s prognosis in case of a liposarcoma, therefore a wide excision should be carried out if infiltrative growth is suspected or if there is any doubt about dignity [30]. Sole extirpation should be reserved for clearly circumscribed tumors. However, due to the enormous size of the tumor preoperative judgment about resectability based on CT-scans is difficult. Therefore, tumor debulking for symptom relief can also be discussed if oncological resection is not feasible. Due to the possible malignant nature of such retroperitoneal tumors resection should be carried out by a trained oncological surgeon in a center of excellence for soft-tissue sarcomas [30]. In this case the tumor was clearly demarcated macroscopically and without any sign of infiltrative growth. Moreover, the enormous size did not allow accomplishing an oncological correct resection. Thus, sole extirpation was performed. Since clinical and experimental data on tumor progression and tumor recurrence of retroperitoneal lipomas are lacking a close and regular follow-up is indicated.


Retroperitoneal lipomas are a rare condition. The presented case points out that abdominal lipomas can grow to enormous size and cause clinically significant symptoms and, even if massively enlarged, are resectable with good clinical outcome. Further research is required to fully understand the underlying etiology and genetic mechanisms. The most important differential diagnosis is the more frequent well-differentiated liposarcoma, therefore oncological resection should always be considered.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.



Computerized tomography


MDM2 proto-oncogene


Cyclin-dependent kinase 4


Magnetic resonance imaging


  1. 1.

    Terada T. Giant fibrolipoma of the spermatic cord. Pathol Int. 2010;60(4):330–2. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1827.2010.02521.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Weiss SW. Lipomatous tumors. Monogr Pathol. 1996;38:207–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Harrington AC, Adnot J, Chesser RS. Infiltrating lipomas of the upper extremities. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1990;16(9):834–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Suga H, Eto H, Inoue K, Aoi N, Kato H, Araki J, et al. Cellular and molecular features of lipoma tissue: comparison with normal adipose tissue. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(4):819–25. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09272.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Saito S. Retroperitoneal lipoma presenting with nutcracker-like phenomenon. Case reports in urology. 2013;2013:893242. doi:10.1155/2013/893242

  6. 6.

    Wei D, Shen L, Yang K, Fang F. Giant retroperitoneal lipoma in a pregnant patient. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(5):522. doi:10.3109/01443615.2013.788621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chander B, Krishna M, Thakur S, Mahajan N, Vij A, Diwakaran J. Extremely rare giant retroperitoneal fibrolipoma: a case report. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8(2):314–6. doi:10.4103/0973-1482.99002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Singh G, Bharadwaj RN, Purandare SN, Gore CR, Dubhashi SP, Vaidya S, et al. Giant retroperitoneal lipoma presenting as inguinal hernia. Indian J Surg. 2011;73(3):187–9. doi:10.1007/s12262-010-0210-5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ukita S, Koshiyama M, Ohnaka M, Miyagawa N, Yamanishi Y, Nishimura F, et al. Retroperitoneal lipoma arising from the urinary bladder. Rare tumors. 2009;1(1):e13. doi:10.4081/rt.2009.e13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ida CM, Wang X, Erickson-Johnson MR, Wenger DE, Blute ML, Nascimento AG, et al. Primary retroperitoneal lipoma: a soft tissue pathology heresy?: report of a case with classic histologic, cytogenetics, and molecular genetic features. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(6):951–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Drop A, Czekajska-Chehab E, Maciejewski R. Giant retroperitoneal lipomas–radiological case report. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sectio D: Medicina. 2003;58(2):142–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Martinez CA, Palma RT, Waisberg J. Giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report. Arq Gastroenterol. 2003;40(4):251–5. doi:/S0004-28032003000400010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Raftopoulos I, Lee T, Byrne MP. Image of the month: retroperitoneal lipoma. Arch Surg. 2002;137(7):865–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Foa C, Mainguene C, Dupre F, Coindre JM, Huguet C, Kober C, et al. Rearrangement involving chromosomes 1 and 8 in a retroperitoneal lipoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2002;133(2):156–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Forte F, Maturo G, Catania A, Sorrenti S, Gemma D, Foti N, et al. Retroperitoneal lipoma. Unusual presentation with detrusor instability. Minerva Urol Nefrol = Italian J Urol Nephrol. 2002;54(2):131–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Marshall MT, Rosen P, Berlin R, Greenson N. Appendicitis masquerading as tumor: a case of two diagnoses. J Emerg Med. 2001;21(4):397–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Matsubara N, Yoshitaka T, Matsuno T, Ikeda M, Isozaki H, Tanaka N, et al. Multiple tumors and a novel E2F-4 mutation. A case report. Digestion. 2000;62(2–3):213–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Acheson A, McIlrath E, Barros D’Sa AA. Pelvic lipoma causing venous obstruction syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14(2):149–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhang SZ, Yue XH, Liu XM, Lo SL, Wang XZ. Giant retroperitoneal pleomorphic lipoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11(7):557–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Deppe G, Malviya VK, Hercule J, Gleicher N. Retroperitoneal pelvic lipoma. J Natl Med Assoc. 1985;77(7):574–6.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rubinstein A, Goor Y, Gazit E, Cabili S. Non-symmetric subcutaneous lipomatosis associated with familial combined hyperlipidaemia. Br J Dermatol. 1989;120(5):689–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Self TH, Akins D. Dramatic reduction in lipoma associated with statin therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(2 Suppl):S30–1. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    da Pires Botelho Costa JS, Reis JC, Valenca-Filipe R, et al. Giant atypical lipoma of the thigh. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(2):213–4. doi:10.1111/dsu.12397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Van Thielen J, Van Loo S, Van der Stighelen Y. Case report: a gastric lipoma in a morbid obese man. Acta Chir Belg. 2012;112(5):393–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zografos GC, Kouerinis I, Kalliopi P, Karmen K, Evagelos M, Androulakis G. Giant lipoma of the thigh in a patient with morbid obesity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(4):1467–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Aust MC, Spies M, Kall S, Jokuszies A, Gohritz A, Vogt P. Posttraumatic lipoma: fact or fiction? Skinmed. 2007;6(6):266–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Leffell DJ, Braverman IM. Familial multiple lipomatosis. Report of a case and a review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;15(2 Pt 1):275–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Casali PG, Jost L, Sleijfer S, Verweij J, Blay JY. Soft tissue sarcomas: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2008;19 Suppl 2:ii89–93. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dalal KM, Antonescu CR, Singer S. Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97(4):298–313. doi:10.1002/jso.20975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23 Suppl 7:vii92-9. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds253.

Download references


We thank the patient described for allowing us to share her details.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin K Angele.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MW was involved in treatment of the patient, performed the literature review and drafted the manuscript. JGDH was involved in treatment of the patient and helped to draft the manuscript. WK was responsible for the 3D-reconstructions of the patient’s CT-scans. SP, MG and JW were involved in treatment of the patient and helped to draft the manuscript. MKA conceived of the idea for the case report and was involved in treatment of the patient. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weniger, M., D’Haese, J.G., Kunz, W. et al. En-bloc resection of a giant retroperitoneal lipoma: a case report and review of the literature. BMC Res Notes 8, 75 (2015).

Download citation


  • Well-differentiated liposarcoma
  • En-bloc resection
  • Tumor debulking