Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Research Notes

Open Access

Hematological reference intervals determination in adults at Gondar university hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

  • Aregawi Yalew1,
  • Betelihem Terefe1,
  • Meseret Alem2 and
  • Bamlaku Enawgaw1Email author
BMC Research Notes20169:483

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2288-8

Received: 18 December 2015

Accepted: 27 October 2016

Published: 2 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Hematological reference values are important for the clinical decisions in laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of patients. The correct interpretation of laboratory results depends entirely on the reference intervals that have been established for the locality. But, in sub-Saharan African countries particularly in Ethiopia, locally derived reference intervals were not established and they are forced to use intervals established from western population. Thus this study aimed to establish locally derived hematological reference values that could be used in Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

A cross sectional study was conducted from April to May 2014 with 120 male and 120 female apparently health adult blood donors at Gondar University Hospital. A structured pretested questionnaire was used for socio demographic and clinical data collection. About 4 ml of blood was collected with EDTA test tube and analyzed using Cell-Dyn 1800 to enumerate the hematological parameters. The data were collected and entered into SPSS version 20 for analysis. Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine reference intervals and Harris and Boyd test was used to determine the reference intervals that need partition. The 95th percentile of measurements was taken as a reference interval.

Results

Median and 95th percentile of WBC for general population were lower than Caucasian population, Addis Ababa, Burkina Faso and Kenya of similar studies. The RBC, Hgb and PCV lower 95% limit values of both sex were lower than studies in Addis Ababa, Kenya, Burkina Faso and text book. While PCV upper limit values higher than the above countries. MCV values of the current study were higher than those countries while MCHC values were lower. Similarly, the absolute values of neutrophils in the current study were lower than Caucasian and Afro Caribbean but higher than African countries and Jamaica but lymphocyte count was higher.

Conclusions

The hematological reference intervals established in this study was different from those reported in other part of Ethiopia or African countries as well as Caucasian population. The RBC, PCV, Hgb and MCHC reference intervals were different in gender. Thus, using of locally determined reference range is advisable.

Keywords

Hematological reference intervalAdult populationGondar

Background

Hematological reference values are necessary in routine assessments for diagnosis of blood disorders, infectious diseases, immune status, and diseases progression and also in assessment of response to antiretroviral treatment. Locally-derived age-specific hematological reference ranges were also recommended for proper patient managements and interpretation of results [1].

In the use and interpretation of laboratory test results, it is important to understand the limitations of tests. These include the ability of the test to indicate the presence or absence of disease or whether the value in a report is normal or abnormal for a patient. These sounds the knowledge of reference value for a particular laboratory test is very crucial in patient management. The laboratory staff and those requesting tests should know the accepted reference ranges and clinical significance of the results of the quantitative tests performed in the laboratory. This will ensure that significantly abnormal results are detected, checked, reported, and acted on as soon as possible [2].

There is a difference in reference ranges related to age, sex, geographic origin, altitude, and ethnic background in addition to hemoglobin abnormalities (thalassemia, sickle cell disease and hemoglobin C) or pathologic conditions (malaria, HIV and other viral infections) prevented to have one common hematological values for all countries [27]. Thus, the use of normal hematological values derived from other African countries could result in incorrect patient management in routine clinical care.

The reference intervals for analysis of hematological parameters during routine clinical activities in Ethiopia or Africa are reference texts generated from Caucasian adult populations living in developed countries [8]. Lower values for hemoglobin, red blood cells, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volumes, platelets and neutrophils and higher monocytes and eosinophils levels were reported in African population compared to similar population in Western counter parts [6, 912]. Also there are ample evidences that clinicians and medical researchers should use method-specific reference ranges in their laboratories which account for gender differences and variances in the ethnic composition of the local society [13], but this is not done in developing countries.

An increasing number of clinical trials taking place in Africa are seeking to identify safe and effective prevention and treatment strategies to combat the heavy burden of infectious diseases in this region but there is only attempts to establish standard reference hematological intervals [14], there is lack of well-established reference intervals.

In the absence of locally derived reference intervals, clinicians and researchers have to use reference values of western population’s, thus it is important to establish local hematological reference intervals for appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and follow up of patients. The reference intervals that are currently used in Ethiopia are adopted from textbooks that refer mainly to Caucasian subjects. But one study in Ethiopia conducted in southeast Addis Ababa showed lower WBC and platelet values of healthy HIV negative Ethiopians than the adopted reference values [15]. Thus, the main aim of this study was to establish locally derived hematological reference values that could be used in Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

Study setting and population

A cross sectional study was conducted from April to June 2014 at Gondar University Hospital blood banking center. The hospital is located in Gondar town which is 740 km from the capital of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, in the Northwest of Ethiopia. The city has a latitude and longitude of 12°36′N and 37°28′E with an elevation of 2133 meters above sea level. Based on figures from the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia in 2007, Gondar has an estimated total population of 231,977. Gondar University Hospital is the only referral hospital with more than 400 beds for North West Ethiopia serving a population of about 5 million. The consecutive nonparametric method was based solely on the ranks of the observations (in order of magnitude) and ignores their measured values. According to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLIS) Guideline recommendations, a minimum size of 120 observations from each category is needed [16]. Based on this guide line 120 male and 120 female study participants who pass the exclusion/inclusion criteria were selected conveniently. The reference individuals were selected based on medical examinations, current health status, blood pressure, taking any medication, working with hazardous chemicals, alcohol intake, presence of inherited health disorder in the family, tuberculosis, lymphadenopathy, weight loss, regular exercise, tobacco smoking, allergy manifestation, fever, malaria, HIV, hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HbsAg), hepatitis C virus antibodies (HcAbs), menstruation, pregnancy and use of contraceptives. After written informed consents were taken from study subjects, 4 ml of venous blood samples were collected immediately following the donation in tube containing EDTA and 4 ml bloods with plan tube for serological analysis was taken and proceed.

Laboratory investigation

About 4 ml of venous blood was collected by an experienced laboratory technologist from each subject for hematological parameters analysis. Hematological parameters; total white cell count (WBC), differential white cell count (neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, monocytes and basophiles), platelet count, red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (%), mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), and red cell distribution width (RDW) were determined using the automated blood analyzer Cell-Dyne 1800 (Abbott Laboratories Diagnostics Division, USA).The other 4 ml of blood after clotting the serum was separated and serological tests (HIV, HbsAg, and HcAbs) was assayed. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was done by using westerngreen method for 1 h.

Statistical analysis

Data was cleaned, edited, checked for completeness and entered into Epi-Info version 3.3.5 and then transferred to SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis. The mean, median and standard deviation of hematological reference intervals were determined using descriptive statistics. Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine reference intervals and also Harris and Boyd test was used to determine the reference intervals that need partition (Table 2). The 95th percentile was taken as a reference interval.

Results

Socio demographic characteristics

A total of 120 male and 120 female adult healthy subjects from Gondar University Hospital Blood Bank Centre were included in this study. The mean age of the study subjects was 24.50 ± 6.65 years with age range from 18 to 50 years and about 69.6% were within age range of 18–25 years. From the study subjects 78.3% were living in Gondar town, 26.7% were married, 58.3% were students and 89.2% were orthodox in religion (Table 1).
Table 1

The socio demographic characteristics of adult of Gondar participated in the study

Variables

Socio demographic characteristics

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Sex

Male

120

50

Female

120

50

Age group (years)

18–25

167

69.6

26–35

51

21.2

>35

22

9.2

Address

Gondar

188

78.9

Around gondar

52

21.1

Marital status

Married

64

26.7

Single

174

72.5

Divorced

2

0.8

Religion

Orthodox

214

89.2

Muslim

22

9.2

Protestant

1

0.4

Others

3

1.2

Occupation

Civil servant

21

8.8

Private

36

15.0

House wife

6

2.5

Farmer

37

15.4

Students

120

58.3

Hematological reference interval

In order to determine hematological parameters that need combined or partition reference interval based on sex, Harris and Boyd test was used. Basing this test partitioned reference interval was determined for RBC, PCV, Hgb, MCH and MCHC (Table 2). Median and 95th percentile of WBC, absolute neutrophils, absolute lymphocytes, absolute mixed cell, platelet, MCV, RDW and ESR were 5.1 (3.2–8.8 × 109/l), 2.7 (1.6–5.1 × 109/l), 1.9 (1–3.5 × 109/l), 0.5 (0.2–1 × 109/l), 264 (128–432 × 109/l), 92 (85–100 fl); 14 (12–17%) and 5 (0–15 mm/h) respectively for the general population (Table 3).
Table 2

