Disinfection by hydrogen peroxide nebulization increases susceptibility to avian pathogenic Escherichia coli

Abstract

Background

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) are the major cause of economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide. Traditionally, antibiotics are used to treat and prevent colibacillosis in broilers. Due to resistance development other ways of preventing/treating the disease have to be found. Therefore during this study the nebulization of low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was tested in the presence of chickens to lower pathogenicity of APEC.

Results

Significantly higher total lesion scores and higher E. coli concentrations were found in the spleen of chickens exposed to 2 % H₂O₂ compared to those exposed to 1 % H₂O₂ and control chickens which had been exposed to nebulization with distilled water. Higher total lesions scores and E. coli concentrations in the spleen were found in chickens exposed to 1 % H₂O₂ in comparison to control chickens (not significant).

Conclusion

H₂O₂ is rendering animals more prone to APEC infection contraindicating H₂O₂ nebulization in the presence of chickens.

Background

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) causes colibacillosis in chickens of all ages, leading yearly to major losses to the poultry industry [1, 2]. Antibiotics have been used for a long time to treat and prevent diseases in chickens; with the consequence of antibiotic resistance development posing a huge threat to the public health worldwide [3] and transfer of virulence and resistance genes to other bacteria [4–6]. Sanitation and cleaning is a first way to reduce infection pressure [7], but is normally performed between different flocks in the barn to prevent flock to flock transmission. The information about the use of disinfectants in the presence of animals to lower pathogenicity of APEC is limited. On conditions safe to the animals, nebulization of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in the presence of chickens may possibly lower pathogenicity of APEC, since (pathogenic) E. coli is normally present in high concentrations in the barn in the form of faeces-contaminated dust [1, 2, 8]. Predisposing factors, such as viral live vaccines, render chickens more prone to APEC infection [9, 10]. Several studies on H₂O₂ toxicity have been performed on rats, mice, rabbits and dogs but there is no documentation on such studies in chickens. As toxicity is depending on many factors like exposure time, number of exposures and concentration [11] the goal of this study was to test if H₂O₂ nebulization in the presence of chickens can lower pathogenicity of APEC.

Methods

The animal experiment was approved by the ethical committee of the KU Leuven (Permit Number: P176/2011) and conducted in strict accordance with the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations guidelines.

Fifteen one-day-old chickens (Ross; Belgabroed NV, Merksplas, Belgium) were housed in a disinfected barn and provided with water and feed ad libitum. At 4 weeks of age, the chickens were orally vaccinated against Newcastle disease (10⁶ mean egg infective dose; MSD Animal Health, Boxmeer, the Netherlands) to render them subsequently more susceptible to APEC challenge. Three days post vaccination (dpv), the chickens were transferred and equally divided over three disinfected isolators (dimensions: 1.5 × 1.0 × 1.0 m, volume ≈ 1.6 m³). Three and 4 dpv they were aerogenically infected with a virulent APEC strain CH2 [12] (10 ml of 10¹⁰ colony forming units/ml (cfu/ml)) with the help of a compressor (N 811 KN.18; KNF Neuberger, Aarselaar, Belgium) and nebulizer (Cirrus 2; Intersurgical, Uden, the Netherlands). The chickens were exposed to the aerosols for 60 min. One day thereafter or 5 dpv they were exposed to 10 ml of different H₂O₂ concentrations (EcoClearProx^®, ABT Belgium BVBA, Affligem, Belgium) by nebulization for 60 min [Group 1—2 % H₂O₂; Group 2—1 % H₂O₂; Group 3—distilled water (DW)].

Eleven dpv all surviving chickens were euthanized by cervical dislocation for clinical necropsy. Macroscopic lesions were scored according to Vandemaele et al. [12].

From two or three chickens per group (chickens that had macroscopic lesions) the spleen was aseptically removed and homogenized in sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (1 g of tissue in 1 ml PBS) as described before [13, 14]. Ten-fold dilutions were plated on MacConkey agar (Oxoid CM0115; Erembodegem, Belgium) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, after which bacterial numbers (cfu/g) were determined.

Results were analyzed with SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Cary, North Carolina, USA) and R [15]. The sum of the total lesion score and the lesion scores per organ were calculated for the three groups. To evaluate the hypothesis of a higher total lesion score in infected chickens treated with DW than H₂O₂, the total lesion scores were analyzed by means of an ordinal logistic regression model. Results of ordinal logistic regression are presented as the odds ratio of having a high lesion score. Average bacterial concentrations were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis Test for significant differences between multiple groups and the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test for differences between each pair of groups. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

Results and discussion

Mortality and lesions scores of infected/treated chickens are given in Table 1. None of the chickens died after infection. Chickens that were exposed to H₂O₂ had a higher sum of total lesion scores (Group 1: 42 and Group 2: 20) than chickens exposed to DW (Group 3: 14). Infected chickens treated with 1 % H₂O₂ had a 3.53 (95 % CI, 0.30–88.84) higher chance of developing a high lesion score (score: 14) than infected chickens treated with DW, while this chance was 12.28 (95 % CI, 1.01–357.07) higher in infected chickens treated with 2 % H₂O₂ than with 1 % H₂O₂. Thus nebulization of 2 % H₂O₂ does increase the lesion scores.

Table 1 Mortality and lesion scores of infected/treated chickens

Bacterial numbers (cfu/g) isolated from the spleen in chickens of Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 are shown in Fig. 1. The highest bacterial load from the spleen was obtained in the group of chickens exposed to aerosols of 2 % H₂O₂, followed by 1 % H₂O₂ and DW (P = 0.11). However, the results are not significant, most likely due to the low number of tested chickens during this study.

Fig. 1

Isolated bacterial concentrations from the spleen. cfu colony forming units, DW distilled water, ns not significant (P ≥ 0.05)

This worsening effect after H₂O₂ nebulization is probably due to the caustic effect of H₂O₂ radicals on (ciliated) epithelial cells, such as the case for Newcastle disease virus infection (or vaccination with virulent vaccines) in one-day-old chickens [16], making it easier for APEC to cross the upper respiratory tract causing colibacillosis. The presented results give a good indication that nebulization of H₂O₂ (higher than 1 %) in the presence of chickens is not advisable. As toxicity was also shown to be dependent on exposure time and number of exposures (Anonymous 2003), these parameters should also be taken into consideration, during future studies. H₂O₂ concentrations lower than 1 % can, however, be used in an experimental respiratory infection model to predispose the chickens to APEC infection.

Conclusion

H₂O₂ nebulization in the presence of chickens in order to lower pathogenicity of APEC is not advisable, since it makes chickens more susceptible to APEC infection.