Open Access

Water-soluble chlorophyll-binding proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Raphanus sativus target the endoplasmic reticulum body

  • Shigekazu Takahashi1,
  • Kyoko Aizawa1,
  • Katsumi Nakayama1 and
  • Hiroyuki Satoh1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Research Notes20158:365

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1333-3

Received: 21 January 2015

Accepted: 12 August 2015

Published: 20 August 2015

Abstract

Background

Non-photosynthetic chlorophyll (Chl) proteins called water-soluble Chl-binding proteins are distributed in Brassicaceae plants. Brassica oleracea WSCP (BoWSCP) and Lepidium virginicum WSCP (LvWSCP) are highly expressed in leaves and stems, while Arabidopsis thaliana WSCP (AtWSCP) and Raphanus sativus WSCP (RshWSCP) are highly transcribed in floral organs. BoWSCP and LvWSCP exist in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) body. However, the subcellular localization of AtWSCP and RshWSCP is still unclear. To determine the subcellular localization of these WSCPs, we constructed transgenic plants expressing Venus-fused AtWSCP or RshWSCP.

Results

Open reading frames corresponding to full-length AtWSCP and RshWSCP were cloned and ligated between the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and Venus, a gene encoding a yellow fluorescent protein. We introduced the constructs into A. thaliana by the floral dip method. We succeeded in constructing a number of transformants expressing Venus-fused chimeric AtWSCP (AtWSCP::Venus) or RshWSCP (RshWSCP::Venus). We detected fluorescence derived from the chimeric proteins using a fluorescence microscope system. In cotyledons, fluorescence derived from AtWSCP::Venus and RshWSCP::Venus was detected in spindle structures. The spindle structures altered their shape to a globular form under blue light excitation. In true leaves, the number of spindle structures was drastically reduced. These observations indicate that the spindle structure was the ER body.

Conclusions

AtWSCP and RshWSCP have the potential for ER body targeting like BoWSCP and LvWSCP.

Keywords

Chlorophyll ER body Water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein WSCP

Background

Chlorophyll (Chl) is a photosynthetic pigment. Most chlorophyll proteins playing a role in photosynthesis are membranous proteins, but highly hydrophilic Chl proteins called water-soluble Chl-binding proteins (WSCPs) have been isolated from various land plants of Chenopodiaceae, Amaranthaceae, Polygonaceae, and Brassicaceae [1]. WSCPs from Chenopodiaceae, Amaranthaceae, and Polygonaceae are photoconvertible, but WSCPs from Brassicaceae do not show this ability [1]. Generally, photoconvertible and non-photoconvertible WSCPs are called Class I and Class II WSCPs, respectively [1]. Furthermore, Class II WSCPs are categorized into two subclasses, IIA and IIB, based on their Chl a/b ratio [1]. To date, Lepidium virginicum WSCP (LvWSCP) is the only Class IIB WSCP [1]. Chenopodiaceae WSCPs are members of the domain unknown function 538 superfamily and thus the biological function of these proteins remains unclear [2, 3]. On the other hand, all Class II WSCPs cloned thus far are members of the Kunitz-type trypsin inhibitor family [48]. The protease inhibitor activity of Class II WSCPs in young leaves was reported to be important for nitrogen remobilization under stressful conditions [9]. Class II WSCPs are also able to repress reactive oxygen species generation derived from excited Chl [10]. Additionally, Brassica oleracea WSCP (BoWSCP) and Lepidium virginicum WSCP (LvWSCP) are located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) body [6, 8], which is contributes to the a unique defense system in Brassicaceae [11, 12]. Thus, Class II WSCPs have the potential to act as Chl scavengers during cell disruption to protect healthy cells [6, 8]. Because the molecular structure of Class II WSCPs is quite simple and the complex is quite stable and easy to handle, Class II WSCPs are used as model proteins for characterizing the Chl–Chl and Chl–protein interactions of Chl proteins [13, 14].

BoWSCP and LvWSCP are highly accumulated in leaves and stems [15, 16], while Arabidopsis thaliana WSCP (AtWSCP) is expressed in the transmitting tract [5]. Moreover, Raphanus sativus var. raphanistroides Makino WSCP (RshWSCP) is highly transcribed in floral organs [7]. In contrast to BoWSCP and LvWSCP, the subcellular localization of AtWSCP and RshWSCP is still unclear. Elucidation of the subcellular localization of these proteins will provide clues for understanding the diversity and universality of Class II WSCPs.

Methods

Plant materials

Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype, Col-0) was grown on 1 % agar plates containing full-strength MS medium and 1 % sucrose at 22 °C under continuous light. Three-week-old A. thaliana was transferred from the plate to Jiffy-7 for further growth.