Result of Harris and Boyd test, which was performed to see the need for partitioning of Reference interval based on sex

Parameters

P value

Harris and Boyd

Z*

Z

Decision

WBC (×109/l)

0.3779

3

0.4

No separate RI

Neutrophil (%)

0.7239

3

0.6

No separate RI

Neutrophils absolute (×109/l)

0.6331

3

0.01

No separate RI

Lymphocyte (%)

0.6750

3

0.5

No separate RI

Lymphocytes absolute (×109/l)

0.1705

3

0.9

No separate RI

Mixed (%)

0.5375

3

0.5

No separate RI

Mixed absolute (×109/l)

0.2784

3

0.5

No separate RI

Platelet (×109/l)

0.0223

3

2.3

No separate RI

RBC (×1012/l)

0.0016

3

3.4

Separate RI

Hgb (g/dl)

<0.0001

3

5.6

Separate RI

PCV (%)

0.0033

3

3.4

Separate RI

MCH (pg)

0.0016

3

3.1

Separate RI

MCHC (g/dl)

<0.0001

3

5.0

Separate RI

MCV (fl)

0.2929

3

0.3

No separate RI

RDW

0.9577

3

0.6

No separate RI

ESR (mm/h)

0.3283

3

0.9

No separate RI

Z = critical value, Z* = calculated value, Separate RI are needed only when Z is greater than Z*, P value is derived from Mann–Whitney U test

Italic values indicate hematological parameters which need partition between male and female (Z > Z*)

Table 3

Median, IQR, range and 95th percentile of reference interval, P values of hematological parameters for adult in Gondar, northwestern Ethiopia

Parameters

N

Median (IQR)

Range (min–max)

RI (95th percentile)

Lower limit 90% CI

Upper limit 90% CI

WBC (×109/l)

240

5.1 (4.2–6.3)

2.7–9.5

3.2–8.8

3.2 (2.9–3.5)

8.8 (8.3–9.1)

Neutrophil (%)

240

53 (48–58)

30–77

36–69

36 (33.8–39.1)

69 (66.9–76.5)

Neutrophils absolute (×109/l)

240

2.7 (2.1–3.5)

1.3–7.3

1.6–5.1

1.6 (1.3–1.7)

5.1 (4.6–6.2)

Lymphocyte (%)

240

38 (33–42)

17–56

22–55

22 (18.2–24.9)

55 (52.4–55.9)

Lymphocytes absolute (×109/l)

240

1.9 (1.5–2.3)

0.70–5.0

1–3.5

1 (0.8–1.1)

3.5 (3.2–4.2)

Mixed (%)

240

9 (8–11)

4–18

6–13

6 (5.4–6.4)

13 (13.0–18.0)

Mixed absolute (×109/l)

240

0.50 (0.4–0.6)

0.2–1.2

0.2–1

0.2 (0.2–0.3)

1.0 (0.9–1.2)

MCV (fl)

240

92 (90–94)

78–105

85–100

85 (80.3–85.1)

100 (99–102)

Platelet (×109/l)

240

264 (210–312)

110–531

128–432

128 (115–140)

432 (403–496)

ESR (mm/h)

240

5.0 (0–5)

0–20

0–15

0 (0–0)

15 (15–20)

RDW

240

14 (13–14)

12–18

12–17

12 (12–12.7)

17 (15.5–18.3)

RBC (×1012/l)

 Male

120

5.01 (4.56–5.59)

3.12–6.95

3.53–6.93

3.53 (3.12–3.9)

