Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Occlusive bandaging of wounds with decreased circulation promotes growth of anaerobic bacteria and necrosis: case report

BMC Research Notes20169:394

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2205-1

Received: 2 April 2016

Accepted: 4 August 2016

Published: 8 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Topical occlusive/semi-occlusive dressings that induce a damp and trapped environment are widely used in wound treatment. Subjecting the wound with impaired circulation to such trapped/air-free environment potentiates the growth of anaerobic bacteria and risk for serious infection.

Case presentation

We present a case of previously healthy Swedish male that had a muscle contusion after heavy trauma that induced impaired circulation. The application of an occlusive bandage to the post-traumatic wound on the patient resulted in a poly-microbial anaerobic infection and necrosis. These complications were treated successfully with antibiotics and open dressing of the wound.

Conclusion

The pathophysiology of difficult- to- treat ulcers should be reviewed by the physician and occlusive dressing should be avoided when treating wounds with impaired circulation.

Keywords

Poly microbialOcclusive bandageAnaerobic infectionWound care

Background

Subjecting wounds to an occlusive trapped/air-free environment potentiates the growth of anaerobic bacteria, which can result in significant sepsis [1]. In a report by Mousa [2], study of 127 cases of burn wound infection revealed that 55.1 % of ulcers were infected with anaerobic bacteria. Patients with openly dressed wounds recovered more quickly from anaerobic bacterial infections than patients with occlusive wound dressings (P < 0.01). Pressure ulcers are also susceptible to infection by biofilm-growing aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, the biofilm formation on the wound being the main reason for its delayed healing [3]. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing [4] showed that 62 % of the bacterial populations in pressure ulcers were identified as obligate anaerobes.

The present case report describes a post-traumatic wound complicated with polymicrobial anaerobic infection and necrosis. We aim to emphasize the importance of the assessment of pathophysiology of wounds in order to gain a better understanding of the wound’s microbiota and recommendation of appropriate wound dressings by the physician before their routine application by medical assistants.

Case presentation

A previously healthy and active 53-year-old Swede male who worked full-time in the metal industry had arthrosis of the right knee and had experienced episodes of pain in his right ear since 2011. The patient was injured when a 400-kg metal device fell on his right leg during the course of his work (13th March). The patient was wearing security shoes and clothes at the time of the accident. He presented with a superficial abrasion (15 cm × 3 cm) on the front of the right lower leg, without heavy bleeding, and swelling of the right ankle. X-rays and blood tests ruled out a fracture and organ failure (Fig. 1). He was assessed by the attending surgeon at the University hospital in Linköping. Surgical intervention or revisions were not indicated and the patient was dismissed with a recommendation for local antiseptics and elevation of the leg while sitting or lying down.
Fig. 1

This X-ray image from the right leg and wrist from the patient presented in the case report is taken on 13th April

A nursing assistant at the Occupational Health Center cared for the patient’s abrasion; it was covered regularly during 4 weeks every other day with an occlusive bandage (Mepilex foam dressing, Mölnlycke Health Care, Sweden), a wound dressing material that is routinely used at health centers. The patient had no fever during this period and did not change the dressing himself. There is no document about him contacting the Department of Infectious Diseases or the health center during this period. He had noticed that the ulcer was producing odorous discharge, but the attending nurse did not experience a situation that should be referred to specialist. The patient was referred to the hospital (13th April) due to visible muscle necrosis accompanied by yellow, odorous secretion at the bottom of an ulcer on the front of the right leg (Fig. 2). The patient had no fever, and his vital parameters were stable, although he did have diffuse redness and pitting edema on the right leg. The laboratory analysis revealed normal white blood cells, creatinine, electrolytes, and c-reactive protein 30 (<5 mg/l).
Fig. 2

The infected post-traumatic wound with necrosis and odorous secretion, 14 April 2015

The local status motivated an ulcer revision and debridement of muscle tissue necrosis. However, there was no sign of acute inflammation in the ulcer area and with respect to the severe necrosis and significant growth of anaerobic bacteria together with gram-positive bacteria in a biofilm [5, 6], there was a risk of developing a larger ulcer area with impaired healing. The clinical status of patient was stable. Intravenous meropenem (3 × 1 g) was started immediately after cultures from blood and ulcer secretion were secured. A culture from the ulcer secretion revealed growth of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus beta hemolytic group G, Clostridium innocuum, and Bacterioides thetaiotaomicron. The ulcer was treated conservatively with the local application of an antibiotic gel containing 250 mg vancomycin and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF in 100 IU antithrombin III Baxter) [7] plus sodium chloride for 2 days, followed by antithrombin III plus sodium chloride gel for 5 days. The wound dressing comprised sterile cotton compresses that were changed daily during the first week.

The first sign of fresh bleeding was observed within 1 week (Fig. 3), and the patient was dismissed with oral amoxicillin + clavulanacid and metronidazole 3 × 500 mg. The patient taught himself to dress the ulcer at home with sterile cotton compresses and attended regular follow-ups at the clinic once each week. Antibiotic therapy was ceased after 20 days of treatment, and the patient returned to full-time work within 4 weeks. The follow-up controls showed complete healing of ulcer (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

After 10 days of treatment, the ulcer shows signs of granulation and fresh bleeding

Fig. 4

Last control, 1 June 2015

Discussion

Anaerobic bacteria are a common cause of infections, some of which can be serious and life-threatening [8]. Because of their fastidious nature, anaerobes are hard to isolate and are often not recovered from infected sites. The delayed or inappropriate therapy against these organisms may lead to failures in eradication of these infections [9]. Clostridium innocuum is a relatively antimicrobial-resistant, frequently misidentified anaerobe that has been associated with bacteremia [10]. Clostridial myonecrosis is a rapidly progressive disease characterized by muscle necrosis and systemic toxicity [11, 12]. In a 1997 report, Mousa found that Bacteroides species were isolated from 14 of 17 cases with burn wounds that developed septic shock, and were also recovered from four patients who had anaerobic infection alone [2].

The patient in the present case had a muscle contusion after heavy trauma that induced impaired circulation and was susceptible to a trapped, air-free environment under an occlusive dressing. The discolored subcutaneous tissue, odorous secretion, slightly increased acute phase proteins, and growth of S. aureus, Streptococcus beta hemolytic group G, C. innocuum, and B. thetaiotaomicron might indicate a serious infection and risk for deleterious consequences. However, because of the patient’s immune competence and appropriate antibiotic therapy, he survived this life-threatening situation.

Conclusion

Wounds with impaired circulation are highly vulnerable to infection. Anaerobic and gram-positive bacteria are over-presenting microorganisms in development of biofilms in such wounds. Occlusive dressing should be avoided when treating wounds with impaired circulation such as after heavy trauma, burn ulcers or pressure ulcers. The conventional open clean cotton dressings are recommended in such cases.

Patient consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The medical assistants at the Department of Infectious Diseases University Hospital in Linköping have performed the nursing for the patient. The report has been supported for language editing by PEAS Institut in Linköping.

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Institute for Protein Environmental Affinity Surveys (PEAS Institut) and Department of Infectious Diseases, Linköping University

References

  1. Chester DL, Waters R. Adverse alteration of wound flora with topical negative-pressure therapy: a case report. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55(6):510–5111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mousa HA. Aerobic, anaerobic and fungal burn wound infections. J Hosp Infect. 1997;37(4):317–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Donelli G, Vuotto C. Biofilm-based infections in long-term care facilities. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(2):175–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowd SE, Sun Y, Secor PR, Rhoads DD, Olcott BM, James GA, Olcott RD. Survey of bacterial diversity in chronic wounds using pyrosequencing, DGGE, and full ribosome shotgun sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Evers F, Lönn J, Wu C, Nayeri F. Periodontitis, an often-overlooked reservoir for bacteria, in a patient with decubital ulcer. Clin Microbiol. 2015;4:1.Google Scholar
  6. Penhallow K. A review of studies that examine the impact of infection on the normal wound-healing process. J Wound Care. 2005;14(3):123–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lönn J, Almroth G, Brudin L, Nayeri F. An antithrombin III product containing biologically active hepatocyte growth factor may be beneficial in deep ulcer infections. Cytokine. 2012;60(2):478–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hentges DJ. The anaerobic microflora of the human body. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;164:S175–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Green RJ, Dafoe DC, Raffin TA. Necrotizing fasciitis. Chest. 1996;110(1):219–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Castiglioni B, Gautam A, Citron DM, Pasculle W, Goldstein EJ, Strollo D, Jordan M, Kusne S. Clostridium innocuum bacteremia secondary to infected hematoma with gas formation in a kidney transplant recipient. Transpl Infect Dis. 2003;5(4):199–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Langhan M, Arnold L. Clostridial myonecrosis in an adolescent male. Pediatrics. 2005;116(5):e735–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Garssen FP, Goslings JC, Bouman CS, Beenen LF, Visser CE, de Jong VM. Necrotising soft-tissue infections: diagnostics and treatment. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(31):A6031.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement