Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Putative pathophysiological mechanisms in recurrent hemicrania from aortic dissection: a case report

  • Joseph Kamtchum Tatuene1Email author,
  • Sophie Excoffier2,
  • Jean-Paul Vallee3 and
  • Andreas Kleinschmidt1
BMC Research Notes20158:246

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1223-8

Received: 31 October 2014

Accepted: 9 June 2015

Published: 17 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Transient or permanent neurological symptoms occur in 17–40% of patients with aortic dissection. They can distract from or even mask the underlying life-threatening condition.

Case presentation

We present the case of a young Caucasian man who consulted for recurrent episodes of stereotyped right-sided sudden-onset severe headache. Upon questioning, he also reported a dull chest pain. Clinical examination and brain magnetic resonance imaging were unremarkable. The concomitant presence of chest pain made us consider aortic dissection. Contrast-enhanced cervico-thoraco-abdominal computerized tomography revealed type A aortic dissection. The patient underwent surgical replacement of the ascending aorta and reported no further episode of headache thereafter. Differential diagnosis of headache in this case includes paroxysmal hemicrania, cluster headache, migraine, trigeminal neuralgia and short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing. Failure to match diagnostic criteria for any of these primary headache disorders and the resolution of pain episodes following surgery led us to postulate that these new-onset hemicrania episodes were symptomatic of aortic dissection. We hypothesize that aortic wall ischemia could have activated the trigeminovascular system and thereby caused hemicranial pain. Such an effect might be mediated by two different pathways that can be referred to as anatomical and humoral. The humoral hypothesis would posit that ischemia results in synthesis of pro-inflammatory mediators released from the aortic wall into the blood stream, such that they reach the central nervous system and directly stimulate specific receptors. The anatomical hypothesis would imply that pain signals generated by nociceptors in the aortic wall are transferred to the trigeminal ganglion via the cardiac plexus, the first cervical ganglion and the internal carotid nerve such that pain perception is referred to related cranio-cervical dermatomes.

Conclusion

In cases of isolated headache that does not match key diagnostic criteria for a primary headache entity; a thorough review of systems should be performed to look for symptoms that may indicate symptomatic headache from potentially life-threatening conditions. Neurologists should consider aortic dissection in patients presenting with acute headache and chest pain. Further clinical or experimental studies are required to refute or validate the pathophysiological hypothesis discussed here.

Keywords

HeadacheHemicraniaEtiologyPathophysiologyAortic dissection

Background

Aortic dissection is defined as the separation of layers within the aortic wall. Typically, this diagnosis has to be considered in any patient presenting with acute tearing thoracic or abdominal pain associated with cardiovascular symptoms. Clinical manifestations are diverse, however, making the diagnosis difficult and requiring a high index of suspicion [1]. An estimated 28% of acute aortic dissections are missed on initial evaluation [2]. Although transient or permanent neurological symptoms are considered atypical manifestations, they occur in 17–40% of patients with aortic dissection and can mask the underlying life-threatening condition [3]. Previous reports have described cases where headache was the main presenting symptom of aortic dissection but pathophysiological mechanisms mediating this unusual manifestation have remained elusive [49]. We present the case of a young adult male who suffered recurrent, stereotyped unilateral sudden-onset severe headache as the major manifestation of a type A aortic dissection. We then discuss possible pathophysiological mechanisms that might underlie the pain, with reference to the literature.

Case presentation

A 44-year-old non-smoking athletic Caucasian man with unremarkable medical history presented in the emergency room with unilateral right pressure-like headache. The pain had a rapid onset over 30 s and was rated 10/10 on a visual analogue scale. It was accompanied by nausea and right hemifacial hypoesthesia but not by vomiting, phonophobia, photophobia, tearing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, eye redness, visual impairment or motor deficit. Pain subsided within about 1 h after initiating analgesic treatment. The patient had suffered two similar headache episodes 3 and 6 days ago, rated 8/10 with spontaneous remission after 30 min. Right after the first episode, he felt a constant dull retrosternal pain rated 2/10, radiating to the back and aggravated by deep inspiration. He noticed that the subsequent episodes of hemicrania were preceded by exacerbation of the thoracic pain with radiation to the right side of the neck. A few hours after the second episode and for about 30 min, he saw flashing lights move slowly toward the midline in the right visual field, without fortification spectra and without ensuing headache. He denied any family history of migraine.

