Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the spine: a case report and review of the literature

  • Mouna Khmou1, 2Email author,
  • Abderrahmane Malihy1, 2,
  • Najat Lamalmi1, 2,
  • Lamia Rouas1, 2 and
  • Zaitouna Alhamany1, 2
BMC Research Notes20169:438

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2246-5

Received: 29 January 2016

Accepted: 6 September 2016

Published: 9 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors are extremely rare tumors in the spine; only 18 cases of extra-dural peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor cervical region have been reported. The aim of this report is to highlight the challenges in diagnosis and management of this condition.

Case presentation

We present a case of 5-year-old Moroccan boy, who presented with torticollis for 1 month. Computed tomography scan and Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine revealed an extradural, dumbbell-shaped mass with extra-spinal extension at the left C1–C6 level. Multiple biopsy specimens were obtained. Histological examination revealed a highly cellular neoplasm composed of diffuse sheets of tumor cells having monomorphic, round to oval, finely vesicular nuclei. Immunohistochemical findings confirmed the diagnosis of intraspinal peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor.

Conclusion

After this illustrative case, we review the literature on clinicopathological and therapeutic aspects. In practice, it is important to consider the diagnosis of peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor in children and adolescents with an apparent soft-tissue mass located in the spine.

Keywords

PNETSpineExtra-duralTumorsChildhood

Background

Primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) are heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that occur mostly in childhood and early adulthood [1]. These tumors can be classified as central PNETs (cPNET) or peripheral PNETs (pPNET) depending on the site of presentation. Primary pPNETs of the spine are extremely rare. Extradural locations are even rarer [2]. Due to their low incidence, the available epidemiology is likely unreliable, and there are currently no standard clinical guidelines outlining their management [1]. Histologically, the PNET cells exhibit a primitive, poorly differentiated morphology with varying degrees of pleomorphism and occasional evidence of neuroectodermal differentiation. The final diagnosis requires immunohistochemical analysis and cytogenetic studies to identify (11;22) (q24;q12) translocation. In this paper we present an illustrative case of a primary extradural PNET of the cervical spine, demonstrating clinical, pathological, and imaging characteristics of PNET of the spine; followed by a comprehensive review of the literature.

Case presentation

A 5-year-old Moroccan boy presented with a 2 months history of torticollis with radiation of the pain to the left upper limb. The patient had no medical history. Physical examination revealed hypoesthesia of the upper limbs, evidence of bilateral lower extremity weakness with motor power 4/5 in distal muscular group, and hypoactive reflexes in four extremities. There was no bowel or bladder dysfunction.

Cervical CT-scan and MR imaging demonstrated the presence of a 75 × 36 × 24 mm extradural mass, with extra-spinal extension at the left C1–C6 level (Fig. 1). This dumbbell-shaped mass had heterogeneous signal intensity, calcifications and homogeneous intermediate post-contrast enhancement following gadolinium administration.
Fig. 1

Sagittal T2 MRI showing an extradural mass observed at C1–C6 level

No other cord lesion and no osseous abnormality of the spine were found. A biopsy was done. Microscopic sections showed a highly cellular neoplasm composed of diffuse sheets of tumor cells having monomorphic, round to oval, finely vesicular nuclei, occasional nucleoli, and scanty cytoplasm. Large areas of necrosis were seen (Fig. 2). Immunohistochemical analysis showed positivity for CD99 (Fig. 3) and S-100 protein, and negativity for synaptophysin, chromogranin, desmin, myogenin and CD56; favoring the diagnosis of PNET. After six courses of chemotherapy, cervical CT scan demonstrated complete regression of the mass. Our patient has remained in remission at 8 months follow-up.
Fig. 2

Diffuse sheets of small, round, blue cells (HE)

Fig. 3

Tumor cells show diffuse membranous positivity for CD-99

Discussion

Primitive neuroectodermal tumors are a group of malignant neoplasms, arising from pluripotent neural crest cells [2]. Although PNET is the second malignant neoplasm in childhood, the spinal cord, as primary site for pPNET, is relatively rare in all age groups, and information concerning these tumors in the medical literature is limited to single case reports.

Close to 107 cases of primary spinal PNET have been reported in the literature with age ranging from 4 months to 70 years, but only 18 cases of extra-dural PNET in cervical region have been reported (Table 1). In fact, the incidence of primary intraspinal PNET in lumbar region is twice as much as in thoracic and cervical regions [3], and it has been reported to have an adult onset and a male predominance [18]. Clinical presentation depends on the affected site and the degree of tumor invasion, with no pathognomonic symptom [4]. Few reports have investigated the imaging characteristics of PNET of the spine [19]. Diagnostic imaging studies should include computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but radiographic findings vary from patient to patient and are generally not helpful in differentiating PNET from other primary spinal [1]. Definitive diagnosis of PNET can only be made after tumor tissue is obtained from a limited biopsy or a radical resection specimen. Histological analysis alone is not sufficient for diagnosis; immunohistochemistry is required [1]. Microscopically, these tumors consist of small uniform round cells with rounded nuclei, fine chromatin, and an eosinophilic scanty cytoplasm. The term “Ewing’s sarcoma” is reserved for undifferentiated neuroectodermal tumors, while “PNET” is used for differentiated tumors with Homer Wright rosettes [4]. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells are positive for CD99 and HBA71, which are products of the MIC2 gene. Immunoreactivity for synaptophysin, NSE, S100 and neurofilament, indicating neuroectodermal differentiation [4]. Cytogenetic analysis detect the presence of a reciprocal translocation t (11;22) (q24;q12), it is important to confirm the diagnosis in certain cases [2]. The differential diagnosis includes central PNET, eosinophilic granuloma, malignant meningioma, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, and lymphoma [4, 6]. Due to the rarity of cases, specific guidelines in the management of intraspinal PNET have not yet been devised. Surgery has been considered as the initial step in the management because patients may present with neurologic deficit [5]. In recent years, chemotherapy has been showing encouraging results for the treatment of Ppnet. An induction chemotherapy tends to reduce the tumor size, as well as to control systemic disease, prior to any total excision of tumor [14, 20]. The regimen includes multiple agents such as doxorubicin, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide, alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide. Radiation therapy is commonly used as an adjuvant treatment for residual disease [4].
Table 1

Summary of the cases of extradural PNET in cervical spine reported in the literature

Authors

year

Age/sex

Location of tumor

Treatment

Kennedy et al. [5]

2000

24 y/M

C1–C5/extradural

STR/RT/CT

Shin et al. [6]

2001

38 y/M

C5–C7/extradural

STR/CT

Shin et al. [6]

2001

22 y/F

C7–T1/extradural

STR/CT

Mukhopadhyay et al. [7]

2001

29 y/F

C3–C5/extradural

STR/RT/CT

Mukhopadhyay et al. [7]

2001

13 y/M

C3–C5/extradural

STR/RT/CT

Kogawa et al. [8]

2004

7 y/F

C2–C4/extradural

STR/RT/CT

Ozturk et al. [9]

2007

18 y/M

C6–T1/extradural

TTR/CT

Bozkurt et al. [10]

2007

28 y/M

C3–C5/extradural

TTR/RT/CT

Erkutlu et al. [11]

2007

7 y/M

C5–T1/extradural

TTR/RT/CT

Duan et al. [12]

2010

14 y/M

C2–C4/extradural

STR/RT/CT

Sharafuddin et al. [13]

1992

21 y/F

C4–5 extradural

TTR/CT

Kumar et al. [14]

2000

12 y/F

C7–T4 extradural

Biopsy/RT

Izycka–Swieszewska et al. [15]

2001

13 y/F

C7–T11 extradural

Biopsy/CT/RT

Mukhopadhyay et al. [7]

2001

29 y/F

C3–5 extradural

STR/CT/RT

Mukhopadhyay et al. [7]

2001

13 y/M

C3–5 extradural

STR/CT/RT

Virani et al. [16]

2002

5 y/M

C7–T1 extradural

TTR/RT

Kumar et al. [17]

2007

8 y/M

C2–4 extradural

TTR

Gustavo et al. [4]

2012

22y/F

C1–C2 extradural

TTR/RT/CT

Our present case

2014

5y/M

C1–C6

Biopsy/CT/RT

CT Chemotherapy, F Female, M Male, RT Radiotherapy, STR Sub-total tumor resection, TTR Total tumor resection, y year

Due to the aggressiveness of these tumors, the prognosis is still poor; disease-free survival is approximately 45 % at 7 years [4].

Conclusions

Primary spinal extradural PNET is very rare and occurs predominantly in children and adolescents. Lacking clinical and radiographic specificity, those tumors should be included in the differential diagnosis of extradural mass lesions. In order to confirm the diagnosis, histopathology and immunohistochemistry analysis are mandatory. The presence of the t (11; 22) (q24, q12) chromosomal translocation is supporting the diagnosis of pPNET. Due to limited evidence regarding the therapeutic aspects of these tumors, no definite protocol can be formulated for their treatment, but resection, radiotherapy, and multipotent chemotherapy are the preferred treatment options for these patients. Clinical outcomes still need to be evaluated in prospective trials.

Abbreviations

PNET: 

peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumors

CT scan: 

computerized tomography scan

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

MK analyzed and interpreted the patient data, drafted the manuscript and made the figures. AM and ZA performed the histological examination, proposed the study, supervised MK and revised the manuscript. NL and LR have made substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of patient data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Children’s Hospital, Ibn Sina University Hospital
(2)
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy Rabat, University Mohammed V

References

  1. Ellis JA, Rothrock RJ, Moise G, McCormick PC, Tanji K, Canoll P, et al. Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the spine: comprehensive review with illustrative clinical cases. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30:E1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ozdemir N, Usta G, Minoglu M, Erbay AM, Bezircioglu H, Tunakan M. Primary primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the lumbar extradural space. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008;2(3):215–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Saeedinia S, Nouri M, Alimohammadi M, Moradi H, Amirjamshidi A. Primary spinal extradural Ewing’s sarcoma (primitive neuroectodermal tumor): report of a case and meta-analysis of the reported cases in the literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabral GA, Nunes CF, Melo JO Jr, Guimarães RD, Gonçalves MB, Rodrigues RS, et al. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cervical spine. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kennedy JG, Eustace S, Caulfield R, Fennelly DJ, Hurson B, O’Rourke KS. Extraskeletal Ewing’s sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1996–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Shin JH, Lee HK, Rhim SC, Cho KJ, Choi CG, Suh DC. Spinal epidural extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma: MR findings in two cases. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:795–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mukhopadhyay P, Gairola M, Sharma M, Thulkar S, Julka P, Rath G. Primary spinal epidural extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma: report of five cases and literature review. Australas Radiol. 2001;45:372–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kogawa M, Asazuma T, Iso K, Koike Y, Domoto H, Aida S, et al. Primary cervical spinal epidural Extra-osseous Ewing’s sarcoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;146:1051–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Ozturk E, Mutlu H, Sonmez G, Vardar Aker F, Cinar Basekim C, Kizilkaya E. Spinal epidural extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma. J Neuroradiol. 2007;34:63–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bozkurt G, Ayhan S, Turk CC, Akbay A, Soylemezoglu F, Palaoglu S. Primary extraosseous Ewing sarcoma of the cervical epidural space. Case illustration. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6:192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Erkutlu I, Buyukhatipoglu H, Alptekin M, Ozsarac C, Buyukbese I, Gok A. Primary spinal epidural extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma mimicking a spinal abscess. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2007;24:537–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan XH, Ban XH, Liu B, Zhong XM, Guo RM, Zhang F, et al. Intraspinal primitive neuroectodermal tumor: imaging findings in six cases. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:426–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sharafuddin MJ, Haddad FS, Hitchon PW, Haddad SF, EL-Khoury GY. Treatment options in primary Ewing’s sarcoma of the spine: report of seven cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1992;30:610–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar R, Prasad KK, Krishnani N, Chhabra DK. Infected Ewing’s sarcoma of spine. Neurol India. 2000;48:370–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Izycka-Swieszewska E, Stefanowicz J, Debiec-Rychter M, Rzepko R, Borowska-Lehman J. Peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor within the spinal epidural space. Neuropathology. 2001;21:218–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Virani MJ, Jain S. Primary intraspinal primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET): a rare occurrence. Neurol India. 2002;50:75–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar R, Reddy SJ, Wani AA, Pal L. Primary spinal primitive neuroectodermal tumor: case series and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007;43:1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wu G, Ghimire P, Zhu L, Baral A, Su J. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of primary intraspinal peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013;64(3):240–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guobin H, Lingjing G, Xianglian D, Liqing S, Hong P, Qilan X. Clinical, pathological, and imaging characteristics of primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the spine. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(2):168–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yan Y, Xu T, Chen J, Hu G, Lu Y. Intraspinal Ewing’s sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(5):601–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement