Open Access

Caffeine differentially alters cortical hemodynamic activity during working memory: a near infrared spectroscopy study

BMC Research Notes20158:520

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1491-3

Received: 5 December 2014

Accepted: 21 September 2015

Published: 1 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Caffeine is a widely used stimulant with potentially beneficial effects on cognition as well as vasoconstrictive properties. In functional magnetic imaging research, caffeine has gained attention as a potential enhancer of the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) response. In order to clarify changes of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin (HbO and HbR) induced by caffeine during a cognitive task, we investigated a working memory (WM) paradigm (visual 2-back) using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS).

Results

Behaviorally, caffeine had no effect on the WM performance but influenced reaction times in the 0-back condition. NIRS data demonstrate caffeine-dependent alterations of the course of the hemodynamic response. The intake of 200 mg caffeine caused a significant decrease of the HbO response between 20 and 40 s after the onset of a 2-back task in the bilateral inferior frontal cortex (IFC). In parallel, the HbR response of the left IFC was significantly increased due to caffeine intake.

Conclusions

In line with previous results, we did not detect an effect of caffeine on most aspects of behavior. Effects of caffeine on brain vasculature were detected as general reduction of HbO. Neuronal effects of caffeine are reflected in an increased concentration of HbR in the left hemisphere when performing a verbal memory task and suggest influences on metabolism.

Keywords

NIRS Caffeine n-back 2-back Working memory Adenosine BOLD WM

Background

Caffeine is one of the most widely consumed stimulants worldwide. Ingredient of a variety of foods and beverages, low doses of caffeine generally produce feelings of well-being and increased alertness in humans. Although there are reports about caffeine facilitating cognitive functions (e.g. [13], these psychological effects have been attributed to increased arousal and overcoming fatigue rather than to a direct enhancement of specific cognitive functions (reviewed by [4]). The major pharmacological action of the stimulant is that of a nonspecific adenosine receptor antagonist (for review see [5]). Since adenosine receptors display a general inhibitory effect on neural activity, the receptor antagonism of caffeine has stimulant properties through disinhibitory mechanisms. However, caffeine further acts as a vasoconstrictor that causes reductions in cerebral blood flow (CBF) [57]. In fMRI research, the latter effect has been discussed as a method to boost the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast [8]. In humans, a dose of 200 mg caffeine can decrease the resting-state CBF to approximately 30 % [9, 10]. As the magnitudes of vascular responses to stimuli remain identical [11], this results in a maximized BOLD contrast. However, results on the BOLD-boosting capability of caffeine are far from being consistent and are discussed controversially in the literature [12, 13].

The BOLD signal is a complex function of changes in neural activity, oxygen metabolism, cerebral blood volume, CBF and further physiological parameters [14]. Among other factors, the relation of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin (HbO and HbR) are critical determinants of the BOLD response. As concentrations HbO and HbR can be measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), we used this technique to investigate components underlying the BOLD response. NIRS is an optical technique that is based on absorption of light in the near-infrared spectrum [1517] and can be used for functional brain mapping (e.g. [1823]. NIRS is able to measure relative cortical concentrations of both HbO and HbR independently (for review see [24]).

To investigate the above mentioned issue in a standard cognitive paradigm, we used the 2-back task to investigate effects of caffeine. This task assesses working memory (WM; [25]), which is the ability to hold and manipulate information for a short amount of time. NIRS has been successfully used to measure brain activity associated with WM [26], demonstrating a linear increase of hemodynamic responses with WM load [27].

Methods

Participants

Eleven subjects participated in the experiment. Data from one subject were excluded due to excessive NIRS signal drifts and two malfunctioning NIRS channels. The remaining 10 participants (7 female) were 29.1 ± 1.6 (mean ± SEM; range 19–34) years old. All participants were classified as moderate caffeine consumers [28], with a averaged consumption of 2-3 cup of coffee per day. All experiments were carried out in the morning and participants were instructed to abstain from drinking coffee the morning before the experiment. All subjects reported to have complied with this instruction. Ethical approval was obtained prior to the study from the ethics committee of the University Magdeburg and all participants gave written informed consent before participation.

Experimental procedure

At the start of each experimental session, the NIRS optode grid (see below) was positioned on the subject’s forehead. During the experiment proper, participants sat in a comfortable chair in front of a computer monitor and performed the task in a dimly lit room. They were instructed in written form. Subjects saw a stream of white single letters (A, B, C, D or E) presented for 0.5 s each on a gray background with a stimulus onset asynchrony of 2 s. Stimulus presentation was controlled by the Presentation software (Neurobehavioral Systems, USA). Stimuli were presented blockwise with a total of 15 stimuli per block. The inter-block interval was varied randomly between 30 and 45 s. In a 2-back condition, subjects were asked to press a button with their index finger if the penultimate stimulus had been identical with the present stimulus or otherwise to press the button with the middle finger of their dominant hand. In a control 0-back condition, participants were instructed to respond with their index finger to all letter stimuli. The order of 0-back and 2-back blocks was pseudorandomized so that not more than 2 identical conditions followed each other. A brief practice sequence was given before the actual test.

Each participant underwent two consecutive NIRS scanning sessions, one control and one experimental session. The control session always preceded the experimental session to avoid carry-over effects (sequential paradigm). After completing eight 0-back blocks and eight 2-back blocks, the NIRS recording was paused and participants ingested a tablet containing 200 mg of caffeine. After a 30 min delay, during which the optode grid remained in place, they performed the same experimental task again. During one complete session, a total of 54 targets were presented along with 186 lures in the 2-back condition, each block containing 3 or 4 targets.

Near-infrared spectroscopy

We recorded the concentration of HbO and HbR at a sampling rate of 10 Hz using Hitachi’s ETG-4000 Optical Topography System (Hitachi Medical Systems, Germany) which uses a modified Beer-Lambert law to calculate hemoglobin concentrations. Thirty-three optodes were placed on the subject’s forehead from which 52 channels were recorded. Positioning of the optode grid was performed such that the middle optode of the most inferior row on the 3 × 11 optode grid was located on the point Fpz of the international 10/20 EEG system. The distances between the optode grid and both preauricular points were kept equivalent. One drawback with this approach is, as distances between individual optodes remain constant, the scalp area under which the content of HbO and HbR are assessed can be quite variable and thus complicate interpretation of results. To ameliorate this problem, we used the ETG-4000’s built-in 3D digitizer and obtained real-world coordinates of each optode position for each individual subject [29]. Subsequently, we transformed these coordinates to the Montral Neurological Institute (MNI) framework using the toolbox of NFRI functions [30] included in the software suite NIRS-SPM [31] to be able to provide the mean channel position on the MNI brain (see insets of Figs. 1, 2). The ETG-4000 software was used for averaging hemoglobin responses to single task blocks for each subject. Data were subsequently analyzed by the R software (see below).
Fig. 1

Effects of caffeine on left hemisphere cortical hemodynamics. The inset shows mean channel positions (averaged over subjects), visualized on the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template brain. Black colored positions indicate the channels that were averaged to form the ROI. The left/right line graphs show time courses of relative concentrations of HbO/HbR in different experimental conditions. Vertical bars indicate the boundaries of time windows 1 and 2 (tw1 and tw2, respectively). The stimulation duration is indicated in the lower part of the graphs. The bar graphs above and below the line graphs depict mean individual maximum/minimum responses during the different time windows (see labels). The bar graphs depict mean HbO of the individual maximum response in tw1 (upper left graph), mean HbO of the individual minimum response in tw2 (lower left graph), mean HbR of the individual minimum response in tw1 (lower right graph), and mean HbR of the individual maximum response in tw2 (upper right graph)

Fig. 2

Effect of caffeine on right hemisphere cortical hemodynamics. The inset shows mean channel positions (averaged over subjects) visualized on the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template brain. Black colored positions indicate the channels that were averaged to form the ROI. The left/right line graphs show time courses of relative concentrations of HbO/HbR hemoglobin in different experimental conditions. Vertical bars indicate the boundaries of time windows 1 and 2 (tw1 and tw2, respectively). The stimulation duration is indicated in the lower part of the graphs. The bar graphs above and below the line graphs depict mean individual peak responses during the different time windows (see labels). The bar graphs depict mean HbO of the individual maximum response in tw1 (upper left graph), mean HbR of the individual minimum response in tw2 (lower left graph), mean HbR of the individual minimum response in tw1 (lower right graph), and mean HbR of the individual maximum response in tw2 (upper right graph)

Data analysis

We used the software package R (version 2.13.1, R Development Core Team, 2009) for all statistical comparisons and graphs. Signal detection theory (SDT; [32]) statistics (d′ and c) were computed for performance data in the 2-back condition. The function of Pallier [33] for R was used to compute d’. In cases in which the hit rate was equal to 1.0 or the false alarm rate was 0, we standard corrected these statistics using the formulas 1 − 1/(2 × [total number of targets]) or 1 − 1/(2 × [total number of lures]), respectively. Raw NIRS data were converted to hemoglobin concentrations, baseline corrected using the 9 s prior to the task, smoothed with a 5 s moving average, low/high-pass filtered with cutoff frequencies of 0.5/0.001 Hz, respectively, and averaged for each condition and individual subject using the ETG-4000 software package. For each individual subject, NIRS signals were averaged over all task blocks separately for each experimental condition. To detect influences of caffeine, we combined four channels on each hemisphere over the left and right inferior prefrontal cortices (PFCs) that showed clear task effects (2-back > 0-back) and averaged these to form two regions-of-interest (ROIs; see insets of Figs. 1, 2). To account for individual differences in peak vascular responses, after visual inspection of the course of the hemodynamic response, we analyzed the maximum or minimum hemodynamic response (HbO/HbR) in each of two time windows: during the first 20 s of the trial period (time window 1; tw1) and in the following 20 s (time window 2; tw2). Time window 2 encompassed 10 s post-task to capture hemodynamic changes induced late in the task period. For all statistical comparisons, we used non-parametric paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests to evade problems concerning normal distribution of data. Briefly, this procedure determines the ranks of the absolute difference between two conditions and, subsequently, restores the signs of these differences. It is then determined whether the ranks are distributed equally on either side of 0. The reported test statistic V is the sum of ranks given to the differences with positive sign, which also determines the sum of ranks assigned to the differences with negative sign.

Results

WM performance

Behaviorally, caffeine did not alter WM processing. In the 2-back conditions, statistics revealed no effects of the stimulant on SDT parameters (d′: no caffeine: 2.64 ± 0.25; caffeine: 2.91 ± 0.26, V = 13, p = 0.160; c: no caffeine: 0.14 ± 0.08; caffeine: 0.23 ± 0.07, V = 14, p = 0.193). Neither did caffeine influence RTs in the 2-back conditions (no caffeine: 671 ± 66 ms; caffeine: 631 ± 69, V = 37, p = 0.098). However, caffeine decreased RTs in the 0-back conditions (no caffeine: 325 ± 22 ms; caffeine: 293 ± 13 ms, V = 43, p = 0.012).

Hemodynamics

Results are presented in Fig. 1 for the left and Fig. 2 for the right hemisphere. The effects of caffeine were analyzed separately for tw1 and tw2, the WM-load conditions (0-back, 2-back) and HbO and HbR. In the 2-back condition in tw2 (20–40 s after stimulus onset), caffeine (compared to the 2-back “no caffeine” condition) resulted in a significant decrease in HbO level (V = 50, p = 0.020) and a corresponding increase in HbR level (V = 5, p = 0.020) in the left hemisphere. In the right hemisphere, caffeine (2-back condition; tw2; compared to the 2-back “no caffeine” condition) caused a significant decrease in the HbO level (V = 50, p = 0.020), without HbR effect (V = 17, p = 0.322). All other comparisons did not reach statistical significance.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first NIRS study investigating the effects of caffeine on the time course of hemoglobin concentrations during a verbal WM-task. Our data show that behaviorally, caffeine did not affect performance in the 2-back WM task, while NIRS data demonstrate caffeine dependent alterations of the course of the hemodynamic response.