Upon admission, the patient was in good general health with normal and symmetrical values of blood pressure on both arms and bradycardia (54 beats per minute). Neurological examination was unremarkable as was cardiovascular examination, including careful search for murmurs from large neck, thoracic and abdominal vessels. An electrocardiogram showed a normal sinus rhythm without signs of myocardial ischemia or infarction. Brain magnetic resonance imaging did not disclose any abnormality that could be related to the headache episodes. The concomitant presence of dull chest pain paved the way for suspecting aortic dissection. Contrast-enhanced cervico-thoraco-abdominal computerized tomography revealed type A aortic dissection sparing coronary arteries and supra-aortic vessels (Figure 1). Heart ultrasound showed an intact aortic valve. Testing for Marfan syndrome was negative. The patient underwent surgical replacement of the ascending aorta. No further episode of headache was reported after the intervention.
Figure 1

Summary of thoracic computerized tomography findings. a Plain axial slices demonstrating a hyperintense crescent on the right margin of the aortic lumen indicating intramural hematoma (white arrow). b Contrast enhanced axial slices demonstrating the intimal flap (white arrow) that underlies the pathognomonic “double lumen sign”. c Volume rendered reconstructed image showing the margins of the Stanford type A aortic dissection (white arrow). The right coronary artery and the major thoracic and cervical arteries are not involved.

Discussion

This patient suffered recurrent episodes of paroxysmal unilateral headache with unremarkable clinical examination. The headache episodes could have been superficially misclassified for instance as paroxysmal hemicrania and one could even wonder if this excruciating pain could have been the cause of the aortic dissection (sudden increase in blood pressure due to pain) rather than its consequence. Paroxysmal hemicrania is a rare primary unilateral, short-lasting (2–45 min), severe and recurrent headache with female preponderance. It is marked by ipsilateral autonomic features and exquisite responsiveness to indomethacin [10, 11]. As opposed to the original syndrome of chronic paroxysmal hemicrania described by Sjaastad [12], the term episodic paroxysmal hemicrania has been used when there was total remission between episodes [13]. Though headache episodes in our patient shared some features with primary episodic paroxysmal hemicrania, the clinical syndrome did not match due to lack of autonomic features, low frequency and longer duration of attacks and no relation with head movements (usually considered as a trigger). Other primary headache types with clinical features that overlap those of paroxysmal hemicrania to some extent, could be considered in this patient, especially cluster headache and migraine or, less likely, trigeminal neuralgia and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing [11]. However, our patient did not fulfil diagnostic criteria for any of these entities. It is worth noting that the single episode of unilateral flashing lights in this case could easily have been misinterpreted as an isolated visual aura in atypical migraine.

Failure to match diagnostic criteria for any primary headache disorder led us to hypothesize that the new-onset hemicrania in this case could be symptomatic of aortic dissection. While different types of headache have been previously reported as a presenting symptom of aortic dissection [49], we did not find any report of recurrent sudden-onset hemicrania as a sign of aortic dissection, especially in the absence of cervical artery involvement that might explain direct lesions of surrounding trigeminal nerve fibres. To explain how aortic dissection can induce headache, some authors have alluded to distension of neck vessels or ischemia of the pericarotid plexus as potentially playing a role [7]. Conversely, we would like to suggest that headache in pure aortic dissection might originate from ischemia of the aortic wall itself.