6.93 (6.45–6.95)

 Female

120

4.8 (4.2–5.25)

3.0–6.50

3.45–6.25

3.45 (3.0–3.57)

6.25 (6.08–6.5)

Hgb (g/dl)

 Male

120

14.2 (13.1–15.5)

11.0–19.1

11.5–18.0

11.5 (11–11.9)

18.0 (17.9–19.1)

 Female

120

12.9 (12.0–14.3)

10.9–16.9

11.0–16.7

11.0 (10.9–11.3)

16.7 (16.2–16.9)

PCV (%)

 Male

120

46.9 (43.2–50.0)

34.5–60.2

36.2–58.6

36.2 (34.5–37.6)

58.6 (57.0–60.2)

 Female

120

45.2 (40.4–48)

30.8–59.0

32.1–56.6

32.1 (30.8–36)

56.6 (52.1–59)

MCH (pg)

 Male

120

29.0 (28–30)

26–34.0

26.6–33.3

26.6 (25.7–27.1)

33.3 (32–34)

 Female

120

28.6 (27.7–29.2)

25.6–33.1

25.8–32.8

25.8 (25.6–26.4)

32.8 (31–33.1)

MCHC (g/dl)

 Male

120

31.3 (30.6–32.4)

28.0–36.5

29.5–34.4

29.5 (28–30)

34.4 (33.6–36.5)

 Female

120

30.8 (30.0–31.2)

28.0–34.7

28.5–34.4

28.5 (28–29)

34.4 (32.5–34.7)

Box and Whisker plots indicate the effect of sex on hematological parameters of the study participants (Fig. 1). The median and 95th percentile reference intervals for RBC, Hgb, PCV, MCH and MCHC were 5.01 (3.53–6.93 × 1012/l), 46.9 (36.2–58.6%), 14.2 (11.5–18 g/dl) and 31.3 (29.5–34.4 g/dl) respectively for males and 4.8 (3.45–6.25 × 1012/l), 45.2 (32.1–56.6%), 12.9 (11–16 g/dl) and 30.8 (28.5–34.4 g/dl) respectively for females (Table 3).
Fig. 1

Box and Whisker plots indicating the effect of sex on hematological parameters of the study participants. a Red blood cells, b Hemoglobin, c Hematocrit, d Mean corpuscular hemoglobin, e Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

Discussion

This study showed a significant gender differences for the RBC parameters (RBC, Hgb, PCV, MCH and MCHC). The finding agrees with the well-established fact that males have higher values than female. While there was no significant differences between genders with regard to WBC parameters, platelet counts, ESR, MCV and RDW. This was also in agreement with previously carried out studies in Addis Ababa and other African countries [1, 6, 15, 1719] (Tables 4, 5 and 6). The significant difference between male and female may be due to biological and physiological factors such as the influence of the hormone androgen on erythropoiesis and also due to menstrual blood loss in females
Table 4

Comparison of median, 95% reference range and Mean ± SD of hematological parameters in this study and others

Parameter

Gondar (current study)

Addis Ababa [17]

Kenya [6]

Burkina Faso (22)

Wintrobe [2]

Sex

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

WBC (×109)

Female

5.1 (3.2–8.8)

5.3 ± 1.4

5.9 (3–12.2)

6.2 ± 2.2

4.9 (3.0–9.1)

NA

5.2 (3.4–7.4)

NA

NA (4.3–10)

7.2 ± NA

Male

  

5.9 (3–9.8)

6.0 ± 1.8

4.3 (2.7–7.5)

NA

5.1 (3.2–9.2)

NA

NA (4.3–100)

7.2 ± NA

Platelet (×109)

Female

264 (128–432)

267 ± 76

193 (98–352)

202 ± 67

251 (124–444)

NA

252 (159–356)

NA

NA (150–450)

NA

Male

  

203 (97–324)

207 ± 62

218 (115–366)

NA

217 (127–365)

NA

NA (150–450)

NA

Neutrophil (absolute) (×109)

Female

2.7 (1.6–5.1)

2.8 ± 0.9

NA

NA

1.96 (0.99–5.6)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Male

  

NA

NA

1.78 (0.88–4.3)

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Neutrophil (%)

Female

53 (36–69)

53 ± 8

NA

NA

42 (20–70)

NA

46 (30–62)

NA

NA

NA

Male

  

NA

NA

42 (20–70)

NA

43 (27–64)

NA

NA

NA

Lymphocyte (absolute) (×109)

Female

1.9 (1–3.5)

2 ± 0.7

1.7 (1.09–3.5)

NA

2.16 (1.29–4.0)

NA

2.2 (1.4–3.2)

NA

NA

NA

Male

  

(0.96–3.5)

NA

1.86 (1.12–3.2)

NA

2.1 (1.3–4.0)

NA

NA

NA

Lymphocyte (%)

Female

38 (22–55)

37 ± 8

(17–59)

36 ± NA

45 (20–60)

NA

43 (27–57)

NA

NA

NA

Male

  

(17–59)

36 ± NA

45 (20–60)

NA

44 (26–60)

NA

NA

NA

Mix cells (absolute) (×109)

Female

0.5 (0.2–1)

0.5 ± 0.2

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Male

  

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Mixed cells (%)

Female

9 (6–13)

10 ± 2

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Male

  

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

WBC white blood cells, SD standard deviation, NA not applicable

Table 5

Comparison of median, 95% reference range and Mean ± SD of hematological parameters in this study and others

Parameter

Gondar (current study)

Addis Ababa [17]

Kenya [6]

Burkina Faso (22)

Wintrobe [2]

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

Median (95% range)

Mean ± SD

RBC (×1012)

 Female

4.8 (3.45–6.25)

4.7 ± 0.725

4.5 (3.7–5.2)

4.5 ± 0.4

4.8 (3.7–5.6)

NA

4.2 (3.5–4.9)

NA

NA (4.2–5.5)

4.8 ± NA

 Male

5.01 (3.53-6.93)

0.09 ± 0.79

5 (4.3–5.9)

5.1 ± 0.4

5.3 (4.4–6.3)

NA

4.7 (3.8–5.6)

NA

NA (4.5–6.3)

5.4 ± NA

PCV (%)

 Female

45.2 (32.1–56.6)

44.2 ± 5.84

42.1 (35.3–48.8)

42 ± 3.2

40 (30–50)

NA

35 (30–39)

NA

NA (37–47)

42 ± NA

 Male

46.9 (36.2–58.6)

6.8 ± 5.8

48.2 (41.6–55.11)

48.3 ± 3.7

47 (40–50)

NA

39 (34–46)

NA

NA (41–51)

46 ± NA

Hgb (g/dl)

 Female

12.9 (11–16.7)

13.2 ± 1.6

14.9 (12.2–16.6)

14.3 ± 3.4

8.44 (5.9–10)

NA

12 (9.8–13.5)

NA

NA (12–16)

14 ± NA

 Male

14.2 (11.5–18)

14.4 ± 1.8

16.1 (13.9–18.3)

16.1 ± 1.1

9.9 (8.3–11.3)

NA

13.5 (11.3–15.6)

NA

NA (14–18)

16 ± NA

MCV (fl)

 Female

 

92 ± 3.7

NA

NA

84.9 (66–95.7)

NA

84 (75–92)

NA

NA

NA

 Male

92 (85 –100)

 

NA

NA

88 (71.4–98.2)

NA

85 (73–94)

NA

NA

NA

MCH (pg)

 Female

28.6 (25.8–32.8)

28.5 ± 1.46

NA

NA

NA

NA

28 (24–32)

NA

NA

NA

 Male

29 (26.6–33.3)

29.1 ± 1.54

NA

NA

NA

NA

29 (25–34)

NA

NA

NA

MCHC (g/dl)

 Female

30.8 (28.5–34.4)

30.6 ± 1.2

NA

NA

33.9 (32.2–35.2)

NA

34.2 (31.4–36.1)

NA

NA

NA

 Male

31.3 (29.5–34.4)

31.5 ± 1.3

NA

NA

34.2 (32.4–35.3)

NA

34.6 (31.7–36.3)

NA

NA

NA

Table 6

Comparisons of median and 95% reference range with Eastern and Southern Africa (18), Tanzania (19), Togo (20) and Uganda (21) of African countries

Parameters

Gondar

Togo

Tanzania

Uganda

Eastern and southern Africa

Median (95% range)

Median (95% range)

Median (95% range)

Median (95% range)

Median (95% range)

WBC (×109/l)

5.1 (3.2–8.8)

4.1 (1.9–10.1)

4.6 (3.0–7.9)

4.9 (2.8–8.2)

3.1–9.1

Neutrophils (Abs)

2.7 (1.6–5.1)

1.6 (0.5–5.4)

2.2 (1.1–4.7)

NA

1.0–5.3

Neutrophils (%)

53 (36–69)

NA

48.1 (32.0–69.1)

38.9 (22.2–59.3)

25–66

Lymphocyte (Abs)

1.9 (1–3.5)

2.1 (1.1–4.3)

1.8 (1.1–3.0)

NA

1.2–3.7

Lymphocyte (%)

38 (22–55)

NA

40.5 (20.8–56.7)

44.4 (26.7–61.2)

23–59

Mixed (Abs)

0.5 (0.2–1)

NA

0.5 (0.3–1.1)

NA

NA

Mixed (%)

9 (6–13)

NA

10.3 (5.6–19.8)

NA

NA

Platelet (×109/l)

264 (128–432)

239 (120–443)

244 (150–398)

218.5 (109–384)

126–438

MCV (fl)

92 (85–100)

84.5 (80–99)

89.4 (77.6–98.1)

85 (71–97)

68–98

RBC (×1012/l)

 Male

4.8 (3.45–6.25) 5.0

5.0 (3.3–6.4)

5.21 (4.41–6.27)

5.0 (3.8–6.1)

4.0–6.4

 Female

1 (3.53–6.93)

4.5 (3.1–6.0)

4.69 (3.84–5.59)

4.4 (3.3–5.3)

3.8–5.6

Hgb (g/dl)

 Male

12.9 (11–16.7)

15.8 (10.0–18.4)

15.4 (13.7–17.7)

14.5 (11.6–17.1)

12.2–17.7

 Female

14.2 (11.5–18)

13.0 (10.3–17.1)

13.5 (11.1–15.7)

12.8 (9.8–16.2)

9.5–15.8

PCV (%)

 Male

45.2 (32.1–56.6)

42.8 (28.0–54.0)

46.6 (40.2–53.7)

42.6 (33.8–49.5)

35.0–50.8

 Female

46.9 (36.2–58.6)

38.1 (28.0–47.0)

41.5 (36.2–46.8)

37.8 (28.3–46.8)

29.4–45.4

MCH (pg)

 Male

28.6 (25.8–32.8)

29.7 (26–36)

30.0 (23.1–33.2)

29.2 (23.0–33.8)

NA

 Female

29 (26.6–33.3)

29.3 (25–37)

29.3 (24.2–33.1)

29.5 (24.8–32.7)

NA

MCHC (%)

 Male

30.8 (28.5–34.4)

35.1 (29–39)

33.3 (30.6–35.1)

34.2 (32.4–35.3)

NA

 Female

31.3 (29.5–34.4)

35.1 (30–41)

32.7 (30.4–34.8)

34.2 (33.0–35.5)

NA

RDW (%)

 Male

14 (12–17)

NA

NA

12.8 (10.9–16.8)

NA

 Female

14 (12–17)

NA

NA

12.7 (11.0–17.3)

NA

Abs absolute

The 95th percentile reference interval of the current study lower limit of RBC in both sexes, were lower than studies conducted in Addis Ababa Ethiopia, Kenya, Burkina Faso and text books while the upper limit was higher than the above mentioned studies (Tables 4, 5 and 6). Comparison of hematological results with this study indicated that similarity could not be found based on geographical proximity, this may be due to difference in altitude, method and instrument used for analysis [6, 8, 15, 18].

