Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Smoking, passive smoking and lung cancer cell types among women in Morocco: analysis of epidemiological profiling of 101 cases

  • Fatima Az-zahra Zakkouri1, 3Email author,
  • Ouaouch Saloua1,
  • Abahssain Halima1,
  • Razine Rachid2,
  • Mrabti Hind1 and
  • Errihani Hassan1
BMC Research Notes20158:530

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1503-3

Received: 17 April 2015

Accepted: 21 September 2015

Published: 3 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Recently women’s lung cancer mortality rates have dramatically increased in developed countries, contrasting with a levelling off or decrease among men. Descriptive epidemiological data on primary lung cancer in women is scarce in Morocco. The aim of this study, conducted in the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, was to describe the epidemiological profiling especially for the smoking status, to determine the most frequent type of lung cancer, and to analyse the survival of Moroccan women with lung cancer diagnosis.

Results

We found 101 women among 1680 (male and female) cases of lung cancer. The never-smokers were estimated to 75 %. The proportion of adenocarcinoma among never and passive smokers was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (69.4 versus 30.6 %), while among women who were smokers, the most frequent histological type was SCC (63.6 %). The Cox regression analysis showed that smoking and passive smoking were not significantly associated with survival [HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19] [HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08] respectively. Adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with shorter survival [HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03].

Conclusions

The majority Moroccan women affected by lung cancer have never smoked (75 %). Environmental exposures, genetic predisposition, hormonal factors, and viral infection may all play a role in lung cancer in this category. The relation between histological type and tobacco found in our series concurred with those reported in the literature—adenocarcinoma appears to be the most frequent cell type affecting never and passive smokers. Adenocarcinoma is significantly associated with poorer survival.

Keywords

Lung cancerWomenSurvival

Background

In the United States, lung cancer has been the leading cause of cancer deaths in both men and women. It’s surpassed both breast cancer and colon cancer [1]. Despite the progress made in the last years in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease, men and women die each year from lung cancer. In recent years, lung cancer mortality rates in women have dramatically increased in developed countries, contrasting with a levelling off or decrease among men [2]. In women, this dramatic increase can be explained by multiple factors. The primary cause remains tobacco, which has rapidly gained social acceptance among women after World War II [3]. In contrast, the decrease of cancer mortality in men is probably attributable to the decrease in smoking rates that began earlier in men than in women [3].

According to the Moroccan registry of cancer of Rabat of 2005, lung cancer is the leading cancer in men and comes at the eleventh place in women [ 4 ]. In Morocco, a study conducted by Lalla Salma’s foundation: “Prevention and Treatment of Cancer”, showed that over 15 years the prevalence of active smoking among elderly Moroccans was estimated at 18 %, 31.5 % of which were men and 3.3 % were women. Moreover, 41 % of the population was exposed to passive smoking [5].

Purely descriptive epidemiological data on primary lung cancer in women are scarce in Morocco. The aim of this study, conducted in the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, was to describe the epidemiological profiling, in particular the smoking status, to determine the most frequent type of lung cancer, and to analyse the survival of Moroccan women with lung cancer diagnosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed enrolling 1680 cases of lung cancer, 101 (6 %) were women diagnosed between the period of January 2004 and December 2008 at the National Institute of Oncology. All these incident cases were within the respective time period.

The study respected the ethical rules of medical research involving human subjects as stipulated by the World Medical Association in the Declaration of Helsinki. The local ethical committee of the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat also approved this study; with the consentment of patients or their families.

The hospital charts, including medical history, were reviewed and the following information was collected: age at diagnosis, smoking status, histology, stage, presenting symptoms, investigations, treatment (surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or no treatment) and survival.

All diagnosis were proved by anatomopathologic analysis of biopsy specimen. Non small cell lung cancer was divided into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma.

The descriptive analysis was made by Statistical Package for the Social Science version 13.0 (SPSS). The progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the first documented disease progression or death from any cause. For PFS, Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed and compared by using a long-rank test. Descriptive statistics with 95 % of confidence interval were calculated according to standard procedure.

Results

We found 101 women among 1680 cases of lung cancer (versus 1579 men). The mean age was 55.68 years (standard deviation was 13.06).

The percentage of never-smokers was 75 %, 14 % of patients had an environmental tobacco smoke exposure (the husband or another person in the family who smoke) and 11 % reported personal smoking (Table 1). The most frequent mode of presentation was chest pain (60 %), cough (54 %), dyspnea (38 %) and hemoptysis (27 %). Proportion of non small cell lung cancer at stage IV was higher (82 %), 16 % of cases were at stage III and only 2 % were classified as stage II (Table 1).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

 

Cases

Percentage

Smoking status

 Never smokers

76

75

 Passive smokers

14

14

 Smokers

11

11

Symptoms

 Dyspnea

38

38

 Chest pain

61

60

 Cough

55

54

 Hemoptysis

27

27

 Intracranial hypertension

7

6

 Vena cava syndrome

1

1

 Phlebitis of upper limb

1

1

Stage of non small cell lung cancer

 Stage IV

83

82

 Stage III

16

16

 Stage II

2

2

 Stage I

0

0

Lung cancer cell type

 Adenocarcinoma

60

59

 Squamous cell carcinoma

33

32

 Poorly differentiated carcinoma

1

1

 Small cell lung cancer

7

7

Treatment

 Palliative chemotherapy

43

43

 Chemoradiation

7

7

 Radiotherapy

8

8

 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before chemoradiation

2

2

 Best supportive care

35

34

 Brain irradiation

4

4

 Surgery and radiotherapy

2

2

The proportion of adenocarcinoma among never and passive smokers was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma (69.4 versus 30.6 %), while among women who were smokers, the most frequent histological type was squamous cell carcinoma (63.6 %).

The median follow-up was 2 months (1–24 months). The histological diagnosis was based on biopsy during bronchoscopy (80 %), as well as biopsy guided by CT scan (16 %) or thoracotomy (4 %).

Palliative chemotherapy was planned in 43 % of cases, 7 % were treated by chemoradiation, 8 % by radiotherapy, 2 % received a neoadjuvant chemotherapy before chemoradiation and 2 % were treated by surgery and radiotherapy. The best supportive care were proposed in 34 % of cases and 4 % of patients received a whole brain irradiation (Table 1).

For follow-up cases (88 %), the survival rates of cases with no small cell lung cancer at 6 months were at 27.7 %. Cases with squamous cell carcinoma had higher survival rates than the ones with adenocarcinoma (44.4 versus 25 %; p = 0.01), but we had no significant difference in progression free survival at 6 months between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (20 versus 25 %; p = 0.81) (Figs. 1, 2). In cases with small cell lung cancer, the survival rate at 6 months was 0 %. 13 cases were lost to follow-up.
Fig. 1

Time to death, survival curve in terms of histological type

Fig. 2

Time to progression, survival curve in terms of histological type

The Cox regression analysis showed that smoking and passive smoking were not significantly associated with survival [HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19] [HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08] respectively.

Adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with poorer survival [HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03], brain metastasis was not significantly associated with survival [HR: 1.01 (95 % CI 0.53, 1.93); p = 0.97].

Subgroup analysis (85 patients who were never or passive smokers) showed that there was no significant difference in survival at 6 months between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (35 versus 20 %; p = 0.08) (Table 2).
Table 2

Subgroups analysis

Adenocarcinoma

Associated with survival

[HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03]

Smoking

Not associated with survival

[HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19]

Passive smoking

Not associated with survival

[HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08]

Brain metastasis

Not associated with survival

[HR: 1.01 (95 % CI 0.53, 1.93); p = 0.97]

90.9 % (10 patients) of active smoking patients died, and one patient (accounting for 9.09 %) was lost to follow. 85 % (12 patients) of passive smoking patients died and 14.28 % (2 patients) were lost to follow.

Discussion

The mean age was 55.68 years (standard deviation was 13.06). Our patients developed the disease at an earlier age than other women in other studies [ 6, 7 ].

In our study, the percentage of never-smokers was 75 %. 14 % of patients had an environmental tobacco smoke exposure (the husband or another person in the family who smoke) and 11 % were reported personal smoking. In the majority of American and European reviews, most of the patients were current or ex-smokers [79]. Recently, approximately 23.1 % of men and 18.3 % of women in the United States have been cigarette smokers so far [10].

Tobacco does not explain all the women cases with lung cancer, because in this study, 75 % of patients were never smokers. Multiple factors such as environmental exposures, genetic mutations, hormonal factors, and some infections have also been implicated in the development of lung cancer in women who have never smoked [1]. A possible role of circulating steroid hormones particularly of oestrogens, in the etiology of lung cancer has been hypothesized [11]. It should be noted that oestrogen receptors have been detected on cancerous lung cells and estrogens induce the differentiation and maturation of the foetal lung [1113]. Different studies have suggested that there is a potential protective effect of increased or prolonged estrogen exposure, others have found the opposite [14, 15].

Furthermore, a large meta-analysis reported a 24.5 % worldwide incidence of HPV in lung cancer, particularly in China [16] and recently, many Asian studies indicate that longer telomere length may increase lung cancer risk [17].

Studies evaluating gene environment interactions may provide important insights into carcinogenesis pathways of lung cancer in never smokers.

In European and American series, most cases of non-small cell lung cancer were diagnosed at a relatively advanced stage according to the TNM classification system [6]. In our population, proportion of non small cell lung cancer at stage IV was higher (82 %), 16 % of cases were at stage III and only 2 % were at stage II. This high percentage can be explained by the delay of diagnosis.

At the end of 1960s, changes in the frequency of different histological subtypes of lung cancer have been observed worldwide, with an increasing proportion of adenocarcinoma and a declining proportion of squamous cell carcinoma [18]. In our study, the proportion of adenocarcinoma among never and passive smokers was higher than that of squamous cell carcinoma (69.4 versus 30.6 %), while among women who were smokers, the most frequent histological type was squamous cell carcinoma (63.6 %). These results are almost similar to those reported in other studies. Adenocarcinoma represented 68.1 % in the Mayo Clinic’ study, 71 % in the Bennet’s series and 43.4 % in the Grivaux study [6, 9, 19].

Moreover, women’s 5-year relative survival rates have improved across nearly all stages with similar histologies, the benefit was more important in those with adenocarcinoma [20, 21]. In this study, adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with poorer survival [HR: 1.73 (95 % CI 1.05, 2.85); p = 0.03], while in a Radzikowska study published in Annals of Oncology 2002, the squamous cell carcinoma was a negative predictor of survival in univariate analysis (p = 0.008), but this result was no significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.29) [7].

Lung cancer survival rates for non smokers have improved compared with those of smokers [22]. In this series, the Cox regression analysis showed that smoking and passive smoking were not significantly associated with survival [HR: 0.62 (95 % CI 0.31, 1.30); p = 0.19] [HR: 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29, 1.08); p = 0.08] respectively. Even though HR are neither statistically significant for smoking nor passive smoking, HR estimates seem to show a protective effect for tobacco smoking, which is highly unlikely. This may indicate some bias or confounding within the study population. However, the data does not allow additional analysis to understand these estimates.

This study had potential limitations, one of which was the retrospective nature of the analysis. Definitely, a case control study with healthy controls would have been methodologically more powerful.

Conclusions

Many Moroccan women affected by lung cancer have never smoked (75 %). The relationships between histological type and tobacco found in our series are in agreement with those reported in the literature: adenocarcinoma appears to be the most frequent cell type among never and passive smokers. Furthermore, adenocarcinoma is significantly associated with poorer survival.

Smoking does not explain all cases of lung cancer. Environmental exposures, genetic predisposition, hormonal factors, and viral infection may all play a role in lung cancer in women.