Arterial walls are concomitantly nourished by vasa vasorum as well as diffusion from the lumen of the vessel. Diffusion is more important in small vessels that accordingly sometimes do not even have vasa vasorum. In larger vessels with a thicker wall, however, diffusion alone cannot ensure adequate supply of oxygen and nutrients to the outermost layers of the arterial wall, which makes vasa vasorum indispensable [14, 15]. One can imagine at least four processes by which dissection can lead to arterial wall ischemia: (1) interruption of blood flow in vasa vasorum due to thrombosis of the false lumen or stenosis of the true one, (2) thrombosis of vasa vasorum itself, (3) compression of the vasa vasorum by hematoma expansion in the false lumen and finally, (4) stress- and ischemia-induced reflex vasoconstriction of vasa vasorum due to sympathetic activation. Ischemia of the aortic wall engages different processes that might result in pathological activation of the trigeminovascular system and occurrence of cranial pain. We propose that this might happen through at least two different pathways that could be referred to as anatomical (anastomotic) and humoral.

The humoral pathway requires that inflammatory mediators formed in the aortic wall undergoing ischemia are released into the blood stream and reach the central nervous system where they can directly stimulate specific receptors. Serotonin is considered the most important of these inflammatory mediators and acts on 5 hydroxy-tryptamine 1D receptors on trigeminal perivascular projections or within trigeminal nucleus caudalis [16, 17]. Several other pain-related mediators have been described notably prostaglandins, bradykinin, adenosine triphosphate, histamine, nitric oxide, potassium and hydrogen ions. Some of them may also modulate endogenous pain-control pathways [18].

The anastomotic pathway implies that pain signals generated by nociceptors of the aortic wall are transferred to the trigeminal ganglion via the cardiac plexus. Activation of these local nociceptors is chemical, involving the aforementioned inflammatory mediators and probably also mechanical from abnormal aortic distension. The subsequent stepwise signal transfer in the anastomotic pathway relies on two anatomical peculiarities. First, small nerve fibre branches that form the cardiac plexus originate from cervical sympathetic ganglia rather than the thoracic ones [19]. Second, there is a direct connection between the first cervical ganglion and the trigeminal ganglion through the internal carotid nerve. Moreover, connections between the first cervical ganglion and the pterygopalatine and ciliary ganglia have also been described [20]. Thus, pain signals generated by nociceptors in the aortic wall undergoing ischemia could be transmitted to the trigeminal ganglion and then to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis in the lower brainstem and upper cervical cord. This information would be further relayed to the contralateral ventral posteromedial thalamic nuclei via the trigeminothalamic tract and finally to somatosensory cortices [21]. Since different levels of representation also integrate various signals from cephalic trigeminal dermatomes, one could imagine that such convergence of pain signals could induce a situation where pain arising from damage to the aorta is felt on the face as is the case in other situations of projected or referred pain [22].

Headache does not always occur in aortic dissection and when it does, it does not usually present as episodic paroxysmal unilateral headache. In most cases of aortic dissection, pain is referred to the thoracic wall and hence felt in the chest rather than in the head. Two hypotheses could be suggested to provide a comprehensive understanding of these clinical facts. First, one could imagine that patients who present with headache from aortic dissection may have anatomical (more connections) and functional (more permissive) variants of the anastomotic circuits between the cardiac plexus and the trigeminal ganglion. Second, patients with aortic dissection whose headache mimics migraine or other short-lived trigeminal autonomic syndromes may have a genetic background modulating the probability of their trigeminovascular system being activated by circulatory inflammatory mediators.

With currently available data, it remains impossible to determine which of the two mechanisms we propose might play the greater role and why patients sometimes have unilateral rather than bilateral pain.

Conclusion

In cases of isolated headache that does not match key diagnostic criteria for a primary headache entity; a thorough review of systems should be performed to look for subtle or atypical symptoms that may indicate symptomatic headache from potentially life-threatening conditions. In particular, neurologists should consider aortic dissection in patients presenting with acute headache and even mild chest pain. The relation between headache, especially hemicrania, and intra-thoracic diseases should not be considered as anecdotal: it could be well explained by pathological activation of the trigeminovascular system through anastomotic and/or humoral pathways. Nonetheless, the putative pathophysiological mechanisms discussed here still require validation in future clinical and experimental studies.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Declarations