The lower limit of hemoglobin reference interval in this study was lower than a study conducted in Addis Ababa and text books while higher than studies conducted in Kenya and Burkina Faso for both genders. On the other hand the upper limit of Hgb was higher than Addis Ababa, text books, Kenya, and Burkina Faso. This difference may be due to altitude and ethnic variations. Thus, it may not be possible, even, to have one standard reference between two localities in the same county as experienced in Kenya. Similarly the lower limit reference intervals of PCV in both sexes was lower than study conducted in Addis Ababa, text books and higher than studies conducted in Kenya and Burkina Faso. While the upper limit was higher than studies carried out in Addis Ababa, Kenya, Burkina Faso and text books [6, 8, 15, 18]. Likewise of RBC and Hgb the difference in the reference interval values might arise from differences in altitude and ethnical variations.

The current study reference interval values of MCV are generally higher than values indicated in different African countries. The lower limit values of MCH in both sexes in this study was higher than a study conducted in Burkina Faso, but the upper limit was comparable, but the established values of MCHC in both sexes was generally lower than values indicated in different African countries [6, 18]. The WBCs reference intervals established for the general population in the current study was lower than the values described for Caucasian population in different text books, Addis Ababa, Burkina Faso and Kenya. However, median and 95 percentile ranges of neutrophils and lymphocytes of this study compared with similar study conducted on Caucasian, African, Afro-Caribbean and Jamaican population, neutrophils were lower than Caucasian and Afro-Caribbean, but higher than African and Jamaica. Lymphocyte count in the current study was higher than Caucasian and African black population [6, 8, 15, 18]. The difference between the current result and other findings might be due to geographical differences, environment, diet, and ethnic background [16].

The median and 95th percentile range values of ESR was at normal range with no difference for male and female as all the recruited subjects were healthy, not exposed to inflammatory conditions associated with systemic inflammatory diseases [20].

Conclusions

Haematological reference intervals established from adult healthy population of Northwest Ethiopia (Gondar and surrounding areas) were different from Caucasian and African counties. The haematological intervals were also different from previous results obtained in other part of Ethiopia. Intervals for red blood cell count, hematocrit values, hemoglobin concentration, MCH and MCHC were different for male and female but there was no difference in WBC parameters, PLT, MCV, RDW and ESR.Further studies on haematological intervals for all age groups are recommended for locally derived standard haematological intervals (Additional file 1).

Abbreviations

AIDS: 

acquired immune deficiency syndrome

BMI: 

body mass index

CLSI: 

Clinical Laboratory Standard Institution

EDTA: 

ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid

HbsAgs: 

hepatitis B virus surface antigen

HcAbs: 

hepatitis C virus antibodies

Hgb: 

hemoglobin

HIV: 

human immunodeficiency virus

IFCC: 

International Federation of Clinical Chemistry

LPT: 

lymphocyte

MCH: 

mean corpuscular hemoglobin

MCHC: 

mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

MCV: 

mean corpuscular volume

NCCLS: 

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards

NTL: 

neutrophils

PCV: 

packed cell volume

PLT: 

platelet

RBC: 

red blood cells

RDW: 

red cell distribution width

RIs: 

reference intervals

WBC: 

white blood cells

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AY: Recruited the patients, collected and analyzed the data and wrote the draft of the manuscript. BE: Conceived the study, obtained ethics papers, supervised the collection of data and revised the draft. BT: Involve in proposal development, data collection and entry for analysis. MA: Interpreted the collected data and wrote the draft along with BE. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their appreciation to Gondar University Hospital, Blood banking and ART laboratory professionals for their help in the collection, processing and analyzing of laboratory tests and University of Gondar for giving this opportunity to conduct this study. Also authors want to express their great thanks to the study participants for their patience and cooperation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and material