Isolation of genomic DNA

Using a DNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands), we extracted and purified genomic DNA from leaves of 2-week-old A. thaliana according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Construction of transgenic A. thaliana

The full-length regions of AtWSCP and RshWSCP were amplified by PCR with specific primer pairs containing a restriction enzyme site: for AtWSCP, 5′-GTCGACATGAAGAATCCTTCAGTGATCTCTTTTC-3′ and 5′-CCATGGAACCCGGGAAGTATAAGTTGCTAGTAGC-3′; for RshWSCP, 5′-GTCGACATGAAGAAACCTTCAGTGACCCCT-3′ and 5′-GGATCCGTAGAATGGGAACATCCTCAGACC-3′. Note that we used the RshWSCP::pGEM-T easy vector constructed in our previous study for RshWSCP amplification [7]. The PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega). After sequence analysis, the correct clones were digested (SalI and NcoI for the AtWSCP construct, SalI and BamHI for the RshWSCP construct) and then the DNA fragments were ligated into the same sites between the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter and Venus in a modified pBI101 vector constructed in our previous study. All constructs used to generate transgenic plants are shown in Fig. 1. We introduced the constructs into A. thaliana using the floral dip method developed by Clough and Bent [17]. Transgenic plants were selected on 1 % agar plates containing 1 % sucrose, MS medium, 50 µg ml−1 kanamycin and 250 µg ml−1 cefotaxime sodium salt. Transformation of genes into A. thaliana was confirmed by PCR analysis with specific primer pairs (Fig. 1). The sequences of the primers used to detect Venus (i.e., VF and VR) and Actin8 were described in our previous manuscript [8].
Fig. 1

Schematic image of the control and modified Venus constructs for subcellular localization analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana WSCP (AtWSCP) and Raphanus sativus WSCP (RshWSCP)

Fluorescence microscopic analysis

To obtain fluorescence images of A. thaliana expressing Venus-fused chimeric AtWSCP and RshWSCP (i.e., AtWSCP::Venus and RshWSCP::Venus, respectively), we used an Axioskop2 plus microscope (Carl Zeiss) and Axio Cam (Carl Zeiss) with the Axio Vision software (Carl Zeiss). The T2 generations of transgenic plants were used for the fluorescence microscopic analysis.

Results and discussion

The aim of this study was to reveal the subcellular localization of AtWSCP and RshWSCP. In previous studies, we characterized the subcellular localization of BoWSCP and LvWSCP by analyzing transgenic A. thaliana expressing Venus-fused chimeric BoWSCP or LvWSCP (i.e., BoWSCP::Venus or LvWSCP::Venus) and found that both chimeric proteins were located in ER bodies [6, 8]. Here, we constructed transgenic AtWSCP::Venus or RshWSCP::Venus. Similar to BoWSCP and LvWSCP, both AtWSCP and RshWSCP possess an N-terminal extension, which is predicted to be a signal peptide. Thus, we introduced Venus at the C-termini of AtWSCP and RshWSCP. All constructs used to generate transgenic A. thaliana are shown in Fig. 1. The correctness of the transformants (35S::AtWSCP::Venus and 35S::RshWSCP::Venus) was confirmed by PCR analysis with the primer sets AtWSCP-F or RshWSCP-F/VR and VF/VR (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 2, we obtained a number of transformant lines.
Fig. 2

PCR analysis to confirm the correct insertion of cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (35S)::AtWSCP::Venus and 35S::RshWSCP::Venus into A. thaliana. Primer sites (AtWSCP-F, RshWSCP-F, VF, and VR) are shown in Fig. 1. Actin8 was used as a control

Figure 3 shows fluorescence images of leaves at different developmental stages from the transformants. In 1-week-old cotyledons of 35S::AtWSCP::Venus and 35S::RshWSCP::Venus plants, the fluorescence from Venus was detected in spindle-shaped structures. In the true leaves, however, most of these structures had disappeared and Venus fluorescence was instead detected in the vacuole. Furthermore, the spindle-shaped structures changed shape from spindle to globular during the fluorescence microscopic analysis with the high irradiation of blue light (Fig. 4). Brassicaceae plants have a unique spindle-shaped organelle called the ER body [11]. It was reported that the ER body changes its structure to a globular form and then fuses with the vacuole under high salinity conditions [18]. Recently, Gotté et al. reported that Raphanus sativus also has the ER body and that its shape was changed by methyl jasmonate treatment [19]. We therefore concluded that AtWSCP and RshWSCP can potentially target the ER body and the vacuole like BoWSCP and LvWSCP, but they do not target chloroplasts.
Fig. 3

Fluorescence images of the transgenic plants. One-week-old cotyledons and 10-day-old true leaves of the T2 generation of transformants (35S::AtWSCP::Venus and 35S::RshWSCP::Venus), which were grown on 1 % agar plates containing full-strength Murashige and Skoog medium and 1 % sucrose at 22 °C under continuous light, were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. The chimeric proteins were excited by blue light and then the fluorescence images were captured. Bar 20 µm

Fig. 4

Time-dependent changes of the shape of the endoplasmic reticulum bodies. Fluorescence from 1-week-old cotyledons of 35S::RshWSCP::Venus was captured. Bar 20 µm

Because AtWSCP has protease inhibitor activity [20] and accumulates in the transmitting tract in the gynoecium and silique [5], Becktas et al. hypothesized that the protease inhibitor activity of AtWSCP might be important for the formation of the transmitting tract. Note that we could not find any difference between the transformants and wild type A. thaliana. Further analysis of the AtWSCP null-mutant will provide clues to elucidate the biological function of AtWSCP.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the subcellular localization of floral organ-expressed WSCPs (i.e., AtWSCP and RshWSCP). Similar to leaf-expressed WSCPs (i.e., BoWSCP and LvWSCP), AtWSCP and RshWSCP target the ER body.