Performance data

The beneficial effects of caffeine on cognitive performance are still controversial. In accordance with a former study [34], we found no significant effect of caffeine in the 2-back task performance. There are, however, other studies reporting caffeine-related modulation of cognition, mood, and vigilance (e.g. [35, 36]). These discrepancies might be attributed to different personality traits of subjects [37], differences in the specific cognitive task or the dependent variable investigated. Also, the lack of effects on SDT statistics may stem from low statistical power due to the small number of subjects investigated. Significant facilitating effects of caffeine were observed on RTs in the 0-back condition and might be interpreted as caffeine’s effects on “a more direct and specific ‘perceptual-motor’ speed or efficiency factor” [4]. Due to the application of a sequential paradigm in the present study, training related RT improvements in the cognitive low load condition or effects of motivation cannot be excluded. In summary, the present study does not find evidence for an effect of caffeine on working memory.

NIRS data

The present data clearly demonstrate caffeine-related alterations of the underlying hemodynamic activity. The localizations of hemoglobin concentration changes in the identified brain areas, collapsed in our ROIs, are in good agreement with other NIRS studies that investigated the 2-back task [26, 38]. These studies reported similar bilateral effects localized to the inferior/ventrolateral PFC. Our approach of using 3D digitizer data and projecting optode positions to the MRI brain thus confirm findings of earlier studies regarding the spatial extend of NIRS signals induced by a n-back WM task.

Complementing knowledge on caffeine’s well-known effects in reducing resting cerebral perfusion [9, 12], the present study shows differential effects on the relative concentrations of both hemoglobin species in the course of a prolonged cognitive task. The high sampling rate of the NIRS technique allowed us to visualize dynamic changes in the concentrations of both hemoglobin species. In fMRI, repetition time (TR) is usually an order of magnitude lower and does thus not allow a visualization of these dynamic changes. The intake of 200 mg caffeine lead to a significant decrease of the HbO response between 20 and 40 s after the onset of the 2-back trial in the bilateral IFC accompanied by a corresponding increase of HbR in the left IFC. The present study thus replicates the results of Dodd et al. [39], who found similar effects of caffeine across a range of cognitive tasks. Decreased HbO coupled with increased HbR thus appear to be hallmark effects of caffeine during cognitive tasks. Apart from the aforementioned report, only a few studies have used NIRS to investigate the effect of caffeine on hemodynamic responses during cognitive tasks so far. Kennedy and Haskell [2] examined the effects of caffeine in a cognitive test battery and found a general decreased total hemoglobin (HbO plus HbR) concentration under its influence. Higashi et al. [40] measured responses over the IFC and reported reduced resting HbO, the best indicator of regional cerebral blood volume, induced by caffeine but, contrary to the present study, a similar increase in response measured while subjects performed an arithmetic test (c.f. [11], see below). Similar to the present study, Niioka and Sasaki [41] found caffeine to reduce concentrations of oxygenated and total hemoglobin on the left hemisphere when subjects performed a modified Stroop task. Similar to Li et al. [11], in the 2-back conditions, we did not find caffeine-related differences in the stimulation-induced response of HbO in tw1. In tw2, however, caffeine’s effects became evident as the relative concentration of HbO quickly decreased after the end of the 2-back task. Effects of caffeine on the decrease of the late but not the early course of the vascular response, such as in the present study, have also been found by Liu et al. [10] in fMRI research. To this end, it is well known that the BOLD response correlates with both HbO and HbR (see [42], for review). By using NIRS to dissect the BOLD response measured by other studies into the crucial determinants HbR and HbO, we show that both increases and decreases in the aforementioned parameters, respectively, may underlie caffeine-induced changes observed in fMRI studies. However, as we did not include an fMRI session in the present study, it is unclear whether these changes reflect the same mechanisms. The absence of a statistically significant effect between the relative concentrations of HbR on the right hemisphere might be related to the well-known finding that verbal WM processes generally place a higher load on left-hemispheric compared to right-hemispheric regions (c.f. [43]). Reduced concentrations of bilateral HbO thus appear to be a general vasoconstrictive effect of caffeine. Higher concentrations of HbR in the left IFC after caffeine consumption might indicate influences on the neuronal metabolic demands such as the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO), as we did not find differences in oxygenated hemoglobin between 2-back conditions in tw1. Indeed, an fMRI investigation shows that caffeine decreases the CBF/CMRO ratio in both motor and visual tasks [44]. With respect to contrasts between the 0-back and the 2-back conditions, unlike fMRI studies (e.g. [34]), we did not find significant load-sensitive changes. This may be due to the heightened between-subject variability in NIRS studies, resulting in lower statistical power of NIRS compared to fMRI group studies [45].

Finally, there are also some limitations to the present results which should be clearly stated. As we wanted our optode montage to be exactly in the same place during the whole experiment to evaluate the spatial extent of changes induced by the WM task, we decided against two separate experimental sessions. Thus, in our experiment, the pharmacological control condition always preceded the caffeine condition, as we also wanted to avoid contamination of the control condition with residual caffeine, which would have occurred if we had randomized the order of the different sessions. This confound makes it difficult to separate the effects of caffeine from those of repeated task completion. The observed effects could thus also be influenced by changes in motivation or by a shift in strategy use associated with repeated task completion. Also, we did not blind the different sessions or try to conceal our intention by using placebo pills at the beginning of the session. Given the strong, well-known subjective experience of caffeine ingestion in most participants, this would probably not have been successful. Furthermore, we only asked subjects to abstain from drinking coffee on the morning of the experiment. However, it has recently been shown that l-theanine, a substance found in tea, can counteract caffeine’s vasoconstrictive effects as well [39]. As we did not control for this or other dietary confounds, we cannot exclude the influence of l-theanine or other dietary factors (e.g. vitamins, see [46]) on the present results. Also, as we only restricted the intake of coffee, our results might have been confounded by caffeine intake from other sources such as tea or soft drinks.

Conclusions

The present study shows dynamic alterations in the content of oxy- and deoxhemoglobin in the left and right inferior frontal cortices during a WM task induced by caffeine. In summary, there are three conclusions to be drawn from the present study. Firstly, caffeine had no effect on working memory performance, only a beneficial effect on simple motor responses. Secondly, effects of caffeine of brain vasculature can be detected as general reduction of HbO. Finally, the neuronal effects of caffeine are reflected in an increased concentration of HbR in the left hemisphere when performing a memory task.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

UH: designed the experimental paradigm, and performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. HH: contributed to the hypothesis, and to the preparation of the manuscript. HJH: contributed to the design, discussion, and to the preparation of the manuscript. TZ conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Katharina Paul for expert technical assistance.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
DZNE, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University
(2)
Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University
(3)
LIN, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
(4)
Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University

References

  1. Jarvis MJ. Does caffeine intake enhance absolute levels of cognitive performance? Psychopharmacology. 1993;110:45–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kennedy DO, Haskell CF. Cerebral blood flow and behavioural effects of caffeine in habitual and non-habitual consumers of caffeine: a near infrared spectroscopy study. Biol Psychol. 2011;86:298–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smit HJ, Rogers PJ. Effects of low doses of caffeine on cognitive performance, mood and thirst in low and higher caffeine consumers. Psychopharmacology. 2000;152:167–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nehlig A. Is caffeine a cognitive enhancer? J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(Suppl 1):S85–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pelligrino DA, Xu HL, Vetri F. Caffeine and the control of cerebral hemodynamics. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(Suppl 1):51–62.Google Scholar
  6. Ngai A, Coyne E, Meno J, West G, Winn H. Receptor subtypes mediating adenosine-induced dilation of cerebral arterioles. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2001;280:2329–35.Google Scholar
  7. Diukova A, Ware J, Smith JE, Evans CJ, Murphy K, Rogers PJ, Wise RG. Separating neural and vascular effects of caffeine using simultaneous EEG–FMRI: differential effects of caffeine on cognitive and sensorimotor brain responses. NeuroImage. 2012;62:239–49.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mulderink TA, Gitelman DR, Mesulam MM, Parrish TB. On the use of caffeine as a contrast booster for BOLD fMRI studies. Neuroimage. 2002;15:37–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron OG, Modell JG, Hariharan M. Caffeine and human cerebral blood flow: a positron emission tomography study. Life Sci. 1990;47:1141–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu TT, Behzadi Y, Restom K, Uludag K, Lu K, Buracas GT, Dubowitz DJ, Buxton RB. Caffeine alters the temporal dynamics of the visual BOLD response. Neuroimage. 2004;23:1402–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Li TQ, Kastrup A, Moseley ME, Glover GH. Changes in baseline cerebral blood flow in humans do not influence regional cerebral blood flow response to photic stimulation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:757–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Laurienti PJ, Field AS, Burdette JH, Maldjian JA, Yen YF, Moody DM. Relationship between caffeine-induced changes in resting cerebral perfusion and blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:1607–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liau J, Perthen JE, Liu TT. Caffeine reduces the activation extent and contrast-to-noise ratio of the functional cerebral blood flow response but not the BOLD response. Neuroimage. 2008;42:296–305.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Buxton RB, Uludağ K, Dubowitz DJ, Liu TT. Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage. 2004;23(Suppl 1):S220–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jöbsis FF. Non-invasive, infra-red monitoring of cerebral O2 sufficiency, bloodvolume, HbO2-Hb shifts and bloodflow. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1977;64:452–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cope M, Delpy D. System for long-term measurement of cerebral blood and tissue oxygenation on newborn infants by near infra-red transillumination. Med Biol Eng Compu. 1988;26:289–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Reynolds EOR, Wyatt JS, Azzopardi D, Delpy DT, Cady EB, Cope M, Wray S. New non-invasive methods for assessing brain oxygenation and haemodynamics. Br Med Bull. 1988;44:1052–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maki A, Yamashita Y, Ito Y, Watanabe E, Mayanagi Y, Koizumi H. Spatial and temporal analysis of human motor activity using noninvasive NIR topography. Med Phys. 1995;22:1997–2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Watanabe E, Yamashita Y, Maki A, Ito Y, Koizumi H. Non-invasive functional mapping with multi-channel near infra-red spectroscopic topography in humans. Neurosci Lett. 1996;205:41–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Koizumi H, Yamashita Y, Maki A, Yamamoto T, Ito Y, Itagaki H, Kennan R. Higher-order brain function analysis by trans-cranial dynamic near-infrared spectroscopy imaging. J Biomed Opt. 1999;4:403–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sato H, Takeuchi T, Sakai KL. Temporal cortex activation during speech recognition: an optical topography study. Cognition. 1999;73:55–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Miyai I, Tanabe HC, Sase I, Eda H, Oda I, Konishi I, Tsunazawa Y, Suzuki T, Yanagida T, Kubota K. Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. NeuroImage. 2001;14:1186–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamashita Y, Maki A, Koizumi H. Wavelength dependence of the precision of noninvasive optical measurement of oxy-, deoxy-, and total-hemoglobin concentration. Med Phys. 2001;28:1108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Strangman G, Boas DA, Sutton JP. Non-invasive neuroimaging using near-infrared light. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52:679–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:829–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoshi Y, Tsou BH, Billock VA, Tanosaki M, Iguchi Y, Shimada M, Shinba T, Yamada Y, Oda I. Spatiotemporal characteristics of hemodynamic changes in the human lateral prefrontal cortex during working memory tasks. Neuroimage. 2003;20:1493–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Molteni E, Butti M, Bianchi A, Reni G. Activation of the prefrontal cortex during a visual n-back working memory task with varying memory load: a near infrared spectroscopy study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:4024–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nehlig A. Are we dependent upon coffee and caffeine? A review on human and animal data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23:563–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Heilbronner U, Münte T. Rapid event-related near-infrared spectroscopy detects age-related qualitative changes in the neural correlates of response inhibition. Neuroimage. 2013;65:408–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh AK, Okamoto M, Dan H, Jurcak V, Dan I. Spatial registration of multichannel multi-subject fNIRS data to MNI space without MRI. Neuroimage. 2005;27:842–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ye J, Tak S, Jang K, Jung J, Jang J. NIRS-SPM: statistical parametric mapping for near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2009;44:428–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Green DM, Swets JA. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley; 1966.Google Scholar
  33. Pallier C. Computing discriminability and bias with the R software. 2002. http://www.pallier.org/ressources/aprime/aprime.pdf. Retrieved 26 October 2012.
  34. Koppelstaetter F, Poeppel TD, Siedentopf CM, Ischebeck A, Verius M, Haala I, Mottaghy FM, Rhomberg P, Golaszewski S, Gotwald T, Lorenz IH, Kolbitsch C, Felber S, Krause BJ. Does caffeine modulate verbal working memory processes? An fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2008;39:492–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Brice CF, Smith AP. Effects of caffeine on mood and performance: a study of realistic consumption. Psychopharmacology. 2002;164:188–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. van Duinen H, Lorist MM, Zijdewind I. The effect of caffeine on cognitive task performance and motor fatigue. Psychopharmacology. 2005;180:539–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Smillie LD, Gökçen E. Caffeine enhances working memory for extraverts. Biol Psychol. 2010;85:496–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ehlis AC, Bähne CG, Jacob CP, Herrmann MJ, Fallgatter AJ. Reduced lateral prefrontal activation in adult patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during a working memory task: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42:1060–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Dodd FL, Kennedy DO, Riby LM, Haskell-Ramsay CF. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of caffeine and L-theanine both alone and in combination on cerebral blood flow, cognition and mood. Psychopharmacology. 2015;232:1–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Higashi T, Sone Y, Ogawa K, Kitamura YT, Saiki K, Sagawa S, Yanagida T, Seiyama A. Changes in regional cerebral blood volume in frontal cortex during mental work with and without caffeine intake: functional monitoring using near-infrared spectroscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2004;9:788–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Niioka T, Sasaki M. Individual cerebral hemodynamic response to caffeine was related to performance on a newly developed stroop color-word task. Opt Rev. 2003;10:607–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Steinbrink J, Villringer A, Kempf F, Haux D, Boden S, Obrig H. Illuminating the BOLD signal: combined fMRI–fNIRS studies. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:495–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Furuya I, Mori K. Cerebral lateralization in spoken language processing measured by multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Brain Nerve. 2003;55:226–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Chen Y, Parrish TB. Caffeine’s effects on cerebrovascular reactivity and coupling between cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism. Neuroimage. 2009;44:647–52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Minati L, Visani E, Dowell NG, Medford N, Critchley HD. Variability comparison of simultaneous brain near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and functional MRI (fMRI) during visual stimulation. J Med Eng Technol. 2011;35:370–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Title L, Cummings P, Giddens K, Nassar B. Oral glucose loading acutely attenuates endothelium-dependent vasodilation in healthy adults without diabetes: an effect prevented by vitamins C and E. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:2185–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Heilbronner et al. 2015

Advertisement