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted after ethical approval was obtained from University of Gondar, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences Ethical Committee. Informed written consent was taken from study participants before enrollment in the study. Then the objective of this research was explained to the study participants. Those willing to participate were included. Participation in the study was voluntary blood donors and refusal was possible. To ensure confidentiality of data, study subjects were identified using codes and unauthorized persons were not able to access the collected data. The study participants’ serological results were reported by blood banking manager to the physician for proper management and counseling.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Hematology & Immunohematology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar
(2)
Department of Immunology & Molecular Biology, School of Biomedical and Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar

References

  1. Zeh C, Amornkul PN, Inzaule S, Ondoa P, Oyaro B, Mwaengo DM, et al. Population-based biochemistry, immunologic and hematological reference values for adolescents and young adults in a rural population in Western Kenya. Plos ONE. 2011;6(6):e21040.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain BJ. Ethnic and sex differences in the total and differential white cell count and platelet count. J Clin Pathol. 1996;49(8):664–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alson OR, Ratsitorahina M, Pfister P, Laganier R, Dromigny J. Estimation of normal hemogram values in Madagascar. Archives de l” Institut Pasteur de Madagascar. 2000;66(1–2):68–71.Google Scholar
  4. Menard D, Mandeng MJ, Tothy MB, Kelembho EK, Gresenguet G, Talarmin A. Immunohematological reference ranges for adults from the Central African Republic. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10(3):443–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lugada ES, Mermin J, Kaharuza F, Ulvestad E, Were W, Langeland N, et al. Population-based hematologic and immunologic reference values for a healthy Ugandan population. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11(1):29–34.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kibaya RS, Bautista CT, Sawe FK, Shaffer DN, Sateren WB, Scott PT, et al. Reference ranges for the clinical laboratory derived from a rural population in Kericho, Kenya. Plos ONE. 2008;3(10):e3327.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Adetifa I, Hill P, Jeffries D, Jackson-Sillah D, Ibanga H, Bah G, et al. Haematological values from a Gambian cohort—possible reference range for a West African population. Int J Lab Hematol. 2009;31(6):615–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greer JP, Wintrobe MM. Wintrobe’s clinical hematology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. Gill G, England A, Marshal C. Low platelet counts in Zambians. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1979;73(1):111–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tugume SB, Piwowar EM, Lutalo T, Mugyenyi PN, Grant RM, Mangeni FW, et al. Hematological reference ranges among healthy Ugandans. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2(2):233–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Urquhart N, Capildeo K, Sargeant L, Wharfe G, Hisada M, Hanchard B. White blood cell counts in healthy Jamaican adults. West Indian Med J. 2008;57(2):147–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lawrie D, Coetzee LM, Becker P, Mahlangu J, Stevens W, Glencross DK. Local reference ranges for full blood count and CD4 lymphocyte count testing. South Afr Med J. 2009;99(4):243–8.Google Scholar
  13. Wakeman L, Al-Ismail S, Benton A, Beddall A, Gibbs A, Hartnell S, et al. Robust, routine haematology reference ranges for healthy adults. Int J Lab Hematol. 2007;29(4):279–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Karita E, Ketter N, Price MA, Kayitenkore K, Kaleebu P, Nanvubya A, et al. CLSI-derived hematology and biochemistry reference intervals for healthy adults in eastern and southern Africa. Plos ONE. 2009;4(2):e4401.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsegaye A, Messele T, Tilahun T, Hailu E, Sahlu T, Doorly R, et al. Immunohematological reference ranges for adult Ethiopians. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6(3):410–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Clinical and laboratory standard institution (CLSI). How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; Approved Guideline-Second Eedition. C28-A2: vol.15 No.4.Google Scholar
  17. Kueviakoe IM, Segbena AY, Jouault H, Vovor A, Imbert M. Hematological reference values for healthy adults in Togo. ISRN Hematol. 2010;2011:736062.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Böhler T, Kynast-Wolf G, Coulibaly B, Siè A, Kapaun A. Gender-specific distribution of hematological parameters in adults living in Nouna, Burkina Faso. Open Hematol J. 2008;2:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Allan R, Alexander M. A sex difference in the leucocyte count. J Clin Pathol. 1968;21(6):691–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Brigden ML. Clinical utility of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Am Fam Phys. 1999;60(5):1443–50.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement