Open Access

Detection of a TRAF1-ALK fusion in an anaplastic large cell lymphoma patient with chemotherapy and ALK inhibitor-resistant disease

  • Kasey Lawrence1,
  • Brian Berry2,
  • John Handshoe1,
  • David Hout1,
  • Rosetta Mazzola3,
  • Stephan W Morris1 and
  • David L Saltman3Email author
BMC Research Notes20158:308

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1277-7

Received: 30 December 2014

Accepted: 14 July 2015

Published: 18 July 2015

Abstract

Background

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which was first identified as the fusion partner of the nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene in the recurrent t(2;5)(p23;q35) found in a subset of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Several distinct, non-NPM1, ALK fusions have subsequently been described in lymphomas and other tumor types. All of these fusions result in the constitutive expression and activation of ALK and ALK signaling pathways, ultimately leading to the malignant phenotype.

Case report

A non-NPM1 fusion partner of ALK was identified in a 32-year-old Caucasian male ALCL patient whose disease was refractory to standard chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, and exhibited a poor response to a first-generation ALK inhibitor. Non-allele-specific ALK RT-qPCR revealed ALK overexpression and 5′ RACE PCR revealed that the patient’s lymphoma expressed a TRAF1-ALK fusion.

Conclusions

We report the case of an ALCL patient whose tumor harbored the newly recognized TRAF1-ALK fusion and describe the clinical outcome after treatment with an ALK inhibitor. The short survival of our patient may reflect a propensity toward aggressive behavior in lymphomas that express this ALK fusion.

Keywords

TNF receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) Lymphoma ALK inhibitor

Background

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene was discovered in 1994 as the fusion partner of the nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene in the recurrent t(2;5) chromosomal translocation in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) [1]. The NPM1-ALK fusion protein produced by this rearrangement results in constitutive activation of the ALK kinase and is associated with the deregulation of multiple signaling pathways downstream of ALK, culminating in increased cellular proliferation, survival and migration [2]. Since the original description of the NPM1-ALK fusion gene in ALCL, a large number of distinct ALK fusion partners have been identified in ALCL as well as a variety of other malignancies including diffuse large B cell lymphoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma [2, 3]. Patients with ALK-positive ALCL treated with ALK inhibitors typically have high response rates and durable progression-free survivals, even if they have been heavily pretreated [4, 5].

Recently, a novel fusion was described between the TNF receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) gene and ALK in an ALCL patient who experienced an almost 3-decade history characterized by several disease relapses followed ultimately by apparently successful treatment with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation [6]. In this report we describe an additional ALCL patient whose tumor contained a TRAF1-ALK fusion. Unlike the case described by Feldman et al. [6], our patient had aggressive disease characterized by poor responses to chemotherapy, autologous transplantation, a CD30 antibody–drug conjugate, and a first-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Case report

The patient was a 32-year-old Caucasian male who was diagnosed in 2004 with mycosis fungoides after developing a pruritic rash. There was no family history of cancer. He was initially treated with topical nitrogen mustard and later received UVB narrow band therapy. In October 2012, the patient presented with a cough, dyspnea, fever, chills, left pleuritic chest pain and significant weight loss. These symptoms were associated with a flare of his skin lesions. A CT scan of the chest demonstrated extensive left cervical, supraclavicular and mediastinal adenopathy, as well as left upper lobe airspace disease. Review of pathology from a left cervical lymph node biopsy from December 2012 revealed complete effacement of the normal architecture by a diffuse infiltration of large and giant pleomorphic lymphocytes characterized by conspicuous nucleoli and large amounts of cytoplasm (Figure 1a). Immunohistochemical stains showed weak CD45 and strong CD43 expression (Figure 1b), with strong CD30 expression in the membrane and Golgi patterns (Figure 1c). The malignant cells expressed cytoplasmic ALK (Figure 1d) but lacked expression of CD 3, 4, 5 and 8. A T cell lineage was confirmed in the tumor cells of the initial biopsy sample by clonal T-cell receptor gamma gene rearrangement. Identical infiltrates were identified in material from recurrent biopsies of skin and subcutaneous tissue, and from lung and endobronchial biopsies at the time of progression.
Figure 1

Pathologic findings in the lymph node biopsy. a Diffuse infiltration of large and pleomorphic lymphocytes (H&E, ×600). b Membranous expression of CD43 (×600). c Membranous and golgi expression of CD30 (×600). d Cytoplasmic expression of ALK (×600).

