Open Access

Helicobacter pylori colonization in Nepal; assessment of prevalence and potential risk factors in a hospital-based patient cohort

  • Shamshul Ansari1Email author,
  • Rajendra Gautam1,
  • Hari Prasad Nepal1,
  • Shankar Nand Subedi2,
  • Sony Shrestha1,
  • Fuleshwar Mandal3,
  • Brihaspati Rimal3 and
  • Muni Raj Chhetri2
BMC Research Notes20169:59

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-1867-z

Received: 5 October 2015

Accepted: 15 January 2016

Published: 2 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Helicobacter pylori, a gram-negative bacterium, can cause gastritis, peptic and duodenal ulcers. It is considered an important public health problem for both developed and developing world. This bacterium is classified as the class 1 carcinogen because it can cause cancer.

Methods

A hospital based study was conducted at Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital (CMCTH) from May to October 2014. Stool samples were collected from the suspected patients and were subjected to detection of the H. pylori stool antigen (HpSAg) following the procedures recommended by the manufacturer. A standard questionnaire on the potential risk factors was also designed and completed.

Result

HpSAg was detected in 16 % of suspected patients. The children up to 10 years of age were found to be highly infected (36 %). The patients living in urban area were found more susceptible to develop H. pylori infection (P < 0.05). Tea drinking and repeated eating habit (more than twice a day) were listed as the important factors that can limit the H. pylori infections significantly (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In this hospital based study, a significant rate of prevalence was evaluated. However, we recommend a community based extensive study to reveal the real scenario of H. pylori infection in Nepalese populations.

Keywords

Colonization HpSAg Helicobactor pylori Nepal Prevalence Risk factors

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), established in 1982 by Robin Warren and Barry Marshall as the causative agent of gastritis and peptic ulcer, is a spiral, Gram-negative, micro-aerophilic bacterium [1, 2]. Before the discovery of Warren and Marshall, the human stomach was believed to be a sterile area but now, H. pylori is recognized as the most common cause of gastritis, which can lead to the development of more severe gastrointestinal complications such as peptic and duodenal ulcers. Because of its causal relationship to gastric adeno-carcinoma, one of the world’s deadliest cancers, the organism is classified as a class 1 carcinogen [3, 4]. Due to its capability to form biofilm and to convert from spiral to a possibly viable but non-cultivable coccoid form, the survival can be favored which can play the major factors in the epidemiology of the bacterium [5, 6].

H. pylori resides in upper gastrointestinal tract of more than 50 % of the world’s population. The incidence of infection is higher in developing countries and decreasing in western countries. H. pylori is helical shape and is thought to have evolved to penetrate the mucous lining of the stomach [7, 8]. The vast majority of infections are asymptomatic but infected individuals often have histological evidence of gastritis [9]. Related gastro-duodenal disorders can be developed in approximately 20 % of persons infected with H. pylori during their lifetime [10]. Although, the H. pylori is a public health problem in both developed and developing countries [8], its annual incidence is more in developing countries in comparison to developed countries [11]. About 50–70 % of H. pylori strains in Western countries carry the genes of cag pathogenicity island (cag PAI) which can increase its pathogenicity [12]. Type IV secretion system expressed by the cag PAI after attachment of H. pylori to stomach epithelial cells, injects the inflammation-inducing agent (peptidoglycan) and cag PAI-encoded protein CagA from their own cell wall into the epithelial cells [13] where it disrupts the cytoskeleton, adherence to adjacent cells, intracellular signaling, cell polarity, and other cellular activities [14].

Childhood and early adult years appear to be the greatest risk age for development of infection [15]. Documented risk factors also include low socioeconomic status, overcrowding, poor sanitation or hygiene, and living in a developing country [8]. Therefore, this study was aimed to document the prevalence of H. pylori colonization and its risk factors in suspected Nepalese population.

Methods

Study design and area

A hospital based study was conducted from May to October 2014 at Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital (CMCTH), a 600 bed tertiary care center in the city of Bharatpur, Chitwan district of central Nepal.

Study population

A total of 100 patients with the clinical features of gastritis and other gastric abnormalities visiting out-patient department during 6 months of study period were enrolled in this study.

Ethical aspects

All the participants were explained about H. pylori infection, pathogenicity, risk factors and importance of the study in local language. Both the verbal and written informed consents were taken from each of the participants (or their parents). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of CMCTH, Bharatpur, Chitwan, Nepal.

Data collection

After obtaining consents, the patients were requested to complete the questionnaire on potential risk factors which included (a) basic socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, ethnicity, number of family members, family education home area); (b) habitual factors (tea drinking habit, level of oral hygiene, type and frequency of food consumption); and (c) any present medical history (gastritis and any gastric abnormality). In addition, instructions were given to the patients for collection of appropriate stool samples.

Exclusion criteria

Patients taking any antimicrobials, proton pump inhibitors or bismuth compounds within 2 weeks were excluded in this study.

Sample collection

Sufficient quantity (1–2 ml or 1–2 g) of stool samples were collected in the morning in a clean and dry specimen collection container to obtain maximum antigens if present in the sample. Care was taken to ensure that the samples were not contaminated with urine. To obtain the best results, the test assay was performed within 6 h of sample collection. In case, when processing was not possible within 6 h, the stool samples were stored at 2–8 °C for 3 days.

Laboratory processing

H. pylori antigen present in stool specimen (HpSAg) was detected by immuno-chromatographic method according to the manufacturer’s instruction. In briefly, for solid specimens, the specimen collection applicator was stabbed randomly into the fecal specimen in at least three different sites to collect approximately 50 mg of feces and then applicator was placed in the specimen collection tube containing the dilution buffer. For liquid specimens, the fecal specimen was aspirated and then two drops of sample was transferred into the specimen collection tube containing the dilution buffer. The screw cap of collection tube was tighten and mixed properly. The mixed preparation was left for 2 min to prepare the sample solution. Two drops of the sample solution was put in the sample well of the cassette. Test result was recorded in 10 min.

Interpretation of test result

Appearance of colored line in the test line region (T) in addition to the colored line in control line region (C) was interpreted as positive result and appearance of colored line only in the control line region (C) and not in test line region (T) was interpreted as negative result.

Performance of the method

H. pylori stool antigen (HpSAg) has been shown to have over 95 % correlation with the reference methods for diagnosing H. pylori infection. HpSAg has >95 % sensitivity, >94 % specificity, and correlation to endoscopy of 95.5 % as claimed by manufacturer. HpSAg is also non-invasive and costs a fraction of what is usually charged for endoscopy.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS-16 version. Association of H. pylori colonization with socio-demographic factors, habitual factors and present medical history were assessed by using Chi square test. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Frequency and distribution

Among a total of 100 patients (60 % males and 40 % females) enrolled in this study, overall prevalence of colonization of H. pylori was found to be 16 % (male-13.3 % and female-20.0 %). Highest number (36.0 %) of the patients was under the age of 10 years followed by 28.0 % from 11 to 20 years and 8.0 % above 60 years. Out of 16 positive cases, 75.0 % were below 10 years and remaining 25.0 % in the age of 21–40 years (Table 1).
Table 1

Age and gender wise distribution of total and positive cases

Age group

Total cases (n = 100)

Positive cases (n = 16)

Male

no.

Female

no.

Male

no. (%)

Female

no. (%)

Up to 10 years

20

16

4

8

11–20 years

20

8

0

0

21–40 years

12

4

4

0

41–60 years

4

8

0

0

More than 60 years

4

4

0

0

Total

60

40

8 (50)

8 (50)

Socio-demographic risk factors and H. pylori colonization

Among the several socio-demographic risk factors assessed in this study, the age up to 20 years, females by gender, people with large family (5–10 members) and education up to primary level were found to have contributions in higher rate of colonization but the association was non-significant (P > 0.05). The urban home area contributed significantly in H. pylori colonization compared to rural home area (P = 0.007) (Table 2).
Table 2

Socio-demographic risk factors

Variable

Total cases

no = 100

Positive cases

no = 16 (%)

χ2 values

P values

Age

  

1.0003

0.317

 Up to 20 years

64

12 (18.7)

  

 Above 20 years

36

4 (11.1)

  

Gender

  

0.7937

0.372

 Male

60

8 (13.3)

  

 Female

40

8 (20.0)

  

Racial ethnicity

  

0.0104

0.918

 Aryan

76

12 (15.8)

  

 Others

24

4 (16.7)

  

No. of family members

  

2.79

0.095

 Up to 4

44

4 (9.0)

  

 5–10

56

12 (21.4)

  

Family education

  

1.785

0.181

 Up to primary

60

12 (20.0)

  

 Above primary

40

4 (10.3)

  

Home area

  

7.059

0.007

 Urban

24

8 (33.3)

  

 Rural

76

8 (10.5)

  

Habitual risk factors and H. pylori colonization

Significant association (P = 0.0078) of H. pylori colonization was found in peoples with no tea drinking habit (33.3 %) and in those consuming meals only for two times a day (33.3 %) (Table 3).
Table 3

Habitual risk factors

Variable

Total cases

no = 100

Positive cases

no = 16 (%)

χ2 values

P values

Tea drinking habit

  

7.05

0.0078

 Yes

76

8 (10.5)

  

 No

24

8 (33.3)

  

Oral hygiene/visiting dentist at least once a year

  

0.085

0.770

 Yes

28

4 (14.3)

  

 No

72

12 (16.7)

  

Type of food consumption

  

3.048

0.080

 Vegetarian

12

4 (33.3)

  

 Non-vegetarian

88

12 (13.6)

  

Frequency of meal consumption per day

  

7.05

0.0078

 Two times

24

8 (33.3)

  

 More than two times

76

8 (10.52)

  

Present medical history and H. pylori colonization

Statistically non-significant association (P > 0.05) was found between H. pylori colonization with potential risk factors like gastritis (16.7 %) and other gastric abnormalities (11.8 %) (Table 4).
Table 4

Present medical history

Variable

Total cases

no = 100

Positive cases

no = 16 (%)

χ2 values

P values

History of gastritis

  

0.085

0.770

 Yes

72

12 (16.7)

  

 No

28

4 (14.3)

  

Any other gastric abnormalities

  

2.836

0.092

 Yes

68

8 (11.8)

  

 No

32

8 (25.0)

  

Discussion

The methods based on the isolation of bacteria are considered as the gold standard method for diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Because of the restriction of invasive procedures in patients such as pediatric group, the detection of bacteria revealed by stool antigen test is gaining popularity as it is less expensive, more patient-friendly than invasive testing and it is the accurate noninvasive diagnostic test that avoid the use of endoscopy in large groups of patients with dyspeptic symptoms, thus the use of noninvasive testing for H. pylori is being strongly recommended [16, 17]. Furthermore, in the case of monitoring the result of the eradicating therapy and for those patients who did not demand the endoscopic diagnosis, the noninvasive tests are recommended as the first diagnostic option [16]. HpSAg is a sensitive and specific noninvasive test in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection and it is also inexpensive as well as easy to perform with high accuracy in patients untreated for H. pylori infection. HpSAg has also shown promising results in adults for the non-invasive diagnosis of gastric infection [18]. However, the method has some drawbacks as the patients may be reluctant to collect stool specimens and the refrigerated stools are more difficult to perform for HpSAg detection.

The varying rate of prevalence, ranging from 5 to 60 %, of H. pylori infection has been documented by several authors [1923]. In this study, we documented the prevalence of 16 % which is in accordance with the reported results of 14.2 % by Portorreal et al. from Brazil [24] and 23.6 % by Ceylan et al. from Turkey [25]. As much as 42.7 % of colonization rate was reported by Rafeey et al. from Iran [26]. The higher colonization rate may be because of selection criteria of patients in which only children were selected and it was found that the children were more colonized than other age group of patients. Early childhood is observed to be associated with H. pylori infection, which is acquired almost always within the first 5 years of life [27] and the colonization rate is higher in children of developing and poor countries in particular than in children of developed countries. The environmental factors of children, such as education level of parents, number of siblings, and economic factors play an important role in H. pylori-associated infections [2830]. Nepal is a developing country and we observed the presence of HpSAg in 75.0 % of individuals below 10 years of age and remaining 25.0 % in the age group of 21–40 years. Similar prevalence (84 %) was also reported in children aged 6–9 years by Mahalanabis et al. from Bangladesh, the other developing country [22].