Notes

Abbreviations

Chl: 

chlorophyll

ER: 

endoplasmic reticulum

WSCP: 

water-soluble chlorophyll-binding proteins

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ST designed the research. ST and KA performed the experiments. ST and HS wrote the paper. NK and HS supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomolecular Science, Faculty of Science, Toho University

References

  1. Satoh H, Uchida A, Nakayama K, Okada M. Water-soluble chlorophyll protein in Brassicaceae plants is a stress-induced chlorophyll-binding protein. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:906–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Takahashi S, Yoshikawa M, Kamada A, Ohtsuki T, Uchida A, Nakayama K, Satoh H. The photoconvertible water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein of Chenopodium album is a member of DUF538, a superfamily that distributes in Embryophyta. J Plant Physiol. 2013;2013(170):1549–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Takahashi S, Abe E, Nakayama K, Satoh H. Identification of genes encoding photoconvertible (Class I) water-soluble chlorophyll-binding proteins from Chenopodium ficifolium. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2015 (in press). doi:10.1080/09168451.2014.972326.
  4. Satoh H, Nakayama K, Okada M. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a water-soluble chlorophyll protein, a putative carrier of chlorophyll molecules in cauliflower. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:30568–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bektas I, Fellenferg C, Paulsen H. Water-soluble chlorophyll protein (WSCP) of Arabidopsis is expressed in the gynoecium and developing silique. Planta. 2012;236:251–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Takahashi S, Yanai H, Nakamaru Y, Uchida A, Nakayama K, Satoh H. Molecular cloning, characterization and analysis of the intracellular localization of a water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein from Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera). Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:879–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Takahashi S, Ono M, Uchida A, Nakayama K, Satoh H. Molecular cloning and functional expression of a water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein from Japanese wild radish. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170:406–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Takahashi S, Yanai H, Oka-Takayama Y, Zanma-Sohtome A, Fujiyama K, Uchida A, Nakayama K, Satoh H. Molecular cloning, characterization and analysis of the intracellular localization of a water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein (WSCP) from Virginia pepperweed (Lepidium virginicum), a unique WSCP that preferentially binds chlorophyll b in vitro. Planta. 2013;238:1065–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Desclos M, Dubousset L, Etienne P, Le Caherec F, Satoh H, Bonnefoy J, Ourry A, Avice JC. A proteomic profiling approach to reveal a novel role of Brassica napus drought 22 kD/water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein in young leaves during nitrogen remobilization induced by stressful conditions. Plant Physiol. 2008;147:1830–44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schmidt K, Fufezan C, Krieger-Liszkay A, Satoh H, Paulsen H. Recombinant water-soluble chlorophyll protein from Brassica oleracea var. Botrys binds various chlorophyll derivatives. Biochemistry. 2003;42:7427–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Yamada K, Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M. Unique defense strategy by the endoplasmic reticulum body in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52:2039–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yamada K, Nagano AJ, Nishina M, Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M. Identification of two novel endoplasmic reticulum body-specific integral membrane proteins. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:108–20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Renger G, Pieper J, Theiss C, Trostmann I, Paulsen H, Renger T, Eichler HJ, Schmitt FJ. Water soluble chlorophyll binding protein of higher plants: a most suitable model system for basic analyses of pigment-pigment and pigment-protein interactions in chlorophyll protein complexes. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168:1462–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Alster J, Lokstein H, Dostal J, Uchida A, Zigmantas D. 2D spectroscopy study of water-soluble chlorophyll-binding protein from Lepidium virginicum. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118:3524–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Murata T, Murata N. Water-soluble chlorophyll-proteins from Brassica nigra and Lepidium virginicum. Carnegie Inst Wash Yearb. 1971;70:504–7.Google Scholar
  16. Kamimura Y, Mori T, Yamasaki T, Katoh S. Isolation, properties and a possible function of a water-soluble chlorophyll a/b-protein from Brussels sprouts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997;38:133–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:736–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Hayashi Y, Yamada K, Shimada T, Matsushima R, Nishizawa N, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I. A proteinase-storing body that prepares for cell death or stresses in the epidermal cells of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001;42:894–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gotté M, Ghosh R, Bernard A, Nguema-Ona E, Vicré-Gibouin M, Hara-Nishimura I, Driouich A. Methyl jasmonate affects morphology, number and activity of endplasmic reticulum bodies in Raphanus sativus root cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015 (in press). doi:10.1093/pcp/pcu141.
  20. Halls CE, Rogers SW, Oufattole M, Ostergard O, Sevensson B, Rogers JC. A Kunitz-type cysteine protease inhibitor from cauliflower and Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2006;170:1102–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Takahashi et al. 2015

Advertisement