After an initial response to four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy, the disease progressed rapidly while the patient was on therapy. He was started on gemcitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin (GDP) chemotherapy in preparation for an autologous stem cell transplant but progressed after 3 cycles. The patient then received one cycle of the CD30 antibody–drug conjugate brentuximab, with a response but tolerated the treatment poorly. He was subsequently started on the ALK small-molecule kinase inhibitor crizotinib and tolerated the therapy well with an improved performance status. A fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scan performed after 3 months of crizotinib showed an improvement in the previously noted airspace disease in the left lung but an enlarging FDG-avid 5.2 cm mass in the apex of the left lung. There was no evidence of disease outside the chest. A CT scan-guided biopsy of this mass was positive for ALK by immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR using an ALK RGQ RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The remaining RNA from the lymph node biopsy was reverse transcribed to cDNA and used in a 5′ RACE PCR followed by Sanger sequencing to identify the ALK fusion partner. Analysis of sequence data revealed a TRAF1-ALK fusion in which 3′ end of exon 6 of TRAF1 was fused to the 5′ end of exon 20 of ALK (Figure 2). The mRNA fusion junction in TRAF1 and ALK in the case was identical to that present in the TRAF1-ALK-positive ALCL case reported by Feldman et al. [6].
Figure 2

Sanger sequencing electropherogram of the TRAF1 exon 6-ALK exon 20 fusion junction. The sequences in blue are from exon 6 of the TRAF1 gene. The sequences in red are from exon 20 of ALK. The TRAF1-ALK fusion junction in this case is identical to that previously reported in the literature by Feldman and colleagues [6] and Abate et al. [7].

The patient underwent an unrelated-donor stem cell transplant in December 2013 but disease recurred in the left lung within 3 months post-transplant, and failed to respond to the reintroduction of crizotinib and brentuximab. Endobronchial biopsies from lesions in the left and right lungs revealed ALK-positive ALCL. The patient died of progressive lymphoma 6 months post-transplant.

Molecular testing of the patient’s biopsy samples was performed with the consent of the patient using a study assay approved by the BC Cancer Agency Research Ethics Board (H13-01763) and conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conclusions

We describe an additional case of TRAF1-ALK fusion in ALCL. Unlike the initial case, which was characterized by a nearly 3-decade course punctuated by multiple therapy-responsive relapses [6], our patient had a short survival after responding poorly to chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, CD30 antibody–drug conjugate therapy, and the first-generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib.

Of note, while this case report was undergoing peer review an independent study of two additional cases of TRAF1-ALK-expressing ALCL was published [7]. Interestingly, these two cases had very different clinical courses: one was a chemotherapy refractory patient whose tumor rapidly progressed to a leukemic phase and contained additional genetic abnormalities (TP53 loss, cMYC amplification, PRDM1/Blimp1 loss) that may have contributed to the aggressiveness of the malignancy while the second was an 11-year-old whose ALCL lacked these genetic abnormalities and who had a remarkable anti-tumor response to conventional chemotherapy and remains in clinical remission. This study also presented experimental data suggesting that the activation of NFκB signaling—mediated by the interaction of TRAF1-ALK with TRAF2, which in turn modulates CD30-mediated activation of NFκB—contributes to oncogenesis associated with TRAF1-ALK [7].

Whether the natural histories observed for these cases are related at least in part to the presence of TRAF1-ALK rather than the more common NPM1-ALK fusion is unclear given the limited clinical experience with TRAF1-ALK-positive ALCL. Preclinical analysis has suggested that various ALK fusions that differ only in the identity of their partner genes respond with differential sensitivity to structurally diverse ALK kinase inhibitors [8]. However, it is not yet clear if these preclinical differences are of clinical relevance.

Nevertheless, some NPM1-ALK-positive ALCL patients who have progressed after multiple prior therapies have been shown to respond favorably to crizotinib [4, 5]. ALK-inhibitor resistance-causing mutations have been detected in NPM1-ALK-positive ALCL patients who have not responded to ALK inhibitors [4]. Interestingly, some of the NPM1-ALK-positive ALCL patients who failed to respond to crizotinib have been shown to harbor inhibitor resistance mutations after only brief (1–2 month) treatment with the kinase inhibitor, suggesting the presence of the mutations de novo (i.e., prior to inhibitor therapy) [4]. Our patient may have had one or more primary resistance-causing mutations at diagnosis or developed ALK inhibitor resistance after multiple lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy. In addition, however, the patient’s failure to achieve a sustained response to cytotoxic therapy, a CD30 antibody–drug conjugate or an ALK inhibitor suggests the presence of one or more alternative drug resistance mechanisms in addition to the possible presence of ALK inhibitor resistance mutations.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s next-of-kin (mother) for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review from the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

TRAF1: 

tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 1

ALK: 

anaplastic lymphoma kinase

ALCL: 

anaplastic large cell lymphoma

FDG-PET: 

fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography

RACE: 

rapid amplification of cDNA ends

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

KL performed the RNA sequencing that detected the TRAF1-ALK fusion. JH performed the RT-qPCR that detected ALK transcripts. DH reviewed the PCR and sequencing data and revised the manuscript. RM reviewed the clinical data and revised the manuscript. BB was the hematopathologist on the case and reviewed and reported the immunohistochemistry. SWM reviewed the PCR and sequencing data and revised the manuscript. DS treated the patient, reviewed the IHC, PCR and sequencing data and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The development of the ALK RT-qPCR assay was funded in part by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), under contract no. HHSN261201000132C and NCI control no. N43CO-2010-00132, and contract no. HHSN261201200047C and NCI no. N44CO-2012-00047.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests KL, JH, DH and SWM are employees and/or equity owners of Insight Genetics, the molecular diagnostics firm that together with Qiagen developed and marketed the ALK RGQ RT-PCR Kit used to assess the ALK status of the ALCL case reported herein. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Insight Genetics
(2)
Department of Pathology, Royal Jubilee Hospital
(3)
British Columbia Cancer Agency

References

  1. Morris SW, Kirstein MN, Valentine MB, Dittmer KG, Shapiro DN, Saltman DL et al (1994) Fusion of a kinase gene, ALK, to a nucleolar protein gene, NPM, in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Science 263(5151):1281–1284PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pearson JD, Lee KH, Bacani TC, Lai R, Ingham RJ (2012) NPM-ALK: the prototypic member of a family of oncogenic fusion tyrosine kinases. J Sig Trans. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/123253 Google Scholar
  3. Hallberg B, Palmer RH (2013) Mechanistic insight into ALK receptor tyrosine kinase in human cancer biology. Nat Rev Cancer 13:685–700PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Gambacorti Passerini C, Farina F, Stasia A, Redaelli S, Ceccon M et al (2014) Crizotinib in advanced, chemoresistant anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lymphoma patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 106(2):1–4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mosse YP, Lim MS, Voss SD, Wilner K, Ruffner K, Laliberte J et al (2013) Safety and activity of crizotinib for paediatric patients with refractory solid tumours or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: a Children’s Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study. Lancet Oncol 14(6):472–480PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman AL, Vamatzis G, Asmann YW, Davila J, Middha S, Eckloff BW et al (2013) Novel TRAF1-ALK fusion identified by deep RNA sequencing of anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Gene Chromosom Cancer 52(11):1097–1102View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Abate F, Todaro M, van der Krogt JA, Boi M, Landra I, Machiorlatti R et al (2015) A novel patient-derived tumorgraft model with TRAF1-ALK anaplastic large-cell lymphoma translocation. Leukemia. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2014.347 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Heuckmann JM, Balke-Want H, Malchers F, Peifer M, Sos ML, Koker M et al (2012) Differential protein stability and ALK inhibitor sensitivity of EML4-ALK fusion variants. Clin Cancer Res 18(17):4682–4690PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lawrence et al. 2015

Advertisement