As reported in most other studies [31, 32], we also found that females were at higher risk for the colonization of H. pylori than males but the association was not significant. The hormonal differences between the two genders have been speculated as the explanatory description for this higher risk in females than males at this moment [33]. Marker of socioeconomic status, particularly education level has been considered as one of the important determinants of H. pylori prevalence in both developed [29] and developing countries [34]. We also found that the large number of family members and lower education level contributed for the colonization but the association was not significant (P > 0.05). Similarly, Rosenstock et al. from Denmark claimed that the short duration of schooling beside low socioeconomic status increases the likelihood of H. pylori infection [29] and similar report of lower education level in colonization of H. pylori was also found by Talaiezadeh et al. from Iran [35].

Nowadays, the rapid change has contributed unprecedented population growth, accompanied by rapid and unplanned urbanization resulting in large increase in urban slums without proper management of water and wastes. The peoples, living in urban slums are migrants from rural areas; lack the immunity to urban diseases posing an excellent environment for communicable diseases to spread [36]. A significantly higher rate of infection in an urban population (78.8 %) than in a rural population (69.2 %), have been reported by Kawasaki et al. from Nepal and Hoang et al. from Viet Nam [37, 38]. Likewise, 25.8 % of urban children infected with H. pylori were also reported by Ceylan et al. from Turkey [25].

Among several habitual risk factors assessed in our study, consumption of tea was found to significantly limit the colonization of H. pylori (P = 0.0078). Nowadays, tea is used as the most popular beverage in the world and its consumption has been reported to lower the rate of H. pylori colonization in vivo and in vitro by several authors [3941]. Tea extracts such as catechins inhibit the growth of several pathogenic bacteria like Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Vibrio spp., Campylobacter jejuni and Plesiomonas shigelloides in vitro [42] and have killing activity to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro [43]. The tea catechins like epigallocatechin gallate, gallocatechin gallate, gallocatechin, and epigallocatechin were found to strongly inhibit urease activity, which leads to the prevention of H. pylori infection [40].

A number of noxious agents provided by diet can contribute synergistically in H. pylori pathogenicity or diet can act as protective agents [44, 45]. In current study, the meal consumption for more than twice a day significantly limited the H. pylori colonization (P = 0.0078). Strict vegetarian diet was observed as the insignificant contributing factor for H. pylori infection as one-third (33.3 %) of strict vegetarians were found to be colonized in this study. Interestingly, more or less equal rate of colonization was observed in peoples who took care of oral hygiene than those who did not.

When the bacterium causes symptoms, they usually have either symptoms of gastritis or peptic ulcer disease but in our study, the gastritis was not found as an aggravating factor as nearly equal rate of H. pylori colonization was observed in patients with gastritis and without gastritis depicting that the development of gastritis can be multi-factorial. However, gastric abnormalities other than gastritis was observed as non-significant (P = 0.092) enhancing factors for H. pylori colonization in this study.

Conclusion

Since our hospital based study indicate 16 % prevalence rate of H. pylori colonization in Nepalese population, we recommend an extensive and community based study to reveal the exact scenario of this infection. Of the various risk factors evaluated to contribute in colonization of H. pylori in this study the patients who live in urban area, have no tea drinking habit and have lesser frequency of meals, were found to be more susceptible to harbor the organism. We also conclude that the data of this study will be supportive for extensive study on community level in the future as this report is one of the rare studies conducted so far on H. pylori in Nepal.

Abbreviations

CMCTH: 

Chitwan medical college teaching hospital

H. pylori

Helicobacter pylori

HpSAg: 

Helicobacter pylori stool antigen

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SA and RG conceived the design of the study. SA, RG, SS and HPN prepared the questionnaire. SA and SS received the collected specimens and transported to the laboratory. SA, SS, FM and BR processed the specimens. SA, RG, HPN, SNS and MRC analyzed the results. SA prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. SA, SNS, FM and BR searched the scientific literatures. SA and SNS performed the statistical analysis of the results. SA, RG, HPN, SNS prepared the final draft of manuscript and MRC guided the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to the subjects participating in this study. The authors also thank the laboratory staffs of the Microbiology Department of Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital (CMCTH) for their kind support in the collection of data and performing the necessary laboratory tests during the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests concerning the information reported in this paper.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, Chitwan Medical College
(2)
School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Chitwan Medical College
(3)
Department of Biochemistry, Chitwan Medical College

References

  1. Warren JR, Marshall B. Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active chronic gastritis. Lancet. 1983;321:1273–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1984;1:1311–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Infection with Helicobacter pylori. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1994;61:177–240.Google Scholar
  4. Peter S, Beglinger C. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: the causal relationship. Digestion. 2007;75:25–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stark RM, Gerwig GJ, Pitman RS, Potts LF, Williams NA, Greenman J, et al. Biofilm formation by Helicobacter pylori. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1999;28(2):121–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan WY, Hui PK, Leung KM, Chow J, Kwok F, Ng CS. Coccoid forms of Helicobacter pylori in the human stomach. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994;102(4):503–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yamaoka Y. Helicobacter pylori: molecular genetics and cellular biology. Caister Academic Press; 2008. ISBN 1-904455-31-X.Google Scholar
  8. Brown LM. Helicobacter pylori: epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(2):283–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Helicobacter pylori: disease burden. URL: http://www.who.int/vaccine,research/disease/soa,bacterial/en/index1.html.
  10. Lacy BE, Rosemore J. Helicobacter pylori: ulcers and more: the beginning of an era. J Nutr. 2001;131:2789–93.Google Scholar
  11. Gold BD. Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2001;31:247–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Peek RM, Crabtree JE. Helicobacter infection and gastric neoplasia. J Pathol. 2006;208(2):233–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Viala J, Chaput C, Boneca IG, Cardona A, Girardin SE, Moran AP, et al. Nod 1 responds to peptidoglycan delivered by the Helicobacter pylori cag pathogenicity island. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(11):1166–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Backert S, Selbach M. Role of type IV secretion in Helicobacter pylori pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(8):1573–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gersten O, Wilmoth JR. The cancer transition in Japan since 1951. Demogr Res. 2002;7(5):271–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. The European Helicobacter pylori study group (EHPSG). Current European concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection—The Maastricht Consensus. Gut. 1997;41:8–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Briggs AH, Sulpher MJ, Logan RP, Aldous J, Ramsay ME, Baron JH. Cost-effectiveness of screening for Helicobacter pylori in management of dyspeptic patients under 45 years of age. British Med J. 1996;312(7042):1321–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Collett JA, Burt MJ, Frampton CM, Yeo KH, Chapman TM, Buttimore RC, et al. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori in the adult population of Christchurch: risk factors and relationship to dyspeptic symptoms and iron studies. N Z Med J. 1999;112:292–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer B, Werth B, Beglinger C, Dill S, Drewe J, Vischer WA, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy people: a dynamic process? Gut. 1991;32:347–50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Biselli R, Fortini M, Matricardi PM, Stroffolini T, D’Ameli R. Incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a cohort of Italian military students. Infection. 1999;27:187–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yamashita Y, Fujisawa T, Kimura A, Kato H. Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori infection in children: a serologic study of the Kyushu region in Japan. Pediatr Int. 2001;43:4–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahalanabis D, Rahman MM, Sarker SA, Bardhan PK, Hildebrand P, Beglinger C, Gyr K. Helicobacter pylori infection in the young in Bangladesh: prevalence, socioeconomic and nutritional aspects. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(4):894–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell HM, Bohane TD, Tobias V, Bullpitt P, Daskalospoulos G, Carrick J, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in children: potential clues to pathogenesis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1993;16(2):120–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Portorreal AC, Machado RS, Vigliar R, Kawakami E. Low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection evaluated by stool antigen test in preschool and school children. Brazilian J Microbiol. 2008;39:664–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ceylan A, Kırımi E, Tuncer O, Türkdoğan K, Arıyuca S, Ceylan N. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in children and their family members in a district in Turkey. J Health Pop Nutr. 2007;25(4):422–7.Google Scholar