Authors’ contribution

JKT did the neurological examination of the patient, searched the literature, drafted and revised the manuscript and figure. SE did the first clinical evaluation of the patient at the emergency department, searched the literature, drafted and revised the manuscript and figure. JPV read the CT, did the figure montage and revised the manuscript. AK searched the literature, drafted and revised the manuscript and figure. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was not funded. All contributors met the criteria for authorship. We thank the patient who kindly provided a signed informed consent for publication of this case.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neurology Division, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva University Hospital
(2)
Emergency Division, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospital
(3)
Radiology Division, Department of Imaging and Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospital

References

  1. Patel PD, Arora RR (2008) Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of aortic dissection. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2(6):439–468PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Spittell PC, Spittell JA Jr, Joyce JW, Tajik AJ, Edwards WD, Schaff HV et al (1993) Clinical features and differential diagnosis of aortic dissection: experience with 236 cases (1980 through 1990). Mayo Clin Proc 68(7):642–651PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gaul C, Dietrich W, Erbguth FJ (2008) Neurological symptoms in aortic dissection: a challenge for neurologists. Cerebrovasc Dis 26(1):1–8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mathys J, Lachat M, Herren T (2004) Headache as a manifestation of a life-threatening vascular disorder. Headache 44(7):706–709PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Nohe B, Ernemann U, Tepe G, Ritz R, Bail D (2005) Aortic dissection mimicking subarachnoidal hemorrhage. Anesth Analg 101(1):233–234PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Singh S, Huang JY, Sin K, Charles RA (2007) Headache: an unusual presentation of aortic dissection. Eur J Emerg Med 14(1):47–49PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Rust H, Kimmig H (2013) Thunderclap headache as the main symptom of an acute aortic dissection type A. J Neurol 260(7):1925–1926PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ko JI, Park T (2014) Headache: a rare manifestation of Debakey type I aortic dissection. Am J Emerg Med 32(3):291e5–291e6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Runyan D, Alexander P, Saba S (2010) Ascending aortic dissection with atypical presentation of headache. Tex Heart Inst J 37(5):614–615PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Goadsby PJ (2002) Cluster headache, other trigeminal autonomic syndromes and the short-lived headaches. In: Asbury AK, McKhann GM, McDonald WI, Goadsby PJ, McArthur JC (eds) Diseases of the nervous system, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 927–938Google Scholar
  11. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2013) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 33(9):629–808View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sjaastad O, Dale I (1974) Evidence for a new (?), treatable headache entity. Headache 14(2):105–108PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kudrow L, Esperanca P, Vijayan N (1987) Episodic paroxysmal hemicrania? Cephalalgia 7(3):197–201PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gossl M, Rosol M, Malyar NM, Fitzpatrick LA, Beighley PE, Zamir M et al (2003) Functional anatomy and hemodynamic characteristics of vasa vasorum in the walls of porcine coronary arteries. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 272(2):526–537PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Heistad DD, Marcus ML (1979) Role of vasa vasorum in nourishment of the aorta. Blood Vessels 16(5):225–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ahn AH, Basbaum AI (2005) Where do triptans act in the treatment of migraine? Pain 115(1–2):1–4PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ahn AH, Basbaum AI (2006) Tissue injury regulates serotonin 1D receptor expression: implications for the control of migraine and inflammatory pain. J Neurosci 26(32):8332–8338PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Dray A (1995) Inflammatory mediators of pain. Br J Anaesth 75(2):125–131PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rouvière H, Delmas A (2002) Nerfs du tronc. In: Delmas V (ed) Anatomie humaine descriptive, topographique et fonctionnelle, 15th edn. Masson, Paris, pp 271–298Google Scholar
  20. Netter F (2011) Cranial and cervical nerves. In: Atlas of human anatomy, 5th edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp Plate 129–Plate 31Google Scholar
  21. Almeida TF, Roizenblatt S, Tufik S (2004) Afferent pain pathways: a neuroanatomical review. Brain Res 1000(1–2):40–56PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Cervero F (1993) Pathophysiology of referred pain and hyperalgesia from viscera. Pain Res Clin Manag 7:35–47Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kamtchum Tatuene et al. 2015

Advertisement