Abbreviations

HR: 

hazard ratio

CT: 

computed tomography

TNM: 

tumor, nodes and metastasis

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ZFA: collected the data and wrote the article. OS: collected the data. AH: collected the data. RR: performed the statistical analysis. MH: participated in the writing of the article. EH: participated in the writing, validated content and form of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the team of epidemiology unit at the National Institute of Oncology for its help for the extraction of the data especially Samir Belgazar and Hicham Bahri.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology
(2)
Laboratory of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
(3)
Department of medical oncology, National Institute of Oncology

References

  1. Kligerman Seth, White Charles. Epidemiology of lung cancer in women: risk factors, survival, and screening. AJR. 2011;196:287–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rivera MP, Stover DE. Gender and lung cancer. Clin Chest Med. 2004;25:391–400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jemal A, Thun MJ, Ries LA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1672–94.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjaafar N, Tazi MA, Er-Raki A, et al. Moroccan Registry of Cancer. 2005:24–25.Google Scholar
  5. Official website of the Foundation “Lalla Salma/prevention and treatment of cancer”. 2015. http://www.contrelecancer.ma/fr/.
  6. Grivaux M, Breton JL, Bombaron P, Kuntz P, Lebas FX, Mehdaoui A, Herman D, David P, Berruchon J, Delclaux B, Zureik M, Blanchon F. Lung cancer among women in France. Analysis of the 904 French women with lung cancer included in the KBP-2000-CPHG study of the French College of General Hospital-based Pneumologists (CPHG). Lung Cancer. 2004;45:279–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Radzikowska E, Glaz P, Roszkowski K. Lung cancer in women: age, smoking, histology, performance status, stage, initial treatment and survival. Population-based study of 20561 cases. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1087–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rachtan J. Smoking, passive smoking and lung cancer cell types among women in Poland. Lung Cancer. 2002;35:129–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Andrade M, Ebbert JO, Wampfler JA, Miller DL, Marks RS, Croghan GA, Jatoi A, Finke EE, Sellers TA, Yang P. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in women with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2004;43:127–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:e46–215 (Erratum in Circulation 2010; 121:e260).View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dresler CM, Fratelli C, Babb J, Everley L, Evans AA, Clapper ML. Gender differences in genetic susceptibility for lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2000;30:15–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Cagle PT, Mody DR, Schwartz MR. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in bronchogenic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1990;50:6632–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mollerup S, Jorgensen K, Berge G, Haugen A. Expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in human lung tissue and cell lines. Lung Cancer. 2002;37:153–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Weiss JM, Lacey JV Jr, Shu XO, et al. Menstrual and reproductive factors in association with lung cancer in female lifetime nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;168:1319–25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dougherty SM, Mazhawidza W, Bohn AR, et al. Gender difference in the activity but not expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006;13:113–34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein F, Amin Kotb WF, Petersen I. Incidence of human papilloma virus in lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2009;65:13–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Machiela MJ, Hsiung CA, Shu XO, Seow WJ, et al. Genetic variants associated with longer telomere length are associated with increased lung cancer risk among never-smoking women in Asia: a report from the female lung cancer consortium in Asia. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(2):311–9.Google Scholar
  18. Alberg AJ, Ford JG, Samet JM. Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:29S–55S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bennett WP, Alavanja MCR, Blomeke B, Vahakangas KH, Castren K, Welsh JA, Bowman ED, Khan MA, Flieder DB, Harris CC. Environmental tobacco smoke, genetic susceptibility, and risk of lung cancer in never-smoking women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91(23):2009–14.Google Scholar
  20. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, et al, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007. Based on November 2009 SEER data submission. Posted to the SEER Website 2010.
  21. Ries LAG, Young JL, Keel GE, Eisner MP, Lin YD, Horner M-J, editors. SEER survival monograph: cancer survival among adults: U.S. SEER program, 1988–2001: patient and tumor characteristics. NIH Publication no. 07-6215. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
  22. Kligerman S, Abbott G. A radiologic review of the new TNM classification for lung cancer. AJR. 2010;194:562–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zakkouri et al. 2015

Advertisement