  26. Rafeey M, Nikvash S. Detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples for diagnosis of infection in children. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 2007;13(5):167–72.Google Scholar
  27. Suerbaum S, Michetti P. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1175–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor DN, Blaser MJ. The epidemology of Helicobacter pylori infection. Epidemiol Rev. 1991;13:42–59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Torres J, Leal-Herrera Y, Perez-Perez G, Gomez A, Camorlinga-Ponce M, Cedillo-Rivera R, et al. A community-based sero-epidemiologic study of Helicobacter pylori infection in Mexico. J Infect Dis. 1998;178(4):1089–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Taylor DN. Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori infection in childhood (invited commentary). Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:225–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang DH, Zhou LY, Lin SR, Ding SG, Huang YH, Gu F, et al. Recent changes in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among children and adults in high or low-incidence regions of gastric cancer in China. Chin Med J. 2009;122(15):1759–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhu Y, Zhou X, Wu J, Su J, Zhang G. Risk factors and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in persistent high incidence area of gastric carcinoma in Yangzhong city. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:481365.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Borg J, Melander O, Johansson L, Uvnas-Moberg K, Rehfeld JF, Ohlsson B. Gastroparesis is associated with oxytocin deficiency, oesophageal dysmotility with hyperCCKemia, and autonomic neuropathy with hypergastrinemia. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009;9:17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenstock SJ, Andersen LP, Rosenstock CV, Bonnevie O, Jørgensen T. Socioeconomic factors in Helicobacter pylori infection among Danish adults. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1539–44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Talaaizadeh AH, Borhani M, Moosavian M, Rafiei A, Neisi AK, Hajiani E, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection detected by stool antigen test in Khuzestan province, south-west of Iran from September to October 2009: a population based study Jundishapur. J Microbiol. 2013;6(2):100–4.Google Scholar
  36. World Health Organization report on global surveillance of epidemic-prone infectious diseases-introduction. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/introduction/en/index5.Html.
  37. Kawasaki M, Kawasaki T, Ogaki T, Itoh K, Kobayashi S, Yoshimizu Y, et al. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Nepal: low prevalence in an isolated rural village. Eur J Gastroenterol. 1998;10(1):47–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoang TT, Bengtsson C, Phung DC, Sorberg M, Granstrom M. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in urban and rural Vietnam. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:81–5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stoicov C, Saffari R, Houghton J. Green tea inhibits Helicobacter growth in vivo and in vitro. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;33(5):473–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Matsubara S, Shibata H, Ishikawa F, Yokokura T, Takahashi M, Sugimura T, Wakabayashi K. Suppression of Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis by green tea extract in Mongolian gerbils. Biochemical Biophysical Res Commun. 2003;310(3):715–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Mabe K, Yamada M, Oguni I, Takahashi T. In vitro and in vivo activities of tea catechins against Helicobacter pylori. Antimicrob Agents Chemothe. 1999;43(7):1788–91.Google Scholar
  42. Toda M, Okubo S, Ohnishi R, Shimamura T. Antibacterial and bactericidal activities of Japanese green tea. Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi. 1989;44:669–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Toda M, Okubo S, Hara Y, Shimamura T. Antibacterial and bactericidal activities of tea extracts and catechins against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi. 1991;46:839–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yamaguchi N, Kakizoe T. Synergistic interaction between Helicobacter pylori gastritis and diet in gastric cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(2):88–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jansen MCJF, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Rasanen L, Fidanza F, Menotti A, Nissinen A, et al. Consumption of plant foods and stomach cancer mortality in the seven countries study. Is grain consumption a risk factor? Nutr Cancer. 1999;34(1):49–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ansari et al. 2016

Advertisement