Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Depiction of dentatorubrothalamic tract fibers in patients with Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis in deep brain stimulation

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Research Notes20169:345

  • Received: 30 January 2016
  • Accepted: 13 July 2016
  • Published:



We wanted to depict fibers of the dentatorubrothalamic tract in patients with Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis in order to use this knowledge for clinical routine and to show its relation to the corticospinal tract for deep brain stimulation. Fibers of these white matter tracts were depicted between February 2014 and February 2015 in nine patients of all ages. There were seven men and two women. The mean age was 60 years. We used a 3DT1 sequence for the navigation. Additional scanning time was less than 9 min. Both tracts were portrayed in all patients.


We were able to successfully portray these white matter tracts in all patients. We visualized the medial and lateral parts of the corticospinal tract by using a region of interest which covered the whole motor cortex. Furthermore we segmented the motor cortex. The fibers ran from this area of the brain through the internal capsule and they could be followed until their entry in the brainstem. The dentatorubrothalamic tract was smaller than the corticospinal tract. It was situated medio-posteriorly of the corticospinal tract. After decussation to the contralateral red nucleus it was localised next to the midline when it entered the motor cortex. From the thalamus on, it proceeds medially and posteriorly of the corticospinal tract further to the motor cortex. Depiction of the whole tract is essential for the differentiation of the dentatorubrothalamic tract with the corticospinal tract.


The depiction of the dentatorubrothalamic tract might be useful for neurosurgeons when deep brain stimulation is planned. Knowing its relation to other white matter tracts can help physicians like neurosurgeons or neurologists avoid side effects and deal with patients with DBS. The position of the electrode might be crucial for a satisfactory outcome.


  • Deep brain stimulation
  • White matter
  • Neurosurgery
  • White matter tract
  • Neurodegenerative disease


PD is a neurodegenerative disease associated with neuropsychiatric illness [1]. It is characterized by the death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra in pars compacta [13]. Patients present in particular with tremor, rigidity and postural instability [4, 5]. Furthermore patients may suffer from nonmotor disorders like depression, apathy, psychotic symptoms or sleep disorders [4, 6]. These symptoms might dramatically affect the quality of life not only of the patients but also of their families. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical procedure which is used in the management of PD in patients with inadequate control of symptoms or with significant side effects from Levodopa [7, 8]. It delivers electrical pulses which are variable in amplitude, pulse width, and frequency, through permanently implanted electrodes [9, 10]. The importance of electrical current for signal transduction was already known to Galvani in the eighteenth century [7]. It took, however, more than two centuries until we were able to use it in the form of DBS for patients with PD. By means of DBS we are able to inhibit or activate a target in the brain [7]. Possible therapeutic targets include the subthalamic nucleus, the globus pallidus internus or the ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus [7]. Most targets aim the improvement of motor symptoms of PD and the DBS is used for tremor of various origins [11] but there is still work necessary to be done for the correction of nonmotor symptoms of PD [7, 12]. Apart from that there still seems to be no concensus between neurosurgeons about the best target in cases of tremor dominant PD with some of them advocating the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus and others preferring the subthalamic nucleus.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a technique that enables neurosurgeons to portray white matter tracts (WMT) in vivo in healthy and non-healthy patients [13]. It can be used in a variety of diseases among others tumours, multiple sclerosis or neurodegenerative diseases like PD [14]. Furthermore DTI can reveal previously unexplained side effects of DBS towards distinct fiber tracts [11, 15]. Some of the WMT portrayed by the DTI include the visual pathway, corticospinal tract (CST) or the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRT). The latter is the main fiber bundle that forms the superior cerebellar peduncle [11, 16]. Affection of this WMT might be the reason for tremor control in patients with PD in the posterior subthalamic region [11, 17]. The aim of our study was to visualize fibers of the DRT before surgery in patients with PD for everyday routine. Furthermore we deem necessary to know the relation between this WMT and the CST. The DRT seems to be a target point for patients who will undergo a DBS. Depending on the position of the electrode in the DRT, we might cause unwanted side effects due to the proximity of this WMT to the CST. Therefore, we portrayed both tracts in all our patients in order to have a better understanding of these two WMT.


We included in our study between February 2014 and February 2015 nine consecutive patients. These were seven men and two women. There was no limit of age. The mean age was 60 years. There were eight patients suffering from PD and one patient suffering from MS. The MRI was performed in order to prepare an eventual DBS. An MRI-scan was acquired on a 3T General Electric SignaHDxt Scanner preoperatively. We performed a 3DT1-sequence to navigate. Furthermore T2-and DTI-sequences were carried out. The FOV was 200 × 200 mm2, slice thickness 2 mm, and the acquisition matrix of 96 × 96 yielding nearly isotropic voxels of 2 × 2 × 2 mm. 3T-MRI was performed strictly axial using 32 gradient directions and one b0-image. b value was 800 s/mm2. We used EchoPlanar-Imaging (EPI) and ASSET parallel imaging with an acceleration factor of 2. The additional scanning time was less than 9 min. One day after surgery a computed tomography of the brain was performed. We processed the DTI data on a standard commercial workstation (StealthViz, Medtronic Inc., USA). This software uses a straightforward fiber tracking approach known as fiber assignment by continuous tracking (FACT). Parameters for the tractographies were a maximum angle of 45° for the CST and 60° for the DRT, an FA Start Value of 0.10 and an ADC Stop Value of 0.20. First we segmented the motor cortex (MC) on both cerebral hemispheres. Then we tracked the CST from this area. A region of interest (ROI) was put in the brain stem. The fibers were tracked also from the brain stem to the MC. It is possible to use a ROI in place of the segmented area of the MC. For the DRT we acted in a similar way. The fibers were tracked from the dentate nucleus (DN) of the cerebellum to the red nucleus of the contralateral hemisphere and later to the MC. Therefore, we used two ROI. One of them was put in the DN of the cerebellum and the other one in the contralateral red nucleus. As mentioned before it is possible to use another ROI instead of the segmented area of the MC. In that case this white matter tract would be portrayed using three ROI. The ROI measured approximately 1 cm in the red nucleus and DN of the cerebellum whereas the ROI for the MC measured approximately the size of the MC.


Using DTI we were able to successfully portray fibers of two main WMT, the CST and the DRT, in all our patients. We visualized the medial and lateral parts of the CST by using a ROI which covered the whole MC. A segmentation of the MC was performed in order to enhance the accuracy. The fibers ran from this area of the brain through the internal capsule and they could be followed until their entry in the brainstem. Our main interest was, however, the portrayal of the DRT. This WMT begins in the DN of the cerebellum. The fibers arise from the DN dorsolaterally of the fourth ventricle and project through the superior cerebellar peduncle (Figs. 1, 3). They enter into the contralateral red nucleus after leaving the pons behind. The fibers proceed further to the thalamus, in the ventral anterior and ventral lateral nuclei. From this point they proceed their way to the medial part of the MC next to the midline (Figs. 4, 5). This doesn’t mean there is one axon arising from one point and finishing in another one. It is rather a bundle of fibers. The DRT traverses through his course the posterior subthalamic nucleus, zona incerta and the thalamus. It is situated medially of the CST in his course from the cerebellum to the thalamus (Figs. 2, 5). From the thalamus on, it proceeds medially and posteriorly of the CST further to the MC. From our point of view this is a very important finding. Fibertracking from the MC in direction of the brainstem e.g. in case of the CST might include fibers of the DRT too. It would be difficult for physicians to distinguish between these two tracts. We have to follow the DRT from the cerebellum up to the MC in order to be able to differentiate between DRT and CST. The start of the DRT in the cerebellum and the further course of the CST through the brainstem give us the possibility of differentiation between the two. The fibers were tracked from the thalamus to the MC. We segmented the MC before this step. It is possible to use a ROI instead of the segmented area. From our point of view we can delineate the MC better if we segment it. The differentiation between this tract and other WMTs is possible if we follow the fibers in their whole course from the DN in the cerebellum. Other thalamocortical fibers do not have their starting point there. We think that fibers which run through these points belong to the DRT and not to another tract. In our study the results of these WMT were anatomically reproducible. The relation between these two WMT did not differ from one patient to another. We have to say, however, that the density of the fibers was not the same in all our patients. Some of the patients presented with a much higher density of fibers like the patient in Fig. 3 whereas other patients presented thinner WMTs like the patient in Fig. 4.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

T1-image, anterior view, Parkinson’s disease. Blue left corticospinal tract, Yellow right corticospinal tract, Gold left dentatorubrothalamic tract, Bright purple right dentatorubrothalamic tract

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

T1-image, anterior view, multiple sclerosis. Blue left corticospinal tract, Yellow right corticospinal tract, Gold left dentatorubrothalamic tract, Bright purple right dentatorubrothalamic tract

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

T1-image, semilateral view from left, Parkinson’s disease. Blue left corticospinal tract, Yellow right corticospinal tract, Gold left dentatorubrothalamic tract, Bright purple right dentatorubrothalamic tract

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

T1-image, semilateral view from right, Parkinson’s disease. Blue left corticospinal tract, Yellow right corticospinal tract, Gold left dentatorubrothalamic tract, Bright purple right dentatorubrothalamic tract



DTI is a technique which can visualize WMT in vivo in healthy and non healthy patients by measuring anisotropic water diffusion of the brain [1820]. This technique has been used increasingly in recent years by neurosurgeons to identify WMT and deal with tumours in eloquent areas of the brain in order to reduce postoperative morbidity [21]. Some of these WMT include the visual pathway, the arcuate fasciculus or the CST. Additionally DTI might be a useful tool in patients with PD. It has a good sensitivity and specificity to differentiate between healthy subjects and de novo patients [3, 22].


The portrayal of other WMT like the DRT might be also of considerable importance for neurosurgeons during DBS in patients with PD for tremor control. This tract has its starting point in the cerebellum in the DN, then it continues to the contralateral red nucleus and ventral anterolateral nuclei of thalamus from where the fibers proceed to the MC [23]. This WMT possesses not only motoric but also linguistic and cognitive functions [24]. Injury of this tract might lead to movement disorders like ataxia or tremor [2527]. It has been suggested that damage in the white matter integrity in the posterior portion might be responsible for motor symptoms while alterations in the ventral part might be related to communication behaviour in patients with autism [23].

DRT-anatomy and review of the literature

There have been two publications which suggest that tremor control with low voltages in the posterior subthalamic region might be attributed to stimulation of the DRT [11, 28]. As this region is a station of the DRT in his course to the thalamus, this might be very well possible. Coenen et al. [11] have provided a case where stimulation of this tract was directly involved in tremor reduction. Furthermore they emphasize that we are actually dealing with one fiber structure during DBS and this is the DRT [29]. A stimulation might not be sufficient if it doesn’t affect enough fibers of DRT. If it is far anterior tremor reduction might not be satisfactory and if it is far posterior we might stimulate the medial lemniscus [29]. By knowing the exact position of the electrode and its angle to the stimulated cerebral structure we might be able to predict the necessary voltages needed for adequate results. Depending on the stimulated part of DRT we might achieve different results in tremor control and avoid side effects. That means we might be able to increase the voltage more if the electrode is far enough of certain structures like the CST. We have to be aware of the fact that the CST runs laterally of the DRT (Fig. 2).

DRT-stimulation site

Depending on the position of the electrode the CST might be affected by a high voltage if the electrode is situated in the lateral portion of the DRT or by the electrode itself if this one is localized outside the DRT. There have been suggestions that the optimal position is inside in the anterior third of the DRT [29]. By means of DTI, it might be, however, difficult to portray WMT completely and in that case it might be difficult to determine the anterior third of the DRT exactly. Another study, however, published by another group suggests that tremor reduction is better achieved if we stimulate directly inside the DRT [30]. Another option seems to be the stimulation in the quadrant posterior, inferior and lateral to it [30]. Although the DRT seems to be an important structure in DBS we have to emphasize the fact that the optimal electrode placement is not so clear. However, we deem necessary to emphasize the fact that the DRT proceeds next to the CST after leaving the thalamus (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). A stimulation in that area might have eventual unintended side effects in the patients. We propose every stimulation should occur caudally to this cerebral area. Therefore, from our point of view, a depiction of both tracts, the DRT and CST, before DBS is important. If the electric field influences neighbouring regions like the CST, it might compromise our results. Our results show that the CST is localized laterally to the fibers of DRT (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Therefore, we need to be very cautious when we stimulate laterally in order to avoid unwanted side effects. The accurate knowledge of the electrode placement after DBS might give additional information of tremor control in patients with PD or other forms of tremor. Another important issue which we need to mention is that we might not be able to stimulate the DRT everywhere in his course e.g. in the DN or red nucleus and achieve the same results as when we stimulate the subthalamic nucleus. By knowing the exact position of the electrode and its angle to the stimulated cerebral structure we might be able to predict the necessary voltages needed for adequate results. Depending on the stimulated part of DRT we might achieve different results in tremor control and avoid side effects. That means we might be able to increase the voltage more if the electrode is far enough of certain structures like the CST. A recently published study, however, has revealed that stimulation closer to the DRT doesn’t provide better results than more distant stimulation [30]. However, even if the results don’t seem to be better we should be carefully taking into account the volume of tissue activated in order to avoid side effects [31]. Besides to its motoric functions this WMT possesses linguistic and cognitive functions too [24]. An injury of DRT leads to cognitive and behavioural deficits, speech impairment or emotional lability [24]. Patients with PD develop these symptoms in the course of their disease, therefore a degeneration of this tract might explain this phenomenon. Further work needs to be done in order to deal with these symptoms.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

T1-image, anterior view, Parkinson’s disease. Blue left corticospinal tract, Yellow right corticospinal tract, Gold left dentatorubrothalamic tract, Bright purple right dentatorubrothalamic tract

PD affects the thalamus

Postmortem studies show that PD affects the thalamus in its own way [3]. It can provoke a degeneration or disruption of the microstructural integrity of the thalamus [3, 32, 33]. As we mentioned above the thalamus is a region which is crossed by the DRT. A degeneration or disruption of this region might induce a degeneration or disruption of this WMT and ultimately be one of the reasons for PD. It seems not to be known how many fibers of this tract need to be stimulated in order to have satisfactory results [29]. However, this might be dependent on the progress of the disease and the grade of fiber degeneration.


DTI was used for the visualization of DRT and CST. It has, however, some limitations. It is difficult to determine with accuracy the starting point and ending point of the fibers [34, 35]. The resolution of crossing or kissing fibers remains also a problem which should be taken into account [34, 35]. Nevertheless, the portrayal of these tracts was reproducible in nine different patients on different times. The DRT were all similar in their form and their relation to the CST, so we believe that the accuracy of our results remains high.

Limitations of the study

The authors are aware of the limitations of the current study. On one hand we are portraying here a small number of patients and on the other hand there is no control group. However, we have to say that, when compared to the existing literature, we found that our results concerning the depiction of the DRT are in accordance with the results of other authors who have worked in this direction. Coenen et al. [17] confirm that the DRT traverses the thalamus, zona incerta and the STN. They add that this WMT is located in the proximity of the CST. In our cases Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 we localised the DRT medially to the CST. Other studies name the superior cerebellar peduncle, the DN and the thalamus as structures traversed by the DRT [25]. We can confirm that. Despite the small group of patients our results are in accordance with the existing literature.

On the other hand, further limitations concern the portrayal of WMT by means of DTI, e.g. the portrayal of crossing or kissing fibers might be difficult and the fact that the starting and ending point of the WMT cannot be visualized correctly [34, 35]. When two WMT are running in the proximity of each other then DTI will have to distinguish which fibers belong to one tract and which fibers belong to the other. Therefore, there is a risk that fibers of the smaller tract might be included to the fibers of the other one. Making the difference between the two might be difficult for physicians. In our case we have fibers of the DRT and CST. In the Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 we see different tracts by using different colours, however, we have to take into account that some fibers might be attributed to the bigger tract due to the limitation mentioned above. Patient motion might be another limitation of the DTI [35]. Diffusion MRI is very sensitive to motion [35]. Therefore, DTI might be difficult in patients suffering from PD.


Our study shows that portrayal of DRT fibers is possible for everyday routine use with a little amount of time. All the results are easily reproducible. From our point of view it is necessary to visualize the CST along with the DRT before surgery in order to have a better idea about the relation between these two WMT which are situated very close to each other in order to avoid unwanted side effects postoperatively (Fig. 5). Identification of DRT can be useful for physicians in controlling tremor.



apparent diffusion coefficient


array spatial sensitivity encoding technique


corticospinal tract


deep brain stimulation


dentate nucleus


dentatorubrothalamic tract


diffusion tensor imaging


echo planar imaging


fractional anisotropy


fiber assignment by continuous tracking


field of view


motor cortex


magnetic resonance imaging


multiple sclerosis


Parkinson’s disease


region of interest


white matter tracts


Authors’ contributions

AH wrote the article, he took the patients in charge, he performed the DTI. AH revised the manuscript, she was in charge of literature control. GD was in charge of the MRI, he gave substantial information of the anatomical localizations of the structures, he revised the manuscript. HB-S revised the manuscript. FH revised the manuscript, he made the corrections, he operated the patients. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We would like to thank the Department of Neuroradiology of the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


All patients gave their consent to participate in the study.

Ethic approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethic committee of the Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg. The patients gave their consent to participate in this study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

National Service of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Rue Barblé 25, 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Internal Medicine Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Service of Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg


  1. Keeney PM, Xie J. Capaldi RA Parkinson’s disease brain mitochondrial complex I has oxidatively damaged subunits and is functionally impaired and misassembled. J Neurosci. 2006;26(19):5256–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jennings D, Siderowf A, Stern M, Seibyl J, Eberly S, Oakes D, et al. Imaging prodromal Parkinson disease: the Parkinson associated risk syndrome study. Neurology. 2014;83(19):1739–46.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Planetta PJ, Schulze ET, Geary EK, Corcos DM, Goldman JG, Little DM, et al. Thalamic projection fiber integrity in de novo Parkinson disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(1):74–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Tremblay C, Achim AM, Macoir J, Monetta L. The heterogeneity of cognitive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(11):126572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Taylor AE, Saint-Cyr JA, Lang AE. Frontal lobe dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. The cortical focus of neostriatal outflow. Brain. 1986;109(Pt 5):845–83.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Martínez-Horta S, Riba J, de Bobadilla RF, Pagonabarraga J, Pascual-Sedano B, Antonijoan RM, et al. Apathy in Parkinson’s disease: neurophysiological evidence of impaired incentive processing. J Neurosci. 2014;34(17):5918–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Karas PJ, Mikell CB, Christian E, Liker MA, Sheth SA. Deep brain stimulation: a mechanistic and clinical update. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(5):E1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Okun MS. Deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(16):1529–38.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mädler B, Coenen VA. Explaining clinical effects of deep brain stimulation through simplified target-specific modeling of the volume of activated tissue. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(6):1072–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Perlmutter JS, Mink JW. Deep brain stimulation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:229–57.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Coenen VA, Mädler B, Schiffbauer H, Urbach H, Allert N. Individual fiber anatomy of the subthalamic region revealed with diffusion tensor imaging: a concept to identify the deep brain stimulation target for tremor suppression. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(4):1069–75 (discussion 1075–6).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fasano A, Daniele A, Albanese A. Treatment of motor and non-motor features of Parkinson’s disease with deep brain stimulation. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(5):429–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yamamoto A, Miki Y, Urayama S, Fushimi Y, Okada T, Hanakawa T, et al. Diffusion tensor fiber tractography of the optic radiation: analysis with 6-, 12-, 40-, and 81-directional motion-probing gradients, a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(1):92–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nucifora PG, Verma R, Lee SK, Melhem ER. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging and tractography: exploring brain microstructure and connectivity. Radiology. 2007;245(2):367–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Coenen VA, Honey CR, Hurwitz T, Rahman AA, McMaster J, Bürgel U, et al. Medial forebrain bundle stimulation as a pathophysiological mechanism for hypomania in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(6):1106–14 (discussion 1114–5).PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Akakin A, Peris-Celda M, Kilic T, Seker A, Gutierrez-Martin A, Rhoton A Jr. The dentate nucleus and its projection system in the human cerebellum: the dentate nucleus microsurgical anatomical study. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(4):401–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Coenen VA, Allert N, Mädler B. A role of diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking in deep brain stimulation surgery: DBS of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (drt) for the treatment of therapy-refractory tremor. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011;153(8):1579–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Martino J, da Silva-Freitas R, Caballero H, Marco de Lucas E, García-Porrero JA, Vázquez-Barquero A. Fiber dissection and diffusion tensor imaging tractography study of the temporoparietal fiber intersection area. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(1 Suppl Operative):87–97 (discussion 97–8).Google Scholar
  19. Cirillo M, Esposito F, Tedeschi G, Caiazzo G, Sagnelli A, Piccirillo G, et al. Widespread microstructural white matter involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a whole-brain DTI study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(6):1102–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. 1996. J Magn Reson. 2011;213(2):560–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Pathak S, Engh J, Verstynen T, Yeh FC, Wang Y, et al. High-definition fiber tractography of the human brain: neuroanatomical validation and neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):430–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Vaillancourt DE, Spraker MB, Prodoehl J, Corcos DM, Zhou XJ, Comella CL, et al. High-resolution diffusion tensor imaging in the substantia nigra of de novo Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2009;72(16):1378–84.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeong JW, Chugani DC, Behen ME, Tiwari VN, Chugani HT. Altered white matter structure of the dentatorubrothalamic pathway in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Cerebellum. 2012;11(4):957–71.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Perreault S, Lober RM, Cheshier S, Partap S, Edwards MS, Yeom KW. Time-dependent structural changes of the dentatothalamic pathway in children treated for posterior fossa tumor. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(4):803–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwon HG, Hong JH, Hong CP, Lee DH, Ahn SH, Jang SH. Dentatorubrothalamic tract in human brain: diffusion tensor tractography study. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(10):787–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Marx JJ, Iannetti GD, Thömke F, Fitzek S, Galeotti F, Truini A, et al. Topodiagnostic implications of hemiataxia: an MRI-based brainstem mapping analysis. Neuroimage. 2008;39(4):1625–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehéricy S, Grand S, Pollak P, Poupon F, Le Bas JF, Limousin P, et al. Clinical characteristics and topography of lesions in movement disorders due to thalamic lesions. Neurology. 2001;57(6):1055–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Plaha P, Patel NK, Gill SS. Stimulation of the subthalamic region for essential tremor. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(1):48–54.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Coenen VA, Allert N, Paus S, Urbach H, Mädler B. Modulation of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network in thalamic deep brain stimulation for tremor: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(6):657–69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Schlaier J, Anthofer J, Steib K, Fellner C, Rothenfusser E, Brawanski A, et al. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: targeting the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract? Neuromodulation. 2014. doi:10.1111/ner.12238.
  31. Butson CR, Cooper SE, Henderson JM, McIntyre CC. Patient-specific analysis of the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation. Neuroimage. 2007;34(2):661–70 (Epub 2006 Nov 17).PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Brooks D, Halliday GM. Intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus in Lewy body diseases. Brain Res Bull. 2009;78(2–3):97–104.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Henderson JM, Carpenter K, Cartwright H, Halliday GM. Loss of thalamic intralaminar nuclei in progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson’s disease: clinical and therapeutic implications. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 7):1410–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Alexander DC, Barker GJ. Optimal imaging parameters for fiber-orientation estimation in diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2005;27(2):357–67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Bihan D, Poupon C, Amadon A, Lethimonnier F. Artifacts and pitfalls in diffusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24(3):478–88.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2016